Evolution sure is strange...

[yirma19]

Recommend a good book on this.

There are 5 evolutionary factors:
1. Recombination (Aka what happens in sex, genetic Material is exchanged)
2.Selection (Chad gets 100foids and produces Chad offspring while incel gets nothing )
3.Migration (introduction of new genetic Material, increase genetic diversity which is important, this is why mixing is good, incest does the opposite)
4. Gendrift (Catastrophe happens Like when India has 1000th famine, which is why Chad didnt survived cuz His Body needs more Energy while currycel did because currycel small)
5. Mutation. Thats the Most important one, You can basically forgot all the other ones I mentioned. Mutations are small Changes in your DNA that deviate from ur parents. Mutation = randomness. If ur lucky, U get good ones which will increase your biological Fitness (aka more attractive easier to get sex), If ur unlucky u do Not. Because those with better Mutations produce more Offspring, beings adapt to their enviroment. Enviroment is important Here. Good genes dont necesarrily mean 2m tall Chad, it means being the best Adapter to ur enviroment, therefore giving U the best chances.

Mutations are also the reason why we are all different, without mutations we'd all be Proteins.

TLDR: Evolution= random algorithm
Random algorithm: If good gene-> more Offspring-> Species more evolved
If Bad Gene-> less Offspring-> Species doesn't inherit Bad genes

 

[Deleted member 22888]

There are 5 evolutionary factors:
1. Recombination (Aka what happens in sex, genetic Material is exchanged)
2.Selection (Chad gets 100foids and produces Chad offspring while incel gets nothing )
3.Migration (introduction of new genetic Material, increase genetic diversity which is important, this is why mixing is good, incest does the opposite)
4. Gendrift (Catastrophe happens Like when India has 1000th famine, which is why Chad didnt survived cuz His Body needs more Energy while currycel did because currycel small)
5. Mutation. Thats the Most important one, You can basically forgot all the other ones I mentioned. Mutations are small Changes in your DNA that deviate from ur parents. Mutation = randomness. If ur lucky, U get good ones which will increase your biological Fitness (aka more attractive easier to get sex), If ur unlucky u do Not. Because those with better Mutations produce more Offspring, beings adapt to their enviroment. Enviroment is important Here. Good genes dont necesarrily mean 2m tall Chad, it means being the best Adapter to ur enviroment, therefore giving U the best chances.

Mutations are also the reason why we are all different, without mutations we'd all be Proteins.

TLDR: Evolution= random algorithm
Random algorithm: If good gene-> more Offspring-> Species more evolved
If Bad Gene-> less Offspring-> Species doesn't inherit Bad genes

And it's mostly Muslims and Christians.
They are not ready to accept something and at the same time not ready to progress either.

They follow the literal meaning of the texts without trying to decipher the text, understand the symbolism, metaphor, meaningg behind it.

Glad to see there’s some smart users on this shithole of a site.

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Stop referring to taken out of context weird videos that don't adhere to science in the slightest, study Jungian functions or stop talking. Not gonna argue on pseudo stuff here you legit say you are half INTP half INTJ how the fuck can you be half Ni-Te-Fi-Se half Ti-Ne-Si-Fe?

All I know is that my brain feels very relaxed and comfortable when I do INTJ things like Chess.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

All I know is that my brain feels very relaxed and comfortable when I do INTJ things like Chess.

That has absolutely 0 fucking correlation to being an Ni dominant with Te auxiliary. @StrangerDanger this man must be studied.

 

[Deleted member 22888]

Where is the evidence for the intermediary species though? No bones have ever been found. There should be like a shiet ton...

Just say there’s no evidence when there’s a plethora of evidence theory. THE EVIDENCE IS LITERALLY IN US TODAY. EVER HEARD OF VESTIGAL STRUCTURES?

 

[Deleted member 19567]

Few things about evolution.

