FEMALE STRATEGIES THAT MEN STILL DON'T KNOW - An analysis on how men and women view the opposite sex for relationships

John Cracovizk

John Cracovizk

Life is so short, you should smile more anon...
Joined
May 13, 2022
Posts
1,479
Reputation
2,858
Approximately 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, with the main reasons being financial problems and the famous 'wear and tear.' You know that classic line: 'Oh, it just wasn't like the beginning anymore and something is missing,' basically boredom. The truth is that men in a relationship have a very different psychology from women. The female psychology within a relationship has a biological clock for getting tired of the male...​

Car Breaking Up GIF by megan lockhart


Obviousness is a big turn-off and there's no avoiding it in a shared life under the same roof. That's why women are seeking fewer relationships nowadays, at least compared to men and to women of the past, because simply sharing a house with a man and discovering everything about him, with no secrets, nothing intriguing, no mystery, nothing to pique a woman's curiosity, is a big turn-off.

By design, a long-term relationship and life together is something that repels the feminine spirit, and as mentioned, this is evidenced by statistics, with women being the ones who initiate divorce the most, citing financial reasons (totally pragmatic, if he's not providing anymore, then he's no longer useful) and wear and tear (pure triviality, there are many things that can lead to this such as seeing famous couples on Instagram living a more exciting life, longing for multiple partners, the obviousness of already knowing that man). So, it makes sense to notice that when a woman reaches a certain age and is still single, she starts adopting cats.

adopts cat lady GIF


The behavior of a cat mimics that of a womanizer to a large extent; the cat only shows up when it wants to, only seeks affection when it wants to, if you try to pet the cat, it will usually not want it, it only comes on its own terms and is quite independent, leaving the house for days to procreate in the streets only to return later, pragmatically seeking cuddles and food; it's a behavior that is quite attractive to women.

On the other hand, men enjoy life together, the obviousness, and knowing their partner since the beginning of her life; they realize that the idea of boyfriends or spouses who were childhood friends is practically a male neurosis.

Look at how many celebrities, after achieving fame and being able to have a vast number of women, often choose a girl they knew before fame, very attached to teenage crushes...

messi_0-sixteen_nine.jpg


Waiting for the girl to be ready to take them as a consolation prize, like: 'Oh, Chad didn't want me, I've been with many guys... This one here is left, who waited for me all this time, now I'll settle for him.' These guys don't have the sagacity and the vision that we in this community have, the red pill/black pill is nothing more than a change in values and paradigms.

Before all of this, you probably didn't see this as a problem, dating a single mother, being a consolation prize; he is convinced that he is the best of the moment and not that the best man didn't want her. These men also don't realize that at 30 and 40 years old, if they've built something beyond appearance, they are at the peak of their career/intellect/physicality (if well maintained), while the woman, at the same age, is at the end of her career, swapping cats for hares, exchanging years of effort for the worst years of a woman's life, full of relationship baggage (which are not only biological, like children, they are also psycho-emotional, already somewhat traumatized by other 'toxic' relationships, guys who just used them and disappeared or did something else, full of baggage and a collection of problems that will have to be dealt with), but the normie man is not aware of this, and if you tell him about it? He'll call you paranoid because his value system does not align with yours.
We think very differently: 'if you're going to ask for this, you have to offer that.' Before, you valued one thing and today you value another, and your system doesn't align with the rest of society; if you demand what you think is fair? You'll be spat on by society. So, what's happening in the relationship market is that men are paying much higher than what you're willing to pay, simple as that.

Imagine you go to the market and oranges are priced at $100 per kilogram, and your nation's favorite fruit is the orange, everyone loves it, and men are willing to pay $100 for it, and it's also your favorite fruit, you would love to have an orange 😍... But do you think it's fair to pay that much for an orange? There's no use crying to the seller, because why would he sell it cheaply if there are plenty of people willing to pay more? So what's left for you? Joining a group of men who don't agree with the price of the orange or one that tells you how to improve yourself so you can pay less/or become accessible to you (literally the goal of 91% of this forum).

Saturday Night Live Nbc GIF by HULU


It all depends on how much money you have to spend and how much you're willing to haggle over the price per kilogram of oranges.

There are many self-proclaimed red pill creators who proclaim: 'tattoos are a red flag, more than X partners is a red flag,' and then the guy shows up with a girlfriend who has tattoos, dyed and short hair :lul:.

I'm not going to say that this guy is unhappy or coping because he might be happy... But you see, it's all about how much you're willing to overlook those values that you assumed after changing your paradigms, how much you want that kilogram of oranges and how much you're willing to pay.

So, understand, I'm referring to the price only in terms of money, which is not the only way you pay, such as: taking them out, going on trips, going to places you don't want to go, giving up certain hobbies. This tends to be the rule in most relationships, of course, there are cases where this doesn't happen, but when you start living together, you're no longer just one, there's more than one person to make happy besides yourself. And at least what is expected, said to the four winds, is: one day one does 80% and the other 20%, the next day you're lucky and both do 50%, and the next 70% and 30%, and so on... There are days when you have to give up more than your partner.

sad jeff buckley GIF by Greg Gunn


And I know, men love relationships, they like them more than women do, for simple reasons: we evolved as protectors and providers, benefiting throughout history in reproductive success with negotiation of fidelity and exclusivity, staying close to your partner, why? Because then other men wouldn't come near and disrupt the guy's reproductive process, preventing false paternities, with his beloved nearby, he could also provide and protect better, avoiding risks against predators, diseases, etc., being extremely careful with the receptacle of his genetics (AKA. Mother of his children), but the woman doesn't, she doesn't benefit as much from this system.

The woman benefits more from a system where she jumps from branch to branch, leaving several guys in the 'closet,' available for any need she may have (consolation prizes, providers, orbiting betas, and a reproductive partner).

Overall, women are very good at dividing men: friend, coworker, boyfriend, reproducer (AKA. Chad), and the consolation prize (that possible guy who will take her if everything goes wrong after 35).

That's the logic of our society because it's very feminine, and you can also observe it in a technocratic way, with this imitating feminine behavior. Men are complicated, still in this Neanderthal module, wanting one woman to be everything: a friend, a mother to their own and often to themselves, an emotional provider, and also a woman for sex.

And that's the problem with men, they're not playing well currently, the rules of the game are dictated by women, if they don't adapt, they will suffer.

Some say that technology is the problem, no, technology is not the problem, technology imitates the current power, which is feminine.

Valentines Day Love GIF by Jimmy Simpson


What are Tinder and Instagram if not catalogs of men for women?

Helping them to separate men based on pragmatism because we are tools for them, it's almost as if they classify men as 'this one is a hammer, this one is a screwdriver,' each with its function: there's the beta orbiter friend (friendzone), the reproducer (hit it and quit it), the sugar daddy (microwave, heats it up for others to eat), and the emotional provision boyfriend who receives sex almost out of pity.

All cataloged in the apps, remember that today people meet more through apps than in the real world, the metaverse is in full swing (people meet and relate more through the internet, a parallel world where they project what they want to be, not what they are. Because, well, the photos are only the best ones, the moments are only the best ones and don't show the real person (appearance and emotional state), almost like makeup (something widely used by women). If men were the prevailing powers, an androcentric society, we would see apps that cater to these masculine interests: marriage, parenthood, more conservative and right-wing interests (according to surveys, men are already leaning more to the right while women lean more to the left). So, Instagram in an androcentric environment would be very different.

Basically, you choose the man you want to be. If you want to be the reproducer, beta orbiter, sugar daddy, or the husband. I believe most will want to be the reproducer. You can't be all at the same time.

If you're too straight-laced, you won't get anyone excited. If you're a sugar daddy, you'll end up with an undeclared escort. If you're the husband, you'll be a mix of sugar daddy and beta orbiter. If you want to be the reproducer, you'll need to develop the required qualities through looksmaxing and not be too attached. If you can't, and still want the orange, you'll end up as one of the other three.

Many believe that the black pill/red pill is an almost magical esoteric awakening, reaching a higher level of consciousness or something like that, but it's merely a change of paradigms.

There are no harsher truths, no one true truth. Not even in the movie where these pills were taken (Matrix), the outside world is nothing more than a different world from what the Matrix is.

matrix GIF


No one knows if the outside world isn't also simulated, a matrix within a matrix.

So you've just changed your paradigms, your values are different, you value youth more, don't want older women with children, want virginity, and so on. The hard part is, you want that, but can you get it? And then comes the bargaining... 'Yeah, that's what I want, but they can't offer it, and I need to ejaculate... I just want to have sex with her and disappear... But who's going to cuddle with me? Is there someone else having sex with her too...? I want her just for myself...'

The more you want, the more you need to offer. Choose how much you want, show how much you have to offer, and how attractive you are.​
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: i hear voices, Vermilioncore, 3virtues and 54 others
@Ryldoo IS COPING @SidharthTheSlayer @HarrierDuBois @Lynxress and I'm lazy to tag more than you guys, sorry if someone wanted to be tagged :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: poopoohead, h111, ggg.tv🤫 and 3 others
I haven't even started reading and already know that I will learn something new and usefull <33
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • Love it
Reactions: zeshama, try2beme, greywind and 5 others
@Ryldoo IS COPING @SidharthTheSlayer @HarrierDuBois @Lynxress and I'm lazy to tag more than you guys, sorry if someone wanted to be tagged :forcedsmile:
Didnt read yet but welcome back
 
  • +1
Reactions: bloomercel and John Cracovizk
high iq post, could've been summarized in less paragraphs tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: Roquefort, Manana, horizontallytall and 5 others
high iq post, could've been summarized in less paragraphs tho
I wanted to be very verbose so that no one interprets anything incorrectly, but if someone just wants the juice of the orange, they can just input it into ChatGPT and ask for a summary :lul:. However, I know that some users enjoy longer writing, and I want to mainly reach those.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Ryldoo IS COPING, HTN_Mentalcel, Xangsane and 1 other person
@John Cracovizk i think exclusivity and monogamy are dead in this era, unless you literally come from a family of politicans and military men so that you have strong power backing.

besides that, 99.99% of women are dogshit eaters and they are not worth motherhood
 
  • +1
Reactions: Patris, horizontallytall and John Cracovizk
I think exclusivity and monogamy are dead in this era, unless you literally come from a family of politicans and military men so that you have strong power backing.

besides that, 99.99% of women are dogshit eaters and they are not worth motherhood
I think many men think like this, but well, as I said in the thread, they end up bargaining and accepting because they don't want to be alone and want someone to have sex... Or maybe they'll search in another country... Spending hundreds of dollars, time and energy to find an "orange".
 
  • +1
Reactions: Patris and horizontallytall
Im like halfway done this thread is very good
 
  • +1
Reactions: John Cracovizk
I remember reading some good posts from you in the past, will def read later, keep up the god work.
 
  • +1
Reactions: John Cracovizk
Approximately 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, with the main reasons being financial problems and the famous 'wear and tear.' You know that classic line: 'Oh, it just wasn't like the beginning anymore and something is missing,' basically boredom. The truth is that men in a relationship have a very different psychology from women. The female psychology within a relationship has a biological clock for getting tired of the male...​

Car Breaking Up GIF by megan lockhart


Obviousness is a big turn-off and there's no avoiding it in a shared life under the same roof. That's why women are seeking fewer relationships nowadays, at least compared to men and to women of the past, because simply sharing a house with a man and discovering everything about him, with no secrets, nothing intriguing, no mystery, nothing to pique a woman's curiosity, is a big turn-off.

By design, a long-term relationship and life together is something that repels the feminine spirit, and as mentioned, this is evidenced by statistics, with women being the ones who initiate divorce the most, citing financial reasons (totally pragmatic, if he's not providing anymore, then he's no longer useful) and wear and tear (pure triviality, there are many things that can lead to this such as seeing famous couples on Instagram living a more exciting life, longing for multiple partners, the obviousness of already knowing that man). So, it makes sense to notice that when a woman reaches a certain age and is still single, she starts adopting cats.

adopts cat lady GIF


The behavior of a cat mimics that of a womanizer to a large extent; the cat only shows up when it wants to, only seeks affection when it wants to, if you try to pet the cat, it will usually not want it, it only comes on its own terms and is quite independent, leaving the house for days to procreate in the streets only to return later, pragmatically seeking cuddles and food; it's a behavior that is quite attractive to women.

On the other hand, men enjoy life together, the obviousness, and knowing their partner since the beginning of her life; they realize that the idea of boyfriends or spouses who were childhood friends is practically a male neurosis.

Look at how many celebrities, after achieving fame and being able to have a vast number of women, often choose a girl they knew before fame, very attached to teenage crushes...

messi_0-sixteen_nine.jpg


Waiting for the girl to be ready to take them as a consolation prize, like: 'Oh, Chad didn't want me, I've been with many guys... This one here is left, who waited for me all this time, now I'll settle for him.' These guys don't have the sagacity and the vision that we in this community have, the red pill/black pill is nothing more than a change in values and paradigms.

Before all of this, you probably didn't see this as a problem, dating a single mother, being a consolation prize; he is convinced that he is the best of the moment and not that the best man didn't want her. These men also don't realize that at 30 and 40 years old, if they've built something beyond appearance, they are at the peak of their career/intellect/physicality (if well maintained), while the woman, at the same age, is at the end of her career, swapping cats for hares, exchanging years of effort for the worst years of a woman's life, full of relationship baggage (which are not only biological, like children, they are also psycho-emotional, already somewhat traumatized by other 'toxic' relationships, guys who just used them and disappeared or did something else, full of baggage and a collection of problems that will have to be dealt with), but the normie man is not aware of this, and if you tell him about it? He'll call you paranoid because his value system does not align with yours.
We think very differently: 'if you're going to ask for this, you have to offer that.' Before, you valued one thing and today you value another, and your system doesn't align with the rest of society; if you demand what you think is fair? You'll be spat on by society. So, what's happening in the relationship market is that men are paying much higher than what you're willing to pay, simple as that.

Imagine you go to the market and oranges are priced at $100 per kilogram, and your nation's favorite fruit is the orange, everyone loves it, and men are willing to pay $100 for it, and it's also your favorite fruit, you would love to have an orange 😍... But do you think it's fair to pay that much for an orange? There's no use crying to the seller, because why would he sell it cheaply if there are plenty of people willing to pay more? So what's left for you? Joining a group of men who don't agree with the price of the orange or one that tells you how to improve yourself so you can pay less/or become accessible to you (literally the goal of 91% of this forum).

Saturday Night Live Nbc GIF by HULU


It all depends on how much money you have to spend and how much you're willing to haggle over the price per kilogram of oranges.

There are many self-proclaimed red pill creators who proclaim: 'tattoos are a red flag, more than X partners is a red flag,' and then the guy shows up with a girlfriend who has tattoos, dyed and short hair :lul:.

I'm not going to say that this guy is unhappy or coping because he might be happy... But you see, it's all about how much you're willing to overlook those values that you assumed after changing your paradigms, how much you want that kilogram of oranges and how much you're willing to pay.

So, understand, I'm referring to the price only in terms of money, which is not the only way you pay, such as: taking them out, going on trips, going to places you don't want to go, giving up certain hobbies. This tends to be the rule in most relationships, of course, there are cases where this doesn't happen, but when you start living together, you're no longer just one, there's more than one person to make happy besides yourself. And at least what is expected, said to the four winds, is: one day one does 80% and the other 20%, the next day you're lucky and both do 50%, and the next 70% and 30%, and so on... There are days when you have to give up more than your partner.

sad jeff buckley GIF by Greg Gunn


And I know, men love relationships, they like them more than women do, for simple reasons: we evolved as protectors and providers, benefiting throughout history in reproductive success with negotiation of fidelity and exclusivity, staying close to your partner, why? Because then other men wouldn't come near and disrupt the guy's reproductive process, preventing false paternities, with his beloved nearby, he could also provide and protect better, avoiding risks against predators, diseases, etc., being extremely careful with the receptacle of his genetics (AKA. Mother of his children), but the woman doesn't, she doesn't benefit as much from this system.

The woman benefits more from a system where she jumps from branch to branch, leaving several guys in the 'closet,' available for any need she may have (consolation prizes, providers, orbiting betas, and a reproductive partner).

Overall, women are very good at dividing men: friend, coworker, boyfriend, reproducer (AKA. Chad), and the consolation prize (that possible guy who will take her if everything goes wrong after 35).

That's the logic of our society because it's very feminine, and you can also observe it in a technocratic way, with this imitating feminine behavior. Men are complicated, still in this Neanderthal module, wanting one woman to be everything: a friend, a mother to their own and often to themselves, an emotional provider, and also a woman for sex.

And that's the problem with men, they're not playing well currently, the rules of the game are dictated by women, if they don't adapt, they will suffer.

Some say that technology is the problem, no, technology is not the problem, technology imitates the current power, which is feminine.

Valentines Day Love GIF by Jimmy Simpson


What are Tinder and Instagram if not catalogs of men for women?

Helping them to separate men based on pragmatism because we are tools for them, it's almost as if they classify men as 'this one is a hammer, this one is a screwdriver,' each with its function: there's the beta orbiter friend (friendzone), the reproducer (hit it and quit it), the sugar daddy (microwave, heats it up for others to eat), and the emotional provision boyfriend who receives sex almost out of pity.

