Extreme leanmaxxing transformation

[Deleted member 7725]

Doesn't even look like the same person. Might be a troll trying to sell his workout plan but posting here anyways for motivation.

 

[Deleted member 14303]

 

[Deleted member 7725]

View attachment 1299380

Yeah, thought so tbh. Similar facial features though so not entirely out of the question.

 

[volcelfatcel]

lifefuel @StrangerDanger

 

[Carnivore]

Looks like the same guy if you analyze his facial features and ears.

You don't need a special workout plan, just focus on compound movements, lift heavy, get enough protein and eat less. There is no special formula you need to pay anyone to get.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

Looks like the same guy if you analyze his facial features and ears.

You don't need a special workout plan, just focus on compound movements, lift heavy, get enough protein and eat less. There is no special formula you need to pay anyone to get.

Yeah, but you need steroids to be that lean with muscle. I'm either bulky or DYEL skinny. As soon as I cut I lose all my muscle and face changes are minimal. I might just take the shortcut and get buccal fat removal.

 

[Carnivore]

Yeah, but you need steroids to be that lean with muscle. I'm either bulky or DYEL skinny. As soon as I cut I lose all my muscle and face changes are minimal. I might just take the shortcut and get buccal fat removal.

He is not on steroids and he is not "that lean." He is around 14% body fat, he just has good insertions, a tan and doesn't store a lot of fat on his face. His amount of muscle mass and leanness is very achievable natty, just hit the gym seriously for a year and you are there. You probably won't look as good, as your insertions are probably not as good as his, but that's just genetics.

 

[Idontknowlol]

Yeah, but you need steroids to be that lean with muscle. I'm either bulky or DYEL skinny. As soon as I cut I lose all my muscle and face changes are minimal. I might just take the shortcut and get buccal fat removal.

He is not that muscular or extremely shredded.. He looks natty

 

[Deleted member 7725]

He is not on steroids and he is not "that lean." He is around 14% body fat, he just has good insertions, a tan and doesn't store a lot of fat on his face. His amount of muscle mass and leanness is very achievable natty, just hit the gym seriously for a year and you are there. You probably won't look as good, as your insertions are probably not as good as his, but that's just genetics.

Yeah, that's why. I'm 12-14% BF but my face is fat as fuck. Probably just bad facial fat storage genetics.

 

[volcelfatcel]

Yeah, that's why. I'm 12-14% BF but my face is fat as fuck. Probably just bad facial fat storage genetics.

boneless moreso

if you don't have the bones to stretch the skin no body fat to have that chiseled look.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

boneless moreso

if you don't have the bones to stretch the skin no body fat to have that chiseled look.

True, but some guys have narrow recessed jaws and still very hollow look like these guys:

 

[volcelfatcel]

True, but some guys have narrow recessed jaws and still very hollow look like these guys:

View attachment 1299414View attachment 1299415View attachment 1299416

View attachment 1299417View attachment 1299418View attachment 1299420

they have actual cheekbones unlike you
they aren't fully boneless
you look 15 and have the bone development of a 14 year old with low T no offense

thats really why no body fat will save you unless you're like 7% or some retarded shit

 

[Deleted member 7725]

they have actual cheekbones unlike you
they aren't fully boneless
you look 15 and have the bone development of a 14 year old with low T no offense

thats really why no body fat will save you unless you're like 7% or some retarded shit

It could go either way. Could be low bone development or high facial fat storage causing the appearance of low bone development.

 

[volcelfatcel]

It could go either way. Could be low bone development or high facial fat storage causing the appearance of low bone development.

nah just from observing you
you don't have the bones necessary to get the stretch

you dont even need insane bones
but you are legit boneless

robert pattinson has a horrible maxilla
but he has the chiseled look becuase he has good wide zygos and jaw

 

[Chadakin]

True, but some guys have narrow recessed jaws and still very hollow look like these guys:

View attachment 1299414View attachment 1299415View attachment 1299416

View attachment 1299417View attachment 1299418View attachment 1299420

tfw a high tier girl will never look at you like this

 

[Deleted member 7725]

nah just from observing you
you don't have the bones necessary to get the stretch

you dont even need insane bones
but you are legit boneless

robert pattinson has a horrible maxilla
but he has the chiseled look becuase he has good wide zygos and jaw
View attachment 1299424

You might be right but still getting buccal fat removal soon. We'll see how I look.

 

[gamma]

Probably just bad facial fat storage genetics.

Could be
I know some polish men and they all have a fat face

 

[volcelfatcel]

You might be right but still getting buccal fat removal soon. We'll see how I look.

buccal fat removal is a meme if you have shit bones
it will age you so fast because you dont have anything holding the skin if you are boneless

 

[Carnivore]

Yeah, that's why. I'm 12-14% BF but my face is fat as fuck. Probably just bad facial fat storage genetics.

Are you sure you are 12-14% bf? The general rule is: what bf you think you are + 5-10% = your true bf. 14% + 5% = 19%. Your body fat is 19%.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

Are you sure you are 12-14% bf? The general rule is, what bf you think you are + 5-10% = your true bf. 14% + 5% = 19%. Your body fat is 19%.

InBody scan said 11.9% so I added a few % to it.

buccal fat removal is a meme if you have shit bones
it will age you so fast because you dont have anything holding the skin if you are boneless

Not if there's an excessive amount of buccal fat, past the range of normal. If anything it would bring my facial age from 15 to my actual age due to natural fatpad regression.

 

[Carnivore]

InBody scan said 11.9% so I added a few % to it.

Not if there's an excessive amount of buccal fat, past the range of normal. If anything it would bring my facial age from 15 to my actual age due to natural fatpad regression.