First, it could and could not be real. I think the actual understanding of creation is still a mystery. These years, humanity has coped well by trying to batch it to "evolution". But there's no proof in nature that a chicken can turn into a alligator, no matter how many years pass. The seed can only create mutations of the same or similar thing, not create a different type of seed from itself, by itself. This is outside of the seeds capability. The seed is essentially a set of instructions. Its not subject or capable to its own will. And regardless of if evolution is real, its a bit short sighted to forget that regardless of organic cell evolution, something instructed that to occur, as existence itself is a paradox of "chicken or egg". Another thing to consider is this quote; "If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we couldn't" To me, humanities claim of figuring out creation is almost certainly a sign of cope.

I do think the story of creation from the bible was a metaphor, at least. But. I think humanity does nature a great disservice when we start thinking it as some simple thing. For some reason people forget the concept of microorganisms is almost infinitely complex, going down to even past subatomic structures. In computer language, thats a lot of data. The mind is also vastly unknown and powerful, and we also have to consider the world is a natural battery for organic species. So at some point, doesn't the erasure of lines between reality and fantasy become possible? Now, whether or not that line was crossed while we were in our current stage of organic reality, is another question.

I think your explanation of us being weak, leading us to great things can be an excellent metaphor. Ironically, i thought about incel people. Rejected people sure have a notoriety of going to great extremes, whether its to finding out about the thing that rejected them, or becoming great characters in general. Its a popular story.

 

[yirma19]

there's no proof in nature that a chicken can turn into a alligator, no matter how many years pass

Evolution doesn't Claim that. You probably misunderstood. A Chicken wont Turn into an Alligator, but an Alligator and a Chicken share a Common ancestor from millions of years ago. And the Descendants of this ancestor Look different because they adapted to different enviroments.
I agree with the Rest though

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Few things about evolution.

First, it could and could not be real. I think the actual understanding of creation is still a mystery. These years, humanity has coped well by trying to batch it to "evolution". But there's no proof in nature that a chicken can turn into a alligator, no matter how many years pass. The seed can only create mutations of the same or similar thing, not create a different type of seed from itself, by itself. This is outside of the seeds capability. The seed is essentially a set of instructions. Its not subject or capable to its own will. And regardless of if evolution is real, its a bit short sighted to forget that regardless of organic cell evolution, something instructed that to occur, as existence itself is a paradox of "chicken or egg". Another thing to consider is this quote; "If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we couldn't" To me, humanities claim of figuring out creation is almost certainly a sign of cope.

I do think the story of creation from the bible was a metaphor, at least. But. I think humanity does nature a great disservice when we start thinking it as some simple thing. For some reason people forget the concept of microorganisms is almost infinitely complex, going down to even past subatomic structures. In computer language, thats a lot of data. The mind is also vastly unknown and powerful, and we also have to consider the world is a natural battery for organic species. So at some point, doesn't the erasure of lines between reality and fantasy become possible? Now, whether or not that line was crossed while we were in our current stage of organic reality, is another question.

I think your explanation of us being weak, leading us to great things can be an excellent metaphor. Ironically, i thought about incel people. Rejected people sure have a notoriety of going to great extremes, whether its to finding out about the thing that rejected them, or becoming great characters in general. Its a popular story.

"Chicken alligator"

Because evolution takes "steps" and "directions" under very specific environments and pressures amongst other variables.

A human cannot "turn into" a mouse again because humans are bipedal and deviated too much from rodentness. Our physiognomy are too specialized now.

 

[Deleted member 19567]

"Chicken alligator"

Because evolution takes "steps" and "directions" under very specific environments and pressures amongst other variables.

A human cannot "turn into" a mouse again because humans are bipedal and deviated too much from rodentness. Our physiognomy are too specialized now.

This proves my point well.

Very specific steps and a multitude of other very specific variables is as the same as instruction. Of course, for a thinking man, we tend to try to understand those instructions itself, instead of leave it at "divine intervention". But ultimately, the paradox is instruction=instructor.

 

[Deleted member 22888]

This proves my point well.

