A
Akhi
Luminary
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2023
- Posts
- 7,592
- Reputation
- 10,994
Most studies about evolutionary biology/psychology has biased methodology that wouldn‘t hold up in any peer reviews
You can argue for opposing hypotheses for every single discussion topic
‚Tall men are more attractive for evolutionary reasons due to being better able to protect their offspring and partner‘
yet
‚average to short height men are more attractive because they consume less resources when resources are sparse, therefore they can provide more and better for their family‘
also being overly tall was actually a detriment for hunting ability
the height topic is just an example, you could also argue for women dont like overly attractive men because competition is higher and a man with a lot of options is less likely to commit for example
thots?
You can argue for opposing hypotheses for every single discussion topic
‚Tall men are more attractive for evolutionary reasons due to being better able to protect their offspring and partner‘
yet
‚average to short height men are more attractive because they consume less resources when resources are sparse, therefore they can provide more and better for their family‘
also being overly tall was actually a detriment for hunting ability
the height topic is just an example, you could also argue for women dont like overly attractive men because competition is higher and a man with a lot of options is less likely to commit for example
thots?