FINAL NAIL IN COFFIN FOR Dating AppCels

[tyronelite]

After seeing all that data I’ve officially deleted all dating apps. Tinder was great back in 2012-2014. Everyone used it mainly to hook up, then bitches got jaded and started virtue signaling turning the app into something it wasn’t intended for. Now they’re showing their sexual duplicity.

Fast forward to 2020 women use it primarily for
A) Attention, Ego
B) Social Media Following
C) Sell premium snaps, manyfans, etc
D) Useless “dates” that don’t lead to sex jfl at normies still believing in dates to fuck...
E) Finding beta bux billy to take care of Chad/Tyrones sire

Guys if you’re above average, just go to the bar seriously. You won’t have to worry about cat fishing, frauding, the insane amount of competition, unrealistic standards, ghosting, the army of single mothers and landwhales, etc.

Yeah you’ll still have to compete with guys in real life, but what’s the likelihood you’ll meet a PSL 6+? What’s the likelihood normies at the bar black-pilled about female nature? You guys are already looksmaxxing so you’re already ahead of the competition.

Now if u wanna use to fool around n shits n giggles or collect data, or live in a big city (at least 1M pop) go ahead but stop taking it seriously

#Deletealldatingapps2020

 

[.👽.]

Jfl i live in a major city with 3mil pop but apps still suck. Ok im average at best but still

 

[tyronelite]

Jfl i live in a major city with 3mil pop but apps still suck. Ok im average at best but still

Over for you buddy boyo

 

[.👽.]

Over for you buddy boyo

Yep. 0 likes bro

 

[Deleted member 5204]

these hoes ain't loyal

 

[Deleted member 3043]

#Deletealldatingapps2020

can't agree more on this

 

[medialcanthuscel]

cope, if you can't fuck a girl with tinder, you can't get any girl even with social circle, because all pretend a chadlite+ face

 

[tyronelite]

cope, if you can't fuck a girl with tinder, you can't get any girl even with social circle, because all pretend a chadlite+ face

Double cope. Your chances of fucking a girl u met at a bar is way higher than a girl using tinder who never goes out and is bombarded by 1,000+ messages.

 

[Ramzes]

Depending where are you in the world. I run this account less than 2 months and I swipe selectively meaning 90% of time I swipe right only on a girl I’d genuinely want to bang.

 

[tyronelite]

Depending where are you in the world. I run this account less than 2 months and I swipe selectively meaning 90% of time I swipe right only on a girl I’d genuinely want to bang.

Obviously feminism and hypergamy isn’t as bad as in the East than the West so women aren’t as picky, + the women in Europe are better. Out of all 500 matches how many lays have you gotten ?

 

[Ramzes]

Obviously feminism and hypergamy isn’t as bad as in the East than the West so women aren’t as picky, + the women in Europe are better. Out of all 500 matches how many lays have you gotten ?

Yeah bro if I change my location to LA or NY I literally hardly get any matches lol. I imagine it must be hell in North America.

I’ll be completely honest I got only 1 lay but I went only for 2 dates. I’ve been making preparations for moving into a new country and matching girls that were 2000 km away. I’m going there next week since apartment I bought gonna be finished. I got many bitches who want to meet I actually have to decide.

This year so far I fucked 3 girls from 3 different countries but only one was a tinder date, the other one was an escort and also one from a sugar baby website.

What’s more unbelievable I often get texted by girls first on tinder and they ask for meetings.

 

[.👽.]

Depending where are you in the world. I run this account less than 2 months and I swipe selectively meaning 90% of time I swipe right only on a girl I’d genuinely want to bang.

Wtf you chad or what

 

[tyronelite]

Yeah bro if I change my location to LA or NY I literally hardly get any matches lol. I imagine it must be hell in North America.

I’ll be completely honest I got only 1 lay but I went only for 2 dates. I’ve been making preparations for moving into a new country and matching girls that were 2000 km away. I’m going there next week since apartment I bought gonna be finished. I got many bitches who want to meet I actually have to decide.

This year so far I fucked 3 girls from 3 different countries but only one was a tinder date, the other one was an escort and also one from a sugar baby website.

What’s more unbelievable I often get texted by girls first on tinder and they ask for meetings.

Brutal, see what I mean ? Your success rate was literally less than 1% and you had 500 matches! How do you do in real life ?

 

[Ramzes]

Brutal, see what I mean ? Your success rate was literally less than 1% and you had 500 matches! How do you do in real life ?

What I meant is I was using tinder passport to match girls in other countries and I have girls who want to meet me but they are far right now. I was just preparing for travels which I’m going to start since next week then I can tell you about my success rate.

Wtf you chad or what

No bro I just go to countries where my chances are bigger.

 

[Oogaboogajiggaboo]

Graycel thread

 

[tyronelite]

What I meant is I was using tinder passport to match girls in other countries and I have girls who want to meet me but they are far right now. I was just preparing for travels which I’m going to start since next week then I can tell you about my success rate.

No bro I just go to countries where my chances are bigger.

Ahh so what about offline? Or do you only meet women online

 

[Ramzes]

Ahh so what about offline? Or do you only meet women online

I only do online since I’m working remotely mostly just from my apartment and my social circle is very limited. I also don’t like PUA and day game I think it’s wasting mine and other people time. With tinder I at least know that the girl is already interested to meet.
But that’s because in countries where I live and travel tinder still works flawlessly and 80% girls there are still in for a LTR lol so you just gotta bs them that you want them for LTR and they will give you what you want.

