Feminists dont hate patriarchy but men

B

blackpillerguy

Gold
Joined
Jan 9, 2023
Posts
892
Reputation
813
..
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Tallooksmaxxer
Patriarchy never existed
 
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940
thenewhebbe said:
It clearly does just look at the senate, congress and the presidents
Click to expand...
No, these men trample upon the rights of the lower status men to impress their wives.
 
  • +1
Reactions: gribsufer1
DFENS said:
No, these men trample upon the rights of the lower status men to impress their wives.
Click to expand...
Patiacry means men are in power and men are in power
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16515
thenewhebbe said:
Patiacry means men are in power and men are in power
Click to expand...
Nonsense! A FEW men are in power, and these men are not supportive of each other when it comes to women. For example, look at how easily Trump wants to destroy Biden based on accusations of abusing women, and Biden of Trump vice versa.
 
mecha72 said:
I will never let a women of all people be in charge of me that's just cucked
Click to expand...
It's not cucked, it's dangerous because on average they hate men.
 
AngryShane said:
Women don't hate men.Women hate UGLY men...
Click to expand...
No, they hate all men, evidenced by how they attack even Leonardo Di Caprio and other high status gl men. Look at cases of false rape accusations. Those are not just ugly men. Men need to band together to fight against misandry.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Clown Show
DFENS said:
No, they hate all men, evidenced by how they attack even Leonardo Di Caprio and other high status gl men. Look at cases of false rape accusations. Those are not just ugly men. Men need to band together to fight against misandry.
Click to expand...
This doesn't mean that women hate men per se.The women trying to "Metoo" famous celebrities are obviously doing it for monetary gain.Also,How are you sure that these accusations are real?This could all be one publicity stunt for the women to get some attention and influence...
 
AngryShane said:
This doesn't mean that women hate men per se.The women trying to "Metoo" famous celebrities are obviously doing it for monetary gain.Also,How are you sure that these accusations are real?This could all be one publicity stunt for the women to get some attention and influence...
Click to expand...
No they do it simply because they like the power to ruin a man. It's not just famous celebrities, but coworkers, fellow students and even former boyfriends they do it to. A study showed that a large part of false accusers do it for emotional gain (not material):

 
Ekil73_YT said:
It’s due to differences in the nature of the sexes.
Click to expand...
It might be patiarcy would still be true. But women participation have increased
 
AngryShane said:
This doesn't mean that women hate men per se.The women trying to "Metoo" famous celebrities are obviously doing it for monetary gain.Also,How are you sure that these accusations are real?This could all be one publicity stunt for the women to get some attention and influence...
Click to expand...
Sorry, but it's clear that women don't really like men. Women constantly rail against their "chads" too if you haven't noticed.
Ekil73_YT said:
It’s due to differences in the nature of the sexes.
Click to expand...
It's because women pressure men to trample over each other to gain status in order to impress women. Women deselect men who cooperate without exploitation of each other. Women select for men who like to dominate over other men. This means basically that women use men as tools to attack and exploit other men.
 
DFENS said:
No they do it simply because they like the power to ruin a man. It's not just famous celebrities, but coworkers, fellow students and even former boyfriends they do it to. A study showed that a large part of false accusers do it for emotional gain (not material):

Click to expand...
This is not going to work for every woman.The woman have to be at least a HTB in order to be taken seriously.Nobody is going to listen to a beckie woman or lower looks level due to her being labeled as a "Karen".Also, Alot of bosses are not going to just fire their employee for a false accusation because they know it would be bad for their company...
 
DFENS said:
It's because women pressure men to trample over each other to gain status in order to impress women. Women deselect men who cooperate without exploitation of each other. Women select for men who like to dominate over other men. This means basically that women use men as tools to attack and exploit other men.
Click to expand...
You do know that women do this to other woman aswell correct?This is not a female trait.It's a human trait...
 
DFENS said:
Sorry, but it's clear that women don't really like men. Women constantly rail against their "chads" too if you haven't noticed.
Click to expand...
Proof?Because from my observation from experience women tend to treat chad as a deity while treating normies and below as peasants...
 
AngryShane said:
This is not going to work for every woman.The woman have to be at least a HTB in order to be taken seriously.Nobody is going to listen to a beckie woman or lower looks level due to her being labeled as a "Karen".Also, Alot of bosses are not going to just fire their employee for a false accusation because they know it would be bad for their company...
Click to expand...
You are coping. Disney dropped Depp before he could defend himself.
 
AngryShane said:
Proof?Because from my observation from experience women tend to treat chad as a deity while treating normies and below as peasants...
Click to expand...
They do that for a while to get something out of them and then they get sick of them. Look at marriages failing among gl Hollywood stars. They fail at around the same rate as the normie population. Sorry, but you are coping.
 