All cataloged in the apps, remember that today people meet more through apps than in the real world, the metaverse is in full swing (people meet and relate more through the internet, a parallel world where they project what they want to be, not what they are. Because, well, the photos are only the best ones, the moments are only the best ones and don't show the real person (appearance and emotional state), almost like makeup (something widely used by women). If men were the prevailing powers, an androcentric society, we would see apps that cater to these masculine interests: marriage, parenthood, more conservative and right-wing interests (according to surveys, men are already leaning more to the right while women lean more to the left). So, Instagram in an androcentric environment would be very different.

Basically, you choose the man you want to be. If you want to be the reproducer, beta orbiter, sugar daddy, or the husband. I believe most will want to be the reproducer. You can't be all at the same time.

If you're too straight-laced, you won't get anyone excited. If you're a sugar daddy, you'll end up with an undeclared escort. If you're the husband, you'll be a mix of sugar daddy and beta orbiter. If you want to be the reproducer, you'll need to develop the required qualities through looksmaxing and not be too attached. If you can't, and still want the orange, you'll end up as one of the other three.

Many believe that the black pill/red pill is an almost magical esoteric awakening, reaching a higher level of consciousness or something like that, but it's merely a change of paradigms.

There are no harsher truths, no one true truth. Not even in the movie where these pills were taken (Matrix), the outside world is nothing more than a different world from what the Matrix is.

matrix GIF


No one knows if the outside world isn't also simulated, a matrix within a matrix.

So you've just changed your paradigms, your values are different, you value youth more, don't want older women with children, want virginity, and so on. The hard part is, you want that, but can you get it? And then comes the bargaining... 'Yeah, that's what I want, but they can't offer it, and I need to ejaculate... I just want to have sex with her and disappear... But who's going to cuddle with me? Is there someone else having sex with her too...? I want her just for myself...'

The more you want, the more you need to offer. Choose how much you want, show how much you have to offer, and how attractive you are.​
 
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: Ryldoo IS COPING, 5'7 zoomer, Sushifart and 2 others
Approximately 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, with the main reasons being financial problems and the famous 'wear and tear.' You know that classic line: 'Oh, it just wasn't like the beginning anymore and something is missing,' basically boredom. The truth is that men in a relationship have a very different psychology from women. The female psychology within a relationship has a biological clock for getting tired of the male...​

Car Breaking Up GIF by megan lockhart


Obviousness is a big turn-off and there's no avoiding it in a shared life under the same roof. That's why women are seeking fewer relationships nowadays, at least compared to men and to women of the past, because simply sharing a house with a man and discovering everything about him, with no secrets, nothing intriguing, no mystery, nothing to pique a woman's curiosity, is a big turn-off.

By design, a long-term relationship and life together is something that repels the feminine spirit, and as mentioned, this is evidenced by statistics, with women being the ones who initiate divorce the most, citing financial reasons (totally pragmatic, if he's not providing anymore, then he's no longer useful) and wear and tear (pure triviality, there are many things that can lead to this such as seeing famous couples on Instagram living a more exciting life, longing for multiple partners, the obviousness of already knowing that man). So, it makes sense to notice that when a woman reaches a certain age and is still single, she starts adopting cats.

adopts cat lady GIF


The behavior of a cat mimics that of a womanizer to a large extent; the cat only shows up when it wants to, only seeks affection when it wants to, if you try to pet the cat, it will usually not want it, it only comes on its own terms and is quite independent, leaving the house for days to procreate in the streets only to return later, pragmatically seeking cuddles and food; it's a behavior that is quite attractive to women.

On the other hand, men enjoy life together, the obviousness, and knowing their partner since the beginning of her life; they realize that the idea of boyfriends or spouses who were childhood friends is practically a male neurosis.

Look at how many celebrities, after achieving fame and being able to have a vast number of women, often choose a girl they knew before fame, very attached to teenage crushes...

messi_0-sixteen_nine.jpg


Waiting for the girl to be ready to take them as a consolation prize, like: 'Oh, Chad didn't want me, I've been with many guys... This one here is left, who waited for me all this time, now I'll settle for him.' These guys don't have the sagacity and the vision that we in this community have, the red pill/black pill is nothing more than a change in values and paradigms.

Before all of this, you probably didn't see this as a problem, dating a single mother, being a consolation prize; he is convinced that he is the best of the moment and not that the best man didn't want her. These men also don't realize that at 30 and 40 years old, if they've built something beyond appearance, they are at the peak of their career/intellect/physicality (if well maintained), while the woman, at the same age, is at the end of her career, swapping cats for hares, exchanging years of effort for the worst years of a woman's life, full of relationship baggage (which are not only biological, like children, they are also psycho-emotional, already somewhat traumatized by other 'toxic' relationships, guys who just used them and disappeared or did something else, full of baggage and a collection of problems that will have to be dealt with), but the normie man is not aware of this, and if you tell him about it? He'll call you paranoid because his value system does not align with yours.
We think very differently: 'if you're going to ask for this, you have to offer that.' Before, you valued one thing and today you value another, and your system doesn't align with the rest of society; if you demand what you think is fair? You'll be spat on by society. So, what's happening in the relationship market is that men are paying much higher than what you're willing to pay, simple as that.

Imagine you go to the market and oranges are priced at $100 per kilogram, and your nation's favorite fruit is the orange, everyone loves it, and men are willing to pay $100 for it, and it's also your favorite fruit, you would love to have an orange 😍... But do you think it's fair to pay that much for an orange? There's no use crying to the seller, because why would he sell it cheaply if there are plenty of people willing to pay more? So what's left for you? Joining a group of men who don't agree with the price of the orange or one that tells you how to improve yourself so you can pay less/or become accessible to you (literally the goal of 91% of this forum).

Saturday Night Live Nbc GIF by HULU


It all depends on how much money you have to spend and how much you're willing to haggle over the price per kilogram of oranges.

There are many self-proclaimed red pill creators who proclaim: 'tattoos are a red flag, more than X partners is a red flag,' and then the guy shows up with a girlfriend who has tattoos, dyed and short hair :lul:.

I'm not going to say that this guy is unhappy or coping because he might be happy... But you see, it's all about how much you're willing to overlook those values that you assumed after changing your paradigms, how much you want that kilogram of oranges and how much you're willing to pay.

So, understand, I'm referring to the price only in terms of money, which is not the only way you pay, such as: taking them out, going on trips, going to places you don't want to go, giving up certain hobbies. This tends to be the rule in most relationships, of course, there are cases where this doesn't happen, but when you start living together, you're no longer just one, there's more than one person to make happy besides yourself. And at least what is expected, said to the four winds, is: one day one does 80% and the other 20%, the next day you're lucky and both do 50%, and the next 70% and 30%, and so on... There are days when you have to give up more than your partner.

sad jeff buckley GIF by Greg Gunn


And I know, men love relationships, they like them more than women do, for simple reasons: we evolved as protectors and providers, benefiting throughout history in reproductive success with negotiation of fidelity and exclusivity, staying close to your partner, why? Because then other men wouldn't come near and disrupt the guy's reproductive process, preventing false paternities, with his beloved nearby, he could also provide and protect better, avoiding risks against predators, diseases, etc., being extremely careful with the receptacle of his genetics (AKA. Mother of his children), but the woman doesn't, she doesn't benefit as much from this system.

The woman benefits more from a system where she jumps from branch to branch, leaving several guys in the 'closet,' available for any need she may have (consolation prizes, providers, orbiting betas, and a reproductive partner).

Overall, women are very good at dividing men: friend, coworker, boyfriend, reproducer (AKA. Chad), and the consolation prize (that possible guy who will take her if everything goes wrong after 35).

That's the logic of our society because it's very feminine, and you can also observe it in a technocratic way, with this imitating feminine behavior. Men are complicated, still in this Neanderthal module, wanting one woman to be everything: a friend, a mother to their own and often to themselves, an emotional provider, and also a woman for sex.

And that's the problem with men, they're not playing well currently, the rules of the game are dictated by women, if they don't adapt, they will suffer.

Some say that technology is the problem, no, technology is not the problem, technology imitates the current power, which is feminine.

Valentines Day Love GIF by Jimmy Simpson


What are Tinder and Instagram if not catalogs of men for women?

Helping them to separate men based on pragmatism because we are tools for them, it's almost as if they classify men as 'this one is a hammer, this one is a screwdriver,' each with its function: there's the beta orbiter friend (friendzone), the reproducer (hit it and quit it), the sugar daddy (microwave, heats it up for others to eat), and the emotional provision boyfriend who receives sex almost out of pity.

All cataloged in the apps, remember that today people meet more through apps than in the real world, the metaverse is in full swing (people meet and relate more through the internet, a parallel world where they project what they want to be, not what they are. Because, well, the photos are only the best ones, the moments are only the best ones and don't show the real person (appearance and emotional state), almost like makeup (something widely used by women). If men were the prevailing powers, an androcentric society, we would see apps that cater to these masculine interests: marriage, parenthood, more conservative and right-wing interests (according to surveys, men are already leaning more to the right while women lean more to the left). So, Instagram in an androcentric environment would be very different.

Basically, you choose the man you want to be. If you want to be the reproducer, beta orbiter, sugar daddy, or the husband. I believe most will want to be the reproducer. You can't be all at the same time.

If you're too straight-laced, you won't get anyone excited. If you're a sugar daddy, you'll end up with an undeclared escort. If you're the husband, you'll be a mix of sugar daddy and beta orbiter. If you want to be the reproducer, you'll need to develop the required qualities through looksmaxing and not be too attached. If you can't, and still want the orange, you'll end up as one of the other three.

Many believe that the black pill/red pill is an almost magical esoteric awakening, reaching a higher level of consciousness or something like that, but it's merely a change of paradigms.

There are no harsher truths, no one true truth. Not even in the movie where these pills were taken (Matrix), the outside world is nothing more than a different world from what the Matrix is.

matrix GIF


No one knows if the outside world isn't also simulated, a matrix within a matrix.

So you've just changed your paradigms, your values are different, you value youth more, don't want older women with children, want virginity, and so on. The hard part is, you want that, but can you get it? And then comes the bargaining... 'Yeah, that's what I want, but they can't offer it, and I need to ejaculate... I just want to have sex with her and disappear... But who's going to cuddle with me? Is there someone else having sex with her too...? I want her just for myself...'

The more you want, the more you need to offer. Choose how much you want, show how much you have to offer, and how attractive you are.​
JFL at this high effort thread getting barely any interaction, brootal orangepill
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: HTN_Mentalcel, logicel369, 5'7 zoomer and 7 others
Approximately 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, with the main reasons being financial problems and the famous 'wear and tear.' You know that classic line: 'Oh, it just wasn't like the beginning anymore and something is missing,' basically boredom. The truth is that men in a relationship have a very different psychology from women. The female psychology within a relationship has a biological clock for getting tired of the male...​

Car Breaking Up GIF by megan lockhart


Obviousness is a big turn-off and there's no avoiding it in a shared life under the same roof. That's why women are seeking fewer relationships nowadays, at least compared to men and to women of the past, because simply sharing a house with a man and discovering everything about him, with no secrets, nothing intriguing, no mystery, nothing to pique a woman's curiosity, is a big turn-off.

By design, a long-term relationship and life together is something that repels the feminine spirit, and as mentioned, this is evidenced by statistics, with women being the ones who initiate divorce the most, citing financial reasons (totally pragmatic, if he's not providing anymore, then he's no longer useful) and wear and tear (pure triviality, there are many things that can lead to this such as seeing famous couples on Instagram living a more exciting life, longing for multiple partners, the obviousness of already knowing that man). So, it makes sense to notice that when a woman reaches a certain age and is still single, she starts adopting cats.

adopts cat lady GIF


The behavior of a cat mimics that of a womanizer to a large extent; the cat only shows up when it wants to, only seeks affection when it wants to, if you try to pet the cat, it will usually not want it, it only comes on its own terms and is quite independent, leaving the house for days to procreate in the streets only to return later, pragmatically seeking cuddles and food; it's a behavior that is quite attractive to women.

On the other hand, men enjoy life together, the obviousness, and knowing their partner since the beginning of her life; they realize that the idea of boyfriends or spouses who were childhood friends is practically a male neurosis.

Look at how many celebrities, after achieving fame and being able to have a vast number of women, often choose a girl they knew before fame, very attached to teenage crushes...

messi_0-sixteen_nine.jpg


Waiting for the girl to be ready to take them as a consolation prize, like: 'Oh, Chad didn't want me, I've been with many guys... This one here is left, who waited for me all this time, now I'll settle for him.' These guys don't have the sagacity and the vision that we in this community have, the red pill/black pill is nothing more than a change in values and paradigms.

Before all of this, you probably didn't see this as a problem, dating a single mother, being a consolation prize; he is convinced that he is the best of the moment and not that the best man didn't want her. These men also don't realize that at 30 and 40 years old, if they've built something beyond appearance, they are at the peak of their career/intellect/physicality (if well maintained), while the woman, at the same age, is at the end of her career, swapping cats for hares, exchanging years of effort for the worst years of a woman's life, full of relationship baggage (which are not only biological, like children, they are also psycho-emotional, already somewhat traumatized by other 'toxic' relationships, guys who just used them and disappeared or did something else, full of baggage and a collection of problems that will have to be dealt with), but the normie man is not aware of this, and if you tell him about it? He'll call you paranoid because his value system does not align with yours.
We think very differently: 'if you're going to ask for this, you have to offer that.' Before, you valued one thing and today you value another, and your system doesn't align with the rest of society; if you demand what you think is fair? You'll be spat on by society. So, what's happening in the relationship market is that men are paying much higher than what you're willing to pay, simple as that.

Imagine you go to the market and oranges are priced at $100 per kilogram, and your nation's favorite fruit is the orange, everyone loves it, and men are willing to pay $100 for it, and it's also your favorite fruit, you would love to have an orange 😍... But do you think it's fair to pay that much for an orange? There's no use crying to the seller, because why would he sell it cheaply if there are plenty of people willing to pay more? So what's left for you? Joining a group of men who don't agree with the price of the orange or one that tells you how to improve yourself so you can pay less/or become accessible to you (literally the goal of 91% of this forum).

Saturday Night Live Nbc GIF by HULU


It all depends on how much money you have to spend and how much you're willing to haggle over the price per kilogram of oranges.

There are many self-proclaimed red pill creators who proclaim: 'tattoos are a red flag, more than X partners is a red flag,' and then the guy shows up with a girlfriend who has tattoos, dyed and short hair :lul:.

I'm not going to say that this guy is unhappy or coping because he might be happy... But you see, it's all about how much you're willing to overlook those values that you assumed after changing your paradigms, how much you want that kilogram of oranges and how much you're willing to pay.

So, understand, I'm referring to the price only in terms of money, which is not the only way you pay, such as: taking them out, going on trips, going to places you don't want to go, giving up certain hobbies. This tends to be the rule in most relationships, of course, there are cases where this doesn't happen, but when you start living together, you're no longer just one, there's more than one person to make happy besides yourself. And at least what is expected, said to the four winds, is: one day one does 80% and the other 20%, the next day you're lucky and both do 50%, and the next 70% and 30%, and so on... There are days when you have to give up more than your partner.

sad jeff buckley GIF by Greg Gunn


And I know, men love relationships, they like them more than women do, for simple reasons: we evolved as protectors and providers, benefiting throughout history in reproductive success with negotiation of fidelity and exclusivity, staying close to your partner, why? Because then other men wouldn't come near and disrupt the guy's reproductive process, preventing false paternities, with his beloved nearby, he could also provide and protect better, avoiding risks against predators, diseases, etc., being extremely careful with the receptacle of his genetics (AKA. Mother of his children), but the woman doesn't, she doesn't benefit as much from this system.

The woman benefits more from a system where she jumps from branch to branch, leaving several guys in the 'closet,' available for any need she may have (consolation prizes, providers, orbiting betas, and a reproductive partner).

Overall, women are very good at dividing men: friend, coworker, boyfriend, reproducer (AKA. Chad), and the consolation prize (that possible guy who will take her if everything goes wrong after 35).

That's the logic of our society because it's very feminine, and you can also observe it in a technocratic way, with this imitating feminine behavior. Men are complicated, still in this Neanderthal module, wanting one woman to be everything: a friend, a mother to their own and often to themselves, an emotional provider, and also a woman for sex.

And that's the problem with men, they're not playing well currently, the rules of the game are dictated by women, if they don't adapt, they will suffer.

Some say that technology is the problem, no, technology is not the problem, technology imitates the current power, which is feminine.

Valentines Day Love GIF by Jimmy Simpson


What are Tinder and Instagram if not catalogs of men for women?

Helping them to separate men based on pragmatism because we are tools for them, it's almost as if they classify men as 'this one is a hammer, this one is a screwdriver,' each with its function: there's the beta orbiter friend (friendzone), the reproducer (hit it and quit it), the sugar daddy (microwave, heats it up for others to eat), and the emotional provision boyfriend who receives sex almost out of pity.

All cataloged in the apps, remember that today people meet more through apps than in the real world, the metaverse is in full swing (people meet and relate more through the internet, a parallel world where they project what they want to be, not what they are. Because, well, the photos are only the best ones, the moments are only the best ones and don't show the real person (appearance and emotional state), almost like makeup (something widely used by women). If men were the prevailing powers, an androcentric society, we would see apps that cater to these masculine interests: marriage, parenthood, more conservative and right-wing interests (according to surveys, men are already leaning more to the right while women lean more to the left). So, Instagram in an androcentric environment would be very different.

Basically, you choose the man you want to be. If you want to be the reproducer, beta orbiter, sugar daddy, or the husband. I believe most will want to be the reproducer. You can't be all at the same time.

