Exposing ihatemysost

dookielooksmaxxer

dookielooksmaxxer

Message for 1 on 1 coaching.
Joined
Jul 10, 2024
Posts
863
Reputation
771
You may have known @ihatemySOST for the subperiosteal hematoma thing blah blah blah whatever. Basically, anyone who believed him needs to start thinking about themselves. In this thread I'll simply just expose his retarded arguements.

Subperiosteal Hematoma:
Already debunked him on this: https://looksmax.org/threads/finall...ot-ultra-high-iq-thread.1641470/post-23918842

Basically it causes bleeding between the periosteum and bone when traumatic/non-traumatic forces occur. The problem with this, is that it actually isn't proper bone growth. Rather, its a balloon of blood that could potentially ossify in that balloon form. So basically, your going to look deformed! :lul::lul:
1761970690022
1761970704303
1761970713169
1761970723681

He also agreed with me that it won't work for aesthetics aswell LMAO :forcedsmile:
1761970817910

1761971125796

PTH analogues
Okay so this retard states that its not going to work for both bone mass/jaw growth but only proves his claim for... jaw growth...
1761971391302

I'll still debate both points, however.
On Bone Mass:
Sources:
"In contrast to the antiresorptive agents, anabolic agents can directly stimulate osteoblastic

formation of new bone. The only anabolic agent currently FDA-approved in the United
States is parathyroid hormone (1-34) (PTH 1-34), or teriparatide"

PTH analogues (such as teriparatide/abaloparatide) are FDA-approved and are generally used in human osteoporosis treatment.
1761971617148

"Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with parathyroid hormone (1-34) decreases the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; increases vertebral, femoral, and total-body bone mineral density; and is well tolerated"
1761971940310

It's pretty safe to say that in humans, PTH analogues can work for radial bone growth if used correctly. I'll get into how to use it correctly (just briefly, I won't actually provide a guide on it since thats not the point of this thread.)


So it works for radial bone growth, what else should we know??
Not sure if you guys do know, but PTH analogues need to be used PTH analogues intermittently in order to effectively get results, otherwise it will turn catabolic overtime (in other words, it will give diminishing returns or bone resorption.)
The reason is why is quite simple. The R^0 state refers to Prolonged cAMP signaling, which will bias bone resorption rather than bone formation.

On the other hand, the RG state efers to transient cAMP signaling, shifting the bias to bone formation.
1761972088909

This would also prove that abaloparatide is arguably better than teriparatide because of bias towards the RG state.
On Mandibular Growth:

1761972239988

1761972307035


TLDR OF HIS ARGUEMENT: yea bro since rats need alot higher of a dose to get mandibular growth, so do you!!! (I'm ignorant of one factor however, the fact that rat physiology differs from human physiology.)
Sprague-Sawley rats (the same rats he utilized in his study) have a much lower ABL bioavailability after subq administration, which would explain the large dosages used.
1761972528401

(source: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/208743Orig1s000PharmR.pdf)
BUT MUHHH DOOKIELOOKSMAXXER!!!! THEY ARENT THE SAME RAT:
1761972706992

They are the same lab rat strain.
Therefore, for mandibular growth, abaloparatide should work perfectly fine within normal ranges of dosaging and if you use it intermittently. (too lazy to look too deep into that mechanism but it seems to me it would be upregulation of Sox9 in the condyle.)

TLDR
It baffles me how you guys will just believe anything you see on the internet. High iq individuals on org are now classified as people who do research, but they don't need to be right. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
1761973240604
 

Attachments

  • 1761971180247.png
    1761971180247.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 0
  • 1761972638816.png
    1761972638816.png
    5.7 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: autisticntmaxer⠀, Manderoqj, shessonice and 16 others
Mb for shit format :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: SolanaBlockchain, Deathninja328, Luca_. and 2 others
  • +1
Reactions: SolanaBlockchain, Deathninja328, bulgeinmypants900 and 2 others
yk this community has gone to shit when they all fell for that joke of a method:lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Manderoqj, Deathninja328, car12345 and 2 others
You may have known @ihatemySOST for the subperiosteal hematoma thing blah blah blah whatever. Basically, anyone who believed him needs to start thinking about themselves. In this thread I'll simply just expose his retarded arguements.

