There are 2 categories of undereye support subhumanities: (a) recessed infraorbital bones and (b) soft tissue insufficiency.
They look different and have different solutions—as a rule of thumb: bone recession is best solved with on-bone infraorbital implants, and soft tissue insufficiency is best solved with fillers, botox, fat grafts, and the like.
Some people have both types of undereye recession. Some people (such as Jordan Kale Barrett) have neither. Usually, the appearance of bad under-eye support is caused by poor bone projection and poor soft tissue padding together.
Would you rather have
They look different and have different solutions—as a rule of thumb: bone recession is best solved with on-bone infraorbital implants, and soft tissue insufficiency is best solved with fillers, botox, fat grafts, and the like.
Some people have both types of undereye recession. Some people (such as Jordan Kale Barrett) have neither. Usually, the appearance of bad under-eye support is caused by poor bone projection and poor soft tissue padding together.
Would you rather have
- trash undereye support and good bones
- good orbital fat pads and trash orbital bones
Join the Conversation Here: |
👁️ [POLL] Eye Area: Fat Pads VERSUS Bones | Blender 3D Visualizations
Poll I made a Blender 3D head model to visualize human facial variations. By using 3D modeling and rendering, we can tweak/morph facial features in THREE dimensions, which lets the morphs’ visual results more accurately account for the ways that faces interact with light in 3D (highlights...
looksmax.org