If you're too straight-laced, you won't get anyone excited. If you're a sugar daddy, you'll end up with an undeclared escort. If you're the husband, you'll be a mix of sugar daddy and beta orbiter. If you want to be the reproducer, you'll need to develop the required qualities through looksmaxing and not be too attached. If you can't, and still want the orange, you'll end up as one of the other three.

Many believe that the black pill/red pill is an almost magical esoteric awakening, reaching a higher level of consciousness or something like that, but it's merely a change of paradigms.

There are no harsher truths, no one true truth. Not even in the movie where these pills were taken (Matrix), the outside world is nothing more than a different world from what the Matrix is.

matrix GIF


No one knows if the outside world isn't also simulated, a matrix within a matrix.

So you've just changed your paradigms, your values are different, you value youth more, don't want older women with children, want virginity, and so on. The hard part is, you want that, but can you get it? And then comes the bargaining... 'Yeah, that's what I want, but they can't offer it, and I need to ejaculate... I just want to have sex with her and disappear... But who's going to cuddle with me? Is there someone else having sex with her too...? I want her just for myself...'

The more you want, the more you need to offer. Choose how much you want, show how much you have to offer, and how attractive you are.​
Shit like this reminds me why I made an account in the first place.

This forum isn't dead yet.

Good post, OP
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Ryldoo IS COPING, HTN_Mentalcel, Patris and 8 others
JFL at this high effort thread getting barely any interaction, brootal orangepill
Yeah2
Yeah

Me schizophrenically thinking that the users who left the forum and were my homies/taught me something are reading this shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ryldoo IS COPING and poopoohead
Oranges are orange thread
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 9cel and John Cracovizk
Read everything and loved the post 😍. I really agree with that "boredom" part.

Notice how in most romantic novels the guy is some tall, rich, handsome, aggressive, kind of like an asshole in the beginning but later in the story falls in love with the girl and is sweet to the girl but mean to others. It's like women have this "I can fix him" mentality. It's like taming the beast with power of "love". In the beginning they like this unpredictability in the man since he is an asshole and can do anything unpredictable.

The same thing is also seen in Korean drama where the guy is rich tall and arrogant meanwhile the girl is poor, sweet and innocent. But later the guy falls in love with the girl and stops being mean to her. It's kind of like a power fantasy.

Although the story ends there after the guy becomes sweet to the girl but I'm curious since he is stable and boring now, will the girl leave this dude behind now to pursue another unpredictable guy ?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: poopoohead, Ryldoo IS COPING, HTN_Mentalcel and 8 others
Read everything and loved the post 😍. I really agree with that "boredom" part.

Notice how in most romantic novels the guy is some tall, rich, handsome, aggressive, kind of like an asshole in the beginning but later in the story falls in love with the girl and is sweet to the girl but mean to others. It's like women have this "I can fix him" mentality. It's like taming the beast with power of "love". In the beginning they like this unpredictability in the man since he is an asshole and can do anything unpredictable.

The same thing is also seen in Korean drama where the guy is rich tall and arrogant meanwhile the girl is poor, sweet and innocent. But later the guy falls in love with the girl and stops being mean to her. It's kind of like a power fantasy.

Although the story ends there after the guy becomes sweet to the girl but I'm curious since he is stable and boring now, will the girl leave this dude behind now to pursue another unpredictable guy ?
It is the excitement combined with the inherent motherly instinct that makes women go and tame the bad boys.

I was smoking when I was much younger and despite what they say about hating smokers, they still chased me.

When I stopped smoking and behaving badly, many women find me boring even though I fit into their "type" as they always said
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: poopoohead, Ryldoo IS COPING and John Cracovizk
nice thread gj
 
  • +1
Reactions: John Cracovizk
Read everything and loved the post 😍. I really agree with that "boredom" part.

Notice how in most romantic novels the guy is some tall, rich, handsome, aggressive, kind of like an asshole in the beginning but later in the story falls in love with the girl and is sweet to the girl but mean to others. It's like women have this "I can fix him" mentality. It's like taming the beast with power of "love". In the beginning they like this unpredictability in the man since he is an asshole and can do anything unpredictable.

The same thing is also seen in Korean drama where the guy is rich tall and arrogant meanwhile the girl is poor, sweet and innocent. But later the guy falls in love with the girl and stops being mean to her. It's kind of like a power fantasy.

Although the story ends there after the guy becomes sweet to the girl but I'm curious since he is stable and boring now, will the girl leave this dude behind now to pursue another unpredictable guy ?
this is every other movie / drama made ever, lord meeks mogs foids to death. He literally used them to his advantage

 
  • +1
Reactions: Ryldoo IS COPING and John Cracovizk
The same thing is also seen in Korean drama where the guy is rich tall and arrogant meanwhile the girl is poor, sweet and innocent. But later the guy falls in love with the girl and stops being mean to her. It's kind of like a power fantasy.

Although the story ends there after the guy becomes sweet to the girl but I'm curious since he is stable and boring now, will the girl leave this dude behind now to pursue another unpredictable guy ?
Probs tbh.

Human life “swings like a pendulum between pain and boredom.” - Schopenhauer

People struggle with the pain of constant striving to meet their desires, and when these are too easily satisfied, they quickly lapse into the despair of boredom.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Subhra26, klamus, Ranjeet Dipshit and 2 others
I never really understood men that wanted long term relationships with women. Maybe I'm built different. So while this seems like a good read, it feels completely meaningless to me. My natural inclination is already towards acting like a cat.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Subhra26, horizontallytall and John Cracovizk
I never really understood men that wanted long term relationships with women. Maybe I'm built different. So while this seems like a good read, it feels completely meaningless to me. My natural inclination is already towards acting like a cat.
Based and catpilled
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Primalsplit
read every word

good high effort post
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead, TechnoBoss and John Cracovizk
Funny how laws of economy also dictates human relationships, change "orange" to "foid" and it will have the same sense. Almost impossible for a bluepill coper to deny this, men have to stop believing the delusion. Blackpill has to become common knowledge.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead, Ryldoo IS COPING, HTN_Mentalcel and 3 others
That's a lot of sperging to say you were sent your own way
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Ryldoo IS COPING, Sub0, vaninskybird and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead
Good thread. Started reading it and will finish it shortly.

Triple H Yes GIF by WWE
Randy Orton Applause GIF by WWE
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: HTN_Mentalcel, Lynxress and John Cracovizk
Probs tbh.

Human life “swings like a pendulum between pain and boredom.” - Schopenhauer

People struggle with the pain of constant striving to meet their desires, and when these are too easily satisfied, they quickly lapse into the despair of boredom.
Which is why beta providers no matter how much they gymmaxxed, will always be seen as boring by foids

Foids rather chase a thugmaxxed skinny bad boy than a bulked boring beta provider
 
Approximately 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, with the main reasons being financial problems and the famous 'wear and tear.' You know that classic line: 'Oh, it just wasn't like the beginning anymore and something is missing,' basically boredom. The truth is that men in a relationship have a very different psychology from women. The female psychology within a relationship has a biological clock for getting tired of the male...​

Car Breaking Up GIF by megan lockhart


Obviousness is a big turn-off and there's no avoiding it in a shared life under the same roof. That's why women are seeking fewer relationships nowadays, at least compared to men and to women of the past, because simply sharing a house with a man and discovering everything about him, with no secrets, nothing intriguing, no mystery, nothing to pique a woman's curiosity, is a big turn-off.

By design, a long-term relationship and life together is something that repels the feminine spirit, and as mentioned, this is evidenced by statistics, with women being the ones who initiate divorce the most, citing financial reasons (totally pragmatic, if he's not providing anymore, then he's no longer useful) and wear and tear (pure triviality, there are many things that can lead to this such as seeing famous couples on Instagram living a more exciting life, longing for multiple partners, the obviousness of already knowing that man). So, it makes sense to notice that when a woman reaches a certain age and is still single, she starts adopting cats.

adopts cat lady GIF


The behavior of a cat mimics that of a womanizer to a large extent; the cat only shows up when it wants to, only seeks affection when it wants to, if you try to pet the cat, it will usually not want it, it only comes on its own terms and is quite independent, leaving the house for days to procreate in the streets only to return later, pragmatically seeking cuddles and food; it's a behavior that is quite attractive to women.

On the other hand, men enjoy life together, the obviousness, and knowing their partner since the beginning of her life; they realize that the idea of boyfriends or spouses who were childhood friends is practically a male neurosis.

Look at how many celebrities, after achieving fame and being able to have a vast number of women, often choose a girl they knew before fame, very attached to teenage crushes...

messi_0-sixteen_nine.jpg


Waiting for the girl to be ready to take them as a consolation prize, like: 'Oh, Chad didn't want me, I've been with many guys... This one here is left, who waited for me all this time, now I'll settle for him.' These guys don't have the sagacity and the vision that we in this community have, the red pill/black pill is nothing more than a change in values and paradigms.

