Face/height formula: what matters more? v1

[thecel]

This right here is my holy grail formula:

face: 0 to 10 scale
height: inches (or cm / 2.54)

( face - 10 )^2 / 10 - ( height - 77 )^2 / 49

• If the answer is a positive number, your face is what's holding you back the most.
• If the answer is a negative number, your height is what's holding you back the most.
• If the answer is 0, then both your height and your face affect your chances with women to the same extent.

IMPORTANT: The only useful info you can get out of this formula is whether you get a positive or a negative answer. The formula absolutely does not quantify your SMV. The formula was not designed to measure how much your height or face affects your hoe-smashing endeavors. For example, if you get -1, that means your height negatively affects your chances with women more than your face does. But, if someone else gets -10, it does not mean their situation is 10 times as bad as yours. The magnitude of the number doesn't really mean anything.

Also, this formula doesn't tell you anything about who slays more than who. A 6'5" 10/10 man and a 5'2" 3/10 man both get results very close to 0 from the formula, but obviously the 6'5" 10/10 man is in a much better situation than the 5'2" 3/10 man. All this formula does is tell you whether your height or your face hurts your chances more. It can't tell you how good or bad your chances are.

 

[Deleted member 6305]

My answer is tending to minus infinite

 

[Chintuck22]

I've gone into minus

Something's wrong

 

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

what was the point of the formula without showing how much which variable affects what? i already know my height is holding me back.

 

[Deleted member 5583]

Which unit and rating system

 

[Deleted member 6873]

what was the point of the formula without showing how much which variable affects what? i already know my height is holding me back.

How tall are u bro?

 

[thecel]

I've gone into minus

Something's wrong

If you get minus that means your height negatively affects your chances with women more than your face does

 

[Nosecel]

That's fucking bullshit, if you are 10/10 face the formula will give you 0 which is nonsense. LOL I can't believe I have to educate gook on math

 

[jordanbarrettisgod]

u gooks have to turn everything into a formula aye

 

[thecel]

That's fucking bullshit, if you are 10/10 face the formula will give you 0 which is nonsense. LOL I can't believe I have to educate gook on math

Dude, if the answer is 0 it means both factors are equal

 

[RAITEIII]

There's no such thing as having one attribute (face) that could compensate a bad height, body, dick to the point of getting the same results as if you had a good height, body and dick.

You need everything.

 

[Deleted member 5891]

This right here is my holy grail formula:

face: 0 to 10 scale
height: inches (or cm / 2.54)

( face - 10 )^2 / 10 - ( height - 77 )^2 / 49

• If the answer is a positive number, your face is what's holding you back the most.
• If the answer is a negative number, your height is what's holding you back the most.
• If the answer is 0, then both your height and your face affect your chances with women to the same extent.

NOTE: The only useful info you can get out of this formula is whether you get a positive or a negative answer. The formula was not designed to measure how much your height or face affects your hoe-smashing endeavors. For example, if you get -1, that means your height negatively affects your chances with women more than your face does. But, if someone else gets -10, it does not mean their situation is 10 times as bad as yours. The magnitude of the number doesn't really mean anything.

This formula doesn't make sense whatsoever because you square
Face-10 part
You could just say under 5'x heights it's over

 

[Deleted member 4053]

There's no such thing as having one attribute (face) that could compensate a bad height, body, dick to the point of getting the same results as if you had a good height, body and dick.

You need everything.

not to mention the infinite combinations of a woman's preferences

 

[Nosecel]

not to mention the infinite combinations of a woman's preferences

Cope, women have one taste, jfl if you disagree. That said, their taste changes through the years BUT foids taste is not individualistic.

 

[RAITEIII]

not to mention the infinite combinations of a woman's preferences

Well, infinite combination of foids preference... I don't agree with that tbh.

It's not like they like their preference could be someone they find ugly, short, small pp or had a bad body.

And I said that "they find", it doesn't mean everyone else will agree with their view. You could be 6 ft, or have 7 inches and for some it could be considered short or small pp even if it sounds crazy.

 

[needsolution]

I think threads like that are useless and you literally cant make mathematical measurement of your SMV. For some women u will have low SMV, for some high. The most important is to be above 5'11 and 5-5.5 at least so your life will be pretty easy.

 

[thecel]

This formula doesn't make sense whatsoever because you square
Face-10 part
You could just say under 5'x heights it's over

It's squared because as you get uglier your face starts hurting your chances with women more and more.

If a 10/10 guy goes down to 8/10 his success wouldn't go down by a lot.

On the other hand, if a 5/10 guy goes down to 3/10 (the same 2-point decrease), his whole life would drastically change.

 

[RAITEIII]

Cope, women have one taste, jfl if you disagree. That said, their taste changes through the years BUT foids taste is not individualistic.

I actually admit that foids only need to like your face.

The better looking you are, the more chances you have for them to like your face, but it could technically still happen regardless even if you aren't truly gl depending on the rest of your stats as a combination.

