Fat Grafts v. Infraorbitals?

P

poopmaster22

Solstice
Joined
Apr 1, 2022
Posts
2,267
Reputation
1,241
Which is better for long lasting effective tear troughs/under eye bags cure?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Jón
Infraorbitals
 
Infraorbitals
 
Infras are better, but let’s be real your not getting either. We can kill outselves in unison
 
Thank you all. Then why do people hype up fat grafts on here of Peek Infras are clearly better?
 
Amiya Prasad said fat grafts in the lower eye are unpredicable
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopmaster22
Amiya Prasad said fat grafts in the lower eye are unpredicable
I think I’ve seen him on YouTube maybe. Isn’t he like some master class eye surgeon in NYC? What does he like Peek Infras more?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deprived
I think I’ve seen him on YouTube maybe. Isn’t he like some master class eye surgeon in NYC? What does he like Peek Infras more?
He's not talked about much but I like his canthopexy results. Especially in patients with lower eyelid retraction, the after results always look natural despite him being able to raise the lower eyelid a lot. He uses silicone implants for undereye, calls them tear trough implants instead of infraorbital rim implants, so I'm unsure about him.
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopmaster22
He's not talked about much but I like his canthopexy results. Especially in patients with lower eyelid retraction, the after results always look natural despite him being able to raise the lower eyelid a lot. He uses silicone implants for undereye, calls them tear trough implants instead of infraorbital rim implants, so I'm unsure about him.
Hmmm well if he thinks implant is better than I’d assume that is the case. Does canthoplasty/pexy actually use threads like some have stated? I wanted both but don’t want results to leave after awhile
 

Similar threads

E
Replies
5
Views
89
rickysalomano
rickysalomano
Alucard69
Replies
0
Views
125
Alucard69
Alucard69
O
Replies
3
Views
111
zemult
zemult

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top