 

[tyronelite]

I only do online since I’m working remotely mostly just from my apartment and my social circle is very limited. I also don’t like PUA and day game I think it’s wasting mine and other people time. With tinder I at least know that the girl is already interested to meet.
But that’s because in countries where I live and travel tinder still works flawlessly and 80% girls there are still in for a LTR lol so you just gotta bs them that you want them for LTR and they will give you what you want.

Damn I need to travel to Europe soon lol

 

[Ramzes]

I’m gonna turn my tinder to LA for one day just for lols to see how miserably I fail.
I’ll share my results tomorrow. LA ages 18-32.

 

[DidntRead]

 

[Deleted member 5061]

Brutal, see what I mean ? Your success rate was literally less than 1% and you had 500 matches! How do you do in real life ?

Well if youve seen that guys pictures, he is quite a rich betabuxx guy who has pictures that look like he is a giga sugardaddy. So comparing him to average guys would be not really representative.

He literally looks like a rich snob on his pictures etc., basically signaling that he has tons of money to betabuxx the foids with.

Other than that OP is absolutely precise. If youre not at least chadlite (or high normie almost chadlite level), dating apps are a huge time waste.

I mean tons of foids have linked their instagram accont on tinder and you can see travel pics with groups of male/female friends and random pics with random dudes, other foids etc. So heres the big question- if they know so many dudes in rl (who usually look decent/above average), how come she is still on the lookout? The only answer is, she is particularly interested in the points mentioned in the 1st post and on the lookout of Chad/Chadlite Dick, thats it.

One time I saw like a 4/10 foid that had something like that in her bio: "I hate how only bitches and fuckboys are left here anymore.. But I figured, I will still give it a chance, mb something good will come out of it".... something along those lines. I had to actually laugh when I saw that shit. Tinder is full of average/below average dudes (remember 82% or more are non chadlite/chad) who have serious intentions and usually want LTR. Its just- the dudes that she thinks "she deserves" and "she is entitled to" will ofcourse be Chadlite/Chad fuckboys, that her below average ass 4/10 foid cant keep for LTR or marriage or whatever. She could get hundreds if not thousands of average, slightly above average and below average dudes who have serious intentions and are looking for LTR etc., but she will instead act like everyone is just a fuckboy on Tinder etc.

I mean yeah, just another example of dumb foid logic. Shes just mad that she aint a Stacy, who actually have the ability to keep Chads for longer than 1 night or have him come back to her now and again, whereas these 6-/10 foids will get banged out for a night at most and then dumped like trash. Basically used as pump and dump cum dumpsters.

 

[goat2x]

good thread tbh

 

[Deleted member 4383]

Bookmarked

 

[Pillarman]

Meeting online mogs meeting in bar by far

 

[chessplayercoper23]

Yeah even teen girls are this bad aswell

 

[tyronelite]

View attachment 680425

Meeting online mogs meeting in bar by far

Sure if you're good looking but in 2020 you either have to be a full blown chad or gymmaxed normie to be SUCCESSFUL using ONLY online apps. I still think meeting IRL is way better.

 

[eduardkoopman]

View attachment 680425

Meeting online mogs meeting in bar by far

I bothered to looks UP, the study!

And found an interesting thing. In the METHOD. That scewed this graph!

To quote:
"The “how did you meet” question is retrospective because the question can only be asked about relationships that have already formed. In HCMST 2009, the “how did you meet” question was asked only of subjects who were partnered at the time of the survey [aka: single people got excluded].
In HCMST 2017, the “how did you meet” question was asked of both partnered respondents and unpartnered [aka: single] respondents. Unpartnered respondents in HCMST 2017 were asked about their most recent past partner."

This above. can skew comparrison alot! I don't know how much is skews comparriosn. BUT, the parameters are not constant anymore, for good comparrison.

 

[Deleted member 6341]

I bothered to looks UP, the study!

And found an interesting thing. In the METHOD. That scewed this graph!

To quote:
"The “how did you meet” question is retrospective because the question can only be asked about relationships that have already formed. In HCMST 2009, the “how did you meet” question was asked only of subjects who were partnered at the time of the survey [aka: single people got excluded].
In HCMST 2017, the “how did you meet” question was asked of both partnered respondents and unpartnered [aka: single] respondents. Unpartnered respondents in HCMST 2017 were asked about their most recent past partner."

This above. can skew comparrison alot! I don't know how much is skews comparriosn. BUT, the parameters are not constant anymore, for good comparrison.

Meeting online doesn't always mean Tinder and other dating softwares, you can meet women online,who you have things in common with, mainly on Facebook, IG, or even Reddit. Meeting complete strangers on Tinder and meeting people you have propinquity with on social media platforms are two different things.

 

[eduardkoopman]

Meeting online doesn't always mean Tinder and other dating softwares, you can meet women online,who you have things in common with, mainly on Facebook, IG, or even Reddit. Meeting complete strangers on Tinder and meeting people you have propinquity with on social media platforms are two different things.

Good adding. That it's more than just Tinder. DM's sliding on social media's, and stuff is also in it.

STILL. What I mentioned, on how theychanged the parameter. From in the past: "ONLY people in relationship at that moment" towards in the last survey: "single AND partnered people". CAN, cause a big skew. I dunno, if so. But could.
I just checked the data. And they added 541 single people to thedata pool off about 3400. Aka 16%. Those single people, would had in the past (graph untill 2010) been excluded.
And lets face it. Single people, are generally less conservative people. LTR people, are generally speaking more into that type of relationship style, and into more cautious vetting and less into hookup culture.

but I dunno how it skews it though.
They should ahd kept the parameters constant.
or had made 2 graphs, at minimum. One in old style parameters, and 1 in new style method parameters