Fathers age importance on childs attractiveness

No. It is mostly selection bias. Attractive men can reproduce when they are young and poor with the youngest and most attractive women. Unattractive men have to wait till they are older and have enough resources to attract a woman who will reproduce with, and then the women that will reproduce with them are older and on average less attractive.
I mean they know its due to genetic mutation in some genes related to craniofacial development which comes with age in the sperms of men. Also the older the parents are the more likely you are to be assymetrical
 
For every ten year increase you are 12 procent less likely to be rated attractive according to studies. Starting at 28 its 12% less likely you are good looking if your dad is that age, 38 its 24% etc.

Apparently its because of some kind of mutation in the sperms that accumulate over time in men that makes craniofacial structure worse.

Over for men who have children late, prob most common among inkwell betacucks
damn im breeding local ltb asap
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
explain barron trump then nigga
 
explain barron trump then nigga
1760041783435
true, what a craniofacial master piece
 
  • JFL
Reactions: hopecel, Petsmart and churmaxxed
For every ten year increase you are 12 procent less likely to be rated attractive according to studies. Starting at 28 its 12% less likely you are good looking if your dad is that age, 38 its 24% etc.

Apparently its because of some kind of mutation in the sperms that accumulate over time in men that makes craniofacial structure worse.

Over for men who have children late, prob most common among inkwell betacucks
This is probs true ngl, better looking people will have kids younger on average because looks matter more the younger u are
 
  • +1
Reactions: 5'8 ltn, churmaxxed and lurking truecel
For every ten year increase you are 12 procent less likely to be rated attractive according to studies. Starting at 28 its 12% less likely you are good looking if your dad is that age, 38 its 24% etc.

Apparently its because of some kind of mutation in the sperms that accumulate over time in men that makes craniofacial structure worse.

Over for men who have children late, prob most common among inkwell betacucks
what about roids? they degrade sperm too much?
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
what about roids? they degrade sperm too much?
I dont know much about roids at all, and i dont know much about this subject either.
 
  • +1
Reactions: churmaxxed
Are u saying that if your parents have you at an older age, youre less likely to be attractive?
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel and churmaxxed
Are u saying that if your parents have you at an older age, youre less likely to be attractive?
I mean you are more likely to be downy bya big amount even. And yes your face is more likely to be craniofacially ugly and more likely to be assymetric
 
  • Woah
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
I mean you are more likely to be downy bya big amount even. And yes your face is more likely to be craniofacially ugly and more likely to be assymetric
Im 21, the meta seems to be freezing sperm cells and then modifying it l8r on via CRISPR or whatever, if that tech becomes accessible in our lifetimes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 5'8 ltn
Im 21, the meta seems to be freezing sperm cells and then modifying it l8r on via CRISPR or whatever, if that tech becomes accessible in our lifetimes.
Yea plan according to that, its very realistic snd likely
 
  • Woah
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
my dad was 45 and my mom almost 40 :forcedsmile:

ovER
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
Yea plan according to that, its very realistic snd likely
Only problem is that I heard freezing destroys nurtients/minerals, so I wonder if freezing would have an affect on the development 🤔
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
Only problem is that I heard freezing destroys nurtients/minerals, so I wonder if freezing would have an affect on the development 🤔
Yea i am not a cum specialist, so i dont really know.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: churmaxxed and VampyrMaxx
my parents were late 30's early 40's when I was born :feelsrope:
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
Ai gives bs answers, if you want to know the true answer you have to ask specialists/do your own research
I mean it used to be like that but ai is better now. But yea you need to out your cum in a glass and then in the freezer and do your own testing. First do a taste test
 
  • JFL
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
  • +1
Reactions: jeb98
Mother’s age matters a lot more but father’s age definitely can screw you over too. The trend of having older parents on both sides nowadays is a huge factor in the rise of autism and ugliness
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
C-section doesn’t impact shit wtf are you talking about, that’s just removing the baby when it’s time because it can’t get out of the vagina normally. It’s a great benefit to women who have such a problem.
C-sections are not a benefit to women, not even close. Absolutely retarded statement.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
Mother’s age matters a lot more but father’s age definitely can screw you over too. The trend of having older parents on both sides nowadays is a huge factor in the rise of autism and ugliness
Skill issue
 
  • +1
Reactions: Outlander
No. It is mostly selection bias. Attractive men can reproduce when they are young and poor with the youngest and most attractive women. Unattractive men have to wait till they are older and have enough resources to attract a woman who will reproduce with, and then the women that will reproduce with them are older and on average less attractive.
Are you geomaxxing in east asia or do you have a family in the states? what does a 64 year old man even do these days?
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
So you’re telling me if my dad was 12 years older when i was born i’d be chad? :feelsuhh:
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
C-sections are not a benefit to women, not even close. Absolutely retarded statement.
How the fuck are they not a benefit. They’re a modern gamechanger for women who used to die during pregnancy.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
How the fuck are they not a benefit. They’re a modern gamechanger for women who used to die during pregnancy.
Of course they’re worse than a normal vaginal birth. I’m not trying to say that women should get C-Sections over a normal birth. I’m just saying that they’re a great advancement in modern medicine.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel
why does this feel like pseudoscience? @The Grinch
 
  • +1
Reactions: lurking truecel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top