InBody scan can suck my cock. Took a scan at my gym some years ago and it told me I was 7.3% body fat when I was closer to 17%.

Most body fat measuring devices produce more inaccurate results than just guessing or thinking of a random number.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

InBody scan can suck my cock. Took a scan at my gym some years ago and it told me I was 7.3% body fat when I was closer to 17%.

Most body fat measuring devices produce more inaccurate results than just guessing or thinking of a random number.

What's the most reliable way to tell your bodyfat?

 

[Carnivore]

What's the most reliable way to tell your bodyfat?

Take a photo and post it here and we'll take a guess, or order a dexa scan (those can be somewhat inaccurate, too, but come close).

Body fat is cope anyway. Can you see your abs clearly with deep cuts in normal lighting? If not, you are not 10%.

 

[ShowerMaxxing]

 

[kebabcoper]

View attachment 1299460

That boy is a monster

 

[Carnivore]

View attachment 1299460

@LooksOverAll What 10% body fat actually looks like, take notes.

 

[Chadakin]

View attachment 1299460

no gym for his face

 

[ShowerMaxxing]

no gym for his face

He became Chadlite

 

[Chadakin]

He became Chadlite

norwooding plus just ugly

 

[ShowerMaxxing]

View attachment 1299470
norwooding plus just ugly

Meh, mogger in motion with body halo

 

[Deleted member 8244]

Always love the basics

 

[Deleted member 8244]

View attachment 1299470
norwooding plus just ugly

cope, read the comments

body halo is real he looks 6 psl imo

 

[Deleted member 7725]

@LooksOverAll What 10% body fat actually looks like, take notes.

I'm not even close to looking like that. Looks closer to 8% tbh. He's extremely cut.

He also has an insane amount of muscle. This guy is easily ~10% but very low muscle mass resulting in what looks to be higher bodyfat:

 

[WannaBeA6]

Looks like the same guy if you analyze his facial features and ears.

You don't need a special workout plan, just focus on compound movements, lift heavy, get enough protein and eat less. There is no special formula you need to pay anyone to get.

I tried this infamous recomp, it didn’t work

 

[Carnivore]

I'm not even close to looking like that. Looks closer to 8% tbh. He's extremely cut.

That's what 10% looks like. People drastically underestimate their own bf and that of others. The reason you are not even close is because you are far away from actually being 10%.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

That's what 10% looks like. People drastically underestimate their own bf and that of others.

He also has an insane amount of muscle though combined with low BF, which most people don't have and realistically can't achieve natty. This guy is easily ~10% but very low muscle mass resulting in what looks to be higher bodyfat:

 

[Carnivore]

He also has an insane amount of muscle though combined with low BF, which most people don't have and realistically can't achieve natty. This guy is easily ~10% but very low muscle mass resulting in what looks to be higher bodyfat:

View attachment 1299507

Lucky Blue Smith is probably around 12% bf in that pic. He would obviously look a lot leaner if he actually had an ounce of muscle mass. It's also shitty lighting for definition compared to the other guy in bathroom lighting.

LBS' body reminds me of my brother's tbh. Never worked out in his life, six pack, eats whatever he wants. Same body fat, similar insertions and frame.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

Lucky Blue Smith is probably around 12% bf in that pic. He would obviously look a lot leaner if he actually had an ounce of muscle mass.

Yeah, that's what bodyfat doesn't take into account. More muscle = less bodyfat % just from a body composition standpoint. 50 lbs of fat and 50 lbs of muscle /= 50 lbs of fat and 75 lbs of muscle. At the end of the day both of them have the same amount of fat in their bodies so their faces would look the same.

 

[Carnivore]

Yeah, that's what bodyfat doesn't take into account. More muscle = less bodyfat % just from a body composition standpoint. 50 lbs of fat and 50 lbs of muscle /= 50 lbs of fat and 75 lbs of muscle. At the end of the day both of them have the same amount of fat in their bodies so their faces would look the same.

More muscle means you can carry more fat and look more peeled at the same body fat. More muscle = more room for fat.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

More muscle means you can carry more fat and look more peeled at the same body fat. More muscle = more room for fat.

True, but from a facial aesthetic standpoint you want to have the least amount of fat possible regardless of the amount of muscle and bodyweight, which is why models with hollow cheeks and aesthetic faces tend to be DYEL as it's much easier to reach that point natty. So someone 225 lbs with 10% bodyfat will have way more fat in his face than someone 185 lbs with 10% bodyfat. Unless I'm misunderstanding something.

 

[Carnivore]

True, but from a facial aesthetic standpoint you want to have the least amount of fat possible regardless of the amount of muscle and bodyweight, which is why models with hollow cheeks and aesthetic faces tend to be DYEL as it's much easier to reach that point natty. So someone 225 lbs with 10% bodyfat will have way more fat in his face than someone 185 lbs with 10% bodyfat. Unless I'm misunderstanding something.

Your face doesn't change, so the facial fat should be the same, it's just that the body can carry around more fat, as there is more room for it. An 18 inch arm has a lot more room for fat around it than a 12 inch arm, but your face stays the same.

I've seen the opposite of what you say somehow, not sure why. When I was lean with no muscle my face looked less lean than it did when I added muscle. I've seen the same with other people. Again, I have no idea why.

 

[Deleted member 7725]

Your face doesn't change, so the facial fat should be the same, it's just that the body can carry around more fat, as there is more room for it. An 18 inch arm has a lot more room for fat around it than a 12 inch arm, but your face stays the same.

You sure overall weight and height makes no difference? A guy like Lebron is easily 8-10% BF but still has bloated cheeks and low facial definition:

You can see it with most NBA and NFL players who are low BF, they still have pretty chubby faces: