Foid IQ, Self Copium, Physical Degeneration, Modern Hypergamy

[hungrythanos414]

Got into a debate with this foid on discord and she was basically saying that women having a peanut skull and being extremely short is actually better and is a halo then having a well developed skull and body as a woman.

This is easily debunkable...


What will Chad pick: ?

OR

well-developed skull + body ( left women) / boneless malnourished peanut skull + compressed stubby body (right women)



Reason I am using chad in the example and not your average man, is because chad has access to all women and wont feel threatened by a woman's beauty in anyway shape or form as he is superior to them development and biologically speaking. Men in general are also superior to attractive women biologically speaking, but when it comes to physically...allot of men wont go for a girl far above their looks range. This is because as the man, your supposed to be superior in everyway, and if your girl has a wider jaw then you...that can lead to some insecurities. This is why most men, even on this forum, are attracted to mtb's. If they were to become chad overnight, their interests would suddenly change guaranteed. Women on the other hand can go for any man above their looks range and not feel shamed, because in a societal + natural setting...the women is always the less dimorphic, least standing out one...meaning its normal passing to the gazing eye, even if a chad is dating an ltb, as the male is better looking then then the female which makes it acceptable.

Chad will obviously pick the left women a 100x times over.

Case settled!

Personal thoughts + reasoning:

We obviously know that men and women are degenerating in looks ; bones becoming weaker, smaller, shorter etc. While this is incredibly harmful for a man, its actually not as bad for a woman, and it shows. Women call themselves feminine to cope with this degeneration of them getting smaller and more frail, and it works damn well and its understandable. An already smaller, weaker counterpart, becoming more submissive just adds to the attraction in a way. And for men its a nightmare obviously. There is nothing to cope about the fact that your degenerating and having smaller bones. I think this is one of the major components of modern hypergamy.

TLDR:

modern women trying to cope with physical degeneration, calling themselves "feminine" for being boneless.


I understand if you DNR, but at the very least rep. This took more than a few mins to make
​

 

[pfl]

 

[hye732]

TLDR:

modern women trying to cope with physical degeneration, calling themselves "feminine" for being boneless.
​

ok i apprecite the tldr

 

[hungrythanos414]

View attachment 4669187View attachment 4669188

Got into a debate with this foid on discord and she was basically saying that women having a peanut skull and being extremely short is actually better and is a halo then having a well developed skull and body as a woman.

This is easily debunkable...


What will Chad pick: ?
View attachment 4669220View attachment 4669223 OR View attachment 4669228View attachment 4669234
View attachment 4669304 View attachment 4669305
well-developed skull + body ( left women) / boneless malnourished peanut skull + compressed stubby body (right women)



Reason I am using chad in the example and not your average man, is because chad has access to all women and wont feel threatened by a woman's beauty in anyway shape or form as he is superior to them development and biologically speaking. Men in general are also superior to attractive women biologically speaking, but when it comes to physically...allot of men wont go for a girl far above their looks range. This is because as the man, your supposed to be superior in everyway, and if your girl has a wider jaw then you...that can lead to some insecurities. This is why most men, even on this forum, are attracted to mtb's. If they were to become chad overnight, their interests would suddenly change guaranteed. Women on the other hand can go for any man above their looks range and not feel shamed, because in a societal + natural setting...the women is always the less dimorphic, least standing out one...meaning its normal passing to the gazing eye, even if a chad is dating an ltb, as the male is better looking then then the female which makes it acceptable.

Chad will obviously pick the left women a 100x times over.

Case settled!

Personal thoughts + reasoning:

We obviously know that men and women are degenerating in looks ; bones becoming weaker, smaller, shorter etc. While this is incredibly harmful for a man, its actually not as bad for a woman, and it shows. Women call themselves feminine to cope with this degeneration of them getting smaller and more frail, and it works damn well and its understandable. An already smaller, weaker counterpart, becoming more submissive just adds to the attraction in a way. And for men its a nightmare obviously. There is nothing to cope about the fact that your degenerating and having smaller bones. I think this is one of the major components of modern hypergamy.

TLDR:

modern women trying to cope with physical degeneration, calling themselves "feminine" for being boneless.


I understand if you DNR, but at the very least rep. This took more than a few mins to make
​

bump + fuck my shitty formatting skills