Fake Russian

K4ZYA223

K4ZYA223

HTN SOMEWHERE, MAYBE NOWHERE
Joined
Feb 26, 2025
Posts
2,033
Reputation
2,301
Fake russian and all her fans try to dox me and fail.


IMG 0440

If you take a look at the top comment its mine, in those comments theyve tried to send my address and location which they failed at as i have a dynamic IP, so they sent me a location in italy 🤣 then theyve called me a fascist, a racist, tried to contact my work :lul: which i quit. Furthermore they tried contacting my family (i live alone and have no family). Theyre all leftists btw. Im pretty sure one of their bios has “bi-natural liberal, Crush Fascism” :lul::lul::lul::lul:.

TL;DR - leftists get mad i call a korean girl not russian, who btw makes her whole personality “russian”.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: theĂĽbermenschboy, pope, Latvianchud185 and 12 others
Its badly written because i just woke up. BUMP
 
  • +1
Reactions: Latvianchud185, Vazelrr and Luca_.
Bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: Luca_.
Bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: Luca_.
gook filth should get a black eye for cultural appropriation
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vazelrr, Latvianchud185, Luca_. and 2 others
Fake russian and all her fans try to dox me and fail.


View attachment 4183257
If you take a look at the top comment its mine, in those comments theyve tried to send my address and location which they failed at as i have a dynamic IP, so they sent me a location in italy 🤣 then theyve called me a fascist, a racist, tried to contact my work :lul: which i quit. Furthermore they tried contacting my family (i live alone and have no family). Theyre all leftists btw. Im pretty sure one of their bios has “bi-natural liberal, Crush Fascism” :lul::lul::lul::lul:.

TL;DR - leftists get mad i call a korean girl not russian, who btw makes her whole personality “russian”.

1000004892
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vazelrr, Latvianchud185, KeepCopingLads and 4 others
Fake russian and all her fans try to dox me and fail.


View attachment 4183257
If you take a look at the top comment its mine, in those comments theyve tried to send my address and location which they failed at as i have a dynamic IP, so they sent me a location in italy 🤣 then theyve called me a fascist, a racist, tried to contact my work :lul: which i quit. Furthermore they tried contacting my family (i live alone and have no family). Theyre all leftists btw. Im pretty sure one of their bios has “bi-natural liberal, Crush Fascism” :lul::lul::lul::lul:.

TL;DR - leftists get mad i call a korean girl not russian, who btw makes her whole personality “russian”.

1759843914300
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Vazelrr and K4ZYA223
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Vazelrr, Latvianchud185, MiserableMan and 2 others
holy bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vazelrr, Latvianchud185 and K4ZYA223
Tbh i cant care less
 
Fake russian and all her fans try to dox me and fail.


View attachment 4183257
If you take a look at the top comment its mine, in those comments theyve tried to send my address and location which they failed at as i have a dynamic IP, so they sent me a location in italy 🤣 then theyve called me a fascist, a racist, tried to contact my work :lul: which i quit. Furthermore they tried contacting my family (i live alone and have no family). Theyre all leftists btw. Im pretty sure one of their bios has “bi-natural liberal, Crush Fascism” :lul::lul::lul::lul:.

TL;DR - leftists get mad i call a korean girl not russian, who btw makes her whole personality “russian”.

Tom Hanks Sigh GIF by Laff


asian foids trying not to simp for wbc for 1 minute attempt
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Vazelrr, MiserableMan, K4ZYA223 and 1 other person
:lul::lul:
Screenshot 20251007 153428
 
  • JFL
Reactions: pope
She’s hideous
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan, FiendFiend and K4ZYA223
Meh they're low IQ they can't differentiate from nationality "russian" from ethnicity,just looking at her makes you think she's fully Asian without a single Slavic feature,these niggas geniuenly nly tweaking
 
  • JFL
Reactions: K4ZYA223
I mean, she is russian.
 
Doesn't Russia have chink eyed ethnicities? So she could be Russian.
 
  • Nerd
  • JFL
Reactions: K4ZYA223 and sayonara
And im Chad
Tell me, what classifies someone as russian or not? Because half of russians are turks or mongols like her, where's the line? A lot of "true" russians have turkic and mongol blood too, due to living in the same country as turkmongols for many centuries.
 
Tell me, what classifies someone as russian or not? Because half of russians are turks or mongols like her, where's the line? A lot of "true" russians have turkic and mongol blood too, due to living in the same country as turkmongols for many centuries.
IMG 0441

Just say ur a gook bro
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Vazelrr
Yeah, this ones a gook. But there are legit blonde, red haired chink eyed ethnicities in Russia like the Udmurts, tatars, Some siberian tribes etc.
Im aware. But she makes her entire personality russian. Which shes not
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
Tell me, what classifies someone as russian or not? Because half of russians are turks or mongols like her, where's the line? A lot of "true" russians have turkic and mongol blood too, due to living in the same country as turkmongols for many centuries.
Choose a team you shit-skin larpoid, this nigga on other posts says slavshits are whiter than germanics (even tho its not true statistically or phenotypically for that matter), and in another post he trashes on slavs, choose a side u retarded shitskin for god sake, you either side with the Germanic or the Slav.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vazelrr, K4ZYA223, FlotPSL and 1 other person
Choose a team you shit-skin larpoid, this nigga on other posts says slavshits are whiter than germanics (even tho its not true statistically or phenotypically for that matter), and in another post he trashes on slavs, choose a side u retarded shitskin for god sake, you either side with the Germanic or the Slav.
Oh, talking about shit-skin larpoids...

You live in your own bubble. You have your own weird race wars in your head. So I have no answer for you, I don't what are you about.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL and whiteegyptian
Fake russian and all her fans try to dox me and fail.


View attachment 4183257
If you take a look at the top comment its mine, in those comments theyve tried to send my address and location which they failed at as i have a dynamic IP, so they sent me a location in italy 🤣 then theyve called me a fascist, a racist, tried to contact my work :lul: which i quit. Furthermore they tried contacting my family (i live alone and have no family). Theyre all leftists btw. Im pretty sure one of their bios has “bi-natural liberal, Crush Fascism” :lul::lul::lul::lul:.

TL;DR - leftists get mad i call a korean girl not russian, who btw makes her whole personality “russian”.

look mongolian
 
  • +1
Reactions: K4ZYA223
Oh, talking about shit-skin larpoids...

You live in your own bubble. You have your own weird race wars in your head. So I have no answer for you, I don't what are you about.
My point is you are a hypocrite, you don't stand by your own sayings, it's like you change opinions every-time you wake up, one time you admire the Germanics and the Nordics, next time, trash on them, and admire the Slavs, and than another time, you trash on the Slavs, calling them Mongols, Russians are sub-human and so, how about you just choose what you believe, instead of trying to LARP on an incel forum as a racial anthropologist and a nazi?

@FlotPSL check this nigga out.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Vazelrr, K4ZYA223, FlotPSL and 1 other person
My point is you are a hypocrite, you don't stand by your own sayings, it's like you change opinions every-time you wake up, one time you admire the Germanics and the Nordics, next time, trash on them, and admire the Slavs, and than another time, you trash on the Slavs, calling them Mongols, Russians are sub-human and so, how about you just choose what you believe, instead of trying to LARP on an incel forum as a racial anthropologist and a nazi?

@FlotPSL check this nigga out.
That's just the conclusions you derive. It's in your head.

You take everything I say as if I was serious about and had my life on it.

Letting that aside, what I meant is that the population of Russia consists in some part of north asiatic and turkic people, and adjacents of them, whose territory has been made part of what is now the RF, during history. I think that's a fact.

As far as I know they are considered russians too?
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteegyptian
That's just the conclusions you derive. It's in your head.

You take everything I say as if I was serious about and had my life on it.

Letting that aside, what I meant is that the population of Russia consists in some part of north asiatic and turkic people, and adjacents of them, whose territory has been made part of what is now the RF, during history. I think that's a fact.

As far as I know they are considered russians too?
Yeah, they are considered Russians, but please, explain this:

1759857621114



WHEN I SAY, Anglos are white and technically the whitest of all, you claim they are swarthy failed Mediterranean mutt like nation, but in other posts, you do agree Germanics or Anglos or Nordics are superior? why?


And what does being serious, have to do with historical and genetical competency? do you think I ARGUE all day or discuss race all day? NO, but when I DO, I AIM to provide a very accurate and unbiased interpretation, only for you to disagree with me and INSULT me or just deflect what I HAVE to say. while admitting you don't think before you type.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vazelrr, K4ZYA223 and Debetro
I mean i know nords are considered white but like.........siberian ancestry
@whiteegyptian did you see varg vikerners opinion on european?
seems pretty retarded
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vazelrr and whiteegyptian
Im aware. But she makes her entire personality russian. Which shes not
Reminds of this half curry and half russian foid, who does something similar. Funny how both look nothing like their whiter parents, no wonder they are so desperate to cling to their white sides. If they looked more whiter they won't act this way, seems like they are quite insecure.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vazelrr and K4ZYA223
@Debetro White never included slavs.....nor did slavs really have alot of history with anglos and nords or other germanics for that matter
 
Reminds of this half curry and half russian foid, who does something similar. Funny how both look nothing like their whiter parents, no wonder they are so desperate to cling to their white sides. If they looked more whiter they won't act this way, seems like they are quite insecure.
Haha i have seen a shitton of half black half croat/serb women try to do the same but they look 100% black
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
@whiteegyptian did you see varg vikerners opinion on european?
seems pretty retarded
Nah send me, but yeah, Nordics are considered white by the vast majority, but my problem with this guy is that he says Nordics are the top and elite, and than he says Slavs are elite, and than he calls Slavs sub-human.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
Haha i have seen a shitton of half black half croat/serb women try to do the same but they look 100% black
They are just insecure tbh, i now a half north indian and half white kid, and he acts normal. Maybe because he got the best features from both of his parents and looks pretty good. It's just that urge for belonging that a lot of mutts have. This is why i don't support race mixing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
Nah send me, but yeah, Nordics are considered white by the vast majority, but my problem with this guy is that he says Nordics are the top and elite, and than he says Slavs are elite, and than he calls Slavs sub-human.
 
@Debetro White never included slavs.....nor did slavs really have alot of history with anglos and nords or other germanics for that matter
Depends who you ask, and as you know, historically it had different meanings. But it's not like it has any meaning. And slavs did have history with nords and especially germanics. I don't know what are you trying to imply.

Ethnicity, nationality, having X of this blood, Y of that blood, it's all irrelevant by itself at the end of the day, what matters is your individual looks, behaviour, intelligence...
Stop generalizing, there are no homogeneous countries. Also, it's great to be proud of your culture, history, whatever, but one should realize it was not you who built them and most likely nor your ancestors, as the majority of the population were just illiterate plebs.
@whiteegyptian
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteegyptian
Depends who you ask, and as you know, historically it had different meanings. But it's not like it has any meaning. And slavs did have history with nords and especially germanics. I don't know what are you trying to imply.

Ethnicity, nationality, having X of this blood, Y of that blood, it's all irrelevant by itself at the end of the day, what matters is your individual looks, behaviour, intelligence...
Stop generalizing, there are no homogeneous countries. Also, it's great to be proud of your culture, history, whatever, but one should realize it was not you who built them and most likely nor your ancestors, as the majority of the population were just illiterate plebs.
@whiteegyptian
I agree with the there are no homogenous countries statement.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
Reminds of this half curry and half russian foid, who does something similar. Funny how both look nothing like their whiter parents, no wonder they are so desperate to cling to their white sides. If they looked more whiter they won't act this way, seems like they are quite insecure.
Fr, her entire personality is Russian . Look at her posts
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
Yeah, they are considered Russians, but please, explain this:

View attachment 4183956
Why nordic? Aren't they finnmongols? Benjamin Franklyn did not count them in.

This is the issue, who defines the historical definition?
And everyone can come out with some genetics argument about anyone to claim they are mixed, because there are no homogeneous countries nor people. Do you get it?

If you go with the cultural and history argument, alright, what makes anglos and french whiter than say germans, polish or swedish? Their historical accomplishments? Well, then I guess they are the whites. The logic then is more succesful = whiter I guess, which I find strange.

But that was the past, how can anglos still be considered whites (going by the cultural argument) given the current state of UK and their people? Same with France. Are those really the whites?
I don't know if you get me.

You did say once that they are the whites because they came out with the definition of white identity. I don't know, you could view it that way I guess, for me it does not make sense.


So this it's just mental gymnastics in my opinion. And does labeling someone as white or not change anything? I don't think so. Whiteness as a racial concept is something people are aware since only recently.

It's complex to set up a proper objective definition, if possible at all. Everything gets more and more globalized and miscegeneated with time. People resort to judge by appearance, but then again, each have their different standards for whiteness. For some it's just white skin, for some is more stuff...

So I don't know really.

I would call white, a person with typical european physical features and abscence of foreign ones. That is it for me. I could elaborate on what are european features for me. You can be from Asia or Africa and be perfectly white, although that is rare realistically.

About culture and history, Europe has formed a block in such a way where europeans have a related culture, history and genetics among each other, to a greater or lesser extent, while outsiders are far differently. I agree on that cultures and nations are not created equal, and some are/were indeed more developed, dominate over other... and people within countries are not created equal too, countries are not homogeneous and you will find all types of undesireable and desireable people everywhere.

So that's my belief.
@Jason Voorhees
only for you to disagree with me and INSULT me or just deflect what I HAVE to say.
Sorry. You do that sometimes too tho...
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteegyptian
I will reply to everything you said NOW.
Why nordic? Aren't they finnmongols? Benjamin Franklyn did not count them in.

This is the issue, who defines the historical definition?
And everyone can come out with some genetics argument about anyone to claim they are mixed, because there are no homogeneous countries nor people. Do you get it?
Franklin was not an honest man to god, he was known for his satirical writings, he was a literal comedian, and regardless, he was an English nationalist, he's the only notable guy that said Nordics were not white, and yes, Scandinavians or Nordics, tend to have an additional 13% Asian component in their genetics, which is not significant enough to change the phenotype of all Swedes (they still look Germanic), yes, but significant enough to change the phenotype of a lot of Swedes, and in general give Swedes, a distant look, and about genetics argument, I DO agree with you, using genetics as an argument is stupid, because everyone is mixed nowadays, directly or indirectly, and yes I GET IT.

You did say once that they are the whites because they came out with the definition of white identity. I don't know, you could view it that way I guess, for me it does not make sense.


So this it's just mental gymnastics in my opinion. And does labeling someone as white or not change anything? I don't think so. Whiteness as a racial concept is something people are aware since only recently.

It's complex to set up a proper objective definition, if possible at all. Everything gets more and more globalized and miscegeneated with time. People resort to judge by appearance, but then again, each have their different standards for whiteness. For some it's just white skin, for some is more stuff...

So I don't know really.

I would call white, a person with typical european physical features and abscence of foreign ones. That is it for me. I could elaborate on what are european features for me. You can be from Asia or Africa and be perfectly white, although that is rare realistically.

About culture and history, Europe has formed a block in such a way where europeans have a related culture, history and genetics among each other, to a greater or lesser extent, while outsiders are far differently. I agree on that cultures and nations are not created equal, and some are/were indeed more developed, dominate over other... and people within countries are not created equal too, countries are not homogeneous and you will find all types of undesireable and desireable people everywhere.

So that's my belief.
@Jason Voorhees

Sorry. You do that sometimes too tho...

Well, about white identity, let me explain, the internet is globalized and Americanized, people identify with the trend, or the general perception, not the lived reality, especially in a very American-centric circles, so Germans and Swedes, Danes, Ukrainians, Portuguese all somehow manage to identify as white, but is it the case in reality? no, IT'S not the case, no European ethnic group, outside of the Anglos and French, even use the term ''white'' in real life, as a literal pseudo living identity, this is not how it works down there, hell, they barely even use terms like Slavic or Germanic or, they refer to themselves, as Dutch, Germans, Danes, Slovaks, Portuguese, Russians, and so, and about them not using white identity, it's not out of ignorance, it's literally reality, why would a Pole identify as white in real life? he never had huge influx of immigrants that were absorbed into the national identity, never had to alienate people, never had to enslave, or colonize, or exploit, out of Polish history, it makes zero sense, to even think of using this term, think of it like this, an Egyptian, who sort of has some identity crisis, identifies as Coptic or ''Ancient Egyptian'' on the internet, but does he go around telling everyone, bro I AM 100% Coptic bro, we eat fesikh and dna tests prove we are Egyptians and shit bro!!, NO. it's very cringe, same case for Europeans.


