MisterMercedes
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2020
- Posts
- 3,661
- Reputation
- 3,835
This concept has been brought up before on this forum. What does it mean?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
he injected iqMistermercedes bro ur threads are becoming better
Ahahahahe injected iq
and some people are saying that looking more average can make you more attractive. though that is nothing more than a convenient cope.having ratios/measurements that aren't too skewed from the average
U dont understand what that meansand some people are saying that looking more average can make you more attractive. though that is nothing more than a convenient cope.
explain it thenU dont understand what that means
Probably they meant thatexplain it then
tbh i agree, averageness is copeand some people are saying that looking more average can make you more attractive. though that is nothing more than a convenient cope.
ok, this definitely makes more senseProbably they meant that
9/10 alien male model gets mogged by 7/10 regular good looking guy, because he goodlooking guy looks more ”conventional”(this is for girls not psl autists)
But i didnt see the comment so idk
Thats how I understand it bro and I think its trueok, this definitely makes more sense
thx
Agreed. This seems pretty contradictory to the theory of looks, which is having ideal features/ratios. I think people misuse the term as they’re really responding to people who say uncannily “good” ratios such as Barrett’s incredibly high FWHR are ideal.and some people are saying that looking more average can make you more attractive. though that is nothing more than a convenient cope.
if that's the case then it's not because of facial averageness. the whole "male models are unattractive because they have too many good features" saying is complete and utter bullshit. learn from jeremy meeks, his features virtually couldn't be any better and the reactions women had upon seeing his face reflected just that, didn't they?9/10 alien male model gets mogged by 7/10 regular good looking guy
Again jeremy meeks is not alien lookingif that's the case then it's not because of facial averageness. the whole "male models are unattractive because they have too many good features" saying is complete and utter bullshit. learn from jeremy meeks, his features virtually couldn't be any better and the reactions women had upon seeing his face reflected just that, didn't they?
if you consider de poot alien looking then it's clearly not because his features are too good, that's why i brought up meeksAgain jeremy meeks is not alien looking
I am talking about like de poot
Bro u dont get it just forget this shitif you consider de poot alien looking then it's clearly not because his features are too good, that's why i brought up meeks
ran out of arguments huhBro u dont get it just forget this shit
Harmony is not ratios you absolute fetus. Harmony is how well your features work together (Chico’s thinner, higher set eyebrows work better with his less hunter eye area than classic hunter eyebrows would).averageness = good ratios, when people talk about "harmony" its just ratios.
obviously having bones+ratios is good but you can be gl with good ratios alone
most of the time when someone says harmony because a bloated guy looks good, its actually because of ratiosHarmony is not ratios you absolute fetus. Harmony is how well your features work together (Chico’s thinner, higher set eyebrows work better with his less hunter eye area than classic hunter eyebrows would).
Then they’re using it incorrectly. Harmony is not ratios. It’s how well your features work together.most of the time when someone says harmony because a bloated guy looks good, its actually because of ratios