Subperiosteal Hematoma:
Already debunked him on this: https://looksmax.org/threads/finall...ot-ultra-high-iq-thread.1641470/post-23918842

Basically it causes bleeding between the periosteum and bone when traumatic/non-traumatic forces occur. The problem with this, is that it actually isn't proper bone growth. Rather, its a balloon of blood that could potentially ossify in that balloon form. So basically, your going to look deformed! :lul::lul:
View attachment 4272687View attachment 4272688View attachment 4272689View attachment 4272690
He also agreed with me that it won't work for aesthetics aswell LMAO :forcedsmile:
View attachment 4272704
View attachment 4272718

PTH analogues
Okay so this retard states that its not going to work for both bone mass/jaw growth but only proves his claim for... jaw growth...
View attachment 4272725

I'll still debate both points, however.
On Bone Mass:
Sources:
"In contrast to the antiresorptive agents, anabolic agents can directly stimulate osteoblastic

formation of new bone. The only anabolic agent currently FDA-approved in the United
States is parathyroid hormone (1-34) (PTH 1-34), or teriparatide"

PTH analogues (such as teriparatide/abaloparatide) are FDA-approved and are generally used in human osteoporosis treatment.
View attachment 4272728
"Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with parathyroid hormone (1-34) decreases the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; increases vertebral, femoral, and total-body bone mineral density; and is well tolerated"
View attachment 4272735
It's pretty safe to say that in humans, PTH analogues can work for radial bone growth if used correctly. I'll get into how to use it correctly (just briefly, I won't actually provide a guide on it since thats not the point of this thread.)


So it works for radial bone growth, what else should we know??
Not sure if you guys do know, but PTH analogues need to be used PTH analogues intermittently in order to effectively get results, otherwise it will turn catabolic overtime (in other words, it will give diminishing returns or bone resorption.)
The reason is why is quite simple. The R^0 state refers to Prolonged cAMP signaling, which will bias bone resorption rather than bone formation.

On the other hand, the RG state efers to transient cAMP signaling, shifting the bias to bone formation.
View attachment 4272738
This would also prove that abaloparatide is arguably better than teriparatide because of bias towards the RG state.
On Mandibular Growth:

View attachment 4272741
View attachment 4272742

TLDR OF HIS ARGUEMENT: yea bro since rats need alot higher of a dose to get mandibular growth, so do you!!! (I'm ignorant of one factor however, the fact that rat physiology differs from human physiology.)
Sprague-Sawley rats (the same rats he utilized in his study) have a much lower ABL bioavailability after subq administration, which would explain the large dosages used.
View attachment 4272747
(source: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/208743Orig1s000PharmR.pdf)
BUT MUHHH DOOKIELOOKSMAXXER!!!! THEY ARENT THE SAME RAT:View attachment 4272751
They are the same lab rat strain.
Therefore, for mandibular growth, abaloparatide should work perfectly fine within normal ranges of dosaging and if you use it intermittently. (too lazy to look too deep into that mechanism but it seems to me it would be upregulation of Sox9 in the condyle.)

TLDR
It baffles me how you guys will just believe anything you see on the internet. High iq individuals on org are now classified as people who do research, but they don't need to be right. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
View attachment 4272771
also these niggas after realising osteoclasts will just come in and break down the callus they gave themselves eventually
1761973696982

like bruh come on mane
 

Attachments

  • 1761973696982.png
    1761973696982.png
    492 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Zagro
broooooo so longgg pls insert more charlie kirk images so its not boring
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zagro
You may have known @ihatemySOST for the subperiosteal hematoma thing blah blah blah whatever. Basically, anyone who believed him needs to start thinking about themselves. In this thread I'll simply just expose his retarded arguements.

Subperiosteal Hematoma:
Already debunked him on this: https://looksmax.org/threads/finall...ot-ultra-high-iq-thread.1641470/post-23918842

Basically it causes bleeding between the periosteum and bone when traumatic/non-traumatic forces occur. The problem with this, is that it actually isn't proper bone growth. Rather, its a balloon of blood that could potentially ossify in that balloon form. So basically, your going to look deformed! :lul::lul:
View attachment 4272687View attachment 4272688View attachment 4272689View attachment 4272690
He also agreed with me that it won't work for aesthetics aswell LMAO :forcedsmile:
View attachment 4272704
View attachment 4272718

PTH analogues
Okay so this retard states that its not going to work for both bone mass/jaw growth but only proves his claim for... jaw growth...
View attachment 4272725

I'll still debate both points, however.
On Bone Mass:
Sources:
"In contrast to the antiresorptive agents, anabolic agents can directly stimulate osteoblastic

formation of new bone. The only anabolic agent currently FDA-approved in the United
States is parathyroid hormone (1-34) (PTH 1-34), or teriparatide"

PTH analogues (such as teriparatide/abaloparatide) are FDA-approved and are generally used in human osteoporosis treatment.
View attachment 4272728
"Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with parathyroid hormone (1-34) decreases the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; increases vertebral, femoral, and total-body bone mineral density; and is well tolerated"
View attachment 4272735
It's pretty safe to say that in humans, PTH analogues can work for radial bone growth if used correctly. I'll get into how to use it correctly (just briefly, I won't actually provide a guide on it since thats not the point of this thread.)


So it works for radial bone growth, what else should we know??
Not sure if you guys do know, but PTH analogues need to be used PTH analogues intermittently in order to effectively get results, otherwise it will turn catabolic overtime (in other words, it will give diminishing returns or bone resorption.)
The reason is why is quite simple. The R^0 state refers to Prolonged cAMP signaling, which will bias bone resorption rather than bone formation.

On the other hand, the RG state efers to transient cAMP signaling, shifting the bias to bone formation.
View attachment 4272738
This would also prove that abaloparatide is arguably better than teriparatide because of bias towards the RG state.
On Mandibular Growth:

View attachment 4272741
View attachment 4272742

TLDR OF HIS ARGUEMENT: yea bro since rats need alot higher of a dose to get mandibular growth, so do you!!! (I'm ignorant of one factor however, the fact that rat physiology differs from human physiology.)
Sprague-Sawley rats (the same rats he utilized in his study) have a much lower ABL bioavailability after subq administration, which would explain the large dosages used.
View attachment 4272747
(source: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/208743Orig1s000PharmR.pdf)
BUT MUHHH DOOKIELOOKSMAXXER!!!! THEY ARENT THE SAME RAT:View attachment 4272751
They are the same lab rat strain.
Therefore, for mandibular growth, abaloparatide should work perfectly fine within normal ranges of dosaging and if you use it intermittently. (too lazy to look too deep into that mechanism but it seems to me it would be upregulation of Sox9 in the condyle.)

TLDR
It baffles me how you guys will just believe anything you see on the internet. High iq individuals on org are now classified as people who do research, but they don't need to be right. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
View attachment 4272771
Dnr summarize this
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zagro
You may have known @ihatemySOST for the subperiosteal hematoma thing blah blah blah whatever. Basically, anyone who believed him needs to start thinking about themselves. In this thread I'll simply just expose his retarded arguements.

Subperiosteal Hematoma:
Already debunked him on this: https://looksmax.org/threads/finall...ot-ultra-high-iq-thread.1641470/post-23918842

Basically it causes bleeding between the periosteum and bone when traumatic/non-traumatic forces occur. The problem with this, is that it actually isn't proper bone growth. Rather, its a balloon of blood that could potentially ossify in that balloon form. So basically, your going to look deformed! :lul::lul:
View attachment 4272687View attachment 4272688View attachment 4272689View attachment 4272690
He also agreed with me that it won't work for aesthetics aswell LMAO :forcedsmile:
View attachment 4272704
View attachment 4272718

PTH analogues
Okay so this retard states that its not going to work for both bone mass/jaw growth but only proves his claim for... jaw growth...
View attachment 4272725

I'll still debate both points, however.
On Bone Mass:
Sources:
"In contrast to the antiresorptive agents, anabolic agents can directly stimulate osteoblastic

formation of new bone. The only anabolic agent currently FDA-approved in the United
States is parathyroid hormone (1-34) (PTH 1-34), or teriparatide"

PTH analogues (such as teriparatide/abaloparatide) are FDA-approved and are generally used in human osteoporosis treatment.
View attachment 4272728
"Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with parathyroid hormone (1-34) decreases the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; increases vertebral, femoral, and total-body bone mineral density; and is well tolerated"
View attachment 4272735
It's pretty safe to say that in humans, PTH analogues can work for radial bone growth if used correctly. I'll get into how to use it correctly (just briefly, I won't actually provide a guide on it since thats not the point of this thread.)


So it works for radial bone growth, what else should we know??
Not sure if you guys do know, but PTH analogues need to be used PTH analogues intermittently in order to effectively get results, otherwise it will turn catabolic overtime (in other words, it will give diminishing returns or bone resorption.)
The reason is why is quite simple. The R^0 state refers to Prolonged cAMP signaling, which will bias bone resorption rather than bone formation.

On the other hand, the RG state efers to transient cAMP signaling, shifting the bias to bone formation.
View attachment 4272738
This would also prove that abaloparatide is arguably better than teriparatide because of bias towards the RG state.
On Mandibular Growth:

View attachment 4272741
View attachment 4272742

TLDR OF HIS ARGUEMENT: yea bro since rats need alot higher of a dose to get mandibular growth, so do you!!! (I'm ignorant of one factor however, the fact that rat physiology differs from human physiology.)
Sprague-Sawley rats (the same rats he utilized in his study) have a much lower ABL bioavailability after subq administration, which would explain the large dosages used.
View attachment 4272747
(source: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/208743Orig1s000PharmR.pdf)
BUT MUHHH DOOKIELOOKSMAXXER!!!! THEY ARENT THE SAME RAT:View attachment 4272751
They are the same lab rat strain.
Therefore, for mandibular growth, abaloparatide should work perfectly fine within normal ranges of dosaging and if you use it intermittently. (too lazy to look too deep into that mechanism but it seems to me it would be upregulation of Sox9 in the condyle.)

TLDR
It baffles me how you guys will just believe anything you see on the internet. High iq individuals on org are now classified as people who do research, but they don't need to be right. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
View attachment 4272771
holy info i would never put this much work in
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zagro and supercope
holy info i would never put this much work in
Pisses me off whenever I see some stupid shit like this whenever I doomscroll on tiktok.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deathninja328, Zagro and supercope
don't have the time to read this thread right now, but well done for questioning this retard

the way he responds to criticism also leads me to believe he doesn't even understand what he is talking about

far too many people suck this guys cock because he seemingly uses "amazing" clinical data and has great points, but I think in reality people just assume he is right because he writes 20 paragraphs explaining his point:Comfy:

@Zagro check this thread out
 
  • +1
Reactions: Luca_. and Zagro
1762015494677


Blah blah blah

This retard simply wont accept a loss.

I will debate his points later.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Luca_. and Zagro
You may have known @ihatemySOST for the subperiosteal hematoma thing blah blah blah whatever. Basically, anyone who believed him needs to start thinking about themselves. In this thread I'll simply just expose his retarded arguements.

Subperiosteal Hematoma:
Already debunked him on this: https://looksmax.org/threads/finall...ot-ultra-high-iq-thread.1641470/post-23918842

Basically it causes bleeding between the periosteum and bone when traumatic/non-traumatic forces occur. The problem with this, is that it actually isn't proper bone growth. Rather, its a balloon of blood that could potentially ossify in that balloon form. So basically, your going to look deformed! :lul::lul:
View attachment 4272687View attachment 4272688View attachment 4272689View attachment 4272690
He also agreed with me that it won't work for aesthetics aswell LMAO :forcedsmile:
View attachment 4272704
View attachment 4272718

PTH analogues
Okay so this retard states that its not going to work for both bone mass/jaw growth but only proves his claim for... jaw growth...
View attachment 4272725

I'll still debate both points, however.
On Bone Mass:
Sources:
"In contrast to the antiresorptive agents, anabolic agents can directly stimulate osteoblastic

formation of new bone. The only anabolic agent currently FDA-approved in the United
States is parathyroid hormone (1-34) (PTH 1-34), or teriparatide"

PTH analogues (such as teriparatide/abaloparatide) are FDA-approved and are generally used in human osteoporosis treatment.
View attachment 4272728
"Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with parathyroid hormone (1-34) decreases the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; increases vertebral, femoral, and total-body bone mineral density; and is well tolerated"
View attachment 4272735
It's pretty safe to say that in humans, PTH analogues can work for radial bone growth if used correctly. I'll get into how to use it correctly (just briefly, I won't actually provide a guide on it since thats not the point of this thread.)


So it works for radial bone growth, what else should we know??
Not sure if you guys do know, but PTH analogues need to be used PTH analogues intermittently in order to effectively get results, otherwise it will turn catabolic overtime (in other words, it will give diminishing returns or bone resorption.)
The reason is why is quite simple. The R^0 state refers to Prolonged cAMP signaling, which will bias bone resorption rather than bone formation.

