Fathers age importance on childs attractiveness

lurking truecel

lurking truecel

Fuchsia
Joined
Jul 12, 2024
Posts
13,681
Reputation
19,160
For every ten year increase you are 12 procent less likely to be rated attractive according to studies. Starting at 28 its 12% less likely you are good looking if your dad is that age, 38 its 24% etc.

Apparently its because of some kind of mutation in the sperms that accumulate over time in men that makes craniofacial structure worse.

Over for men who have children late, prob most common among inkwell betacucks
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Woah
Reactions: hopecel, Gonthar, gymcel64 and 11 others
Considering the inflation scale its probably 20% that would be considered unnattractive. And if it was women who rated it would be 40%
 
  • +1
Reactions: \/orman and IraniancelV2
Father early-mid 30s, mother in late 30s. Was born via C-section as well. Incel birth conditions
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: hopecel, gymcel64, muhammad18347 and 9 others
Father early-mid 30s, mother in late 30s. Was born via C-section as well. Incel birth conditions
And your mom got small boobs so you didnt get breastfeed either ?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: churmaxxed, Eltrē, JohnDoe and 2 others
Father early-mid 30s, mother in late 30s. Was born via C-section as well. Incel birth conditions
Nga mine are were 40 and 45 or something
 
  • Woah
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: hopecel, churmaxxed, Incelforeever and 2 others
Is this controlling for the mothers age?
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill, Latvianchud185 and lurking truecel
And your mom got small boobs so you didnt get breastfeed either ?
Probably got some poisonous soy milk missing half of the essential nutrients from the cheapest convenient store in my area..
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBoy and lurking truecel
Is this controlling for the mothers age?
Mothers gee doesnt matter as much for this apperntly, could be jew study or some. I just grooked it
 
  • +1
Reactions: churmaxxed
both age 32 when i was born

when my sister was born they were 37 andd she has everything going for her :cautious:
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: hopecel and lurking truecel
  • +1
Reactions: IraniancelV2
Mothers gee doesnt matter as much for this apperntly, could be jew study or some. I just grooked it
I think it’s a BS Jew study in order to demonize older men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gonthar, churmaxxed, OldRooster and 1 other person
both age 32 when i was born

when my sister was born they were 37 andd she has everything going for her :cautious:
She is a women, she can look like malnourished cum slut and be queen either way
 
  • +1
Reactions: churmaxxed, Latvianchud185, JohnDoe and 4 others
I think it’s a BS Jew study in order to demonize older men.
Its for sure true in the regards to men, but i think womens age matter too
 
  • +1
Reactions: churmaxxed and \/orman
  • +1
Reactions: churmaxxed, Eltrē, IraniancelV2 and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: Aladin, IraniancelV2 and \/orman
So what’s the prime age to have children as a male
 
I believe the ideal is early 20s
 
No women’s age matters far more.
Yea for most things, a 40 year old women will birth a downy every 30 time she tries
 
My mother was 23, my father was 30, and I turned out fine (mostly because of my mother. If I had inherited mostly my father's genes, I would be in a different life right now, lol)
 
  • +1
Reactions: hopecel, gonnabehappy and lurking truecel
My dad was 50 ☠️😪
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: hopecel, lurking truecel and IraniancelV2
Another lost for red piller
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
I somewhat agree with this, i think the fathers age can be off-set by a younger mother, E.G. a 32 year old father and a 23 year old mother will not cause issues because the mother is still in her prime age. When parents are both 30+ and not in perfect health, that's when it becomes an issue. The fact there are so many women having geriatric pregnancies nowadays is going to cause massive issues down the line for their progeny. The redpillers who commonly go with the 40+ year old breeding with a 25 year old, i bet the % you stated is probably quite high, although obviously not as bad as 40 and 40 for father/mother. Most people don't understand a womans prime age fertility and to give birth is between 17 - 23 which also coincides with it being the years she is at the peak of her beauty. Nature cannot be fooled and does not care about your feelings, feminism is so garbage.
My parents were both 40 when they had me and i somehow managed to avoid getting Autism, i did however suffer from poor craniofacial development as you state. That's kinda expected when your parents are both 40 years old though, surprised she even got pregnant at that age, oh and i ofc wasn't breastfed. If i recall there was a study showing a large % of atheletes had parents who conceived them while they were in their early to mid 20s.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
20-24 male 16-20 female
Pretty much this. Although most women can be good up until 23 i'd say. The single biggest advantage women in this age range have over older women besides the health of their child is that they recover significantly faster and almost always revert back to their body pre-pregnancy while older women, especially late 20s or even in their 30s take long to recover and most hold onto some of the fat.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
I somewhat agree with this, i think the fathers age can be off-set by a younger mother, E.G. a 32 year old father and a 23 year old mother will not cause issues because the mother is still in her prime age. When parents are both 30+ and not in perfect health, that's when it becomes an issue. The fact there are so many women having geriatric pregnancies nowadays is going to cause massive issues down the line for their progeny. The redpillers who commonly go with the 40+ year old breeding with a 25 year old, i bet the % you stated is probably quite high, although obviously not as bad as 40 and 40 for father/mother. Most people don't understand a womans prime age fertility and to give birth is between 17 - 23 which also coincides with it being the years she is at the peak of her beauty. Nature cannot be fooled and does not care about your feelings, feminism is so garbage.
My parents were both 40 when they had me and i somehow managed to avoid getting Autism, i did however suffer from poor craniofacial development as you state. That's kinda expected when your parents are both 40 years old though, surprised she even got pregnant at that age, oh and i ofc wasn't breastfed. If i recall there was a study showing a large % of atheletes had parents who conceived them while they were in their early to mid 20s.
I mean the craniofacial was specific for fathers, but yea 28-32 could work
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: JohnDoe
Pretty much this. Although most women can be good up until 23 i'd say. The single biggest advantage women in this age range have over older women besides the health of their child is that they recover significantly faster and almost always revert back to their body pre-pregnancy while older women, especially late 20s or even in their 30s take long to recover and most hold onto some of the fat.
They should go in the disposal if they are pregnant after 35
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: JohnDoe
Pretty much this. Although most women can be good up until 23 i'd say. The single biggest advantage women in this age range have over older women besides the health of their child is that they recover significantly faster and almost always revert back to their body pre-pregnancy while older women, especially late 20s or even in their 30s take long to recover and most hold onto some of the fat.
But yea also its the father that get the mutations in their sperm but the mother id young enough have a better capability of dealing with those and filter it out. I dont really know how this system work but yea
 
  • +1
Reactions: JohnDoe
I mean the craniofacial was specific for fathers, but yea 28-32 could work
So the risk of having worse craniofacial development increases as the age of the father increases regardless of what age the mother is? wouldn't a younger, more fertile and healthier woman off-set the sperm defects or does it just not matter? It's an interesting topic, do you mind posting the study? I recall reading the decline in sperm quality is very minimal for a man in his 30s but maybe they weren't measuring the chance of their progeny having a higher chance of poor craniofacial development. Can't say i've ever heard such a thing being tested before.
 
They should go in the disposal if they are pregnant after 35
30+ pregnancies are very common these days, i'm pretty sure the statistics revealed the average of women becoming mothers was something like 33 which is absolutely ridiculous compared to our ancestors. This is mostly because of the whole career woman propaganda, women want to be "boss bitches" and then when they are 30+, they get a sudden realization that they're going to end up 40 year old cat ladies so they quickly find a betabuxx and get pregnant, giving birth to an autismo future .org user.
 
But yea also its the father that get the mutations in their sperm but the mother id young enough have a better capability of dealing with those and filter it out. I dont really know how this system work but yea
The % increase could still be minimal, 24% of 1% or whatever, the original figure would be relevant here. What is the study anyways?
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
Oh my fucking god. I didn't know this shit. Nah I'm defo gonna try to become a father way more early than I was planning to.
 
The % increase could still be minimal, 24% of 1% or whatever, the original figure would be relevant here. What is the study anyways?
It was just some quick search on grok you can probably find the orginal study somewhere if you search craniofacial deformities or attractiveness dependcy on fathers age etc. But the thing is these things should be studied a lot more but they cant because its seen as unethical in many cases
 
  • +1
Reactions: JohnDoe
30+ pregnancies are very common these days, i'm pretty sure the statistics revealed the average of women becoming mothers was something like 33 which is absolutely ridiculous compared to our ancestors. This is mostly because of the whole career woman propaganda, women want to be "boss bitches" and then when they are 30+, they get a sudden realization that they're going to end up 40 year old cat ladies so they quickly find a betabuxx and get pregnant, giving birth to an autismo future .org user.
Yea the age is becoming higher and higher aswell, and imagine with the frozen eggs in 40+ mother. Holy fucking genetic freaks. At 40 a women has a 1 in 50 chnace to get downy vs 1 in 2000 at 18. Imagine all the other genetic diseases or whatever it is that is also more likely.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: JohnDoe and looksmaxxed
makes sense from an intuitive perspective. chad fucks early and often, subhuman has to accumulate status and wealth first

but i'm sure there are exceptions, i remember a few cases contradicting this
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
Yea the age is becoming higher and higher aswell, and imagine with the frozen eggs in 40+ mother. Holy fucking genetic freaks. At 40 a women has a 1 in 50 chnace to get downy vs 1 in 2000 at 18. Imagine all the other genetic diseases or whatever it is that is also more likely.
They're saying 1 in 2 babies in 2050 will have Autism. Women think they can do the whole IVF treatment but personally i think that whole industry is a sham, completely unnatural and unhealthy.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
makes sense from an intuitive perspective. chad fucks early and often, subhuman has to accumulate status and wealth first

but i'm sure there are exceptions, i remember a few cases contradicting this
A few cases don't mean the general rule of it isn't true which it is unfortunately for all the betabuxxers. Chad gets stacy pregnant at 18-20 and becomes a father while betabuxx spends 10 years becoming a doctor/engineer to betabuxx a late 20s or early 30s roastie. So over.
 
my father was 36 when i was born
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
They're saying 1 in 2 babies in 2050 will have Autism. Women think they can do the whole IVF treatment but personally i think that whole industry is a sham, completely unnatural and unhealthy.
The thing is a Society collapses when womens decisions roam freely. The average women is a narci and only think of herself
 
It was just some quick search on grok you can probably find the orginal study somewhere if you search craniofacial deformities or attractiveness dependcy on fathers age etc. But the thing is these things should be studied a lot more but they cant because its seen as unethical in many cases
These things won't get the funding needed to study it thoroughly because for one, it goes against all the propaganda they've shoved down womens throats which has resulted in them becoming mothers at 30+. If they knew all the issues they would be open to, they'd completely ignore the jewish brainwashing and get pregnant at 20 instead but this is not what the elite want, they need more worker bees. This is why they made women get into the workforce, double the amount of people to slave away.
"Science" still doesn't accept that Telegony & Microchimerism is real even though it's obvious at this point. And ofc it never will because of the state of modern women and them having so many partners.
Like you said there's not many studies on how the age of parents affects the progeny in all the different ways, i wonder if age has anything to do with the height of their children aswell.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
The thing is a Society collapses when womens decisions roam freely. The average women is a narci and only think of herself
Women's rights movement was the biggest blunder in the past century, worst decision ever. Women do not deserve rights, they're retarded.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
These things won't get the funding needed to study it thoroughly because for one, it goes against all the propaganda they've shoved down womens throats which has resulted in them becoming mothers at 30+. If they knew all the issues they would be open to, they'd completely ignore the jewish brainwashing and get pregnant at 20 instead but this is not what the elite want, they need more worker bees. This is why they made women get into the workforce, double the amount of people to slave away.
"Science" still doesn't accept that Telegony & Microchimerism is real even though it's obvious at this point. And ofc it never will because of the state of modern women and them having so many partners.
I mean in the long run having women in the work force and giving them rights will litteraly make the population collapse. Because low birth rates, but yea we can also continue the multiculturalism to make the west inhabitable and brainless arab countries but atleast they have children like catel
 
  • +1
Reactions: JohnDoe
Father early-mid 30s, mother in late 30s. Was born via C-section as well. Incel birth conditions
C-section doesn’t impact shit wtf are you talking about, that’s just removing the baby when it’s time because it can’t get out of the vagina normally. It’s a great benefit to women who have such a problem.
 
For every ten year increase you are 12 procent less likely to be rated attractive according to studies. Starting at 28 its 12% less likely you are good looking if your dad is that age, 38 its 24% etc.

Apparently its because of some kind of mutation in the sperms that accumulate over time in men that makes craniofacial structure worse.

Over for men who have children late, prob most common among inkwell betacucks
Post the studies or sybau. This isn’t common knowledge enough to be talking about without studies.
 
C-section doesn’t impact shit wtf are you talking about, that’s just removing the baby when it’s time because it can’t get out of the vagina normally. It’s a great benefit to women who have such a problem.
Its the first man test to come out of the womb, removing this creates a cuck
 
  • +1
Reactions: JohnDoe
Apparently its because of some kind of mutation in the sperms that accumulate over time in men that makes craniofacial structure worse.
No. It is mostly selection bias. Attractive men can reproduce when they are young and poor with the youngest and most attractive women. Unattractive men have to wait till they are older and have enough resources to attract a woman who will reproduce with, and then the women that will reproduce with them are older and on average less attractive.
 
Post the studies or sybau. This isn’t common knowledge enough to be talking about without studies.
Just groked it, but yea i light go into the studies someday
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top