Foids on this forum

[Deleted member 425886]

There is some foids in here I just can't prove it

 

[peter1287]

scary

 

[buccalfatremoval]

 

[Deleted member 423773]

There is some foids in here I just can't prove it

“Using language like that is not appropriate in any respectful or constructive discussion. Even if it was intended casually or without malice, the term is widely understood as derogatory and demeaning, and it reduces people to a label based on gender rather than recognizing them as individuals.
If there is uncertainty about who is present in a space, the appropriate response is to communicate that uncertainty in neutral, factual terms. For example, simply stating that you cannot confirm who is there is sufficient. Introducing assumptions or using dismissive language about gender is unnecessary and detracts from the quality and professionalism of the conversation.
It is important to recognize that respectful communication is not about being overly formal, but about avoiding language that stereotypes, excludes, or devalues others. Every individual deserves to be treated with equal consideration regardless of gender, and discussions are more productive when they remain focused on verifiable information rather than assumptions or labels.
Maintaining respectful language also reflects on the speaker’s credibility. In most environments—whether casual, academic, or professional—people are expected to communicate in a way that does not alienate or insult others. Choosing neutral wording helps ensure that conversations remain constructive, inclusive, and centered on ideas rather than derogatory characterizations.
In short, if the goal is to make a point or express uncertainty, it is always possible to do so without resorting to language that disrespects or diminishes others.”

 

[Stalker]

“Using language like that is not appropriate in any respectful or constructive discussion. Even if it was intended casually or without malice, the term is widely understood as derogatory and demeaning, and it reduces people to a label based on gender rather than recognizing them as individuals.
If there is uncertainty about who is present in a space, the appropriate response is to communicate that uncertainty in neutral, factual terms. For example, simply stating that you cannot confirm who is there is sufficient. Introducing assumptions or using dismissive language about gender is unnecessary and detracts from the quality and professionalism of the conversation.
It is important to recognize that respectful communication is not about being overly formal, but about avoiding language that stereotypes, excludes, or devalues others. Every individual deserves to be treated with equal consideration regardless of gender, and discussions are more productive when they remain focused on verifiable information rather than assumptions or labels.
Maintaining respectful language also reflects on the speaker’s credibility. In most environments—whether casual, academic, or professional—people are expected to communicate in a way that does not alienate or insult others. Choosing neutral wording helps ensure that conversations remain constructive, inclusive, and centered on ideas rather than derogatory characterizations.
In short, if the goal is to make a point or express uncertainty, it is always possible to do so without resorting to language that disrespects or diminishes others.”

tldr