Fact Check: Study did not find women ‘store’ DNA from intercourse with men

[standardcel]

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-did-not-find-women-store-dna-intercourse-with-men-2024-01-22/

 

[ChiraqJihad]

they only swabbed the vagina

sperms go straight to their brain and form cocoon

 

[standardcel]

they only swabbed the vagina

sperms go straight to their brain and form cocoon

Source?

 

[T50 Demon]

Source?

What happened to just trusting a nigga on his word

 

[TechnoBoss]

“Oh my god inkwells. See? There’s nothing to worry about. The sperm I took from the 78 Chads and 64 Tyrone’s won’t have an affect on my future baby!”

 

[TheLastLaugh]

“Oh my god inkwells. See? There’s nothing to worry about. The sperm I took from the 78 Chads and 64 Tyrone’s won’t have an affect on my future baby!”

First of all never trust some Jewish site like Reuters as what they say is always the opposite. They also claim vaccines are harmless so should we believe them on that too? All of these well known sites whether its BBC, CNN, or Reuters push nothing but garbage propaganda. Modern society is wrong about anything & everything, and the more mainstream something is the more incorrect it is. By default you can safely assume that when they go out of their way to try and debunk microchimerism its indeed legit, the same way they go out of their way to prove vaccines are safe and definitely not poison.

Its already been scientifically proven beyond all reasonable doubt that when a woman gets impregnated, even when it ends in early termination that man's DNA will show up in any future pregnancy the woman has. What hasn't been "officially proven" and is often labelled fake news is that women carry the DNA from past men they've had sex with but didn't get pregnant by. Now instead of being a good goy NPC that can't think for themselves, use some common sense to put two and two together. Even these bullshit studies that claim women don't retain the DNA of their previous sexual partners will admit that it occurs in women who were never pregnant, so where else is it coming from then? Not all of these case studies have a previous abortion or a male sibling, but the one common denominator in all of them is they're non-virgins.

Over for guys like OP who believe every bullshit article the Jews put out and lack common sense & critical thinking skills to figure out the truth. Microchimerism in particular is a hard pill to swallow as its some of the most deeply disturbing information. Humans have deviated from the natural way of life being violent conquerors and killing women's children to being weak & docile to the point of even normalizing raising other men's children (cuckoldry). We're living such a perverse & unnatural existence so of course people can't handle these facts.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7676297_Male_microchimerism_in_women_without_sons_Quantitative_assessment_and_correlation_with_pregnancy_history

 

[TechnoBoss]

First of all never trust some Jewish site like Reuters as what they say is always the opposite. They also claim vaccines are harmless so should we believe them on that too? All of these well known sites whether its BBC, CNN, or Reuters push nothing but garbage propaganda. Modern society is wrong about anything & everything, and the more mainstream something is the more incorrect it is. By default you can safely assume that when they go out of their way to try and debunk microchimerism its indeed legit, the same way they go out of their way to prove vaccines are safe and definitely not poison.

Its already been scientifically proven beyond all reasonable doubt that when a woman gets impregnated, even when it ends in early termination that man's DNA will show up in any future pregnancy the woman has. What hasn't been "officially proven" and is often labelled fake news is that women carry the DNA from past men they've had sex with but didn't get pregnant by. Now instead of being a good goy NPC that can't think for themselves, use some common sense to put two and two together. Even these bullshit studies that claim women don't retain the DNA of their previous sexual partners will admit that it occurs in women who were never pregnant, so where else is it coming from then? Not all of these case studies have a previous abortion or a male sibling, but the one common denominator in all of them is they're non-virgins.

Over for guys like OP who believe every bullshit article the Jews put out and lack common sense & critical thinking skills to figure out the truth. Microchimerism in particular is a hard pill to swallow as its some of the most deeply disturbing information. Humans have deviated from the natural way of life being violent conquerors and killing women's children to being weak & docile to the point of even normalizing raising other men's children (cuckoldry). We're living such a perverse & unnatural existence so of course people can't handle these facts.


View attachment 2804034

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7676297_Male_microchimerism_in_women_without_sons_Quantitative_assessment_and_correlation_with_pregnancy_history

dnr but skimmed through seems true

 

[standardcel]

First of all never trust some Jewish site like Reuters as what they say is always the opposite. They also claim vaccines are harmless so should we believe them on that too? All of these well known sites whether its BBC, CNN, or Reuters push nothing but garbage propaganda. Modern society is wrong about anything & everything, and the more mainstream something is the more incorrect it is. By default you can safely assume that when they go out of their way to try and debunk microchimerism its indeed legit, the same way they go out of their way to prove vaccines are safe and definitely not poison.

Its already been scientifically proven beyond all reasonable doubt that when a woman gets impregnated, even when it ends in early termination that man's DNA will show up in any future pregnancy the woman has. What hasn't been "officially proven" and is often labelled fake news is that women carry the DNA from past men they've had sex with but didn't get pregnant by. Now instead of being a good goy NPC that can't think for themselves, use some common sense to put two and two together. Even these bullshit studies that claim women don't retain the DNA of their previous sexual partners will admit that it occurs in women who were never pregnant, so where else is it coming from then? Not all of these case studies have a previous abortion or a male sibling, but the one common denominator in all of them is they're non-virgins.

Over for guys like OP who believe every bullshit article the Jews put out and lack common sense & critical thinking skills to figure out the truth. Microchimerism in particular is a hard pill to swallow as its some of the most deeply disturbing information. Humans have deviated from the natural way of life being violent conquerors and killing women's children to being weak & docile to the point of even normalizing raising other men's children (cuckoldry). We're living such a perverse & unnatural existence so of course people can't handle these facts.


View attachment 2804034

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7676297_Male_microchimerism_in_women_without_sons_Quantitative_assessment_and_correlation_with_pregnancy_history

Reuters says about this study from 2005 that the 2012 study done debunks it

 

[News]

In a 2005 study, "chads" are actually ugly-hearted on the inside. Their physical appearance may look "charming" but on the inside, they are a subhuman beast.

 

[BrendioEEE]