Very specific and a multitude of other very specific variables is almost as the same as instruction. Of course, for a thinking man, we tend to try to figure out those very specific instructions instead of attribe it to "divine intervention"

Im gonna go out on a limb here and say that God is real and so is evolution. I feel like no one considers how both can be true. Its always one or the other.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Im gonna go out on a limb here and say that God is real and so is evolution. I feel like no one considers how both can be true. Its always one or the other.

Not saying that is an impossibility but there are some holes with that idea. One positive is that it explains the first singular cell from where everything stems which is what the normal theory of evolution falls short against. Another positive is it explains why people and animals ended up looking so functional and aesthetic, if everything was down to chance it would end up way less precise and unaesthetic. A big question which that perspective opens up however is to answer at which point in time humans were given a soul since animals don't have them.

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Im gonna go out on a limb here and say that God is real and so is evolution. I feel like no one considers how both can be true. Its always one or the other.

The incarnations of Vishnu clearly correspond to the stages of human evolution.

Like even Narasimha avatar is just a primitive ape that was more aggressive, therefore larger incisors/canine teeth and heavier jaws.

This Atheist cocksucking faggot out of pure spite for religion "tries to debunk" this obvious correlation. Like 1) the avatars are in stages and the stages perfectly describe the actual stages of human evolution, (marine life first, Fish aka Matsya avatar, land mammal, Boar aka Varaha and even Vamana or Dwarf humans aka Negritoes of Andamans BEFORE Battle Axe man aka Parashurama BEFORE Bow and Arrow man aka Rama)

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Where is the evidence for the intermediary species though? No bones have ever been found. There should be like a shiet ton...

Literally everything is an intermediary species depending on how you look at it

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Literally everything is an intermediary species depending on how you look at it

Yes.

Every specie is a transition to another. There is no "pure" or "complete" specie because environments have alot of variables and therefore diverse.

Maybe if we lock you up in a white room for eternity and asked you to procreate and we create generations for millennia we might see a "pure" specie. LOL

Maybe a blob or some shit. LOL

 

[Deleted member 22888]

Not saying that is an impossibility but there are some holes with that idea. One positive is that it explains the first singular cell from where everything stems which is what the normal theory of evolution falls short against. Another positive is it explains why people and animals ended up looking so functional and aesthetic, if everything was down to chance it would end up way less precise and unaesthetic. A big question which that perspective opens up however is to answer at which point in time humans were given a soul since animals don't have them.

Interesting statements here but I feel like ur narrowing it down to evolution vs god, when it's not like that at all. Evolution is an extension of god. It explains how life has adapted and changed over time and this life was created and instructed to be in the first place through god, who created the Big Bang and all the particles and matter that stemmed from it which ultimately led to life on earth and its evolution. The big question you have about a soul is not objective. Let me ask you this, what is a soul exactly? Why do you think animals do not have a soul? Yes, they are not conscious and introspective/self-aware like we are, however, they are capable of loving, of fighting for their survival and they are just like us when it comes to dying and being mortal. In my opinion, the only difference is the levels of consciousness that you correlate to having a soul vs not having a soul. I would like to know ur exact definition of what a soul is. Yes, animals are brutal and it's a kill-or-be-killed world, but aren't humans the same, if not even more cruel? We are self-aware and self-conscious of all our actions yet many of us still torment others and torture others when it isn't needed. There's nothing pure about that. In fact I'd argue we are more soulless in that aspect vs animals, since at least they do what they do to survive/obtain resources.

