EverythingMattersCel
that bitch
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2020
- Posts
- 9,978
- Reputation
- 21,564
I've always had a bad habit of staring at people for too long. If I do it long enough, many assume I am interested in them sexually. It's funny because it's an assumption rooted in evolutionary psychology. They are essentially experiencing somatic delusions rooted in sexual selection strategies.
They don't realise that I am obsessively analysing their facial morphology and body language to understand them as a person.
Is their facial rating congruent with their body language/confidence/ mannerisms? Who else in the room is paying attention to them? How does their looks level compare to their friends? Are they conscious of my presence? If so, how do they react to my presence? How dimorphic are they? How is their soft tissue? What clothes are they wearing? How is their skin and hair? What is their mood at this precise moment? How tall are they?
By the end of my stare down, I have already compiled enough information to semi-accurately infer how much sex they are having, their hormonal profile, social class, personality type and looks level. Ofc it's not 100%, but you can get a good idea of what a person is like by just observing them for 30 seconds.
The truth is that while what I'm doing may seem strange, everyone else is doing the same thing. The difference is they are not rationalising their subconscious behavioural biases and preferences.
So when you're talking to a girl, remember they are judging you in every way possible. The "ick" they have/develop from you is a product of environmental and genetic factors out of your control. It's like a script containing a loop that goes through 1000s of filters. These "filters" are essentially litmus tests for compatibility, and they are looking for any excuse to input a break clause at a single flaw in your genetic code.
It might seem shallow but it's their (the foids') function as sexual selectors to find out what is wrong with you, rather than what is right. My black pilled logic doesn't just apply to sexual selection. The importance of looks and behavioural congruency carryover to every interaction/mutual exchange. And I don't want to write an essay here, but when you strip away human morals, man-made institutions, concepts and frameworks, all we are left with is flesh and blood.
We can try to distance ourselves from our primates as much as possible, but the reality is that evolution takes place at a significantly slower rate than institutional change or technological adoption. To override our primal wiring is improbable. To have a truly egalitarian society is improbable. Do you know why? It's because the capitalist economic system is heavily intertwined with sexual selection strategies. The profit motive to accumulate wealth and resources is based on our biological imperative raison d'etre embedded in all of us... and that is providing the security for future offspring so we can propagate our genes to the next generation. Assuming a society has an equal provision of resources, the monetary burden of inequality is shifted to the sexual market.
We are seeing it now in Western societies. Having resource abundance means nothing because women already have security. As a result, they select mostly for looks and they don't care about how much money a man has. Even though financial inequality is heavily based on socioeconomic circumstance and IQ (out of our control)... at least there is some social mobility in the current system. The sexual market is both ruthless and cruel. Either you have it or you don't. There's no silver lining and your ability to attract a partner is dictated purely by genetic determinism.
It's essentially an unregulated market that no one (apart from incels) has conceived of regulating or controlling. So the Gini co-efficient in the dating market is 10x worse than the economic inequality in Western society? Doesn't matter. So Chad holds a monopoly in the market? No leftist bats an eye. The clear disequilibrium in the SMV dynamics of the average man and woman on Tinder... no one cares. When you consider how important relationships are for life satisfaction, I find it awfully hypocritical that leftists suddenly adopt a callous, almost Darwinistic attitude towards mate selection. Just work on yourself bro... and if no woman is attracted to you, there's nothing you can do. "No one in this world is entitled to anything" (just lol the cognitive dissonance is too much with these people man).
tl;dr
It's over. That's all you need to know. Also, people are hypocrites.
They don't realise that I am obsessively analysing their facial morphology and body language to understand them as a person.
Is their facial rating congruent with their body language/confidence/ mannerisms? Who else in the room is paying attention to them? How does their looks level compare to their friends? Are they conscious of my presence? If so, how do they react to my presence? How dimorphic are they? How is their soft tissue? What clothes are they wearing? How is their skin and hair? What is their mood at this precise moment? How tall are they?
By the end of my stare down, I have already compiled enough information to semi-accurately infer how much sex they are having, their hormonal profile, social class, personality type and looks level. Ofc it's not 100%, but you can get a good idea of what a person is like by just observing them for 30 seconds.
The truth is that while what I'm doing may seem strange, everyone else is doing the same thing. The difference is they are not rationalising their subconscious behavioural biases and preferences.
So when you're talking to a girl, remember they are judging you in every way possible. The "ick" they have/develop from you is a product of environmental and genetic factors out of your control. It's like a script containing a loop that goes through 1000s of filters. These "filters" are essentially litmus tests for compatibility, and they are looking for any excuse to input a break clause at a single flaw in your genetic code.
It might seem shallow but it's their (the foids') function as sexual selectors to find out what is wrong with you, rather than what is right. My black pilled logic doesn't just apply to sexual selection. The importance of looks and behavioural congruency carryover to every interaction/mutual exchange. And I don't want to write an essay here, but when you strip away human morals, man-made institutions, concepts and frameworks, all we are left with is flesh and blood.
We can try to distance ourselves from our primates as much as possible, but the reality is that evolution takes place at a significantly slower rate than institutional change or technological adoption. To override our primal wiring is improbable. To have a truly egalitarian society is improbable. Do you know why? It's because the capitalist economic system is heavily intertwined with sexual selection strategies. The profit motive to accumulate wealth and resources is based on our biological imperative raison d'etre embedded in all of us... and that is providing the security for future offspring so we can propagate our genes to the next generation. Assuming a society has an equal provision of resources, the monetary burden of inequality is shifted to the sexual market.
We are seeing it now in Western societies. Having resource abundance means nothing because women already have security. As a result, they select mostly for looks and they don't care about how much money a man has. Even though financial inequality is heavily based on socioeconomic circumstance and IQ (out of our control)... at least there is some social mobility in the current system. The sexual market is both ruthless and cruel. Either you have it or you don't. There's no silver lining and your ability to attract a partner is dictated purely by genetic determinism.
It's essentially an unregulated market that no one (apart from incels) has conceived of regulating or controlling. So the Gini co-efficient in the dating market is 10x worse than the economic inequality in Western society? Doesn't matter. So Chad holds a monopoly in the market? No leftist bats an eye. The clear disequilibrium in the SMV dynamics of the average man and woman on Tinder... no one cares. When you consider how important relationships are for life satisfaction, I find it awfully hypocritical that leftists suddenly adopt a callous, almost Darwinistic attitude towards mate selection. Just work on yourself bro... and if no woman is attracted to you, there's nothing you can do. "No one in this world is entitled to anything" (just lol the cognitive dissonance is too much with these people man).
tl;dr
It's over. That's all you need to know. Also, people are hypocrites.
Last edited:
