female gaze/pretty boy/twink reevaluated/debunked

[looksmaxxed]

why would a 6'6 robust jock bully who gets sex on demand ever think that mousy effete hollywood celebrities like timothy chalamet and tom holland were the epitome of female attraction? and why would he ever humiliate himself by styling himself after them?

female gaze is obviously cope for losers who get shoved in lockers and dunked in urinals. it's the looksmax equivalent of the pua concept of sigmas. genetically inferior omegas who can't compete with alphas and betas so they invent arbitrary parameters and criteria in which they are "the best". this delusion is further enforced by hollywood promoting ugly twink faggots to top positions to help these losers cope.

female gaze/femboy ideology is a byproduct of civilizaitional decadence. it's the "tails" created by weak men to rationalize their weakness and pure inferiority as a virtue, while expecting positive outcomes as a result. you can't have a society that selects for weakness, which preening pretentious fops like female gaze copers are, and expect strength and virility as a consequence. there must be objective universal standards for how we judge attraction that is rooted in scientific observations and facts, divorced from socially conditioned variables like whatever's popular on tv or social media. and this is what female gaze should actually reflect. female gaze should describe men who look and function like this:

this also necessitates that twinks, prettyboys, and "female gaze" maxxers stop coping and propagating their delusions and giving false hope to subhumans who would better off be helping chad breed instead of competing with chad with their eyeliners cringey mop hair, and horrendous upper eyelid exposure. i would go so far as to say men like timothy chalemet should be actively sabotaged and killed if necessary for being the antithesis to what society most requires at the moment.

tldr: female gaze are just incels in denial with an extra step

 

[MrShimano]

I wonder who’s gonna read all ts hmm

All that just for this BAC bull to steal yo onetis

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

I wonder who’s gonna read all ts hmm
View attachment 4157573
All that just for this BAC bull to steal yo onetis
View attachment 4157576

Almost at that legendary number yo

 

[wasteofspace]

This is what I need, someone who truly understands how to treat a man

 

[mogtivism]

why would a 6'6 robust jock bully who gets sex on demand ever think that mousy effete hollywood celebrities like timothy chalamet and tom holland were the epitome of female attraction? and why would he ever humiliate himself by styling himself after them?

female gaze is obviously cope for losers who get shoved in lockers and dunked in urinals. it's the looksmax equivalent of the pua concept of sigmas. genetically inferior omegas who can't compete with alphas and betas so they invent arbitrary parameters and criteria in which they are "the best". this delusion is further enforced by hollywood promoting ugly twink faggots to top positions to help these losers cope.

female gaze/femboy ideology is a byproduct of civilizaitional decadence. it's the "tails" created by weak men to rationalize their weakness and pure inferiority as a virtue, while expecting positive outcomes as a result. you can't have a society that selects for weakness, which preening pretentious fops like female gaze copers are, and expect strength and virility as a consequence. there must be objective universal standards for how we judge attraction that is rooted in scientific observations and facts, divorced from socially conditioned variables like whatever's popular on tv or social media. and this is what female gaze should actually reflect. female gaze should describe men who look and function like this:

View attachment 4157523
View attachment 4157524


this also necessitates that twinks, prettyboys, and "female gaze" maxxers stop coping and propagating their delusions and giving false hope to subhumans who would better off be helping chad breed instead of competing with chad with their eyeliners cringey mop hair, and horrendous upper eyelid exposure. i would go so far as to say men like timothy chalemet should be actively sabotaged and killed if necessary for being the antithesis to what society most requires at the moment.

tldr: female gaze are just incels in denial with an extra step

“Sigma” “Alpha” “Omega”

JFL at this redpill cringe.

Prettyboy doesn’t mean “skinny weak twink”, it means a guy like vinne hacker for example.

I’m willing to bet tiktok prettyboys could beat the shit out of most of the skinnyfat/fatcel copers crying “muh prettyboy not masculine, they don’t get the gurl!!1!1!”

I bet all the women are just lining up to sleep with balding ogre powercopers lol.