On the other hand, the RG state efers to transient cAMP signaling, shifting the bias to bone formation.
View attachment 4272738
This would also prove that abaloparatide is arguably better than teriparatide because of bias towards the RG state.
On Mandibular Growth:

View attachment 4272741
View attachment 4272742

TLDR OF HIS ARGUEMENT: yea bro since rats need alot higher of a dose to get mandibular growth, so do you!!! (I'm ignorant of one factor however, the fact that rat physiology differs from human physiology.)
Sprague-Sawley rats (the same rats he utilized in his study) have a much lower ABL bioavailability after subq administration, which would explain the large dosages used.
View attachment 4272747
(source: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/208743Orig1s000PharmR.pdf)
BUT MUHHH DOOKIELOOKSMAXXER!!!! THEY ARENT THE SAME RAT:View attachment 4272751
They are the same lab rat strain.
Therefore, for mandibular growth, abaloparatide should work perfectly fine within normal ranges of dosaging and if you use it intermittently. (too lazy to look too deep into that mechanism but it seems to me it would be upregulation of Sox9 in the condyle.)

TLDR
It baffles me how you guys will just believe anything you see on the internet. High iq individuals on org are now classified as people who do research, but they don't need to be right. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
View attachment 4272771
Good shit man but you could’ve just put him on ignore and be over with it, but it is cagefuel debating with him as he shows major signs of autism
 
  • +1
Reactions: Luca_., rotation and dookielooksmaxxer
don't have the time to read this thread right now, but well done for questioning this retard

the way he responds to criticism also leads me to believe he doesn't even understand what he is talking about

far too many people suck this guys cock because he seemingly uses "amazing" clinical data and has great points, but I think in reality people just assume he is right because he writes 20 paragraphs explaining his point:Comfy:

@Zagro check this thread out
Yeah providing studies is like FDA approval for greys they instantly believe that shit, and if you check my debate with him he doesn’t even read the studies he provides nor reads the ones you provide
 
  • +1
Reactions: Luca_., rotation and dookielooksmaxxer
Yeah providing studies is like FDA approval for greys they instantly believe that shit, and if you check my debate with him he doesn’t even read the studies he provides nor reads the ones you provide
U said u will tag me in your post to complete our debate, but u didn’t
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zagro
uses "amazing" clinical data and has great points, but I think in reality people just assume he is right because he writes 20 paragraphs explaining his point:Comfy:
No, they assume I'm right because I provide evidence for everything I say, literally everything, and no one else on this entire forum does that. Also, no one can respond to me except with insults, stupid arguments, or by saying "he won" even though he didn't. These are convincing reasons for them to do that If you think I'm wrong, you can respond to me directly; no one is stopping you. But resorting to insults and acting like you're busy and own companies proves nothing except that you're incapable of responding.
 
  • +1
Reactions: rblonxo and rotation
No, they assume I'm right because I provide evidence for everything I say, literally everything, and no one else on this entire forum does that. Also, no one can respond to me except with insults, stupid arguments, or by saying "he won" even though he didn't. These are convincing reasons for them to do that If you think I'm wrong, you can respond to me directly; no one is stopping you. But resorting to insults and acting like you're busy and own companies proves nothing except that you're incapable of responding.
I originally hated on you for the severely retarded comebacks to people criticising you,

it would be some shit like "fuck u donkehy monkehy brain u stopud:lul:"or something along those lines

and then you got some points debunked by zagro, and after a lot of back and forth you decided you couldn't prove it wrong so you resorted to projecting and spewing bs

:feelsokman:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deathninja328 and Sink
U said u will tag me in your post to complete our debate, but u didn’t
I have 11 exams next week man, so i have my priorities although i will be making a comeback to the forum after that
 
  • +1
Reactions: Luca_., Sink and rotation
I originally hated on you for the severely retarded comebacks to people criticising you,

it would be some shit like "fuck u donkehy monkehy brain u stopud:lul:"or something along those lines

and then you got some points debunked by zagro, and after a lot of back and forth you decided you couldn't prove it wrong so you resorted to projecting and spewing bs

:feelsokman:

I originally hated on you for the severely retarded comebacks to people criticising you,

it would be some shit like "fuck u donkehy monkehy brain u stopud:lul:"or something along those lines

and then you got some points debunked by zagro, and after a lot of back and forth you decided you couldn't prove it wrong so you resorted to projecting and spewing bs

:feelsokman:
Insulting always proves u are incapable of responding
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2014.jpeg
    IMG_2014.jpeg
    314.1 KB · Views: 0
You may have known @ihatemySOST for the subperiosteal hematoma thing blah blah blah whatever. Basically, anyone who believed him needs to start thinking about themselves. In this thread I'll simply just expose his retarded arguements.

