FaceIQ is a faggot

[asdvek]

Muhh "randle cycle bro"

 

[WhoTookVendetta]

Muhh "randle cycle bro"

View attachment 4681468

https://looksmax.org/threads/faceiq-dick-leak.1888033/

 

[mohito]

What makes the randle cycle stupid but not primal as a whole

 

[bigseedy]

i literally do not listen to diet advice from niggas under htn icl

 

[asdvek]

i literally do not listen to diet advice from niggas under htn icl

His diet advice of raw meat is correct. What's wrong about him is his religious beliefs like randle cycle and nutrients.

 

[rayhuul]

His diet advice of raw meat is correct. What's wrong about him is his religious beliefs like randle cycle and nutrients.

you listed the opposite of religious beliefs

 

[bigseedy]

His diet advice of raw meat is correct. What's wrong about him is his religious beliefs like randle cycle and nutrients.

raw meat is fine and preached by many other people in this space and similar health/biohacking spaces, basically everything else he preaches is somewhat retarded and its not like he has the looks or transformation to back up his methods.

 

[asdvek]

you listed the opposite of religious beliefs

No. Randle cycle and nutrients are literally a religious belief. Nutrients and randle cycle has never been observed or actually proven to exist with genuine proof, yet people believe it in with faith & no proof, which means it's a religious belief.

 

[rayhuul]

Nutrients have never been observed or actually proven to exist

what is your definition of proven

 

[Ergogenic]

No. Randle cycle and nutrients are literally a religious belief. Nutrients and randle cycle has never been observed or actually proven to exist with genuine proof, yet people believe it in with faith & no proof, which means it's a religious belief.

You are incorrect. YOU have never observed individual nutrients to exist because you are not a scientist.

Scientists have observed nutrients, and they have been able to isolate and synthesise them in laboratories and factories. We have known about nutrients for over a hundred years since Kazimierz Funk used his knowledge to isolate and synthesise vitamins.

Definition of Nutrient: Chemical that is required by an organism to maintain and develop and reproduce.

 

[StyIix]

Muhh "randle cycle bro"

View attachment 4681468

Who tf is randle just eat the raw meat with the milk brah

 

[Nexom]

No. Randle cycle and nutrients are literally a religious belief. Nutrients and randle cycle has never been observed or actually proven to exist with genuine proof, yet people believe it in with faith & no proof, which means it's a religious belief.

If that's the case, try eating chicken breast only for a while and we'll see how fast you'll observe nutrients

 

[asdvek]

You are incorrect. YOU have never observed individual nutrients to exist because you are not a scientist.

Scientists have observed nutrients, and they have been able to isolate and synthesise them in laboratories and factories. We have known about nutrients for over a hundred years since Kazimierz Funk used his knowledge to isolate and synthesise vitamins.

Definition of Nutrient: Chemical that is required by an organism to maintain and develop and reproduce.

 

[asdvek]

If that's the case, try eating chicken breast only for a while and we'll see how fast you'll observe nutrients

nice argument for nutrients existing bro

show me nutrients

chicken breast doesnt even have fat thats why long term its bad

 

[StyIix]

What makes the randle cycle stupid but not primal as a whole

Man made rules

 

[Nexom]

nice argument for nutrients existing bro

show me nutrients

chicken breast doesnt even have fat thats why long term its bad

So you think you can live a healthy life with chicken breast and beef tallow only?

 

[asdvek]

So you think you can live a healthy life with chicken breast and beef tallow only?

Why wouldn't you?

 

[mohito]

Man made rules

I feel like @asdvek wanted to reply to my post but mistakenly did that other guy

 

[asdvek]

I feel like @asdvek wanted to reply to my post but mistakenly did that other guy

No lol..

 

[Nexom]

Why wouldn't you?

Anything anyone would reply to this question you'd simply argue with "haven't been observed" so there's no point in discussing, I have a feeling you're pretty unsure yourself and just making shots in the dark about it. You say the Randle Cycle is religious but the way I see it your dismissal of the existence of nutrients is much more religious. You'd be missing out on at least 15 micronutrients if you'd only eat that and I'm pretty sure you wouldn't even want to try it (that would be the only proof based on your 'theory')

 

[Ergogenic]

Anything anyone would reply to this question you'd simply argue with "haven't been observed" so there's no point in discussing, I have a feeling you're pretty unsure yourself and just making shots in the dark about it. You say the Randle Cycle is religious but the way I see it your dismissal of the existence of nutrients is much more religious. You'd be missing out on at least 15 micronutrients if you'd only eat that and I'm pretty sure you wouldn't even want to try it (that would be the only proof based on your 'theory')

I already refuted Asdvek's statement on "nutrients never being observed", and Asdvek simply replied with a reaction rather than changing his mind. Check it out above.

 

[asdvek]

Anything anyone would reply to this question you'd simply argue with "haven't been observed" so there's no point in discussing, I have a feeling you're pretty unsure yourself and just making shots in the dark about it. You say the Randle Cycle is religious but the way I see it your dismissal of the existence of nutrients is much more religious. You'd be missing out on at least 15 micronutrients if you'd only eat that and I'm pretty sure you wouldn't even want to try it (that would be the only proof based on your 'theory')

Tell me why chicken breast and beef tallow is not enough for a healthy life

I'm %100 sure about everything im talking about

 

[asdvek]

I already refuted Asdvek's statement on "nutrients never being observed",

YOU DIDNT SHOW ANY PROOF FAGGOT

YOU JUST SAID "SCIENTISTS HAVE OBSERVED"

LIKE OK?? SHOW THE OBSERVATION