DFENS said:
You are coping. Disney dropped Depp before he could defend himself.
Click to expand...
How do you know this for sure?Didn't he won the case against amber heard?Why should it matter now.His name have been cleared from any bad publicity...
DFENS said:
They do that for a while to get something out of them and then they get sick of them. Look at marriages failing among gl Hollywood stars. They fail at around the same rate as the normie population. Sorry, but you are coping.
Click to expand...
That's usually due to the woman getting bored of previous chad and moving onto the next chad.Honestly Speaking if what you are saying is true about these "accusations"what exactly is your solution for this problem?
 
DFENS said:
No, studies have shown that women have far more ingroup bias than men. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/
Click to expand...
This article is hogwash...You sound really young.I have worked jobs that was female dominated and it was nothing but drama and chaos.Constant backbiting and spreading rumors amongst one another.Women don't like women more than men.Infact, Women hate other women more than they oppose men because know that the female is always have some sort of nefarious motive...
 
AngryShane said:
How do you know this for sure?Didn't he won the case against amber heard?Why should it matter now.His name have been cleared from any bad publicity...

That's usually due to the woman getting bored of previous chad and moving onto the next chad.Honestly Speaking if what you are saying is true about these "accusations"what exactly is your solution for this problem?
Click to expand...
Depp only won because he could afford the lawsuit and had tons of fans (including male fans) supporting him. A normie (however gl) would be dropped by any company based on a mere accusation. Stop coping.

"Women getting bored of previous chad" Exactly. Why do they get bored though? And once they get bored they turn on them. That's why even "chads" need to fight for their rights as men. The solution is to expose women for how they are, and get men to DEMAND their rights and protections under the law just like the civil rights movement demanded their rights as colored people despite all the hate (racism is really just anti-male as well btw).
 
AngryShane said:
This article is hogwash...You sound really young.I have worked jobs that was female dominated and it was nothing but drama and chaos.Constant backbiting and spreading rumors amongst one another.Women don't like women more than men.Infact, Women hate other women more than they oppose men because know that the female is always have some sort of nefarious motive...
Click to expand...
Yes, this doesn't contradict the study; among each other they can't even behave (lesbian couples are some of the most violent relationships btw), but when faced with men as a group, women band together against us in hate (otherwise there would be no feminist movement in the first place). And btw, why do you think the work field even became female dominated in the first place? When I look at psychology, teaching and social work throughout history, these fields were (as with everything) created by men, and then women kicked men out and took over. It's what they are trying to do to STEM now, and frankly are succeeding (because fewer boys are getting into college as we speak, EVEN IN SAUDI ARABIA). The reason: female teachers discriminate boys so they get discouraged and get lower grades.
 
DFENS said:
The solution is to expose women for how they are, and get men to DEMAND their rights and protections under the law just like the civil rights movement demanded their rights as colored people despite all the hate (racism is really just anti-male as well btw).
Click to expand...
Men are already doing this it's called the "redpill manosphere"....
 
AngryShane said:
Men are already doing this it's called the "redpill manosphere"....
Click to expand...
No, most of these guys are tradcons who just want to go back to enslaving themselves to provide for women and die in wars as cannon fodder for them. And the rest are trying to scam other men in order to gain money like Andrew Tate did (and if you listen to him, he constantly ridicules men who are not like him). None of them organize against the draft, child support laws and call for legal, social and financial protections from metoo accusations.
 
DFENS said:
(lesbian couples are some of the most violent relationships btw), but when faced with men as a group, women band together against us in hate (otherwise there would be no feminist movement in the first place). And btw, why do you think the work field even became female dominated in the first place?
Click to expand...
The only reason why feminism was created was the mere fact of average to ugly looking women being able to have a chance to have a "hoe phase" with HTN+.You earnestly believe that women care about feminism.Heck, Most of them don't even know why it was created...
DFENS said:
When I look at psychology, teaching and social work throughout history, these fields were (as with everything) created by men, and then women kicked men out and took over. It's what they are trying to do to STEM now, and frankly are succeeding (because fewer boys are getting into college as we speak, EVEN IN SAUDI ARABIA). The reason: female teachers discriminate boys so they get discouraged and get lower grades.
Click to expand...
The reason for this is the fact that it's cheaper for companies to higher women than it is for men since women don't negotiate with their bosses for higher payments and the fact that women are going to spend their money on dumb stuff as usual...The CEO's of these companies such as GUCCI,Louie Vitton,Sephora,H&M,etc.. are actually working together with the educational system by funding them to push more women into colleges to get more educated so that they can spend their money on these companies with interest to make them richer.It's all just one big Marketing scheme...
 
