Fat grafting + LLRR + canthoplasty results

[Adee]

Not OP
Straight from the slums of discord
Mirin

 

[ArimaWillAscend]

View attachment 4934476
View attachment 4934477
Not OP
Straight from the slums of discord
Mirin

I'm getting foxeye myself once I'm 18-20 bc my hooding is negative I'll show results when I do it

 

[Adee]

I'm getting foxeye myself once I'm 18-20 bc my hooding is negative I'll show results when I do it

fox eye? It’s a name for an intense brow lift
Also known as bella eyes
Has nothing to do with these procedures
Why are you getting a lift?
Or you mixed it up with almond eye surgery combination

 

[ArimaWillAscend]

dfk which surgery it was,i js need to fix my negative hooding

fox eye? It’s a name for an intense brow lift
Also known as bella eyes
Has nothing to do with these procedures
Why are you getting a lift?
Or you mixed it up with almond eye surgery combination

 

[Kyriae]

View attachment 4934476
View attachment 4934477
Not OP
Straight from the slums of discord
Mirin

PFL change is quite significant w cantho damn
Fatgrafting doesnt seem to be overfill

 

[IDontBlameAnybody]

PFL change is quite significant w cantho damn
Fatgrafting doesnt seem to be overfill

Perceived pfl yeah, the actual pfl cant change that much imo

 

[kullancı1998572619]

View attachment 4934476
View attachment 4934477
Not OP
Straight from the slums of discord
Mirin

mirin

u mind checking pm ?

 

[nishka]

Who is the surgeon? I want to get something similar

 

[ICL]

View attachment 4934476
View attachment 4934477
Not OP
Straight from the slums of discord
Mirin

Mirin hardmaxx.org

 

[Adee]

Who is the surgeon? I want to get something similar

OP is gatekeeping

 

[nishka]

OP is gatekeeping

Org classic

 

[cutecel1337]

View attachment 4934476
View attachment 4934477
Not OP
Straight from the slums of discord
Mirin

i have to get bleph

 

[haus33]

Surgeon name plsssss

 

[zemult]

It honestly just looks like the lighting changed lol. Like maybe you could argue there's less lower eyelid sagging but 99% of what you see here is lighting

 

[Adee]

It honestly just looks like the lighting changed lol. Like maybe you could argue there's less lower eyelid sagging but 99% of what you see here is lighting

Definitely lightning man

 

[Lookologist003]

It honestly just looks like the lighting changed lol. Like maybe you could argue there's less lower eyelid sagging but 99% of what you see here is lighting

What? Are you for real right now? Do our eyes see the same image? This guy got his lateral canthus enchadifed by a surgeon and you think it's lighting.

OP is gatekeeping

Well tell him that its a dick move after you tell him that his eyes are like a million times better. I want to know because this is the best canthoplasty result I've ever seen. Hopeful for some guys whose eyes are droopy.

 

[zemult]

What? Are you for real right now? Do our eyes see the same image? This guy got his lateral canthus enchadifed by a surgeon and you think it's lighting.


Well tell him that its a dick move after you tell him that his eyes are like a million times better. I want to know because this is the best canthoplasty result I've ever seen. Hopeful for some guys whose eyes are droopy.

Not really dude. I could achieve the same result by taking two pictures at different angles and lighting. Maybe there is a clear difference but these pictures don't do it any justice. But I doubt it considering how many people larp surgeries

 

[LackEmpathyTherefor]

Not really dude. I could achieve the same result by taking two pictures at different angles and lighting. Maybe there is a clear difference but these pictures don't do it any justice. But I doubt it considering how many people larp surgeries

Yes

 

[Lookologist003]

I could achieve the same result by taking two pictures at different angles and lighting.

Well then do it. Because I don't believe you can, because his eyes have after the surgery a different range of appearances.

Maybe there is a clear difference but these pictures don't do it any justice.

Most people in their lifetime will never learn enough about photography to ensure identical photographic conditions. People mistakenly call perspective distortion "lens distortion" all the time on this forum. In my perception it looks like he hasn't tilted his head; it looks like the lighting is in the same direction. The difference in lighting is its intensity (you can know because smartphone cameras are awful at low light photography, hence the other photograph is grainy).

And if you think these pictures are bad, you should see how Ascender1 tried to show before and after of his buccal fat removal. My point is that it's that normal people don't understand photography, but the form of his eyelids has changed.

Buccal Fat removal 32 days post op, I think around 30-50% of the result

This is how it's coming along, I said I was gonna do a post when the swelling went down because for the first few weeks I looked the exact same as before, but people have started to point out I look leaner from the side profile and I took some pics the other day in GOOD lighting and definitely...

looksmax.org

I don't know if its that they don't understand what to do with a camera or are too impatient to wait twelve hours for daytime.

But I doubt it considering how many people larp surgeries

They do? What have you seen?

 

[zemult]

They do? What have you seen?

It's a very common thing to do now. Ever since blackpill became somewhat mainstream it's been popular to pretend you got surgeries on TikTok. You get a bunch of clueless normies looking at a looks difference and because surgeries are popular now they assume you've done something special to achieve that, even if it was just something like losing fat etc. In their eyes I guess it gives them reputation in the blackpill community.