Before all of this, you probably didn't see this as a problem, dating a single mother, being a consolation prize; he is convinced that he is the best of the moment and not that the best man didn't want her. These men also don't realize that at 30 and 40 years old, if they've built something beyond appearance, they are at the peak of their career/intellect/physicality (if well maintained), while the woman, at the same age, is at the end of her career, swapping cats for hares, exchanging years of effort for the worst years of a woman's life, full of relationship baggage (which are not only biological, like children, they are also psycho-emotional, already somewhat traumatized by other 'toxic' relationships, guys who just used them and disappeared or did something else, full of baggage and a collection of problems that will have to be dealt with), but the normie man is not aware of this, and if you tell him about it? He'll call you paranoid because his value system does not align with yours.
We think very differently: 'if you're going to ask for this, you have to offer that.' Before, you valued one thing and today you value another, and your system doesn't align with the rest of society; if you demand what you think is fair? You'll be spat on by society. So, what's happening in the relationship market is that men are paying much higher than what you're willing to pay, simple as that.

Imagine you go to the market and oranges are priced at $100 per kilogram, and your nation's favorite fruit is the orange, everyone loves it, and men are willing to pay $100 for it, and it's also your favorite fruit, you would love to have an orange 😍... But do you think it's fair to pay that much for an orange? There's no use crying to the seller, because why would he sell it cheaply if there are plenty of people willing to pay more? So what's left for you? Joining a group of men who don't agree with the price of the orange or one that tells you how to improve yourself so you can pay less/or become accessible to you (literally the goal of 91% of this forum).

Saturday Night Live Nbc GIF by HULU


It all depends on how much money you have to spend and how much you're willing to haggle over the price per kilogram of oranges.

There are many self-proclaimed red pill creators who proclaim: 'tattoos are a red flag, more than X partners is a red flag,' and then the guy shows up with a girlfriend who has tattoos, dyed and short hair :lul:.

I'm not going to say that this guy is unhappy or coping because he might be happy... But you see, it's all about how much you're willing to overlook those values that you assumed after changing your paradigms, how much you want that kilogram of oranges and how much you're willing to pay.

So, understand, I'm referring to the price only in terms of money, which is not the only way you pay, such as: taking them out, going on trips, going to places you don't want to go, giving up certain hobbies. This tends to be the rule in most relationships, of course, there are cases where this doesn't happen, but when you start living together, you're no longer just one, there's more than one person to make happy besides yourself. And at least what is expected, said to the four winds, is: one day one does 80% and the other 20%, the next day you're lucky and both do 50%, and the next 70% and 30%, and so on... There are days when you have to give up more than your partner.

sad jeff buckley GIF by Greg Gunn


And I know, men love relationships, they like them more than women do, for simple reasons: we evolved as protectors and providers, benefiting throughout history in reproductive success with negotiation of fidelity and exclusivity, staying close to your partner, why? Because then other men wouldn't come near and disrupt the guy's reproductive process, preventing false paternities, with his beloved nearby, he could also provide and protect better, avoiding risks against predators, diseases, etc., being extremely careful with the receptacle of his genetics (AKA. Mother of his children), but the woman doesn't, she doesn't benefit as much from this system.

The woman benefits more from a system where she jumps from branch to branch, leaving several guys in the 'closet,' available for any need she may have (consolation prizes, providers, orbiting betas, and a reproductive partner).

Overall, women are very good at dividing men: friend, coworker, boyfriend, reproducer (AKA. Chad), and the consolation prize (that possible guy who will take her if everything goes wrong after 35).

That's the logic of our society because it's very feminine, and you can also observe it in a technocratic way, with this imitating feminine behavior. Men are complicated, still in this Neanderthal module, wanting one woman to be everything: a friend, a mother to their own and often to themselves, an emotional provider, and also a woman for sex.

And that's the problem with men, they're not playing well currently, the rules of the game are dictated by women, if they don't adapt, they will suffer.

Some say that technology is the problem, no, technology is not the problem, technology imitates the current power, which is feminine.

Valentines Day Love GIF by Jimmy Simpson


What are Tinder and Instagram if not catalogs of men for women?

Helping them to separate men based on pragmatism because we are tools for them, it's almost as if they classify men as 'this one is a hammer, this one is a screwdriver,' each with its function: there's the beta orbiter friend (friendzone), the reproducer (hit it and quit it), the sugar daddy (microwave, heats it up for others to eat), and the emotional provision boyfriend who receives sex almost out of pity.

All cataloged in the apps, remember that today people meet more through apps than in the real world, the metaverse is in full swing (people meet and relate more through the internet, a parallel world where they project what they want to be, not what they are. Because, well, the photos are only the best ones, the moments are only the best ones and don't show the real person (appearance and emotional state), almost like makeup (something widely used by women). If men were the prevailing powers, an androcentric society, we would see apps that cater to these masculine interests: marriage, parenthood, more conservative and right-wing interests (according to surveys, men are already leaning more to the right while women lean more to the left). So, Instagram in an androcentric environment would be very different.

Basically, you choose the man you want to be. If you want to be the reproducer, beta orbiter, sugar daddy, or the husband. I believe most will want to be the reproducer. You can't be all at the same time.

If you're too straight-laced, you won't get anyone excited. If you're a sugar daddy, you'll end up with an undeclared escort. If you're the husband, you'll be a mix of sugar daddy and beta orbiter. If you want to be the reproducer, you'll need to develop the required qualities through looksmaxing and not be too attached. If you can't, and still want the orange, you'll end up as one of the other three.

Many believe that the black pill/red pill is an almost magical esoteric awakening, reaching a higher level of consciousness or something like that, but it's merely a change of paradigms.

There are no harsher truths, no one true truth. Not even in the movie where these pills were taken (Matrix), the outside world is nothing more than a different world from what the Matrix is.

matrix GIF


No one knows if the outside world isn't also simulated, a matrix within a matrix.

So you've just changed your paradigms, your values are different, you value youth more, don't want older women with children, want virginity, and so on. The hard part is, you want that, but can you get it? And then comes the bargaining... 'Yeah, that's what I want, but they can't offer it, and I need to ejaculate... I just want to have sex with her and disappear... But who's going to cuddle with me? Is there someone else having sex with her too...? I want her just for myself...'

The more you want, the more you need to offer. Choose how much you want, show how much you have to offer, and how attractive you are.​
GIGA high IQ
saved will read later.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: John Cracovizk
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead and !MagicMan777
good thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: John Cracovizk
Approximately 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, with the main reasons being financial problems and the famous 'wear and tear.' You know that classic line: 'Oh, it just wasn't like the beginning anymore and something is missing,' basically boredom. The truth is that men in a relationship have a very different psychology from women. The female psychology within a relationship has a biological clock for getting tired of the male...​

Car Breaking Up GIF by megan lockhart


Obviousness is a big turn-off and there's no avoiding it in a shared life under the same roof. That's why women are seeking fewer relationships nowadays, at least compared to men and to women of the past, because simply sharing a house with a man and discovering everything about him, with no secrets, nothing intriguing, no mystery, nothing to pique a woman's curiosity, is a big turn-off.

By design, a long-term relationship and life together is something that repels the feminine spirit, and as mentioned, this is evidenced by statistics, with women being the ones who initiate divorce the most, citing financial reasons (totally pragmatic, if he's not providing anymore, then he's no longer useful) and wear and tear (pure triviality, there are many things that can lead to this such as seeing famous couples on Instagram living a more exciting life, longing for multiple partners, the obviousness of already knowing that man). So, it makes sense to notice that when a woman reaches a certain age and is still single, she starts adopting cats.

adopts cat lady GIF


The behavior of a cat mimics that of a womanizer to a large extent; the cat only shows up when it wants to, only seeks affection when it wants to, if you try to pet the cat, it will usually not want it, it only comes on its own terms and is quite independent, leaving the house for days to procreate in the streets only to return later, pragmatically seeking cuddles and food; it's a behavior that is quite attractive to women.

On the other hand, men enjoy life together, the obviousness, and knowing their partner since the beginning of her life; they realize that the idea of boyfriends or spouses who were childhood friends is practically a male neurosis.

Look at how many celebrities, after achieving fame and being able to have a vast number of women, often choose a girl they knew before fame, very attached to teenage crushes...

messi_0-sixteen_nine.jpg


Waiting for the girl to be ready to take them as a consolation prize, like: 'Oh, Chad didn't want me, I've been with many guys... This one here is left, who waited for me all this time, now I'll settle for him.' These guys don't have the sagacity and the vision that we in this community have, the red pill/black pill is nothing more than a change in values and paradigms.

