everyone here would be a chad or atleast chadlite if we lived like we did 1000 years ago

Deleted member 10615

Deleted member 10615

Brachy pride worldwide
Joined
Nov 5, 2020
Posts
6,503
Reputation
12,060
in no order

1 no acne because your diet would be perfect
2 skin would age better, no smoking, junk food, drugs alcahol
3 highter t features from lifestyle, sun and no shit in plastics and water, better browridges, better fwhrs
4 balding was way less prevelant, you would still bald but at a much slower rate
5 better forward growth, everyone would of been breatfed and had hard foods to chew
6 most people besides the rich would have a good body from working the fields and being outside all day also you would be lean most likely around 15-12% body fat
7 no hypergemy


so pretty much better skin/hair, lower body fat, better bodys, balding less prevelant, better browridges and fwhr and better forward growth



the only way you wouldn't be a chad/chadlite is if you have an utterly dog shit pheno
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 14875, Deleted member 15099, Deleted member 6403 and 9 others
1630548135966
YES
 
People were subhuman 1000 years ago and they all lived to like 35
 
  • JFL
Reactions: oldcelloser
in no order

1 no acne because your diet would be perfect
2 skin would age better, no smoking, junk food, drugs alcahol
3 highter t features from lifestyle, sun and no shit in plastics and water, better browridges, better fwhrs
4 balding was way less prevelant, you would still bald but at a much slower rate
5 better forward growth, everyone would of been breatfed and had hard foods to chew
6 most people besides the rich would have a good body from working the fields and being outside all day also you would be lean most likely around 15-12% body fat
7 no hypergemy


so pretty much better skin/hair, lower body fat, better bodys, balding less prevelant, better browridges and fwhr and better forward growth



the only way you wouldn't be a chad/chadlite is if you have an utterly dog shit pheno
There is a divided opinion on whether humans were healthier back then or now. If you look at the lack of health awareness back then, then you would see that people were more prone to fall ill. In the modern day people are more aware and can discriminate between what's good for them and what's not(the exact reason why people stress on exercise, food, rest and rejuvenation in this day and age more than the olden days)
Then their is this opposite opinion that people were knowledgeable back then and knew how to take care of themselves through diet and exercise and cause of everything being natural back then, they had access to quality food, skin care, hair care, body care etc. And the modern generation has forgotten all of that hence the deteriorated quality of life and more diseases.
I feel that it depends on individual approach, there were people back then too who blindly just hogged on red meat without caring about the health consequences and then there are people now who hog on processed food without caring about the consequences. But people who prioritise health exist in every generation and the ones that didn't really care about it at all also exist in every generation.
Think about Somerhalder and his healthy and disciplined lifestyle in this day and age -



And now take for example George Washington who had gallons of ice cream and lost all his teeth before the age of 30 in 1700's -

 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15099
Realistically tho. Looks wouldn't matter unless you are actually super ugly or deformed. It all came down to physical strength. Aka height, frame, testosterone, androgen receptors, and an explosive nervous system
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10615
Good points,but you're overlooking the fact that if everyone became chad/lites that easily,it would just raise the standard
even higher for what women will consider Chad,because these new chad/lites would become the new normal/average

Meaning that if more and more men became chad/lites,it would just raise the standard even higher for what will be considered
chad.

this basically

Eva cudmore
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Deleted member 10615 and Baldingman1998
Good points,but you're overlooking the fact that if everyone became chad/lites that easily,it would just raise the standard
even higher for what women will consider Chad,because these new chad/lites would become the new normal/average

Meaning that if more and more men became chad/lites,it would just raise the standard even higher for what will be considered
chad.

this basically

View attachment 1297890
there wasn't really hypergemy back then


im just making the point our ancestors were probably chads at one point but here we are rotting and crying
 
  • +1
Reactions: No Bones Dax and Yliaster
Half of this forum would of been dead nigga
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 10615
Half of this forum would of been dead nigga
:feelskek: why would half the forum die?


some of the autists would die just looking at there reflection mirmin themselves then get eaten by a wild animal lmao
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6403
:feelskek: why would half the forum die?


some of the autists would die just looking at there reflection mirmin themselves then get eaten by a wild animal lmao
You're idolizing the past either way, that's seldomly a good thing
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcelloser and Deleted member 10615
The problem is, you just see the autistic stuff this forum puting in your head, but you dont see the reality of those days.

If you had not been born into a rich or aristocratic family (depending on which century we are talking about), you would have spent your whole life (which would not have been so long at that time) with hard work and practically loss and slavery.

Not to mention that a large percentage of people would not live to their 18 birthdays, because of things like wars and diseases.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot, oldcelloser, Deleted member 15099 and 3 others
Good points,but you're overlooking the fact that if everyone became chad/lites that easily,it would just raise the standard
even higher for what women will consider Chad,because these new chad/lites would become the new normal/average

Meaning that if more and more men became chad/lites,it would just raise the standard even higher for what will be considered
chad.

this basically

View attachment 1297890
So you decide to support your argument by showing a morphed guy who actually is buck toothed and recessed in real life?
I feel height, face, frame, skin, hair of chads has mostly stayed the same through generations. I don't know why people think the mean height of the population has increased over the years, while it clearly hasn't. Yes, if you want to show example of Netherlands, then you are living in a lie, cause those guys literally are a product of adulterated dairy coming from hormone injected cows which causes abnormal height growth.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Yliaster and Deleted member 10615

Similar threads

nuttheb
Replies
72
Views
7K
concavulus
concavulus
Xangsane
Replies
51
Views
5K
curryascenderr
C
D
Replies
24
Views
8K
Maalik
Maalik
D
Replies
20
Views
6K
carlos72
carlos72

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top