For example that itsactuallyover0 guy never got surgeries lol

Most people in their lifetime will never learn enough about photography to ensure identical photographic conditions. People mistakenly call perspective distortion "lens distortion" all the time on this forum. In my perception it looks like he hasn't tilted his head; it looks like the lighting is in the same direction. The difference in lighting is its intensity (you can know because smartphone cameras are awful at low light photography, hence the other photograph is grainy).

Perhaps, like I've said originally there are signs of the lower eyelid appearing less droopy. But the majority of the difference looks to be better contrast in the second photo, etc. Camera angle can also change how droopy your eyelids can appear, but it's pretty irrelevant here. It's mostly just the lighting to be honest.

 

[Lookologist003]

You get a bunch of clueless normies looking at a looks difference and because surgeries are popular now they assume you've done something special to achieve that,

Well, I know that a lot of stupid normies regularly mistake the masculininsing effects of the last stage of male puberty for some sort of creatine powder, or peptides, or any other cope. But I didn't know that the Chad who did so much to go through puberty would be so deceitful to lie and say he had surgery at eighteen while failing Calculus II and playing Fortnite and eating their mum's cooking.

There's this picture of Chadlicular when he's 15 and not 19 that you've seen. So many people can't recognise that the difference between is only four years of organic bone growth, and Chadlicular was just scrolling on TikTok when he got home from school. That being to grow into his face he sat on his ass and his genes did all the work.

---

Camera angle can also change how droopy your eyelids can appear

Being precise, it's the motility of the eyeballs and the stance of the muscles of the eyelids that change when your head is straight and you look in a different direction. I am not unaware of that. I think that guy is looking head on at his smartphone camera in both photos (most lazy thing to do, so of course that's what he did), so I think the muscles are doing the same thing in both photos.

But the majority of the difference looks to be better contrast in the second photo

I think you need glasses. If you concede that he's looking head on, then there is no other explanation for how much less scalera his eyes have. Focus deeply on the lateral canthus on both images. The second one is tighter and more posterior. If you can't notice it, then you might bog yourself in surgery

OP better say who was his surgeon. Bitch is teasing more than your oneitus on OnlyFans.

 

[zemult]

Being precise, it's the motility of the eyeballs and the stance of the muscles of the eyelids that change when your head is straight and you look in a different direction. I am not unaware of that. I think that guy is looking head on at his smartphone camera in both photos (most lazy thing to do, so of course that's what he did), so I think the muscles are doing the same thing in both photos.


I think you need glasses. If you concede that he's looking head on, then there is no other explanation for how much less scalera his eyes have. Focus deeply on the lateral canthus on both images. The second one is tighter and more posterior. If you can't notice it, then you might bog yourself in surgery

OP better say who was his surgeon. Bitch is teasing more than your oneitus on OnlyFans.

I know you mean well, but you’re grossly overstating the difference in the eye area between the two images apart from the lighting.

I am not the only one that thinks this either

 

[zemult]

Well, I know that a lot of stupid normies regularly mistake the masculininsing effects of the last stage of male puberty for some sort of creatine powder, or peptides, or any other cope. But I didn't know that the Chad who did so much to go through puberty would be so deceitful to lie and say he had surgery at eighteen while failing Calculus II and playing Fortnite and eating their mum's cooking.

There's this picture of Chadlicular when he's 15 and not 19 that you've seen. So many people can't recognise that the difference between is only four years of organic bone growth, and Chadlicular was just scrolling on TikTok when he got home from school. That being to grow into his face he sat on his ass and his genes did all the work.

---

Being precise, it's the motility of the eyeballs and the stance of the muscles of the eyelids that change when your head is straight and you look in a different direction. I am not unaware of that. I think that guy is looking head on at his smartphone camera in both photos (most lazy thing to do, so of course that's what he did), so I think the muscles are doing the same thing in both photos.


I think you need glasses. If you concede that he's looking head on, then there is no other explanation for how much less scalera his eyes have. Focus deeply on the lateral canthus on both images. The second one is tighter and more posterior. If you can't notice it, then you might bog yourself in surgery

OP better say who was his surgeon. Bitch is teasing more than your oneitus on OnlyFans.

I had GPT recreate the lighting in the second image (not spot on but somewhat close).

Now imagine him squinting a bit and tilting his head down, cropping only his eye area so he can impress incels on .org.

Would be pretty close to how the eyes look in the OP probably.

 

[yussimania]

I know you mean well, but you’re grossly overstating the difference in the eye area between the two images apart from the lighting.

I am not the only one that thinks this either

I think this too

And if it wasn't bone drill it's gonna relapse back maybe

 

[Lookologist003]

I know you mean well, but you’re grossly overstating the difference in the eye area between the two images apart from the lighting.

I don't know where to go. If you can't see it, then will never agree. Dis is a crazy canthoplasty result.

Just look at the right of the image. I matched the image of the iris, a facial feature which never deforms (a circle in perspective is an ellipse) if the man is looking at the camera lens. And I ensured that the perspective is the same by matching the image of the medial canthus. I think it speaks for itself. Hopefully it does. (I tried to do some color correction in normalizing the shadows and highlights, but I failed a bit.) I can't make this any clearer that these are great results.