Before all of this, you probably didn't see this as a problem, dating a single mother, being a consolation prize; he is convinced that he is the best of the moment and not that the best man didn't want her. These men also don't realize that at 30 and 40 years old, if they've built something beyond appearance, they are at the peak of their career/intellect/physicality (if well maintained), while the woman, at the same age, is at the end of her career, swapping cats for hares, exchanging years of effort for the worst years of a woman's life, full of relationship baggage (which are not only biological, like children, they are also psycho-emotional, already somewhat traumatized by other 'toxic' relationships, guys who just used them and disappeared or did something else, full of baggage and a collection of problems that will have to be dealt with), but the normie man is not aware of this, and if you tell him about it? He'll call you paranoid because his value system does not align with yours.
We think very differently: 'if you're going to ask for this, you have to offer that.' Before, you valued one thing and today you value another, and your system doesn't align with the rest of society; if you demand what you think is fair? You'll be spat on by society. So, what's happening in the relationship market is that men are paying much higher than what you're willing to pay, simple as that.

Imagine you go to the market and oranges are priced at $100 per kilogram, and your nation's favorite fruit is the orange, everyone loves it, and men are willing to pay $100 for it, and it's also your favorite fruit, you would love to have an orange 😍... But do you think it's fair to pay that much for an orange? There's no use crying to the seller, because why would he sell it cheaply if there are plenty of people willing to pay more? So what's left for you? Joining a group of men who don't agree with the price of the orange or one that tells you how to improve yourself so you can pay less/or become accessible to you (literally the goal of 91% of this forum).

Saturday Night Live Nbc GIF by HULU


It all depends on how much money you have to spend and how much you're willing to haggle over the price per kilogram of oranges.

There are many self-proclaimed red pill creators who proclaim: 'tattoos are a red flag, more than X partners is a red flag,' and then the guy shows up with a girlfriend who has tattoos, dyed and short hair :lul:.

I'm not going to say that this guy is unhappy or coping because he might be happy... But you see, it's all about how much you're willing to overlook those values that you assumed after changing your paradigms, how much you want that kilogram of oranges and how much you're willing to pay.

So, understand, I'm referring to the price only in terms of money, which is not the only way you pay, such as: taking them out, going on trips, going to places you don't want to go, giving up certain hobbies. This tends to be the rule in most relationships, of course, there are cases where this doesn't happen, but when you start living together, you're no longer just one, there's more than one person to make happy besides yourself. And at least what is expected, said to the four winds, is: one day one does 80% and the other 20%, the next day you're lucky and both do 50%, and the next 70% and 30%, and so on... There are days when you have to give up more than your partner.

sad jeff buckley GIF by Greg Gunn


And I know, men love relationships, they like them more than women do, for simple reasons: we evolved as protectors and providers, benefiting throughout history in reproductive success with negotiation of fidelity and exclusivity, staying close to your partner, why? Because then other men wouldn't come near and disrupt the guy's reproductive process, preventing false paternities, with his beloved nearby, he could also provide and protect better, avoiding risks against predators, diseases, etc., being extremely careful with the receptacle of his genetics (AKA. Mother of his children), but the woman doesn't, she doesn't benefit as much from this system.

The woman benefits more from a system where she jumps from branch to branch, leaving several guys in the 'closet,' available for any need she may have (consolation prizes, providers, orbiting betas, and a reproductive partner).

Overall, women are very good at dividing men: friend, coworker, boyfriend, reproducer (AKA. Chad), and the consolation prize (that possible guy who will take her if everything goes wrong after 35).

That's the logic of our society because it's very feminine, and you can also observe it in a technocratic way, with this imitating feminine behavior. Men are complicated, still in this Neanderthal module, wanting one woman to be everything: a friend, a mother to their own and often to themselves, an emotional provider, and also a woman for sex.

And that's the problem with men, they're not playing well currently, the rules of the game are dictated by women, if they don't adapt, they will suffer.

Some say that technology is the problem, no, technology is not the problem, technology imitates the current power, which is feminine.

Valentines Day Love GIF by Jimmy Simpson


What are Tinder and Instagram if not catalogs of men for women?

Helping them to separate men based on pragmatism because we are tools for them, it's almost as if they classify men as 'this one is a hammer, this one is a screwdriver,' each with its function: there's the beta orbiter friend (friendzone), the reproducer (hit it and quit it), the sugar daddy (microwave, heats it up for others to eat), and the emotional provision boyfriend who receives sex almost out of pity.

All cataloged in the apps, remember that today people meet more through apps than in the real world, the metaverse is in full swing (people meet and relate more through the internet, a parallel world where they project what they want to be, not what they are. Because, well, the photos are only the best ones, the moments are only the best ones and don't show the real person (appearance and emotional state), almost like makeup (something widely used by women). If men were the prevailing powers, an androcentric society, we would see apps that cater to these masculine interests: marriage, parenthood, more conservative and right-wing interests (according to surveys, men are already leaning more to the right while women lean more to the left). So, Instagram in an androcentric environment would be very different.

Basically, you choose the man you want to be. If you want to be the reproducer, beta orbiter, sugar daddy, or the husband. I believe most will want to be the reproducer. You can't be all at the same time.

If you're too straight-laced, you won't get anyone excited. If you're a sugar daddy, you'll end up with an undeclared escort. If you're the husband, you'll be a mix of sugar daddy and beta orbiter. If you want to be the reproducer, you'll need to develop the required qualities through looksmaxing and not be too attached. If you can't, and still want the orange, you'll end up as one of the other three.

Many believe that the black pill/red pill is an almost magical esoteric awakening, reaching a higher level of consciousness or something like that, but it's merely a change of paradigms.

There are no harsher truths, no one true truth. Not even in the movie where these pills were taken (Matrix), the outside world is nothing more than a different world from what the Matrix is.

matrix GIF


No one knows if the outside world isn't also simulated, a matrix within a matrix.

So you've just changed your paradigms, your values are different, you value youth more, don't want older women with children, want virginity, and so on. The hard part is, you want that, but can you get it? And then comes the bargaining... 'Yeah, that's what I want, but they can't offer it, and I need to ejaculate... I just want to have sex with her and disappear... But who's going to cuddle with me? Is there someone else having sex with her too...? I want her just for myself...'

The more you want, the more you need to offer. Choose how much you want, show how much you have to offer, and how attractive you are.​
IF YOU'RE ATHEIST AND DON'T WANT CHILDREN HOW AREN'T YOU GAY YET?
 
JFL kill all females.

Thanks op, I guess it's either dating way below your looksmatch or betabuxing I really want to just cuddle I don't care about sex that much to begin with

I now understand why chads date Beckies but why do Stacies date normies? Besides betabuxing, they shouldn't desire stability at all right?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: poopoohead, HTN_Mentalcel and Eren
I now understand why chads date Beckies but why do Stacies date normies? Besides betabuxing, they shouldn't desire stability at all right?
Sometimes the normie manages to arouse intense emotions by using some fetish of the woman (as several serial killers manage through hybristophilia, see this thread of mine), but I believe that most of the time it's pure pragmatism: sometimes they want a shoulder to cry on (that's when the "pretend to be gay bf" works :lul:), they see that the beta guy is a good boy and can be a good father to her future children (possibly from other guys) or they're just horny and by circumstances the guy gets lucky. But let's be honest, what you're talking about is a rare exception.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Subhra26, poopoohead and Patris
CC916EB8 0575 4016 8B84 ECF8CA1288C1
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orvka381, Patris and John Cracovizk
There is some text in this generalization
 
  • JFL
Reactions: John Cracovizk
Approximately 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, with the main reasons being financial problems and the famous 'wear and tear.' You know that classic line: 'Oh, it just wasn't like the beginning anymore and something is missing,' basically boredom. The truth is that men in a relationship have a very different psychology from women. The female psychology within a relationship has a biological clock for getting tired of the male...​

Car Breaking Up GIF by megan lockhart


Obviousness is a big turn-off and there's no avoiding it in a shared life under the same roof. That's why women are seeking fewer relationships nowadays, at least compared to men and to women of the past, because simply sharing a house with a man and discovering everything about him, with no secrets, nothing intriguing, no mystery, nothing to pique a woman's curiosity, is a big turn-off.

By design, a long-term relationship and life together is something that repels the feminine spirit, and as mentioned, this is evidenced by statistics, with women being the ones who initiate divorce the most, citing financial reasons (totally pragmatic, if he's not providing anymore, then he's no longer useful) and wear and tear (pure triviality, there are many things that can lead to this such as seeing famous couples on Instagram living a more exciting life, longing for multiple partners, the obviousness of already knowing that man). So, it makes sense to notice that when a woman reaches a certain age and is still single, she starts adopting cats.

adopts cat lady GIF


The behavior of a cat mimics that of a womanizer to a large extent; the cat only shows up when it wants to, only seeks affection when it wants to, if you try to pet the cat, it will usually not want it, it only comes on its own terms and is quite independent, leaving the house for days to procreate in the streets only to return later, pragmatically seeking cuddles and food; it's a behavior that is quite attractive to women.