 

[Deleted member 45391]

Literally everything is an intermediary species depending on how you look at it

What I mean is that there should be at least millions of bones found of the species in between the whale and the whale that grew legs... None have ever been found. Believing in intermediary spices is cage fuel. Think about this: How did we get different dog breeds? We bred dogs with other dogs. The reason we can have a different dog is because the dog was already there.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Interesting statements here but I feel like ur narrowing it down to evolution vs god, when it's not like that at all. Evolution is an extension of god. It explains how life has adapted and changed over time and this life was created and instructed to be in the first place through god, who created the Big Bang and all the particles and matter that stemmed from it which ultimately led to life on earth and its evolution. The big question you have about a soul is not objective. Let me ask you this, what is a soul exactly? Why do you think animals do not have a soul? Yes, they are not conscious and introspective/self-aware like we are, however, they are capable of loving, of fighting for their survival and they are just like us when it comes to dying and being mortal. In my opinion, the only difference is the levels of consciousness that you correlate to having a soul vs not having a soul. I would like to know ur exact definition of what a soul is. Yes, animals are brutal and it's a kill-or-be-killed world, but aren't humans the same, if not even more cruel? We are self-aware and self-conscious of all our actions yet many of us still torment others and torture others when it isn't needed. There's nothing pure about that. In fact I'd argue we are more soulless in that aspect vs animals, since at least they do what they do to survive/obtain resources.

Let me start off by saying that I am looking at this from the perspective of the Abrahamic faiths. Souls are what we are judged for and what makes us eligible to get into heaven or hell. Something the animals don't have. At what point in time did the animals turned human get the stamp of "judgeable" and at what part did they not? It's like 18th birthday when you are of age in a sense. There must have been a pivotal moment at which God said "now you are to be judged". The perspective, although not disproveable, opens up more questions than it answers from my initial impression. It's more tangible that we were all made the way we are, animals to serve man, man to serve God, man judged by God, animals fulfilling a purpose of their resources.

 

[Deleted member 22888]

Let me start off by saying that I am looking at this from the perspective of the Abrahamic faiths. Souls are what we are judged for and what makes us eligible to get into heaven or hell. Something the animals don't have. At what point in time did the animals turned human get the stamp of "judgeable" and at what part did they not? It's like 18th birthday when you are of age in a sense. There must have been a pivotal moment at which God said "now you are to be judged". The perspective, although not disproveable, opens up more questions than it answers from my initial impression. It's more tangible that we were all made the way we are, animals to serve man, man to serve God, man judged by God, animals fulfilling a purpose of their resources.

I'll once again ask what determines whether animals do not have souls and we do.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

I'll once again ask what determines whether animals do not have souls and we do.

By looking at it from the perspective of Christianity (which I already established that I am) animals do not have souls but people do.

 

[Meteor21]

Gotta be a retard to not believe in God

 

[Meteor21]

By looking at it from the perspective of Christianity (which I already established that I am) animals do not have souls but people do.

I don't get this line of thinking, animals are a creation of God. They'll be humans and plant life in the afterlife but not animals?

 

[Deleted member 45391]

I'll once again ask what determines whether animals do not have souls and we do.

The thing that separates a human and an animal is the spirit. Humans and animals both have bodies and souls, if you consider the soul by definition to be emotions and intellect. But animals have no spirit connected to them.

Also, you said that you can believe in God along side what the Luciferians have taught you. Pick a side. Their evolution, their dinosaurs, their space. Luciferians brought all of this horseshit together as late as the 1700's. To do what? To attack the Bible. They took a world that was Catholically united, and turned it into a gay dystopia.

 

[Deleted member 22888]

What I mean is that there should be at least millions of bones found of the species in between the whale and the whale that grew legs... None have ever been found. Believing in intermediary spices is cage fuel. Think about this: How did we get different dog breeds? We bred dogs with other dogs. The reason we can have a different dog is because the dog was already there.

You don't even need fossils anymore when you have DNA and genetics... However, there ARE fossils of in-between species I'm not sure why you are saying there are not any did not know you were an archeologist. Also vestigal structures exist to this day which is further proof of linkage between current species and past ancestral species. You keep mentioning different dog breeds... Did u ever take a step back and think how tf the dog even came to be in the first place??? It sure as hell didn't spawn out of nowhere. It developed from a lineage of ancestors over a large period of time.

 

[PseduoAryan]

The incarnations of Vishnu clearly correspond to the stages of human evolution.

Like even Narasimha avatar is just a primitive ape that was more aggressive, therefore larger incisors/canine teeth and heavier jaws.

This Atheist cocksucking faggot out of pure spite for religion "tries to debunk" this obvious correlation. Like 1) the avatars are in stages and the stages perfectly describe the actual stages of human evolution, (marine life first, Fish aka Matsya avatar, land mammal, Boar aka Varaha and even Vamana or Dwarf humans aka Negritoes of Andamans BEFORE Battle Axe man aka Parashurama BEFORE Bow and Arrow man aka Rama)

Hinduism is just a collection of stories by kings to. Glorify themselves as God.

 

[PseduoAryan]

By looking at it from the perspective of Christianity (which I already established that I am) animals do not have souls but people do.

Animals do have soul.

 

[Deleted member 22888]

By looking at it from the perspective of Christianity (which I already established that I am) animals do not have souls but people do.

The thing that separates a human and an animal is the spirit. Humans and animals both have bodies and souls, if you consider the soul by definition to be emotions and intellect. But animals have no spirit connected to them.

Also, you said that you can believe in God along side what the Luciferians have taught you. Pick a side. Their evolution, their dinosaurs, their space. Luciferians brought all of this horseshit together as late as the 1700's. To do what? To attack the Bible. They took a world that was Catholically united, and turned it into a gay dystopia.

It doesn't make sense to say animals do not have souls. Especially when in your religion it is believed that God created them in the first place. Whats the point in creating them then? Also, why save them during Noah's ark? This is where we disagree because I do believe there is a God but u cant prove that animals are soulless to be honest its subjective and if u look at actual evidence its clear we evolved from these soulless animals. I can see why you disagree with evolution now. It doesn't fit the narrative. So be it

 

[HarrierDuBois]

It doesn't make sense to say animals do not have souls. Especially when in your religion it is believed that God created them in the first place. Whats the point in creating them then? Also, why save them during Noah's ark? This is where we disagree because I do believe there is a God but u cant prove that animals are soulless to be honest its subjective and if u look at actual evidence its clear we evolved from these soulless animals. I can see why you disagree with evolution now. It doesn't fit the narrative. So be it

We believe animals are soulless because they cannot be murdered or judged for their actions.

 

[Deleted member 22888]

We believe animals are soulless because they cannot be murdered or judged for their actions.

that makes some sense but why even have them in the first place? And do they go to hell after their death? Still so many questions and why does a creature need to be judged for their actions to have a soul? In a world where resources are scarce and there is competition just to stay alive, what dictates right and wrong? Once you go down the subjective route there are so many questions that need to be answered and there are many different ways to answer them. Interesting tho

 

[PseduoAryan]

We believe animals are soulless because they cannot be murdered or judged for their actions.

Hm what about dolphins who rape baby seals or killer whales who play with their prey. Pure evil.

It is complete utter nonsense saying they don't have should because they can't be judged.

They don't possess self consciousness but they do possess consciousness.

What about Babies who die in womb or at birth, they wont be judged. So they don't have a soul?
What about martyrs of the religion. There is clear text saying they won't be judged because they died fighting for the religion. They were martyred.
But they also had soul.

 

[Deleted member 22888]

Hm what about dolphins who rape baby seals or killer whales who play with their prey. Pure evil.

It is complete utter nonsense saying they don't have should because they can't be judged.

They don't possess self consciousness but they do possess consciousness.

What about Babies who die in womb or at birth, they wont be judged. So they don't have a soul?
What about martyrs of the religion. There is clear text saying they won't be judged because they died fighting for the religion. They were martyred.
But they also had soul.

When you ask subjective questions you get subjective answers. This is why there are so many different religions and thought processes when it comes to this stuff. Theres never one objective answer.

 

[PseduoAryan]

When you ask subjective questions you get subjective answers. This is why there are so many different religions and thought processes when it comes to this stuff. Theres never one objective answer.

Lol and the one who actually give an objective answers are declared enemy of the religion jfl.
Even though he is more religious

 

[Samsepioler]

Does anything even matter jfl

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Hm what about dolphins who rape baby seals or killer whales who play with their prey. Pure evil.