About the European culture and history, sure, most European nations have the surface level ''cultural stuff'' such as Christianity, or Indo European languages, but that doesn't make most of them similar in any way, hell even the most similar ones tried to unite, but failed, for example Nazi Germany, they tried to unite Germans, Dutch, Danes, Scandinavians, the English and so, but failed, why? because even if they are the same genetically for the most part, nationalism, sovereignty, and pride override any genetics thing.

And culture doesn't always have to be religion, language and food, it can be something sentimental, something you have inside of you, but you cannot express it, or fail to express it, do you think a Dutch would like if Germans invaded Netherlands and absorbed? most won't, even if they are culturally and genetically similar for the most part.
If you go with the cultural and history argument, alright, what makes anglos and french whiter than say germans, polish or swedish? Their historical accomplishments? Well, then I guess they are the whites. The logic then is more succesful = whiter I guess, which I find strange.

But that was the past, how can anglos still be considered whites (going by the cultural argument) given the current state of UK and their people? Same with France. Are those really the whites?
I don't know if you get me.
Well, the Anglos and the French, practically invented whiteness? used it the most, made an identity out of it? and still live and identify with it nowadays in their modern countries? which are filled with immigrants from the nations they also exploited? and yes their accomplishments have something to do with it, accomplishments are not everything of-course that makes them whiter than Germans, or the Swedes, and about cultural argument? you do realize that, when people think of Western culture, first thing that comes to them is not Polish or German or Norwegian culture? I THOUGHT it was supposed to be obvious but let me explain, celebrations, for example, such as Christmas, Halloween, TV culture, and so and so, even the names when people think of say white names, they don't think of Bogdan or Heinrich, they think of Paul, Thomas, Arthur, Louis, Axel, Jean, and so. I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN NOW, at least by these few examples.

And you do realize the state of the modern nations of the nations I CONSIDER WHITE, is a direct result out of years of colonization, slavery and exploitation? German immigrant cycle boomed in 2000s or 2010s, blacks have in France since 17th century, oldest black community is in Liverpool, from 1600 something, I DON'T know, but you can search it, meaning it's not a recent immigration boom thing, it's historical.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
I will reply to everything you said NOW.

Franklin was not an honest man to god, he was known for his satirical writings, he was a literal comedian, and regardless, he was an English nationalist, he's the only notable guy that said Nordics were not white, and yes, Scandinavians or Nordics, tend to have an additional 13% Asian component in their genetics, which is not significant enough to change the phenotype of all Swedes (they still look Germanic), yes, but significant enough to change the phenotype of a lot of Swedes, and in general give Swedes, a distant look, and about genetics argument, I DO agree with you, using genetics as an argument is stupid, because everyone is mixed nowadays, directly or indirectly, and yes I GET IT.



Well, about white identity, let me explain, the internet is globalized and Americanized, people identify with the trend, or the general perception, not the lived reality, especially in a very American-centric circles, so Germans and Swedes, Danes, Ukrainians, Portuguese all somehow manage to identify as white, but is it the case in reality? no, IT'S not the case, no European ethnic group, outside of the Anglos and French, even use the term ''white'' in real life, as a literal pseudo living identity, this is not how it works down there, hell, they barely even use terms like Slavic or Germanic or, they refer to themselves, as Dutch, Germans, Danes, Slovaks, Portuguese, Russians, and so, and about them not using white identity, it's not out of ignorance, it's literally reality, why would a Pole identify as white in real life? he never had huge influx of immigrants that were absorbed into the national identity, never had to alienate people, never had to enslave, or colonize, or exploit, out of Polish history, it makes zero sense, to even think of using this term, think of it like this, an Egyptian, who sort of has some identity crisis, identifies as Coptic or ''Ancient Egyptian'' on the internet, but does he go around telling everyone, bro I AM 100% Coptic bro, we eat fesikh and dna tests prove we are Egyptians and shit bro!!, NO. it's very cringe, same case for Europeans.


About the European culture and history, sure, most European nations have the surface level ''cultural stuff'' such as Christianity, or Indo European languages, but that doesn't make most of them similar in any way, hell even the most similar ones tried to unite, but failed, for example Nazi Germany, they tried to unite Germans, Dutch, Danes, Scandinavians, the English and so, but failed, why? because even if they are the same genetically for the most part, nationalism, sovereignty, and pride override any genetics thing.