On the other hand, men enjoy life together, the obviousness, and knowing their partner since the beginning of her life; they realize that the idea of boyfriends or spouses who were childhood friends is practically a male neurosis.

Look at how many celebrities, after achieving fame and being able to have a vast number of women, often choose a girl they knew before fame, very attached to teenage crushes...

messi_0-sixteen_nine.jpg


Waiting for the girl to be ready to take them as a consolation prize, like: 'Oh, Chad didn't want me, I've been with many guys... This one here is left, who waited for me all this time, now I'll settle for him.' These guys don't have the sagacity and the vision that we in this community have, the red pill/black pill is nothing more than a change in values and paradigms.

Before all of this, you probably didn't see this as a problem, dating a single mother, being a consolation prize; he is convinced that he is the best of the moment and not that the best man didn't want her. These men also don't realize that at 30 and 40 years old, if they've built something beyond appearance, they are at the peak of their career/intellect/physicality (if well maintained), while the woman, at the same age, is at the end of her career, swapping cats for hares, exchanging years of effort for the worst years of a woman's life, full of relationship baggage (which are not only biological, like children, they are also psycho-emotional, already somewhat traumatized by other 'toxic' relationships, guys who just used them and disappeared or did something else, full of baggage and a collection of problems that will have to be dealt with), but the normie man is not aware of this, and if you tell him about it? He'll call you paranoid because his value system does not align with yours.
We think very differently: 'if you're going to ask for this, you have to offer that.' Before, you valued one thing and today you value another, and your system doesn't align with the rest of society; if you demand what you think is fair? You'll be spat on by society. So, what's happening in the relationship market is that men are paying much higher than what you're willing to pay, simple as that.

Imagine you go to the market and oranges are priced at $100 per kilogram, and your nation's favorite fruit is the orange, everyone loves it, and men are willing to pay $100 for it, and it's also your favorite fruit, you would love to have an orange 😍... But do you think it's fair to pay that much for an orange? There's no use crying to the seller, because why would he sell it cheaply if there are plenty of people willing to pay more? So what's left for you? Joining a group of men who don't agree with the price of the orange or one that tells you how to improve yourself so you can pay less/or become accessible to you (literally the goal of 91% of this forum).

Saturday Night Live Nbc GIF by HULU


It all depends on how much money you have to spend and how much you're willing to haggle over the price per kilogram of oranges.

There are many self-proclaimed red pill creators who proclaim: 'tattoos are a red flag, more than X partners is a red flag,' and then the guy shows up with a girlfriend who has tattoos, dyed and short hair :lul:.

I'm not going to say that this guy is unhappy or coping because he might be happy... But you see, it's all about how much you're willing to overlook those values that you assumed after changing your paradigms, how much you want that kilogram of oranges and how much you're willing to pay.

So, understand, I'm referring to the price only in terms of money, which is not the only way you pay, such as: taking them out, going on trips, going to places you don't want to go, giving up certain hobbies. This tends to be the rule in most relationships, of course, there are cases where this doesn't happen, but when you start living together, you're no longer just one, there's more than one person to make happy besides yourself. And at least what is expected, said to the four winds, is: one day one does 80% and the other 20%, the next day you're lucky and both do 50%, and the next 70% and 30%, and so on... There are days when you have to give up more than your partner.

sad jeff buckley GIF by Greg Gunn


And I know, men love relationships, they like them more than women do, for simple reasons: we evolved as protectors and providers, benefiting throughout history in reproductive success with negotiation of fidelity and exclusivity, staying close to your partner, why? Because then other men wouldn't come near and disrupt the guy's reproductive process, preventing false paternities, with his beloved nearby, he could also provide and protect better, avoiding risks against predators, diseases, etc., being extremely careful with the receptacle of his genetics (AKA. Mother of his children), but the woman doesn't, she doesn't benefit as much from this system.

The woman benefits more from a system where she jumps from branch to branch, leaving several guys in the 'closet,' available for any need she may have (consolation prizes, providers, orbiting betas, and a reproductive partner).

Overall, women are very good at dividing men: friend, coworker, boyfriend, reproducer (AKA. Chad), and the consolation prize (that possible guy who will take her if everything goes wrong after 35).

That's the logic of our society because it's very feminine, and you can also observe it in a technocratic way, with this imitating feminine behavior. Men are complicated, still in this Neanderthal module, wanting one woman to be everything: a friend, a mother to their own and often to themselves, an emotional provider, and also a woman for sex.

And that's the problem with men, they're not playing well currently, the rules of the game are dictated by women, if they don't adapt, they will suffer.

Some say that technology is the problem, no, technology is not the problem, technology imitates the current power, which is feminine.

Valentines Day Love GIF by Jimmy Simpson


What are Tinder and Instagram if not catalogs of men for women?

Helping them to separate men based on pragmatism because we are tools for them, it's almost as if they classify men as 'this one is a hammer, this one is a screwdriver,' each with its function: there's the beta orbiter friend (friendzone), the reproducer (hit it and quit it), the sugar daddy (microwave, heats it up for others to eat), and the emotional provision boyfriend who receives sex almost out of pity.

All cataloged in the apps, remember that today people meet more through apps than in the real world, the metaverse is in full swing (people meet and relate more through the internet, a parallel world where they project what they want to be, not what they are. Because, well, the photos are only the best ones, the moments are only the best ones and don't show the real person (appearance and emotional state), almost like makeup (something widely used by women). If men were the prevailing powers, an androcentric society, we would see apps that cater to these masculine interests: marriage, parenthood, more conservative and right-wing interests (according to surveys, men are already leaning more to the right while women lean more to the left). So, Instagram in an androcentric environment would be very different.

Basically, you choose the man you want to be. If you want to be the reproducer, beta orbiter, sugar daddy, or the husband. I believe most will want to be the reproducer. You can't be all at the same time.

If you're too straight-laced, you won't get anyone excited. If you're a sugar daddy, you'll end up with an undeclared escort. If you're the husband, you'll be a mix of sugar daddy and beta orbiter. If you want to be the reproducer, you'll need to develop the required qualities through looksmaxing and not be too attached. If you can't, and still want the orange, you'll end up as one of the other three.

Many believe that the black pill/red pill is an almost magical esoteric awakening, reaching a higher level of consciousness or something like that, but it's merely a change of paradigms.

There are no harsher truths, no one true truth. Not even in the movie where these pills were taken (Matrix), the outside world is nothing more than a different world from what the Matrix is.

matrix GIF


No one knows if the outside world isn't also simulated, a matrix within a matrix.

So you've just changed your paradigms, your values are different, you value youth more, don't want older women with children, want virginity, and so on. The hard part is, you want that, but can you get it? And then comes the bargaining... 'Yeah, that's what I want, but they can't offer it, and I need to ejaculate... I just want to have sex with her and disappear... But who's going to cuddle with me? Is there someone else having sex with her too...? I want her just for myself...'

The more you want, the more you need to offer. Choose how much you want, show how much you have to offer, and how attractive you are.​
Every single word
Sometimes Even obvious truth slap is needed n harden our resolves..

Offtopic--- be catpilled rn, pump n dump women....Then find a religious village women in some shithole for a stable relationship theory
 
  • +1
Reactions: John Cracovizk
messi scored tbh
 
  • JFL
Reactions: John Cracovizk
messi scored tbh
Maybe if he didn't had his status and money, to me, she's the one who scored! Won't have to work ever again and every family member of her is retired rn.
 
Never move together with a Foid before marriage or birth, she will loose interest real fast
 
  • +1
Reactions: John Cracovizk
Read most of it
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead and John Cracovizk
Maybe if he didn't had his status and money, to me, she's the one who scored! Won't have to work ever again and every family member of her is retired rn.
Ur right but in terms of looks, Messi scored hard
 
  • +1
Reactions: John Cracovizk
Forgive me! For my comprehension skills are poor!!
How do you explain women in super long term relationships? Do you think that they are secretly wanting something else on the side? Or are there outliers who’s brain chemistry is different to normal woman’s where they are more similar to a mans
 
this is every other movie / drama made ever, lord meeks mogs foids to death. He literally used them to his advantage



he didn't even "use" them, they gave him everything after his mugshot went viral

Img 6077 jpeg
 
Last edited:
Never move together with a Foid before marriage or birth, she will loose interest real fast
be rich + never move in at all, always be travelling and working oustide + never get legally married
 
  • +1
Reactions: future_

Similar threads

RichmondBread
Replies
2
Views
63
Hardrada
Hardrada
Freixel
Replies
8
Views
288
darkness97
darkness97
letsgetout
Replies
16
Views
213
Funnyunenjoyer1
Funnyunenjoyer1
Subhra26
Replies
0
Views
94
Subhra26
Subhra26

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top