It is complete utter nonsense saying they don't have should because they can't be judged.

They don't possess self consciousness but they do possess consciousness.

What about Babies who die in womb or at birth, they wont be judged. So they don't have a soul?
What about martyrs of the religion. There is clear text saying they won't be judged because they died fighting for the religion. They were martyred.
But they also had soul.

All children go to heaven regardless, that is why to become Christian is to "be born again", since only children are pure from corruption. Animals just stop existing after they die. Just like a tree.

that makes some sense but why even have them in the first place?

To work for man.

And do they go to hell after their death?

They just stop existing like a tree would after the forest burns down. Animals are not individuals.

Still so many questions and why does a creature need to be judged for their actions to have a soul?

Because you can't have free will and the ability to think and then be let loose to roam without consequence.

In a world where resources are scarce and there is competition just to stay alive, what dictates right and wrong?

There is a moral law.

Once you go down the subjective route there are so many questions that need to be answered and there are many different ways to answer them. Interesting tho

I mean I have said that I am Christian so that is my entrypoint into the discussion.

 

[Deleted member 22888]

All children go to heaven regardless, that is why to become Christian is to "be born again", since only children are pure from corruption. Animals just stop existing after they die. Just like a tree.



To work for man.

They just stop existing like a tree would after the forest burns down. Animals are not individuals.

Because you can't have free will and the ability to think and then be let loose to roam without consequence.

There is a moral law.

I mean I have said that I am Christian so that is my entrypoint into the discussion.

What makes Christianity the correct religion?

 

[HarrierDuBois]

What makes Christianity the correct religion?

@BigBiceps

 

[Meteor21]

We believe animals are soulless because they cannot be murdered or judged for their actions.

That means babies and retards have no soul either

 

[HarrierDuBois]

That means babies and retards have no soul either

They are without sin, they can only go to heaven.

 

[Deleted member 57464]

i believe in everything

 

[Meteor21]

They are without sin, they can only go to heaven.

But animals can't? Makes no sense

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

What I mean is that there should be at least millions of bones found of the species in between the whale and the whale that grew legs...

There literally are

 

[Deleted member 45391]

There literally are

Source?

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Source?

Just google it. Im not gonna debate on this topic. Idc

 

[try2beme]

Almost like it doesn't make sense.

 

[hypernormie]

Humans really have a hard time comprehending how much time has passed since humans were rodent like creatures

Not really that odd when you consider the timeframe

Even less odd when you realize human civilization came about very suddenly and very recently

 

[longjohnmong]

if we were evolved from monkies, why we still got monkies?

 

[Banasura]

evolution has some truths but some of this shit is trolling, even more so than an defied ideal man who takes on extended archetypes like planets or attributes. Some of these archaic human bones they find are literally 1 tiny little chip of a penis bone, and they dub this a new ancient archaic ancestor of ours a million years ago thats half monke.

 

[BigBiceps]

What makes Christianity the correct religion?

The most convincing proof. Jesus was widely considered more than a mere man by the people of that time, whether they were his followers or not, even muslims believe Jesus will return to defeat the anti-christ. Jews say he was a sorcerer, and that's how he did the miracles. Jesus filled all the messianic prophecies, and there were hundreds of them, some of which can not be filled anymore today.
Also the fact that there is convincing proof of various biblical events and that they were also recorded by others, and most importantly the fact that the end time prophecies that were written nearly 2000 years ago are eerily similar to the state of the world today, they predicted the love of money, whoremongering, love of self over God etc. One of the end time prophecies even predicted these two witnesses, who would be the last appeal to reason before the end, and when they would be killed, bible predicted that ALL NATIONS would bear witness to their dead bodies lying in the streets of Jerusalem. Does that not eerily sound like the technology we have today, that all nations can bear witness to a singular location?
There's so much that could be said, but bible is a large book and it just makes perfect sense. There's these people who say they've read the bible and don't believe it. I can't believe that. It just makes sense, and the things written by different people in different centuries or decades tie together perfectly. Just like if there was a God who inspired them when they wrote it.

