sub3pieceofshit
rapist
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2025
- Posts
- 241
- Reputation
- 196
I did a facial analysis of @sharman after he asked for tips, and I'm wondering if anyone else here who has more experience could rate how I did. Here's what I got.
Notes:
Right eye sits below the left, that’s why the right has a negative canthal tilt while the left is neutral.
The outer fifths (the far left and far right vertical lines which separate the face into 5 segments) are much slimmer than the rest, which causes your ears to be much more prominent, this could somewhat be explained by camera distortion, but it definitely is present.
Pretty decent thirds (the black horizontal lines that separate the face into 3 segments). If you were looking straight at the camera and weren’t looking up (which you are), they would be much more even.
Shitty haircut.
Facial length to width ratio is 1.73, which indicates a slightly long face (The ideal is 1.618).
Nose width to lip width ratio is 1.25 (ideal 1.618), which indicates a very large nose.
Very flat nose bridge.
Very broad nose.
Low set ears.
Wide-set eyes.
Lips are tall in height, but short in width.
And here's how I measured:
Notes:
Right eye sits below the left, that’s why the right has a negative canthal tilt while the left is neutral.
The outer fifths (the far left and far right vertical lines which separate the face into 5 segments) are much slimmer than the rest, which causes your ears to be much more prominent, this could somewhat be explained by camera distortion, but it definitely is present.
Pretty decent thirds (the black horizontal lines that separate the face into 3 segments). If you were looking straight at the camera and weren’t looking up (which you are), they would be much more even.
Shitty haircut.
Facial length to width ratio is 1.73, which indicates a slightly long face (The ideal is 1.618).
Nose width to lip width ratio is 1.25 (ideal 1.618), which indicates a very large nose.
Very flat nose bridge.
Very broad nose.
Low set ears.
Wide-set eyes.
Lips are tall in height, but short in width.
And here's how I measured: