Fetish pairings and grossly mismatched couples are not life fuel

Jason Voorhees

Jason Voorhees

๐•ธ๐–Š๐–—๐–ˆ๐–Š๐–“๐–†๐–—๐–ž ๐•ฎ๐–”๐–—๐–• โ€ข ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿฅ‡
Joined
May 15, 2020
Posts
85,999
Reputation
256,321
Let me make this clear because I see a lot of cope about this.People cope hard with "fetish pairings" and call it representation or open mindedness or bluepill, when a white girl or ethnic girl of any race for that matter dates or hooks up with ethnic or white guy outsider her race or some below average looking guy in a clear exotic fetish and validation context, it isn't genuine partnership or love.

It's often mental illness and/or validation behavior mixed with novelty seeking treating the man like a taboo thrill. I don't believe attraction is all looks it obviously has layers, but reducing someone to a fetish object isn't love. It's cope for deeper issues on both sides.

Real life fuel would be a socially well adjusted woman choosing that man organically for what he brings to the table and marrying him as her primary partner with full respect and not treating him like some exotic animal or some foreign breed due to her urges. That is what actual crossing of preferences looks like not temporary degeneracy or social signaling.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: GynoGladiator, Bryce, Algernon and 18 others
@imontheloose @Glorious King @Swarthy Knight @Ibohammed Eshaktโ€™ur
 
  • +1
Reactions: L88, kababcel, Glorious King and 3 others
@Jimcel @cryptt @EvilSatanArseRapist
 
  • +1
Reactions: kababcel, EvilSatanArseRapist and Jimcel
Real life fuel would be a socially well adjusted woman choosing that man organically for what he brings to the table and marrying him as her primary partner with full respect and not treating him like some exotic animal. That is what actual crossing of preferences looks like not temporary degeneracy or social signaling.
Preach, but would you say 'fetish pairing' better then no relationship at all?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Topkra

Is this a follow up to this thread?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jason Voorhees, Glorious King and Jimcel
Preach, but would you say 'fetish pairing' better then no relationship at all?
If it's just a random hookup that's alright but a relationship and God forbid is a child is brought into a relationship like this it is over
 
  • +1
Reactions: L88 and Jimcel
@italianltn
 
  • +1
Reactions: italianltn
Let me make this clear because I see a lot of cope about this.People cope hard with "fetish pairings" and call it representation or open mindedness or bluepill, when a white girl or ethnic girl of any race for that matter dates or hooks up with ethnic or white guy outsider her race or some below average looking guy in a clear exotic fetish and validation context, it isn't genuine partnership or love.

It's often mental illness and/or validation behavior mixed with novelty seeking treating the man like a taboo thrill. I don't believe attraction is all looks it obviously has layers, but reducing someone to a fetish object isn't love. It's cope for deeper issues on both sides.

Real life fuel would be a socially well adjusted woman choosing that man organically for what he brings to the table and marrying him as her primary partner with full respect and not treating him like some exotic animal. That is what actual crossing of preferences looks like not temporary degeneracy or social signaling.
How is your title in bold
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
@Bryce @L88
 
  • +1
Reactions: L88
I feel honored for getting tagged :DONTPETTHEPEEPO:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees

Similar threads

IronMike
Replies
9
Views
174
i believe in angels
i believe in angels
Jason Voorhees
Replies
31
Views
266
Jason Voorhees
Jason Voorhees
pleasevanity
Replies
18
Views
117
superpsycho
superpsycho
Jason Voorhees
Replies
94
Views
803
Giornoblaze
Giornoblaze
BWC_virgin
Replies
0
Views
22
BWC_virgin
BWC_virgin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top