DFENS said:
No, most of these guys are tradcons who just want to go back to enslaving themselves to provide for women and die in wars as cannon fodder for them. And the rest are trying to scam other men in order to gain money like Andrew Tate did (and if you listen to him, he constantly ridicules men who are not like him). None of them organize against the draft, child support laws and call for legal, social and financial protections from metoo accusations.
Click to expand...
Well this is true for the most part.But,there is a minority of red pillers that pro male rights the problem is these men are being stifled by the social media algorithm...
 
AngryShane said:
The only reason why feminism was created was the mere fact of average to ugly looking women being able to have a chance to have a "hoe phase" with HTN+.You earnestly believe that women care about feminism.Heck, Most of them don't even know why it was created...

The reason for this is the fact that it's cheaper for companies to higher women than it is for men since women don't negotiate with their bosses for higher payments and the fact that women are going to spend their money on dumb stuff as usual...The CEO's of these companies such as GUCCI,Louie Vitton,Sephora,H&M,etc.. are actually working together with the educational system by funding them to push more women into colleges to get more educated so that they can spend their money on these companies with interest to make them richer.It's all just one big Marketing scheme...
Click to expand...
You are coping HARD now. Read E.B. Bax of the early 1900s on why feminism was invented and what it is. It was misandry from the start. The hoe phase always existed. It was never really suppressed anyway. Just look at how few men got to reproduce all the way back in ancient Egypt. And how can women be hoes if they only go to htn+? That is the opposite of being loose. That is being MORE sexually careful if anything.

"women don't negotiate with their bosses for higher payments"

What kind of cope is this? A giga part of feminism is the non-existant "gender pay gap" they harp about all the time. They are constantly demanding higher pay if you haven't noticed.

"It's all just one big Marketing scheme..."

So you are saying muh evul elite men are brainwashing the innocent puppet women. You forget one thing: Women demand their husbands and boyfriends to earn more than them and provide for all the "spending on dumb stuff". And women don't date men who earn less or are less educated.

You have to know that the high status rich men are all anti-male themselves. They have daughters and wives whom they protect from all the "creepy" low status male employees.

You have swallowed the feminist lie that men are somehow all misogynists who look to keep women down and promote men (while in reality men work the most dangerous jobs, have the highest work related deaths, and constitute most of the homeless population).
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
AngryShane said:
Well this is true for the most part.But,there is a minority of red pillers that pro male rights the problem is these men are being stifled by the social media algorithm...
Click to expand...
True. But I would not call them red pill then but simply MRAs or pro-male activists. The mainstream redpillers like Tate, Sneako, Fresh and Fit, Hamza etc. are all pro-male-slavery not pro-male-liberation.
 
DFENS said:
You are coping HARD now. Read E.B. Bax of the early 1900s on why feminism was invented and what it is. It was misandry from the start. The hoe phase always existed. It was never really suppressed anyway. Just look at how few men got to reproduce all the way back in ancient Egypt. And how can women be hoes if they only go to htn+? That is the opposite of being loose. That is being MORE sexually careful if anything.
Click to expand...
Feminism is just female nature out in the open.Meaning most women being able to sleep around with a minority of good looking men without being shamed for it.Because back in the 1900s the woman had no other chose to but be married and let men provide from them since there was not alot of jobs available for women to be self sufficent. You can ask any women 65+ they'll tell you the exact same thing...
DFENS said:
"women don't negotiate with their bosses for higher payments"

What kind of cope is this? A giga part of feminism is the non-existant "gender pay gap" they harp about all the time. They are constantly demanding higher pay if you haven't noticed.
Click to expand...
This is just a feminist lie that was created for them to be paid more money for doing less work due to them having a vagina...
DFENS said:
"It's all just one big Marketing scheme..."

So you are saying muh evul elite men are brainwashing the innocent puppet women. You forget one thing: Women demand their husbands and boyfriends to earn more than them and provide for all the "spending on dumb stuff". And women don't date men who earn less or are less educated.

You have to know that the high status rich men are all anti-male themselves. They have daughters and wives whom they protect from all the "creepy" low status male employees.

You have swallowed the feminist lie that men are somehow all misogynists who look to keep women down and promote men (while in reality men work the most dangerous jobs, have the highest work related deaths, and constitute most of the homeless population).
Click to expand...
Women do date men that make less than them as long as he has good looks,potential and work ethic...

The high status rich men are anti-male due to the fact that they are trying to screw over other men so they can earn more money have more access to women.High status rich men are know cheat on their wives alot....