Subperiosteal Hematoma:
Already debunked him on this: https://looksmax.org/threads/finall...ot-ultra-high-iq-thread.1641470/post-23918842

Basically it causes bleeding between the periosteum and bone when traumatic/non-traumatic forces occur. The problem with this, is that it actually isn't proper bone growth. Rather, its a balloon of blood that could potentially ossify in that balloon form. So basically, your going to look deformed! :lul::lul:
View attachment 4272687View attachment 4272688View attachment 4272689View attachment 4272690
He also agreed with me that it won't work for aesthetics aswell LMAO :forcedsmile:
View attachment 4272704
View attachment 4272718

PTH analogues
Okay so this retard states that its not going to work for both bone mass/jaw growth but only proves his claim for... jaw growth...
View attachment 4272725

I'll still debate both points, however.
On Bone Mass:
Sources:
"In contrast to the antiresorptive agents, anabolic agents can directly stimulate osteoblastic

formation of new bone. The only anabolic agent currently FDA-approved in the United
States is parathyroid hormone (1-34) (PTH 1-34), or teriparatide"

PTH analogues (such as teriparatide/abaloparatide) are FDA-approved and are generally used in human osteoporosis treatment.
View attachment 4272728
"Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with parathyroid hormone (1-34) decreases the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; increases vertebral, femoral, and total-body bone mineral density; and is well tolerated"
View attachment 4272735
It's pretty safe to say that in humans, PTH analogues can work for radial bone growth if used correctly. I'll get into how to use it correctly (just briefly, I won't actually provide a guide on it since thats not the point of this thread.)


So it works for radial bone growth, what else should we know??
Not sure if you guys do know, but PTH analogues need to be used PTH analogues intermittently in order to effectively get results, otherwise it will turn catabolic overtime (in other words, it will give diminishing returns or bone resorption.)
The reason is why is quite simple. The R^0 state refers to Prolonged cAMP signaling, which will bias bone resorption rather than bone formation.

On the other hand, the RG state efers to transient cAMP signaling, shifting the bias to bone formation.
View attachment 4272738
This would also prove that abaloparatide is arguably better than teriparatide because of bias towards the RG state.
On Mandibular Growth:

View attachment 4272741
View attachment 4272742

TLDR OF HIS ARGUEMENT: yea bro since rats need alot higher of a dose to get mandibular growth, so do you!!! (I'm ignorant of one factor however, the fact that rat physiology differs from human physiology.)
Sprague-Sawley rats (the same rats he utilized in his study) have a much lower ABL bioavailability after subq administration, which would explain the large dosages used.
View attachment 4272747
(source: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/208743Orig1s000PharmR.pdf)
BUT MUHHH DOOKIELOOKSMAXXER!!!! THEY ARENT THE SAME RAT:View attachment 4272751
They are the same lab rat strain.
Therefore, for mandibular growth, abaloparatide should work perfectly fine within normal ranges of dosaging and if you use it intermittently. (too lazy to look too deep into that mechanism but it seems to me it would be upregulation of Sox9 in the condyle.)

TLDR
It baffles me how you guys will just believe anything you see on the internet. High iq individuals on org are now classified as people who do research, but they don't need to be right. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
View attachment 4272771
is ts high iq????? ❤️‍🩹
 
  • +1
Reactions: rotation
Insulting always proves u are incapable of responding
you are a chronic offender of doing this, but sure

I don't blindly hate on you, I have told you my reasoning

you won't accept criticism whatsoever and resort to autist nonsense and insults to anyone who even questions that you may be wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deathninja328 and Sink
you are a chronic offender of doing this, but sure

I don't blindly hate on you, I have told you my reasoning

you won't accept criticism whatsoever and resort to autist nonsense and insults to anyone who even questions that you may be wrong
i wish people weren't retarded like me on ts forum 💔💔
 
  • +1
Reactions: rotation
Loss ? How tho? How did you decide I lost when you didn't say anything except give the example of a hematoma due to a fractured orbital bone?
Don't make me laugh.

What you are saying is irrelevant and comes to show you don't understand basic bone biology. The point is you don't grow bones via a subperiosteal hematoma, rather by stimulating the periosteum.

Anyone who willingly believes you deserves to get deformed. At the end of the day, its all natural selection, isn't it?

