disillusioned
Fuchsia
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
- Posts
- 11,687
- Reputation
- 35,184
I've concluded this after thinking about it long and hard. I know it sounds ridiculous, but it makes a depressing amount of sense if you think about it.
The thing is, being ugly is a much stronger motivator for being successful Vs being physically and genetically fit (e.g. Chad). Attractive people don't really need to do anything because they're inherently more likely to be satisfied by default. They do not need a drive to motivate them, and this invariably results in lower success overall. Meanwhile, the ugly losers and normies are insecure af and try to compensate by building empires, armies, dynasties and wealth, etc. They're the ones who go out there and conquer the world. Look at the most powerful and richest people in the world. Almost none of them are Chads.
But that also leads us to some extremely depressing predictions about the future. Who are the demographics who work the hardest, educate themselves them hardest, are trying to build the most power, wealth, etc? It's curries and riceman e.g. the least desired demographics of men. Nature has set them up for world conquest exactly BECAUSE they are so inferior. It's the only realistic way they can 'win' e.g. simply remove all the other men who are more desired than them. This is actually fucking dystopic when you think about it and it also arguably debunks the idea that evolution selects for superior traits.
No never mind; it DOES debunk the idea that evolution selects for superior traits.
GigaChad: "World conquest? Nah. I'd rather just chill and fuck Stacy." *Goes Extinct*
Subhuman: "World conquest? Hell yea! We gotta prove it to dem bitches that we be Chad!" *Takes over world until everyone is a subhuman*
The thing is, being ugly is a much stronger motivator for being successful Vs being physically and genetically fit (e.g. Chad). Attractive people don't really need to do anything because they're inherently more likely to be satisfied by default. They do not need a drive to motivate them, and this invariably results in lower success overall. Meanwhile, the ugly losers and normies are insecure af and try to compensate by building empires, armies, dynasties and wealth, etc. They're the ones who go out there and conquer the world. Look at the most powerful and richest people in the world. Almost none of them are Chads.
But that also leads us to some extremely depressing predictions about the future. Who are the demographics who work the hardest, educate themselves them hardest, are trying to build the most power, wealth, etc? It's curries and riceman e.g. the least desired demographics of men. Nature has set them up for world conquest exactly BECAUSE they are so inferior. It's the only realistic way they can 'win' e.g. simply remove all the other men who are more desired than them. This is actually fucking dystopic when you think about it and it also arguably debunks the idea that evolution selects for superior traits.
No never mind; it DOES debunk the idea that evolution selects for superior traits.
GigaChad: "World conquest? Nah. I'd rather just chill and fuck Stacy." *Goes Extinct*
Subhuman: "World conquest? Hell yea! We gotta prove it to dem bitches that we be Chad!" *Takes over world until everyone is a subhuman*