I never stated that all men are misogynists.It's like a said before.Feminism is just female nature out in the open.Also, As i stated before, You sound young and just started college and you are being bombarded with feminist and left wing ideology this is why you have this whole notion of men taking back patriarchy.Once you get out in the adult world nobody care about this sort of stuff...
 
AngryShane said:
Feminism is just female nature out in the open.Meaning most women being able to sleep around with a minority of good looking men without being shamed for it.Because back in the 1900s the woman had no other chose to but be married and let men provide from them since there was not alot of jobs available for women to be self sufficent. You can ask any women 65+ they'll tell you the exact same thing...

This is just a feminist lie that was created for them to be paid more money for doing less work due to them having a vagina...

Women do date men that make less than them as long as he has good looks,potential and work ethic...

The high status rich men are anti-male due to the fact that they are trying to screw over other men so they can earn more money have more access to women.High status rich men are know cheat on their wives alot....

I never stated that all men are misogynists.It's like a said before.Feminism is just female nature out in the open.Also, As i stated before, You sound young and just started college and you are being bombarded with feminist and left wing ideology this is why you have this whole notion of men taking back patriarchy.Once you get out in the adult world nobody care about this sort of stuff...
Click to expand...
Man, you are deceived. I'm not so young, I'm 31 and not a "take back patriarchy" type guy because patriarchy never existed in hte first place. And I'm a leftist and for equality, which feminism is NOT. Feminism is a reactionary hate movement and women love capitalism and select for the most competitive men which they then leech off.

It's you who have given into feminist lies.
"there was not alot of jobs available for women to be self sufficent"
Totally false. The women of the 50s simply didn't need to work because they could leech off men who had an easier time bribing a woman into their lives due to the better economy back then. But wives had cushy jobs before they got pregnant, look it up. Nobody stopped them from working. Ever. Women simply didn't want to work because there was always a dude who craves for a woman they could leech off.

"High status rich men are know cheat on their wives alot...."

False. More anti-male lies. Now you sound like a salty female redditor who is projecting. But even if true, this just proves me right anyway, because it means women are willing to give themselves to high status men way more than low status men no matter the looks.

"Women do date men that make less than them as long as he has good looks,potential and work ethic..."

You need to wake up, man.

Title says "women decline to date men who earn less - however good looking"

www.bbc.com

Men from poor backgrounds 'twice as likely to be single'

The income gap between men from poor families and rich ones is also widening, the IFS said.
www.bbc.com
Title says "Men from poor backgrounds 'twice as likely to be single'"

metro.co.uk

I don't date working class men - am I trying to leave my upbringing behind?

Growing up in this way made me acutely aware of the power that having money yields, and the many ways a person can feel its absence.
metro.co.uk metro.co.uk
Title says "I don’t date working class men – I think I’m trying to leave my upbringing behind"

It's almost like women hate the proletariat and are incapable of being leftists.

But you even admit it yourself in your own statement "Women do date men that make less than them as long as he has good looks,potential and work ethic..."

Yes, good "potential and work ethic", lol yeah. Like when you bought a Negro in 1700s, you looked for qualities such as "potential and work ethic". Women date good looking ambitious men in hope that they climb the economic latter and then be a provider slave. And the good looks are just a proxy for it anyway. Things such as height and jaw shape correlate strongly with higher income. So when they see that they think "oh, this guy might climb the ladder soon, let me get with him so I can leech off soon". But then they get tired of him if he does not follow the statistically predicted tendency and instead look for a guy that has already achieved the financial success whatever the looks. This also fits with the fact that women prefer a guy older than them (ahead in the financial rat race).


au.finance.yahoo.com

Handsome returns – good looking men earn $30K a year more

New research has found that good looks influence the salary of men with handsome individuals generally earning significantly more than below-average looking blokes.
au.finance.yahoo.com au.finance.yahoo.com

www.apa.org

Standing tall pays off, study finds

The findings suggest that someone who is 6 feet tall earns, on average, nearly $166,000 more during a 30-year career than someone who is 5 feet 5 inches, even when controlling for gender, age and weight.
www.apa.org www.apa.org

www.yahoo.com

Tall Men Land More Jobs Than Short Guys — and Height-Boosting Shoe Lifts Can Help Give You the Advantage

Guys who may not stand tall can still score on a job interview by dressing right.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

And again, look at which male lines got to reproduce more all the way back to ancient Egypt. It was the high status rich only.

psmag.com

8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man

An analysis of modern DNA uncovers a rough dating scene after the advent of agriculture.
psmag.com psmag.com

The article says "only a few men accumulated lots of wealth and power, leaving nothing for others. These men could then pass their wealth on to their sons, perpetuating this pattern of elitist reproductive success."

