Female boobs are ugly

I prefer smaller ones tbh

Boobs in general are just unattractive when big idk
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dorogi and theRetard
teenage girls have tits
girls are not the aestethic gender though so they are not the best representation
read that shopenhauer essay "on women'
he explains that females are the uglier gender aesthetically
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: MiserableMan, m0ss26 and Dorogi
girls are not the aestethic gender though so they are not the best representation
read that shopenhauer essay "on women'
he explains that females are the uglier gender aesthetically
Water

Look at birds, the males are the prettier ones that have to attract the mate. Same with humans, a beautiful male is rarer and much more impressing than any woman
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan, Mike456, Dorogi and 1 other person
girls are not the aestethic gender though so they are not the best representation
read that shopenhauer essay "on women'
he explains that females are the uglier gender aesthetically
Men are the more dimorphic gender but that doesnt really matter for me since im not some higher being observing another species
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan and theRetard
Uuuhm
 
  • JFL
Reactions: theRetard
are you a homosexual?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: theRetard
Men are the more dimorphic gender but that doesnt really matter for me since im not some higher being observing another species
Water

Look at birds, the males are the prettier ones that have to attract the mate. Same with humans, a beautiful male is rarer and much more impressing than any woman
it's not about dimorhism and men aren't more dimorphic.
read this, it's only a small part of his essay
It is only the man whose intellect is clouded by his sexual instinct that could give that stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped, and short-legged race the name of the fair sex; for the entire beauty of the sex is based on this instinct. One would be more justified in calling them the unaesthetic sex than the beautiful. Neither for music, nor for poetry, nor for fine art have they any real or true sense and susceptibility, and it is mere mockery on their part, in their desire to please, if they affect any such thing.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: MiserableMan, m0ss26 and Dorogi
it's not about dimorhism and men aren't more dimorphic.
read this, it's only a small part of his essay
It is only the man whose intellect is clouded by his sexual instinct that could give that stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped, and short-legged race the name of the fair sex; for the entire beauty of the sex is based on this instinct. One would be more justified in calling them the unaesthetic sex than the beautiful. Neither for music, nor for poetry, nor for fine art have they any real or true sense and susceptibility, and it is mere mockery on their part, in their desire to please, if they affect any such thing.
Schopenhauer writes beautifully, I really like his work. I’ve tried discussing his ideas (like the one written in this essay) with women before (big mistake obv because they are stupid) and the main refutation they had was “oh well he’s biased because he was an incel with mommy issues so he just hates women”

Just lol bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan and theRetard
Schopenhauer writes beautifully, I really like his work. I’ve tried discussing his ideas (like the one written in this essay) with women before (big mistake obv because they are stupid) and the main refutation they had was “oh well he’s biased because he was an incel with mommy issues so he just hates women”

Just lol bro
aristotle was also quite based
45317 how unfair path 2 happinesscom
1761849945321
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan and m0ss26
@Klasik616
 
Literal homosexuality
 
  • JFL
Reactions: theRetard

Similar threads

slavsmog
Replies
9
Views
133
slavsmog
slavsmog
mcmentalonthemic
Replies
50
Views
458
IliaTopuria
IliaTopuria
unkownincel
Replies
8
Views
245
mrdouchebag
mrdouchebag
normal boy
Replies
70
Views
499
kahi
kahi
thepathsdontremembe
Replies
20
Views
147
True adam in mumbai
True adam in mumbai

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top