Faceiqlabs it's cope?

I think org ratings are more realistic than that ai
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascendent, cancsrs and GeneticsIsEverythin
I think org ratings are more realistic than that ai
you mean ratings where some random pu to the thread not having looked at the picture for even a milisecond and instacomments "kys + rope + sub 2 + its so over + khhvmaxxing" LOL
 
  • Nerd
  • +1
Reactions: ascendent and Stalker
you mean ratings where some random pu to the thread not having looked at the picture for even a milisecond and instacomments "kys + rope + sub 2 + its so over + khhvmaxxing" LOL
There are some people that try to give genuine rating and advice. Of course on an Incel forum, people are Jealous and just try to put others down. I would rather trust an org comment than an ai still
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascendent
dude wym its cope? are u retarded
god bro where do these inbred mindless retarded low iq monkeys come from?
its js a place where u put ur face in and measure ur ratios and harmony
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascendent
It's not as bad as people claim. Definitely a cool tool that tells you all your strengths/weaknesses but its pointless if you can be bothered to take the time to measure your own ratios and compare it with the facts and literature. But if you're some normie who dgaf that much and just want a rating then yh sure it does the job.

I personally am inclined to think it overrates slightly and my sole reason for thinking that is I do not believe faceiq is facially above a 6/10. With all due respect.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascendent and Maicolll
There are some people that try to give genuine rating and advice. Of course on an Incel forum, people are Jealous and just try to put others down. I would rather trust an org comment than an ai still
Fair but those genuine ratings are unfortunately far and few between, and the ratings with genuine intentions behind them where the poster also actually took the time to fully assess your face/ratios, even fewer. The best route is just DIY.
 
It's not as bad as people claim. Definitely a cool tool that tells you all your strengths/weaknesses but its pointless if you can be bothered to take the time to measure your own ratios and compare it with the facts and literature. But if you're some normie who dgaf that much and just want a rating then yh sure it does the job.

I personally am inclined to think it overrates slightly and my sole reason for thinking that is I do not believe faceiq is facially above a 6/10. With all due respect.
Because Faceiqlabs gave me 70% of harm, i dont think its accurate
 
Fair but those genuine ratings are unfortunately far and few between, and the ratings with genuine intentions behind them where the poster also actually took the time to fully assess your face/ratios, even fewer. The best route is just DIY.
Agree 👏
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maicolll
Sorry bro
Don't apologise to that fucking troglodyte. Imagine a guy losing his shit like that on someone irl cuz they asked a simple (albeit slightly silly) question, is that someone you'd owe any respect to apologise to?
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: 2chevskuy and Maicolll
Don't apologise to that fucking troglodyte. Imagine a guy losing his shit like that on someone irl cuz they asked a simple (albeit slightly silly) question, is that someone you'd owe any respect to apologise to?
woah woah a gentleman here
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Sub6cel and Maicolll
It doesn't even measure colouring right? So pheno or race isn't taken into account making it a meme for ratings.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maicolll
Don't apologise to that fucking troglodyte. Imagine a guy losing his shit like that on someone irl cuz they asked a simple (albeit slightly silly) question, is that someone you'd owe any respect to apologise to?
thing is its not irl
1783118102898
 
Because Faceiqlabs gave me 70% of harm, i dont think its accurate
I think the harmony rating is accurate cuz its purely based off mathematical ratios it's just the final overall rating where its slightly too generous because different sections and portions of your face will weigh differently to the final score according to what FaceIQ wants it to be.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maicolll
It doesn't even measure colouring right? So pheno or race isn't taken into account making it a meme for ratings.
Why would they take race or phenotype into account if they’re measuring facial harmony? Phenotype is just the set of visible physical traits that make you look the way you do and allow people to categorize your appearance. If an AI is evaluating facial proportions and harmony, those traits are already part of what it’s measuring. For example, if someone has a wider nose because of their phenotype, the AI would still evaluate how that nose fits the overall facial ratios. It doesn’t stop being part of the measurement just because it’s linked to phenotype.
Coloring is cope anyways, pale chad is a chad, tanned chad is a chad
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Alienmaxxer and Maicolll
Why would they take race or phenotype into account if they’re measuring facial harmony? Phenotype is just the set of visible physical traits that make you look the way you do and allow people to categorize your appearance. If an AI is evaluating facial proportions and harmony, those traits are already part of what it’s measuring. For example, if someone has a wider nose because of their phenotype, the AI would still evaluate how that nose fits the overall facial ratios. It doesn’t stop being part of the measurement just because it’s linked to phenotype.
Coloring is cope anyways, pale chad is a chad, tanned chad is a chad
Wouldn't you at least agree that colouring to some extent can enhance features that make someone a "chad". Colouring is moreso fraud than it really is "cope" imo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maicolll
So pheno or race isn't taken into account making it a meme for ratings.
Yhh class idea that is mate. Just imagine this poor guy putting his face through IQlabs expecting to be niced only to see at the bottom it says "2/10, currycel, It's SO over" right under a 6.4 point deduction in the race/phenotype category:lul:
1783118566996
 

Attachments

  • 1783118550157.png
    1783118550157.png
    138.7 KB · Views: 0
Why would they take race or phenotype into account if they’re measuring facial harmony? Phenotype is just the set of visible physical traits that make you look the way you do and allow people to categorize your appearance. If an AI is evaluating facial proportions and harmony, those traits are already part of what it’s measuring. For example, if someone has a wider nose because of their phenotype, the AI would still evaluate how that nose fits the overall facial ratios. It doesn’t stop being part of the measurement just because it’s linked to phenotype.
Coloring is cope anyways, pale chad is a chad, tanned chad is a chad
What garbage cope, dnr past first sentence

Yeah indian = white guy, totally no disadvantages with the first :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maicolll
Wouldn't you at least agree that colouring to some extent can enhance features that make someone a "chad". Colouring is moreso fraud than it really is "cope" imo.
Bad coloring won’t descend you noticeably imo, just as good coloring wouldn’t add any points.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Sub6cel, Alienmaxxer and Maicolll
Yhh class idea that is mate. Just imagine this poor guy putting his face through IQlabs expecting to be niced only to see at the bottom it says "2/10, currycel, It's SO over" right under a 6.4 point deduction in the race/phenotype category:lul:
View attachment 5310755
Just use a single italian-looking curry male model extreme outlier to prove your point theorem

Yeah colouring doesn't matter guys, pack it up. T50 = pale blue eyes. Ginger pheno = med pheno.
 
What garbage cope, dnr past first sentence

Yeah indian = white guy, totally no disadvantages with the first :lul:
Yeah if an Indian has better ratios he will mog the shit out of you
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7427.jpeg
    IMG_7427.jpeg
    141.7 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Maicolll
Giga ethnic coping ITT :lul:

You currys can hash this out between each other
 
Giga ethnic coping ITT :lul:

You currys can hash this out between each other
You can stay at home all year long and wear spf 1488, you’re still a virgin ltn with 50 bucks to your name, tf are you trying to prove rofl
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Sub6cel
My point is meta you failed to grasp my superior knowledge and you’re stuck in jbw 2023 era
Yeah bro ginger pheno = north atlantid colouring what superior knowledge :lul:

albino = hexum colouring

What a genius I am in awe of your superior knowledge :lul:
 
What garbage cope, dnr past first sentence

Yeah indian = white guy, totally no disadvantages with the first :lul:
Ofc theres real world disadvantages of being anything non-white, Nigga turning wine into water:lul::lul::lul:

The point being made is what relevance would phenotype/race have in the final rating if all the rating is supposed to be is a final score formed from a collection of facial ratios compared with data and chosen ideal ranges. I don't think the math cares if your CT is 8 degrees but you're Indian, good canthal tilt is good canthal tilt likewise, white chad, black chad, brown chad, purple or green chad.
White chad would obviously have more advantages in life generally by virtue of being fucking white lmao but other than that, there is nothing that can objectively pit one skin colour or more bogusly a "phenotype" as inherently more attractive than the other. The objectivity of facial attractiveness starts and stops at the mathematics of it all, ratios, proportions etc. Anything beyond that is the fascinating world of human unpredictability of which we can only attempt to understand.

No need for ur "dnr" we KNOW you didn't read it, just leaving it here for any good lads who'd want to read it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2chevskuy and Maicolll
Ofc theres real world disadvantages of being anything non-white, Nigga turning wine into water:lul::lul::lul:

The point being made is what relevance would phenotype/race have in the final rating if all the rating is supposed to be is a final score formed from a collection of facial ratios compared with data and chosen ideal ranges. I don't think the math cares if your CT is 8 degrees but you're Indian, good canthal tilt is good canthal tilt likewise, white chad, black chad, brown chad, purple or green chad.
White chad would obviously have more advantages in life generally by virtue of being fucking white lmao but other than that, there is nothing that can objectively pit one skin colour or more bogusly a "phenotype" as inherently more attractive than the other. The objectivity of facial attractiveness starts and stops at the mathematics of it all, ratios, proportions etc. Anything beyond that is the fascinating world of human unpredictability of which we can only attempt to understand.

No need for ur "dnr" we KNOW you didn't read it, just leaving it here for any good lads who'd want to read it.
Mirin both lingo and keyboard
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Sub6cel and Maicolll
Just use a single italian-looking curry male model extreme outlier to prove your point theorem

Yeah colouring doesn't matter guys, pack it up. T50 = pale blue eyes. Ginger pheno = med pheno.
You are genuinely void of basic comprehension. Read the point you made and the response I sent to it, then when you're clued up again we'll continue.

Also, Jfl at "italian-looking curry male model" as if most major ethnic groups of the Indian subcontinent aren't thousands of years older than Italians in terms of ethnogenesis and lineage divergence. The gene pool that gave that Indian man his looks formed way before the gene pool that gave any living Italian their looks. Could maybe ragebait a bit here and say that Italians are the ones who look like Indians:lul:

Edit: Reminder to all lay people, white people are the newest formed race of all the human races. Everyone non-white group has existed for far longer.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Maicolll
You are genuinely void of basic comprehension. Read the point you made and the response I sent to it, then when you're clued up again we'll continue.

Also, Jfl at "italian-looking curry male model" as if most major ethnic groups of the Indian subcontinent aren't thousands of years older than Italians in terms of ethnogenesis and lineage divergence. The gene pool that gave that Indian man his looks formed way before the gene pool that gave any living Italian their looks. Could maybe ragebait a bit here and say that Italians are the ones who look like Indians:lul:

are you a native speaker by any chance genuinely good writing skills
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maicolll

Similar threads

slzlzcrvnts
Replies
1
Views
45
MirinDaZygos
MirinDaZygos
MilknApples
Replies
4
Views
67
TestoMaxxer
TestoMaxxer
ascendent
Replies
7
Views
59
iabsolvenico
iabsolvenico
surronz
Replies
5
Views
33
surronz
surronz
rationalguy.xx
  • Question
Cope Icemax
Replies
2
Views
30
PolishTrucell
PolishTrucell

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top