 

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

How tall are u bro?

57

 

[Deleted member 4053]

Cope, women have one taste, jfl if you disagree. That said, their taste changes through the years BUT foids taste is not individualistic.

well I mean yea they only want chad, but chad does not always look the same (coloring, body, etc.) attractive traits that can look good in different forms and will have a greater appeal to some women more than others. "Infinite combinations" was an exaggeration, but I think you can get my point now.

 

[thecel]

I think threads like that are useless and you literally cant make mathematical measurement of your SMV. For some women u will have low SMV, for some high. The most important is to be above 5'11 and 5-5.5 at least so your life will be pretty easy.

Bruh no one understands what the formula is for. It doesn't measure SMV

I'm 2/10 and 5'6". Here's what I get out of the formula:

( 2 - 10 )^2 / 10 - ( 66 - 77 )^2 / 49 ≈ 3.93

It's a positive number, so that means my ugliness hurts my chances with women more than my shortness.

What if I were a high-tier normie — a 6?

( 6 - 10 )^2 / 10 - ( 66 - 77 )^2 / 49 ≈ -0.869

See, now the formula tells me that my height negatively affects my dating success more than my looks, so I should wear shoe lifts or get leg extension surgery to increase my height.

 

[vodkacel]

I got -248.5

 

[Tyronecell]

dn read

FACE

 

[thecel]

I got -248.5

Did you convert cm to inches?

 

[vodkacel]

Did you convert cm to inches?

yeah then it's 2.07, so face is holding me back. Good formula btw

 

[Alexanderr]

Face is holding me back the most, but I already knew that of course.

 

[JosephGarrot123]

Face is more important because people look at your eyes and everything especially in a relationship. Height is important but not much more because it only garners attention to you

 

[reptiles]

This right here is my holy grail formula:

face: 0 to 10 scale
height: inches (or cm / 2.54)

( face - 10 )^2 / 10 - ( height - 77 )^2 / 49

• If the answer is a positive number, your face is what's holding you back the most.
• If the answer is a negative number, your height is what's holding you back the most.
• If the answer is 0, then both your height and your face affect your chances with women to the same extent.

IMPORTANT: The only useful info you can get out of this formula is whether you get a positive or a negative answer. The formula absolutely does not quantify your SMV. The formula was not designed to measure how much your height or face affects your hoe-smashing endeavors. For example, if you get -1, that means your height negatively affects your chances with women more than your face does. But, if someone else gets -10, it does not mean their situation is 10 times as bad as yours. The magnitude of the number doesn't really mean anything.

Also, this formula doesn't tell you anything about who slays more than who. A 6'5" 10/10 man and a 5'2" 3/10 man both get results very close to 0 from the formula, but obviously the 6'5" 10/10 man is in a much better situation than the 5'2" 3/10 man. All this formula does is tell you whether your height or your face hurts your chances more. It can't tell you how good or bad your chances are.

Where did you get the -77 and /49 component from ?

 

[reptiles]

This right here is my holy grail formula:

face: 0 to 10 scale
height: inches (or cm / 2.54)

( face - 10 )^2 / 10 - ( height - 77 )^2 / 49

• If the answer is a positive number, your face is what's holding you back the most.
• If the answer is a negative number, your height is what's holding you back the most.
• If the answer is 0, then both your height and your face affect your chances with women to the same extent.

IMPORTANT: The only useful info you can get out of this formula is whether you get a positive or a negative answer. The formula absolutely does not quantify your SMV. The formula was not designed to measure how much your height or face affects your hoe-smashing endeavors. For example, if you get -1, that means your height negatively affects your chances with women more than your face does. But, if someone else gets -10, it does not mean their situation is 10 times as bad as yours. The magnitude of the number doesn't really mean anything.

Also, this formula doesn't tell you anything about who slays more than who. A 6'5" 10/10 man and a 5'2" 3/10 man both get results very close to 0 from the formula, but obviously the 6'5" 10/10 man is in a much better situation than the 5'2" 3/10 man. All this formula does is tell you whether your height or your face hurts your chances more. It can't tell you how good or bad your chances are.

My height is 6/2 I would say my psl currently is a 3/8 ngl. Plugging this equation in.


(3-10)^2/10-(187.96-77)^2/49= −246.3677878 my calc results.

What does all this mean ?

 

[thecel]

My height is 6/2 I would say my psl currently is a 3/8 ngl. Plugging this equation in.


(3-10)^2/10-(187.96-77)^2/49= −246.3677878 my calc results.

What does all this mean ?

Height is in inches, and face is on the decile scale. (I just did a crude conversion by multiplying by 1.25)

(3.75-10)^2/10-(74-77)^2/49 = 3.7225765306

Not surprisingly, as you are 6'2", you get a positive number, which means your face is holding you back from sexual success more than your height.

 

[HighIQcel]

I am 6'2 and still v, so ofc the problem is my face.