Facial convexity test

[Deleted member 59870]

Measured below the threshold of 165°. I wasn't really asking to be ideal but at least solidly over the not subhuman would be great. Apparently average is 162°.

You probably can't measure accurately enough to know if Ur above or below exactly. But I sure as hell aren't solidly above. I'm in the area of average probably. Above or below a bit.

Is there a facial convexity that passes the Frankfurt plane?

 

[Rivers of Nihil]

mine is about 170
you said ideal should be below 165 ?

 

[Deleted member 59870]

mine is about 170
you said ideal should be below 165 ?

No, 165 and above is considered forward grown I believe. 170 is good.

 

[Rivers of Nihil]

No, 165 and above is considered forward grown I believe. 170 is good.

i feel my hyoid bone is holding me back , makes my side profile so mid

170 is good.

also when the angle is above 180 you start to look like you got an underbite

 

[rubberduck]

can someone measure mine in pm

 

[smallman]

No, 165 and above is considered forward grown I believe. 170 is good.

He doesnt look forward grown

 

[ascenscionisnear]

i feel my hyoid bone is holding me back , makes my side profile so mid

also when the angle is above 180 you start to look like you got an underbite

BDD if you think it’s your hyoid holding you back

 

[smallman]

i feel my hyoid bone is holding me back , makes my side profile so mid

Its just lack of forward growth

 

[Rivers of Nihil]

Its just lack of forward growth

View attachment 2800509

My forward growth is normal, try to do the maxillary triangle test and check yourself
I can agree that my mandible is somewhat short tho

 

[smallman]

My forward growth is normal, try to do the maxillary triangle test and check yourself
I can agree that my mandible is somewhat short tho

Yea it looks average

 

[Rivers of Nihil]

Yea it looks average

Idk if I should get something to make the mandible look longer , idk something like genio or a slight bimax ,but I feel it will look botched