And culture doesn't always have to be religion, language and food, it can be something sentimental, something you have inside of you, but you cannot express it, or fail to express it, do you think a Dutch would like if Germans invaded Netherlands and absorbed? most won't, even if they are culturally and genetically similar for the most part.

Well, the Anglos and the French, practically invented whiteness? used it the most, made an identity out of it? and still live and identify with it nowadays in their modern countries? which are filled with immigrants from the nations they also exploited? and yes their accomplishments have something to do with it, accomplishments are not everything of-course that makes them whiter than Germans, or the Swedes, and about cultural argument? you do realize that, when people think of Western culture, first thing that comes to them is not Polish or German or Norwegian culture? I THOUGHT it was supposed to be obvious but let me explain, celebrations, for example, such as Christmas, Halloween, TV culture, and so and so, even the names when people think of say white names, they don't think of Bogdan or Heinrich, they think of Paul, Thomas, Arthur, Louis, Axel, Jean, and so. I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN NOW, at least by these few examples.

And you do realize the state of the modern nations of the nations I CONSIDER WHITE, is a direct result out of years of colonization, slavery and exploitation? German immigrant cycle boomed in 2000s or 2010s, blacks have in France since 17th century, oldest black community is in Liverpool, from 1600 something, I DON'T know, but you can search it, meaning it's not a recent immigration boom thing, it's historical.
Alright. I get it.

You need to understand most people have another definition of whiteness nowadays. In this age it's used by people in Europe too, in the way it's used in USA.

Which is why your claims come off as very controversial.
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteegyptian
Alright. I get it.

You need to understand most people have another definition of whiteness nowadays. In this age it's used by people in Europe too, in the way it's used in USA.

Which is why your claims come off as very controversial.
Thank you for understanding, IF I recall anyone who looks white is white to you right? I guess it's mostly the same for other people too, and is my take not as controversial now when i explained myself?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
Thank you for understanding, IF I recall anyone who looks white is white to you right? I guess it's mostly the same for other people too,
Yes. But it's not just depigmentation= white.
Features are just as important, but you need to have a good eye to tell. Most people don't pay attention to features.
and is my take not as controversial now when i explained myself?
Not as much but you just contradicted yourself in a different thread.
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteegyptian
Yes. But it's not just depigmentation= white.
Features are just as important, but you need to have a good eye to tell. Most people don't pay attention to features.
I understand, but don't you find this contradictory with your core beliefs? like you said most nations are mixed, and even locals can look swarthy sometimes, but by focusing on key features, means you are going subjective, and setting a standard, say you think if you don't look ''German'' in structure, than you are not white, which is kind of contradictory because again not all germans are like the idealized image.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
I understand, but don't you find this contradictory with your core beliefs? like you said most nations are mixed, and even locals can look swarthy sometimes, but by focusing on key features, means you are going subjective, and setting a standard,
Yes, it's subjective where to draw the line. Nothing can be done do about that
say you think if you don't look ''German'' in structure, than you are not white, which is kind of contradictory
I mean, german looks =/ the only white looks
I didn't say ever it's about looking german or germanic, because, what does looking german or germanic even mean? It's not like "whites" originated there and spread around the rest places with their blond hair and blue eyes, that's not how inmigration to and in Europe happened
because again not all germans are like the idealized image.
Of course, applies to all countries

Some countries are "whiter", because they have more white people, obviously

If basing whiteness by a looks only standpoint, you look at a person and you tell whether it looks white or not. There's not much else to it
It does not matter if the person is X or Y, or it has this blood or that blood,by itself, because if the "mix" was relevant enough, the apperance would show, even small concentrations

It's how people view it basically. Yeah each have their standards, it's true. And I think that's a key point, whiteness standards depends on location, or better said, on environment, what people are around.
I would add that looking at the whole family is important, because we know how genes can be a lottery when there's quite some genetic difference between your predecessors

If we would get strict, then nobody could be considered white except some individual exceptions, it's almost always possible to point out something on someone.

So it needs to be accepted that basing whitenes on appearance is subjective and can't be an universal thing.
 

Similar threads

habeebullah
Replies
13
Views
322
Aryan Incel
Aryan Incel
Heightpilldealer
Replies
22
Views
513
Sub5kang
Sub5kang
Neonsit0
Replies
7
Views
148
PSLbbc
PSLbbc

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top