Also learn how to speak properly.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deathninja328, rotation and Luca_.
im crying yo
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1903.jpeg
    IMG_1903.jpeg
    534.6 KB · Views: 0
you are a chronic offender of doing this, but sure

I don't blindly hate on you, I have told you my reasoning

you won't accept criticism whatsoever and resort to autist nonsense and insults to anyone who even questions that you may be wrong

you are a chronic offender of doing this, but sure

I don't blindly hate on you, I have told you my reasoning

you won't accept criticism whatsoever and resort to autist nonsense and insults to anyone who even questions that you may be wrong
When have I ever insulted someone who questions what I say? Of course, everyone on this forum has the right to question what I say, and I have the right to publish whatever I want, whether it's true or not. So, whenever someone says I'm wrong, what I do is ask them to present an argument for me to respond to, not insult them.
 
Don't make me laugh.

What you are saying is irrelevant and comes to show you don't understand basic bone biology. The point is you don't grow bones via a subperiosteal hematoma, rather by stimulating the periosteum.

Anyone who willingly believes you deserves to get deformed. At the end of the day, its all natural selection, isn't it?

Also learn how to speak properly.
I think it's better to reply to me directly rather than advising me on how to learn the language correctly. I appreciate that, but this isn't an English language learning forum. Either reply and provide logical arguments, or remain silent and act as if you haven't read my post.
 
  • +1
Reactions: rblonxo
I think it's better to reply to me directly rather than advising me on how to learn the language correctly. I appreciate that, but this isn't an English language learning forum. Either reply and provide logical arguments, or remain silent and act as if you haven't read my post.
You clearly haven't even read my post thoroughly, aswell. I even provided bright colors and concise arguements for you retards to comprehend it better.

1762018672931

Continued use? I've already debunked this. How about you read my arguement you iqtard.

As for your arguements on diameter, im not going to even bother reading it since its frying my neurons. I've already provided evidence that it can accelerate the periosteal bone formation process. Read my arguement dipshit.
1762019077107


I'll also debate you on the rat mandible growth point later. However, it leads me back to my original point, rat physiology differs from human physiology.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deathninja328
Continued use? I've already debunked this. How about you read my arguement you iqtard.
It seems you misunderstood. I meant continuing the treatment for years, not a continuous injection .i know injektion should be pluses to increase bone density.
s for your arguements on diameter, im not going to even bother reading it since its frying my neurons. I've already provided evidence that it can accelerate the periosteal bone formation process. Read my arguement dipshit.
Yes i dont understand how accelerate fracture healing gonna increase bone width
 
It seems you misunderstood. I meant continuing the treatment for years, not a continuous injection .i know injektion should be pluses to increase bone density.
No, YOU misunderstood my point. My point was continuous treatment over the years is retarded because mechanistically thats not how you should be using it.

Provide me with good counterarguements otherwise I won't waste my time responding.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deathninja328
@ihatemySOST don't listen to these niggas, it's not worth replying because they don't want to be convinced they just wanna argue with you

i know it works from personal experience, i have grown bone that has stayed for a long time using this method, it feels identical to the previous bone that was there but sticks out more

pm if you wanna discuss
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: rblonxo and dookielooksmaxxer
@ihatemySOST don't listen to these niggas, it's not worth replying because they don't want to be convinced they just wanna argue with you

i know it works from personal experience, i have grown bone that has stayed for a long time using this method, it feels identical to the previous bone that was there but sticks out more

pm if you wanna discuss
I agree with this, especially since their response is often 95% insults and 5% arguments. The problem is that they keep saying they won the debate and that I can't accept defeat, even though when I ask them to continue the discussion, they go back to repeating the same thing, resorting to insults and claiming victory. I think I'll stop debating with them unless they present strong arguments and evidence to refute my claims.
 
  • +1
Reactions: rblonxo and pentamogged9000
I agree with this, especially since their response is often 95% insults and 5% arguments. The problem is that they keep saying they won the debate and that I can't accept defeat, even though when I ask them to continue the discussion, they go back to repeating the same thing, resorting to insults and claiming victory. I think I'll stop debating with them unless they present strong arguments and evidence to refute my claims.
Lmao I went back to repeating the same thing because guess what... You didn't read any of my arguements!

I genuinely didn't know someone with frontal lobe recession is this persistent in trying to prove that they are right. And by the way, there is a reason why I insult you. You quite literally don't listen to any of my arguements.

You don't want to share proper information or arguements, you simply want incel fame and rep.
 
Lmao I went back to repeating the same thing because guess what... You didn't read any of my arguements!