@HarrierDuBois

 

[StrangerDanger]

There are plenty but you lack the nuance just like a Ti dom does. @StrangerDanger he self exposed as Ti dom once again.

Ti does not lack nuance
Its Ne blindspot so ISxPs and low Ne users in general, Ne and Ti are the most nuanced functions

 

[Deleted member 27066]

(macro) Evolution ain't real my boy

 

[NoReedemingFeature]

I would rather belive the evolution theory than the story of how a man landed naked on earth out of nowhere from the sky

Like the predictable impotent imbecile you are all you can do is scoff at another's belief.

Some niggas take it seriously.
Too low iq to understand the symbolism and connect it to logical reasonings.

Muhh symbolism. Where is it implied that it's meant to be symbolic? In the biblical texts it's pretty much always clear when something a parable, vision, poetry or symbolism. There is nothing the indicate that the Genesis account is supposed to be anything but a literal creation story. And treated as such all throughout the books.

Evolution is the result of random mutation in the gene pool.

That's how the tree shrews became human and every other mammal rn.

Do you do anything but regurgitate existing information from other and exclude that which doesn't conform to your wishful worldview? Because if you actually thought about those statements maybe you would actually realize how ridiculous those claims actually are. First off, starting with the atheistic creation story of abiogenesis. All the amino acids must have come together to form proteins, then those proteins would have to assemble themselves to form a proto cell wall, then those proteins would have to get coated with fatty acids to form a cell and only then you'd have to have the same happen for multiple organelles, for it to be still missing DNA. Now with this very simplified description you can already see how unlikely (not just unlikely, but entirely impossible) such thing would have happened. Let alone all the required condition the environment would have to meet and for the earth to be formed in the first place (let's not get into that). Now you'd also need DNA to get into these new-formed organelles, but not just any, but DNA that encodes for the cell to reproduce. Then the new created cell would have to gather the resources (instructions for this act being performed all in it's randomly formed DNA btw) but that wouldn't happen, since there would be no amino acids for it to do so as there is no life.

But if you don't believe this and you are a theistic evolutionist. Then still, no matter how many billions of years you give it. It would not be possible for the progeny of some initial species to deviate so much that they'd produce all of earth's species. It would definitely not be possible for a fish to become human. Just thinking about it reveals many reasons as to why. For example what would be the evolutionary incentive for fish to develop limbs and crawl out of the marine environment? There is also the fact that sexual reproduction would not allow for such thing to happen. Because just because a single animal mutating a new trait would result in it likely being lost in it's offspring after reproducing with a mate not sharing said change, and most definitely being lost in the offspring's offspring. There also has to be a framework of extremely intertwined genes together working for speciation to be possible in progeny. The genomic model a random chance would produce would be so simplistic that further speciation would just be completely impossible off it.

There is enough genetic evidence..bones are old news

No there is not. You trust other's claims at face value just because of "credibility". The evidence meh at best. And lots is deliberately made up and you can't verify it. Saying this gets you labeled a "low iq conspiracy theorists", but it should be common sense.

We have found many different human species cousins.
We have also found inactive vestigial genes that coded for primitive traits lost throughout the evolutionary scale.
Its also common sense the different human races evolved to their locations over time

Yea carbon footprints, morphology, fossils, radioactive dating, ancient organism remains, fossil layers, similarities among organisms alive today, similarities in DNA, and similarities of embryos among plethora of more evidence means evolution is fake and gay.
Let’s just ignore solid factual evidence.

Just suck up someone's doctored dog shit as evidence theory. And fossils are the result of a worldwide flood.
You clearly also lack any knowledge in engineering, because sharing components among designs is a much better path to take than making everything from the ground up. It's not the evidence of us having a common ancestor or whatever bullshit, it's the evidence of a designer that designed his creation with common parts. Now you can go on not using your mind to come to these logical conclusions because it's "unscientific".