It had nothing to do with looks, although the wealth hoarders likely were taller and better looking, lighter skinned etc.

But that's not why women chose them. I mean, come on, stop the cope. Do you really think a woman will give free housing, free food and free video games to a man as long as he has a nice jaw? :lul: Tell me how many house-husbands exist. And when they do exist, they are more likely to get divorced :lul::lul::lul: See here:

www.theglobeandmail.com

Stay-at-home husbands more likely to divorce: study

Unemployment a strong predictor of divorce for men, according to a U.S. report
www.theglobeandmail.com www.theglobeandmail.com
 
DFENS said:
Man, you are deceived. I'm not so young, I'm 31 and not a "take back patriarchy" type guy because patriarchy never existed in hte first place. And I'm a leftist and for equality, which feminism is NOT. Feminism is a reactionary hate movement and women love capitalism and select for the most competitive men which they then leech off.
Click to expand...
Honestly Speaking if your 31 and still claim to be a leftist it sounds like your the problem not the women and they must treat you badly due to fact that your not that physically appealing...
DFENS said:
Totally false. The women of the 50s simply didn't need to work because they could leech off men who had an easier time bribing a woman into their lives due to the better economy back then. But wives had cushy jobs before they got pregnant, look it up. Nobody stopped them from working. Ever. Women simply didn't want to work because there was always a dude who craves for a woman they could leech off.
Click to expand...
Yes women did have jobs but it wasn't enough for the woman to live in a house by themselves.Therefore they would rather let a man just provide money and a house for them.Now that they can have jobs to obtain a house for themselves without a man they don't need a man other than sex and attention...
DFENS said:
False. More anti-male lies. Now you sound like a salty female redditor who is projecting. But even if true, this just proves me right anyway, because it means women are willing to give themselves to high status men way more than low status men no matter the looks.
Click to expand...
You do know that women cheat on their high status men too correct?They just use the high value man as a financial safety net till they get bored with him and divorce him.I'm living proof of this,I have slept with a woman who was married to a millionaire investor...
 
AngryShane said:
Honestly Speaking if your 31 and still claim to be a leftist it sounds like your the problem not the women and they must treat you badly due to fact that your not that physically appealing...

Yes women did have jobs but it wasn't enough for the woman to live in a house by themselves.Therefore they would rather let a man just provide money and a house for them.Now that they can have jobs to obtain a house for themselves without a man they don't need a man other than sex and attention...

You do know that women cheat on their high status men too correct?They just use the high value man as a financial safety net till they get bored with him and divorce him.I'm living proof of this,I have slept with a woman who was married to a millionaire investor...
Click to expand...
You are all over the place. You contradict yourself all the time, you ignore the studies I bring to the table and don't really understand what my point is. Not much value in continuing this discussion. Take care bro
 
DFENS said:
You are all over the place. You contradict yourself all the time, you ignore the studies I bring to the table and don't really understand what my point is. Not much value in continuing this discussion. Take care bro
Click to expand...
You kept telling me that women hate men and I'm telling you they only hate ugly men.

You told me about metoo allegations and I'm telling you that you don't know if those allegations are true and they all could have been publicity stunts.

You keep insinuating that i have been brainwashed by feminist propaganda and I'm telling you that feminism is nothing more than female nature out in the open
 
DFENS said:
you ignore the studies I bring to the table
Click to expand...
You can't believe everything you see off the internet.My life experiences are saying otherwise of your statements.This is why i didn't counter most of your studies...
 
AngryShane said:
You can't believe everything you see off the internet.My life experiences are saying otherwise of your statements.This is why i didn't counter most of your studies...
Click to expand...
By that standard I should definitely not believe what you say either nor can I even believe the Golden Gate bridge exists because I have not experienced it. Knowing your epistemology now I DEFINITELY wasted my time with you. :lul: :lul: :lul:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Autistic Goodboy
men are gross?
Replies
0
Views
25
Autistic Goodboy
Autistic Goodboy
pinterest
Discussion i dont believe in any morals
Replies
24
Views
100
richoxne
richoxne
batman1997
Serious Deep down i dont hate my dad..
Replies
0
Views
45
batman1997
batman1997
ZoomerPsycho
Here's what I don't get about the feminist criticism of the Sydney Sweeney ad...
Replies
3
Views
102
Jeremy Meeks
Jeremy Meeks
whiteegyptian
Discussion i hate jesus
Replies
8
Views
65
whiteegyptian
whiteegyptian

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top