I genuinely didn't know someone with frontal lobe recession is this persistent in trying to prove that they are right. And by the way, there is a reason why I insult you. You quite literally don't listen to any of my arguements.

You don't want to share proper information or arguements, you simply want incel fame and rep.
Which argument i haven’t reply for it yet?
 
I have responded to every single point you made, literally
No you haven't. Use that "high iq" brain of yours to go back again and read it over. I don't have to teach you how to read an arguement cohesively, do I?
 
You may have known @ihatemySOST for the subperiosteal hematoma thing blah blah blah whatever. Basically, anyone who believed him needs to start thinking about themselves. In this thread I'll simply just expose his retarded arguements.

Subperiosteal Hematoma:
Already debunked him on this: https://looksmax.org/threads/finall...ot-ultra-high-iq-thread.1641470/post-23918842

Basically it causes bleeding between the periosteum and bone when traumatic/non-traumatic forces occur. The problem with this, is that it actually isn't proper bone growth. Rather, its a balloon of blood that could potentially ossify in that balloon form. So basically, your going to look deformed! :lul::lul:
View attachment 4272687View attachment 4272688View attachment 4272689View attachment 4272690
He also agreed with me that it won't work for aesthetics aswell LMAO :forcedsmile:
View attachment 4272704
View attachment 4272718

PTH analogues
Okay so this retard states that its not going to work for both bone mass/jaw growth but only proves his claim for... jaw growth...
View attachment 4272725

I'll still debate both points, however.
On Bone Mass:
Sources:
"In contrast to the antiresorptive agents, anabolic agents can directly stimulate osteoblastic

formation of new bone. The only anabolic agent currently FDA-approved in the United
States is parathyroid hormone (1-34) (PTH 1-34), or teriparatide"

PTH analogues (such as teriparatide/abaloparatide) are FDA-approved and are generally used in human osteoporosis treatment.
View attachment 4272728
"Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with parathyroid hormone (1-34) decreases the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures; increases vertebral, femoral, and total-body bone mineral density; and is well tolerated"
View attachment 4272735
It's pretty safe to say that in humans, PTH analogues can work for radial bone growth if used correctly. I'll get into how to use it correctly (just briefly, I won't actually provide a guide on it since thats not the point of this thread.)


So it works for radial bone growth, what else should we know??
Not sure if you guys do know, but PTH analogues need to be used PTH analogues intermittently in order to effectively get results, otherwise it will turn catabolic overtime (in other words, it will give diminishing returns or bone resorption.)
The reason is why is quite simple. The R^0 state refers to Prolonged cAMP signaling, which will bias bone resorption rather than bone formation.

On the other hand, the RG state efers to transient cAMP signaling, shifting the bias to bone formation.
View attachment 4272738
This would also prove that abaloparatide is arguably better than teriparatide because of bias towards the RG state.
On Mandibular Growth:

View attachment 4272741
View attachment 4272742

TLDR OF HIS ARGUEMENT: yea bro since rats need alot higher of a dose to get mandibular growth, so do you!!! (I'm ignorant of one factor however, the fact that rat physiology differs from human physiology.)
Sprague-Sawley rats (the same rats he utilized in his study) have a much lower ABL bioavailability after subq administration, which would explain the large dosages used.
View attachment 4272747
(source: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/208743Orig1s000PharmR.pdf)
BUT MUHHH DOOKIELOOKSMAXXER!!!! THEY ARENT THE SAME RAT:View attachment 4272751
They are the same lab rat strain.
Therefore, for mandibular growth, abaloparatide should work perfectly fine within normal ranges of dosaging and if you use it intermittently. (too lazy to look too deep into that mechanism but it seems to me it would be upregulation of Sox9 in the condyle.)

TLDR
It baffles me how you guys will just believe anything you see on the internet. High iq individuals on org are now classified as people who do research, but they don't need to be right. :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
View attachment 4272771
good thread, hematoma ossification is the new buzzword for new gens. nice to see people that actually do the research rather than spew out what they heard from a rando on youtube.
 

Similar threads

pentamogged9000
Replies
30
Views
423
extractor
extractor
7evenvox22
Replies
24
Views
2K
dgn.b
dgn.b
ihatemySOST
Replies
10
Views
646
ihatemySOST
ihatemySOST
UMIRINBRAH?
Replies
62
Views
879
TrueLabRat
T

Users who are viewing this thread

  • edwardianlooksmaxxe
Back
Top