D
Deleted member 18522
Anti-fascist|Muslim Jew|Anti-JB|BBC expert|Zionist
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2022
- Posts
- 27,497
- Reputation
- 34,356
Tito, Stalin and Castro mog so hard
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Pol potTito, Stalin and Castro mog so hard
The Nazis would have an Empire from France to China ethnically cleansing every non-Germanic/Nazified people in the process, Stalin literally saved all of Europe and sent the Nazis to Allah.Tito. He can be described as a benevolent dictator. Stalin is the least favorite, he was a literal reincarnation of Satan.
Stalin was such a Chad I wonder what the world would be like if he lived 20 years longer.
There would be one Korea, he would have probably conquered all of Europe and forced America into in a corner in the Old World.
Not to mention China would have been much stronger without the split with the Soviets.
Stalin had the nuke and was about to kick America out of Korea and Germany before his death. And not to mention he gained massive recruits and rebuilt his economy and industry after taking control of the Baltics and PolandHe wouldn't have conquered shit. Germany dealt Soviet Union so large casualties that another large-scale war so soon would've completely collapsed the USSR. 27 million Soviets died during the WW2, and USA was arguably in even stronger shape by the end of WW2 than Germany had ever been.
Nikita Khrushchev was the real chad, because he begun de-stalinization in 1956 and attempted to erase all legacy of that monstrous man. And it says a lot that Khrushchev was one of the Stalin's most loyal followers, he saw everything Stalin did first hand.
View attachment 1620865
Ho Chi MinhTito, Stalin and Castro mog so hard
The fact that Hitler was going to do unimaginable atrocities doesn't make Stalin a hero. They were both battling for power, not about saving Europe. Shit, in his deranged mind Hitler was probably seeing himself as a savior of the German people, whereas Stalin just wanted absolute rule over the world by any means possible.The Nazis would have an Empire from France to China ethnically cleansing every non-Germanic/Nazified people in the process, Stalin literally saved all of Europe and sent the Nazis to Allah.
He is a gift from God to the Jewish and Slavic people especially
He had a nuke he didn't have any capabilities delivering to America. USA could've on the contrary nuked Moscow with a little preparation. USA also had vastly higher productional capabilities and more manpower. Also had the USSR fought against UK and USA, their fighting morale would've been SIGNIFICANTLY lower. In WW2 regular Soviets had heard of the atrocities Germans were planning for them if they lost the war. They knew they had no other choice but to fight the Germans to the last man. To Americans they could've just surrendered and they would've fed them chocolate and given a comfy bed in some military hospital.Stalin had the nuke and was about to kick America out of Korea and Germany before his death. And not to mention he gained massive recruits and rebuilt his economy and industry after taking control of the Baltics and Poland
He was not a bitch like Khreushchev who didn't have what it takes to create Marxist utopia
The fact that Hitler was going to do unimaginable atrocities doesn't make Stalin a hero. They were both battling for power, not about saving Europe. Shit, in his deranged mind Hitler was probably seeing himself as a savior of the German people, whereas Stalin just wanted absolute rule over the world by any means possible.
View attachment 1620867
Then he's a villainThe Nazis would have an Empire from France to China ethnically cleansing every non-Germanic/Nazified people in the process, Stalin literally saved all of Europe and sent the Nazis to Allah.
He is a gift from God to the Jewish and Slavic people especially
My heart is Mao Tse-tung !View attachment 1620893View attachment 1620895
Eternal glory to Chairman Mao Tse-tung!
"Follow the Communist Party forever! Follow Chairman Mao forever!"
View attachment 1620898
The perfect Marxist utopia is one where the industrialized killing of Marxist is accomplished.Stalin had the nuke and was about to kick America out of Korea and Germany before his death. And not to mention he gained massive recruits and rebuilt his economy and industry after taking control of the Baltics and Poland
He was not a bitch like Khreushchev who didn't have what it takes to create Marxist utopia
Unironically closest thing to Karl Marx's vision of socialist utopia are the nordic countries. In USSR and other communist countries, the wealth of the previous ruling class was just transfered to the communist party, and inefficient economic policies were put in place.The perfect Marxist utopia is one where the industrialized killing of Marxist is accomplished.
Literally this, Commiepoops literally invented a system that doesn't reward hard work and wonders why nobody does their shitty jobs and does the bare minimum. It's as braindead as having a welfare system that pays you more money for not working than you could while working(this happened btw).Unironically closest thing to Karl Marx's vision of socialist utopia are the nordic countries. In USSR and other communist countries, the wealth of the previous ruling class was just transfered to the communist party, and inefficient economic policies were put in place.
In Soviet Union the leaders of the factories and farms intentionally stagnated production every year, so they could stimulate ''growth'' the next year. The workers did the bare minimum, because the jobs were basicly guaranteed, nobody would fire you for slacking off and you wouldn't get any sort of benefit from working hard. The same went on in basicly any communist country. The leader of China after Mao, Deng Xiaoping recognized this problem, and began to implement principles of the free market into the Chinese society. During his rule, China saw TREMENDOUS growth in the well-being of it's citizens and he formed the base for the entire great power that China is today.
Mao was a crappy leader. @Redsoldier
View attachment 1620933
Pol pot
Absolute sigma male grindset. People with glasses? Kill them cause they're more intelligent than you.
JFL if you think literal monarchies are more socialist than USSR, mirin brain worms.Unironically closest thing to Karl Marx's vision of socialist utopia are the nordic countries. In USSR and other communist countries, the wealth of the previous ruling class was just transfered to the communist party, and inefficient economic policies were put in place.
In Soviet Union the leaders of the factories and farms intentionally stagnated production every year, so they could stimulate ''growth'' the next year. The workers did the bare minimum, because the jobs were basicly guaranteed, nobody would fire you for slacking off and you wouldn't get any sort of benefit from working hard. The same went on in basicly any communist country. The leader of China after Mao, Deng Xiaoping recognized this problem, and began to implement principles of the free market into the Chinese society. During his rule, China saw TREMENDOUS growth in the well-being of it's citizens and he formed the base for the entire great power that China is today.
Mao was a crappy leader. @Redsoldier
View attachment 1620933
Only semi based oneTito
You really think those monarchs have some power jfl? They get a few millions a year to hold an image of this royal lifestyle in exchange of doing royal duties, swaying investors in to the country etc. They're basicly performance artists similar to some pop singer. Whereas in the USSR the party elites owned everything and now that you look at the former USSR states like Russia, you see that the very same party elites and KGB leaders are now the oligarchs with fortunes worth of billions.JFL if you think literal monarchies are more socialist than USSR, mirin brain worms.
He just took a step back, Deng opened up to the global economy which was needed but he was still a Marxist-Lenninist and controlled the entirety of China's means of production and represented the chinese people via the communist party of china.Unironically closest thing to Karl Marx's vision of socialist utopia are the nordic countries. In USSR and other communist countries, the wealth of the previous ruling class was just transfered to the communist party, and inefficient economic policies were put in place.
In Soviet Union the leaders of the factories and farms intentionally stagnated production every year, so they could stimulate ''growth'' the next year. The workers did the bare minimum, because the jobs were basicly guaranteed, nobody would fire you for slacking off and you wouldn't get any sort of benefit from working hard. The same went on in basicly any communist country. The leader of China after Mao, Deng Xiaoping recognized this problem, and began to implement principles of the free market into the Chinese society. During his rule, China saw TREMENDOUS growth in the well-being of it's citizens and he formed the base for the entire great power that China is today.
Mao was a crappy leader. @Redsoldier
View attachment 1620933