Focus on learning and improving your learning capabilities

[Crusile]

muh proxy innate intelligence can be easily learned in 40 hrs



Listen to cognitive scientists @_MVP_

 

[Crusile]

lol if you arent learning and improving your learning capabilities 16 hrs a day (all waking hours). seriously what are you doing and why?

 

[SexuallyAbusive]

lol if you arent learning and improving your learning capabilities 16 hrs a day (all waking hours). seriously what are you doing and why?

jacking off to judy hopps all day

 

[Crusile]

jacking off to judy hopps all day

lol at you for wasting time not learning

 

[BigBoy]

jacking off to judy hopps all day

she can get it

 

[CT03]

Have u tried these yourself and howd it go?

 

[Deleted member 23391]

lol if you arent learning and improving your learning capabilities 16 hrs a day (all waking hours). seriously what are you doing and why?

Genetically gifted intelligent people like myself don't need to spend 16 hours a day "improving learning capabilities", we just remember things effortlessly and synergize them with our previous knowledge. It's the power of having a high IQ, which you deny.

 

[rolex]

muh proxy innate intelligence can be easily learned in 40 hrs



Listen to cognitive scientists @_MVP_

High iq

 

[Crusile]

Genetically gifted intelligent people like myself don't need to spend 16 hours a day "improving learning capabilities", we just remember things effortlessly and synergize them with our previous knowledge. It's the power of having a high IQ, which you deny.

lol how easily I can bait you with a simple retarded thread on "learning is everything". https://www.jstor.org/stable/23469390 Le IQ doesnt predict learning speed, because IQ doesnt measure intelligence

 

[Crusile]

This research examined how motivation (perceived control, intrinsic motivation, and extrinsic motivation), cognitive learning strategies (deep and surface strategies), and intelligence jointly predict long-term growth in students' mathematics achievement over 5 years. Using longitudinal data from six annual waves (Grades 5 through 10; M age = 11.7 years at baseline; N = 3,530), latent growth curve modeling was employed to analyze growth in achievement. Results showed that the initial level of achievement was strongly related to intelligence, with motivation and cognitive strategies explaining additional variance. In contrast, intelligence had no relation with the growth of achievement over years, whereas motivation and learning strategies were predictors of growth. These findings highlight the importance of motivation and learning strategies in facilitating adolescents' development of mathematical competencies.

epic power of the g-factor
#iqism