Go back to Hamza’s youtube channel and gtfo of .org

 

[Jager]

why would a 6'6 robust jock bully who gets sex on demand ever think that mousy effete hollywood celebrities like timothy chalamet and tom holland were the epitome of female attraction? and why would he ever humiliate himself by styling himself after them?

female gaze is obviously cope for losers who get shoved in lockers and dunked in urinals. it's the looksmax equivalent of the pua concept of sigmas. genetically inferior omegas who can't compete with alphas and betas so they invent arbitrary parameters and criteria in which they are "the best". this delusion is further enforced by hollywood promoting ugly twink faggots to top positions to help these losers cope.

female gaze/femboy ideology is a byproduct of civilizaitional decadence. it's the "tails" created by weak men to rationalize their weakness and pure inferiority as a virtue, while expecting positive outcomes as a result. you can't have a society that selects for weakness, which preening pretentious fops like female gaze copers are, and expect strength and virility as a consequence. there must be objective universal standards for how we judge attraction that is rooted in scientific observations and facts, divorced from socially conditioned variables like whatever's popular on tv or social media. and this is what female gaze should actually reflect. female gaze should describe men who look and function like this:

View attachment 4157523
View attachment 4157524


this also necessitates that twinks, prettyboys, and "female gaze" maxxers stop coping and propagating their delusions and giving false hope to subhumans who would better off be helping chad breed instead of competing with chad with their eyeliners cringey mop hair, and horrendous upper eyelid exposure. i would go so far as to say men like timothy chalemet should be actively sabotaged and killed if necessary for being the antithesis to what society most requires at the moment.

tldr: female gaze are just incels in denial with an extra step

DNRRR

 

[Prøphet]

Chalamet isn’t a pretty boy he’s just a cutecel that starved himself so ts is cope

Pretty boy is like chico

 

[GabachoCopium]

I wonder who’s gonna read all ts hmm
View attachment 4157573
All that just for this BAC bull to steal yo onetis
View attachment 4157576

correcto mijo

 

[looksmaxxed]

“Sigma” “Alpha” “Omega”

JFL at this redpill cringe.

Prettyboy doesn’t mean “skinny weak twink”, it means a guy like vinne hacker for example.

I’m willing to bet tiktok prettyboys could beat the shit out of most of the skinnyfat/fatcel copers crying “muh prettyboy not masculine, they don’t get the gurl!!1!1!”

I bet all the women are just lining up to sleep with balding ogre powercopers lol.

Go back to Hamza’s youtube channel and gtfo of .org

vinnie hackers needs to be killed. he's a leech and a parasite. what does he actually contribute?

at least clavicular is an educator and a representative of true female gaze

 

[Bryce]

Prettyboys and twinks are hormonally imbalanced and underdeveloped men, and from a biological standpoint cannot be attractive.

This is the result of the Jewish vaccines and hormone disruptors that are affecting the development of the unborn. Pair that with Jewish media which sole purpose is to promote racemixing, black and brown supremacy, and queers. Boys in school are subconsciously being taught that masculinity is evil while girls are being taught that femineity is a byproduct of an oppressing patriarchy and they should instead get careers instead of raising a family.

So what is the result. More homos, more effeminate men, more masculine women, less reproductive opportunity through bioengineered food products and microplastics, and the successful eradication of a people (whites are the primary target, notice how "prettyboys" are all whites typically). The only redeemable quality of black people is their hatred and outright violence towards faggots, otherwise they need to get deleted too if we want a chance to recover.

The milk is spilt on many issues, there's no coming back from the damage that has been caused unless something big happens, which we know will never happen. Even if Chad impregnates a woman the chances of his offspring developing as good as him are slim in todays society.

 

[looksmaxxed]

Chalamet isn’t a pretty boy he’s just a cutecel that starved himself so ts is cope

Pretty boy is like chico

same category tbh. is chico shrunk 8 inches he'd be timothy chalamet. both deserve torture. see my sig