And if it wasn't bone drill it's gonna relapse back maybe

Hopefully it was. Ideally this will last for him.

I am not the only one that thinks this either

Don't care. Not an argument. One-hundred scientists against Einstein was a real book that was printed.

I had GPT recreate the lighting in the second image (not spot on but somewhat close).

You know what's better than asking an AI to think for you? Understanding something, it's hard to do! I might be wrong, but I have an argument in the differences between the two images.

 

[zemult]

I don't know where to go. If you can't see it, then will never agree. Dis is a crazy canthoplasty result.
View attachment 4945232
Just look at the right of the image. I matched the image of the iris, a facial feature which never deforms (a circle in perspective is an ellipse) if the man is looking at the camera lens. And I ensured that the perspective is the same by matching the image of the medial canthus. I think it speaks for itself. Hopefully it does. (I tried to do some color correction in normalizing the shadows and highlights, but I failed a bit.) I can't make this any clearer that these are great results.


Hopefully it was. Ideally this will last for him.


Don't care. Not an argument. One-hundred scientists against Einstein was a real book that was printed.


You know what's better than asking an AI to think for you? Understanding something, it's hard to do! I might be wrong, but I have an argument in the differences between the two images.

Ah yes having AI image gen give an image similar lighting conditions means I'm getting it to think for me

You're just presenting my argument in a blatantly dishonest way for whatever reason

It's clear to anyone with a functioning brain the guy is just squinting & changed conditions of the photos. And an oldcel like you that calls Clavicular "Chadicular" can't see that JFL

It's literally a cropped picture of his eye area in two entirely different conditions with no idea of the angle of the photo yet you're coming up with all of these schizo theories that hold no merit

 

[zemult]

It could very well be true results. But these photos prove jack shit

 

[Psl.sinper]

View attachment 4934476
View attachment 4934477
Not OP
Straight from the slums of discord
Mirin

this nigga larping you ain't got no surgeries

 

[Lookologist003]

Ah yes having AI image gen give an image similar lighting conditions means I'm getting it to think for me

Yes it does! It does. That's imagination of the generative model. I can suggest that the dynamic range in the photos are different and try crush the highlights to replicate the dynamic range of the grainy photo. That's gamma correction of a photograph whereas the AI is basically just painting you a picture.

You're just presenting my argument in a blatantly dishonest way for whatever reason

I can't present your argument in a blatantly dishonest way, because you have no argument. You prompted an AI to do something and can't explain how it proves anything, but saying

Now imagine him squinting a bit and tilting his head down

Wow great argument. In my imagination, his eyes would still look droopy when he's squinting or tilting his head down. Which he is not tilting his head down, and you can see that in how I matched an object in both photographs to reveal the similarities in angle of view and where he is looking relative to his head position.

It's clear to anyone with a functioning brain the guy is just squinting

Nope. It's clear to you maybe. Have some humility. My proof is quite compelling if you understood perspective and angle of view and so understood how he's looking at the camera head on. My proof is quite compelling if you understood how changes in luminosity can't alter the form of an object, like how you can shade a drawing.

two entirely different conditions with no idea of the angle of the photo yet you're coming up with all of these schizo theories that hold no merit

It would be nice if you could aquatint yourself with some rudiments of photography rather than blow hot air. It's easier to blow hot air than learning and it's easier than admitting that you might not know as much as you think you do. I'm happy to admit I'm wrong any day, but you need to have an argument using specific subjects and clauses. Explain just how the conditions are different... But you can't! Because you don't know what a dynamic range is. You don't talk of highlights or shadows. Those are aspects of light in photographs.

no idea of the angle of the photo

Because I matched parts of the facial features quite well, they are congruent images and thus are taken with an identical angle of view to say that he is looking at the camera head on in both photos.

And an oldcel like you that calls Clavicular "Chadicular" can't see that JFL

No need for it.

 

[DnrGriffith]

View attachment 4934476
View attachment 4934477
Not OP
Straight from the slums of discord
Mirin

Bro could just listen to positive cantal tilt and sparking eyes subliminal vids and achieve the same result. What an iqlet

 

[zemult]

Yes it does! It does. That's imagination of the generative model. I can suggest that the dynamic range in the photos are different and try crush the highlights to replicate the dynamic range of the grainy photo. That's gamma correction of a photograph whereas the AI is basically just painting you a picture.

You said: "I'm using AI to think for me" when using image generation. Compare these photos.

All that is different structurally is the lighting. And his eye area immediately looks better.

Muh imagination of the generative model. Trying so hard to hide from the fact that lighting, quality, contrast, angle, and slight expression changes can affect how the eye area appears. You can use whatever photography verbatim you want to hide from the fact you simply do not have enough information here to come to any real conclusion. None of this is objective yet you're trying to make it sound like it is lol

 

[Lefor3Laser]

OP is gatekeeping

What's to even gatekeep genuinely, i mean any competent surgeon can somewhat get you a result like this.