'Fixing undereyes' will NOT ascend you and barely gives you any + psl

sorrowfulsad

sorrowfulsad

Luminary
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
9,229
Reputation
12,474
IMG 4699


imagine if this chad would only post his under eye region.if he asked if he could benefit from undereye filler or shit like that most people will say 'definitely!' but would it make a difference? the truth is it wouldn't make a difference for you either.

most mfers are ugly with or without bad undereyes. focus on your bones mates
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: everyone, Devon, Im sorry mother and 1 other person
It's not as black and white imo. You post a non-bad example on a GL guy.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ltn_looksminner, It'snotover, existingandliving and 6 others
Add simply one (1) bad feature and see how bad it turns out, around 2 failos max are tolerated
 
View attachment 3757094

imagine if this chad would only post his under eye region.if he asked if he could benefit from undereye filler or shit like that most people will say 'definitely!' but would it make a difference? the truth is it wouldn't make a difference for you either.

most mfers are ugly with or without bad undereyes. focus on your bones mates
What would then
 
Bad features on chad is like spices


Nobody likes spices on their own but if you put them in a good dish it gets better sometimes

If you throw spices in an already bad dish it's just gonna be worse


Same here, you are not chad, so having less failos will help you
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: william., bruhtoobrutal and Im sorry mother
he ain't chad
 
View attachment 3757094

imagine if this chad would only post his under eye region.if he asked if he could benefit from undereye filler or shit like that most people will say 'definitely!' but would it make a difference? the truth is it wouldn't make a difference for you either.

most mfers are ugly with or without bad undereyes. focus on your bones mates
OH YEAH LETS CHERRY PICK SOMEONE WHO HAS ONE BAD FEATURE


1747955552879


PERFECT PSL GOD SIDE PROFILE COMBINED :lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: moltisantichincel and Im sorry mother
  • Love it
Reactions: aids
View attachment 3757094

imagine if this chad would only post his under eye region.if he asked if he could benefit from undereye filler or shit like that most people will say 'definitely!' but would it make a difference? the truth is it wouldn't make a difference for you either.

most mfers are ugly with or without bad undereyes. focus on your bones mates
I expect better threads from a Luminary!
You have to look at a face in its entirety.
Just because a good looking man has a very minor flaw (very mild hollowing here) doesn't mean that an unattractive man shouldn't address as many flaws as he can.
It could make all the difference in the latter's case.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Im sorry mother
View attachment 3757094

imagine if this chad would only post his under eye region.if he asked if he could benefit from undereye filler or shit like that most people will say 'definitely!' but would it make a difference? the truth is it wouldn't make a difference for you either.

most mfers are ugly with or without bad undereyes. focus on your bones mates
1759369881681
 
View attachment 3757094

imagine if this chad would only post his under eye region.if he asked if he could benefit from undereye filler or shit like that most people will say 'definitely!' but would it make a difference? the truth is it wouldn't make a difference for you either.

most mfers are ugly with or without bad undereyes. focus on your bones mates
would still benefit from it
 
I have excess skin and no fat, it is my main flaw.
 
how does it look
I like the results tbh. Nano fat transfer is the way

I also got a chin lipo by the dame Dr and damn shi looks sharp now
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 228717
Bad features on chad is like spices


Nobody likes spices on their own but if you put them in a good dish it gets better sometimes

If you throw spices in an already bad dish it's just gonna be worse


Same here, you are not chad, so having less failos will help you
no

he would be better looking with better under eyes
 
he literally have good under-eyes
 

Similar threads

J
Replies
144
Views
3K
JohnDoe
J
Vazelrr
Replies
24
Views
343
taai
taai
Sphénoïde
Replies
46
Views
4K
vanitycel
vanitycel
habeebullah
Replies
45
Views
2K
miloeatscookies
miloeatscookies

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top