Female Attractiveness to Straight Men: Is Ideal Ideal?

[thecel]

My observation, as a male who's attracted to females, is:

More perfectness past a certain amount of beauty is not desirable.

Basically, if a woman is unattractive, morphing her to better fit the ideal golden ratio facial proportions makes her better looking. But if a woman is attractive and has no major falios, morphing her to be more perfect usually results in a less sexy (even if more conventionally beautiful) face.

And this phenomenon is a very subjective thing.



Here we have Emma Stone, a woman who I find very sexy facially. You might not think she's that sexy, but I'm sure you have many of your own examples.

The morph of Emma Stone is more perfect according to the golden ratio but loses the sexiness aspect. The morph is merely pretty and not hot—it lacks the unique appeal that makes Emma Stone look like Emma Stone.



The same thing happens when I tried to morph some of the girls at my school who I find irresistibly hot.

Some of these girls have too much UEE. Some of them have hooked noses, and some have recessed chins. Some have slightly downswung faces.

But every time I've taken these girls' photos into FaceTune and attempted to do PSL-esque morphs to them like I do for Looksmax, I end up perferring the originals.

Theoretically, if every guy who likes women each had an n-dimensional plot with n being the quantity of all the facial measurements needed to differentiate human faces, every guy's plot wouldn't have a single peak of female attractiveness on it—there'd be multiple peaks.

 

[buckchadley31]

Cope. I'd fuck anything that has a vagina

 

[Deleted member 2214]

Past Chadlite looks, Chad is subjective. That's why women say they prefer different types of men. They're thinking of guys who are at least 5.5PSL, but on their own preferences (hair color, ethnicity, body build, etc).

So maybe it's the same for girls.

 

[Babyblackcarrot]

morph is hotter

 

[Deleted member 9003]

Golden ratio doesn’t work for all faces tbh

 

[Deleted member 7076]

above 6PSL is when it doesn't really matter what anyone thinks tbh

 

[Deleted member 4562]

i think it's mainly because of the uncanny valley, skin texture, wrinkles and shadows aren't realistic in the morph.

Its proportionally more perfect but it is missing all of the others stuff.

Uncanny valley - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[TheChosenChad]

Morph looks better to me

 

[MostGLSlayer]

Ricecel IQ over here but as long as she looks good to my eyes then she's perfect, I don't give a fuck about no golden ratio or whatever bs psl autists consider attractive or not

 

[Selfahate]

men are attracted to a wide range of women
but I think what is most important is facial collegan and

 

[MisterMercedes]

Emma Stone already fits the golden ratio nearly perfectly. Any morphing probably made her worse.

In terms of dimorphism, Studies show males prefer feminine looking women as this shows nurturing and maternal traits.

It’s a bit more complicated for males. While highly dimorphic males have lots of sex appeal, their traits also suggest selfish, aggressive, and deceptive tendencies. Most Women want males who look more feminine as this suggests good personality traits and better fathering.

The trick is the balance.

You have guys like Momoa who are more on the caveman side:

Classically handsome without looking hyper masculine (average dimorphism):

Probably as feminine as you can look while maintaining sex appeal:

Based on what I’ve seen in real life, guys like Delon, Pitt, Bale, and Hemsworth have the highest appeal. A combination of androgenic or masculine traits and feminine traits leads to highest appeal as you maintain sex appeal while not looking aggressive or selfish.

And, of course, golden ratio and symmetry (to a degree) are huge factors.

 

[Deleted]

My observation, as a male who's attracted to females, is:

More perfectness past a certain amount of beauty is not desirable.

Basically, if a woman is unattractive, morphing her to better fit the ideal golden ratio facial proportions makes her better looking. But if a woman is attractive and has no major falios, morphing her to be more perfect usually results in a less sexy (even if more conventionally beautiful) face.

And this phenomenon is a very subjective thing.



Here we have Emma Stone, a woman who I find very sexy facially. You might not think she's that sexy, but I'm sure you have many of your own examples.

View attachment 922027

The morph of Emma Stone is more perfect according to the golden ratio but loses the sexiness aspect. The morph is merely pretty and not hot—it lacks the unique appeal that makes Emma Stone look like Emma Stone.



The same thing happens when I tried to morph some of the girls at my school who I find irresistibly hot.

Some of these girls have too much UEE. Some of them have hooked noses, and some have recessed chins. Some have slightly downswung faces.

But every time I've taken these girls' photos into FaceTune and attempted to do PSL-esque morphs to them like I do for Looksmax, I end up perferring the originals.

Theoretically, if every guy who likes women each had an n-dimensional plot with n being the quantity of all the facial measurements needed to differentiate human faces, every guy's plot wouldn't have a single peak of female attractiveness on it—there'd be multiple peaks.

True ngl i used to consider a high tier becky literarly perfect