Example of Jordan Peterson's Cluelessness

[CupOfCoffee]

"They must settle for Chad" yeah yeah Dr. Peterson. That's what's happening these days. Fuck

 

[Final82]

View attachment 9601

"They must settle for Chad" yeah yeah Dr. Peterson. That's what's happening these days. Fuck

All chicks want to fuck chads .THEY fuck chads in their neighborhood / tinder by rotation. In addition , most millennial women frequently travel “ to experience the world”. It’s not to see Museums and statues in Madrid . It is to hook up with hottest chads across the world and hook up with rich sugar daddies to fund their vacations .

 

[Deleted member 176]

r/TheRedPill faggots worship this guy along with that fucking charlatan RSDTyler.

 

[CupOfCoffee]

r/TheRedPill faggots worship this guy along with that fucking charlatan RSDTyler.

Bro his book is actually very good and insightful. There's a lot to learn from what he says, even though they aren't his original ideas. (And he's said many times that his talk of archetypes and biblical stories is not original)

 

[dodt]

All chicks want to fuck chads .THEY fuck chads in their neighborhood / tinder by rotation. In addition , most millennial women frequently travel “ to experience the world”. It’s not to see Museums and statues in Madrid . It is to hook up with hottest chads across the world and hook up with rich sugar daddies to fund their vacations .

Killer blackpill

 

[Phad]

All chicks want to fuck chads .THEY fuck chads in their neighborhood / tinder by rotation. In addition , most millennial women frequently travel “ to experience the world”. It’s not to see Museums and statues in Madrid . It is to hook up with hottest chads across the world and hook up with rich sugar daddies to fund their vacations .

are u getting fucked by chad too? cuz I don’t see how else you would know this information

 

[BeautifulBones]

Way to misconstrue Dr. Peterson's main idea

 

[CupOfCoffee]

Way to misconstrue Dr. Peterson's main idea

How was his idea misconstrued?

 

[BeautifulBones]

How was his idea misconstrued?

His central thesis is that woman should lower their standard to the point to where they can enter a stable LTR

It's give the most utilitarian value for society as large. Since if woman's general orientation is towards ONS then a lot of men are disenfranchised, and many woman don't get the holistic value of a relationship. Since 20% of the men can't date 80% of the woman

Low IQ post

Shut it down

 

[CupOfCoffee]

His central thesis is that woman should lower their standard to the point to where they can enter a stable LTR

It's give the most utilitarian value for society as large. Since if woman's general orientation is towards ONS then a lot of men are disenfranchised, and many woman don't get the holistic value of a relationship. Since 20% of the men can't date 80% of the woman

Low IQ post

Shut it down

I'm only commenting on this portion where he says that they're "settling" for one night stands. Not about his main argument that the west needs to return to and reemphasize monogamy for a stable society. Obviously we can all agree that in the long run, ONS culture is bad for men (because 80% of men are left sexless and loveless) AND for women (because they can't get relationships due to their cock carousel habit and inflated standards).

 

[badromance]

Bro his book is actually very good and insightful. There's a lot to learn from what he says, even though they aren't his original ideas. (And he's said many times that his talk of archetypes and biblical stories is not original)

What book ?

 

[Ritalincel]

fucking annoying CUNT

 

[Final82]

are u getting fucked by chad too? cuz I don’t see how else you would know this information

I have done over 60 sugar babies - these are all regular girls we see in daily life . This is direct info from Stacie tier chicks .

 

[CupOfCoffee]

What book ?

This one is "12 Rules For Life"

 

[Phad]

I have done over 60 sugar babies - these are all regular girls we see in daily life . This is direct info from Stacie tier chicks .

hanging around the wrong girls unless you got the money and looks to maintain the lifestyle

 

[Dude420]

This one is "12 Rules For Life"

Is that the book made for cucks?

 

[Final82]

hanging around the wrong girls unless you got the money and looks to maintain the lifestyle

Got money. Not the looks . Working on it . I know it’s hard to accept these facts because they are brutal . I am 36 , Harvard trained MD MBA . Seen a fair share of world and society from poor strata ( where I began ) to corporate politics . no affirmative action here . All scholarships on pure hard work and talent . So when I say something , probably makes at least some sense . But your points are well taken .

 

[CupOfCoffee]

Is that the book made for cucks?

Lots of cucks read it for sure.

 

[dodt]

JFL if someone thinks woman wont prefer ONS to having nothing from chad. Woman goes for chads, but cannot settle in LTR with them, so a woman is totally ok with them fucking her as soon as they wish. So, it is an LTR of some kind (between a woman and chads), but better, because of its flexibility.

 

[Insomniac]

I really don’t get what’s so special about this man that he has managed to accumulate so many diehard worshippers. He seems like a condescending cunt to me.

 

[Dude420]

I really don’t get what’s so special about this man that he has managed to accumulate so many diehard worshippers. He seems like a condescending cunt to me.

His IQ is overblown by the fact that he is an exceptional orator (on top of having credibility with his degree/experience and willingness to advocate for principles that are slightly outside the norm which help to add to the aura effect). If you actually just listen to the words he says most of it gibberish, he always get lost in symbolism/mysticism and biblical stuff over addressing the factual scientific knowledge on the topic he is speaking of (even in his books). Basically, he says a lot of stupid stuff but people can't see through his bullshit because he is a great orator, use sophisticated terminologies which makes him sound more knowledgeable than he really is and gets people away from critical thinking by getting them lost in abstract ideas(that are impossible to indisputably refute since his ideas are based on abstract concepts) to prove his points. That is basically a form of intellectual manipulation, people should be careful when listening to him, that guy would make a great sect leader, and it is actually pretty much what is unfolding in front of our eyes when you think about it.

 

[Deleted member 611]

 

[CupOfCoffee]

JFL if someone thinks woman wont prefer ONS to having nothing from chad. Woman goes for chads, but cannot settle in LTR with them, so a woman is totally ok with them fucking her as soon as they wish. So, it is an LTR of some kind (between a woman and chads), but better, because of its flexibility.

There's nothing that can completely stop hypergamy in women. But what Peterson calls "enforced monogamy" is what societies have been doing for thousands of years to keep stable family units for the parents and for the children. "Enforced monogamy" doesn't really mean some socialistic redistribution of mates (that would be ridiculous lol). The alternative is what's happening now in the US, Australia etc. where majority of young women are just fucking around, literally, and then settling for betabuxes later in life to further cheat on them once they realize they're not sexually attracted to them. This is a generalization, doesn't apply to everybody obviously.

His IQ is overblown by the fact that he is an exceptional orator (on top of having credibility with his degree/experience and willingness to advocate for principles that are slightly outside the norm which help to add to the aura effect). If you actually just listen to the words he says most of it gibberish, he always get lost in symbolism/mysticism and biblical stuff over addressing the factual scientific knowledge on the topic he is speaking of (even in his books). Basically, he says a lot of stupid stuff but people can't see through his bullshit because he is a great orator, use sophisticated terminologies which makes him sound more knowledgeable than he really is and gets people away from critical thinking by getting them lost in abstract ideas(that are impossible to indisputably refute since his ideas are based on abstract concepts) to prove his points. That is basically a form of intellectual manipulation, people should be careful when listening to him, that guy would make a great sect leader, and it is actually pretty much what is unfolding in front of our eyes.

Yes this.