Xangsane
TTD thanks to Helene
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
- Posts
- 145,767
- Reputation
- 122,934
- OP
- #51
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
especially bottom 2 in set 1. midface is too short.Why? Thoughts on 2?
Why are 2 real moggers?especially bottom 2 in set 1. midface is too short.
2 are real moggers ngl
4 has a rather narrow face, could maybe benefit from a cut like the others in the set to help fraud a bit of mass. 3's face is a bit small, looks more like a child than a robust prettyboy, the kind that'd grow up into a gaymaxxed peanuthead normie. First two have pretty and soft features + robustness which tends to be the ideal for women within this age range.Why would you say 4 is mid, 3 looks more twink and the first 2 mog? Overall which group mogs?
How old does 1 look and why does 4 look like a nordic sherlock? What do you rate the groups as a whole in psl?
I do mean among the group jbs - age 21.
angularity, masc midface, chinsWhy are 2 real moggers?
And would you say set 2 are ideal for women in that range or not? Overall who did you vote for?4 has a rather narrow face, could maybe benefit from a cut like the others in the set to help fraud a bit of mass. 3's face is a bit small, looks more like a child than a robust prettyboy, the kind that'd grow up into a gaymaxxed peanuthead normie. First two have pretty and soft features + robustness which tends to be the ideal for women within this age range.
why that age range? To me he looks a little older for some reason JFL. What about the others?1 looks about 23-26.
Is he the worst looking of 4?As for 4 it's because of the wide IPD, narrow PFL, long midface and very pronounced cheekbones. But the added facial mass makes him look like an overall better looking Benedict Cumberbatch.
are set 2 masc?angularity, masc midface, chins
2Don't vote on PSL, vote on APPEAL ONLY.
Set 1
View attachment 2569817View attachment 2569818View attachment 2569819View attachment 2569820
Set 2
View attachment 2569821View attachment 2569822View attachment 2569823View attachment 2569824
why 2?
Sexual dimorphismwhy 2?
yesAnd would you say set 2 are ideal for women in that range or not? Overall who did you vote for?
why that age range? To me he looks a little older for some reason JFL. What about the others?
Is he the worst looking of 4?
Are group 2 masc?
are set 2 masc?
anything else?Sexual dimorphism
I would say so. I didn't cast a vote as I felt both have appeal.And would you say set 2 are ideal for women in that range or not? Overall who did you vote for?
Skin quality is too good to be much older than that.why that age range? To me he looks a little older for some reason JFL. What about the others?
Not but maybe he hits the target audience the leastIs he the worst looking of 4?
Both the same question? Yeah they're a bit more dimorphic. Particularly around the eye areas. The first set have slightly higher eyebrows and less protruding brows thus creating a bit more of a feminised eye area. Set 2 have lower set brows with very little exposed eye area between the brows and the eyes. But as for the rest of the face both groups are quite dimorphic.Are group 2 masc?
are set 2 masc?
I gotcha.I would say so. I didn't cast a vote as I felt both have appeal.
Assume everyone's skin quality is a bit worse than in the photos as they're AI characters.Skin quality is too good to be much older than that.
why? Does he have roastie appeal?Not but maybe he hits the target audience the least
Overall what's your classification of them?Both the same question? Yeah they're a bit more dimorphic. Particularly around the eye areas. The first set have slightly higher eyebrows and less protruding brows thus creating a bit more of a feminised eye area. Set 2 have lower set brows with very little exposed eye area between the brows and the eyes. But as for the rest of the face both groups are quite dimorphic.
why 2?Both beaultiful, but 2 is more complete
@Allornothing @Napoleon1800Don't vote on PSL, vote on APPEAL ONLY.
Set 1
View attachment 2569817View attachment 2569818View attachment 2569819View attachment 2569820
Set 2
View attachment 2569821View attachment 2569822View attachment 2569823View attachment 2569824
Don't vote on PSL, vote on APPEAL ONLY.
Set 1
View attachment 2569817View attachment 2569818View attachment 2569819View attachment 2569820
Set 2
View attachment 2569821View attachment 2569822View attachment 2569823View attachment 2569824
You know you have autism when you comparing made up people who don't even fucking exist made by literal ai trained on human biases to create the perfect face we consider appealing use some 1 like brad pitt or paul walker and compare him to tera nik kaufman or timothee chalamet
How is set 2 feminine JFLthe second has a good mix of masc and is also feminine at the same time, it is a look with broad appeal, like young Cavill and Tom Welling for example
View attachment 2570043View attachment 2570044
he can attract 17 year old foids at the same time as attracting a 25 year old, the true gigaslayer.
he does not have an alien appearance, has good collagen and indicators of youth + high confidence eyes in contrast to a strong jawHow is set 2 feminine JFL
still masc, JFL.he does not have an alien appearance, has good collagen and indicators of youth + high confidence eyes in contrast to a strong jaw
It's masculine, but to a certain extentstill masc, JFL.
what extent?It's masculine, but to a certain extent
De poop mogs.up to the point that it doesn't reach the alien layer
View attachment 2570060View attachment 2570062View attachment 2570063
Vat a mogger
In mumbai he moggs muchDe poop mogs.
dotheads meIn mumbai he moggs much
Who did you vote for? Thought 1 were prettyboysWomen are sexually mature at 18. Which means they’re past their cutecel phase in most cases.
I voted 2. Pretty boys are 1 and robust pretty boys are 2. Robust pretty boys can pretty much appeal to almost any age. They aren't too feminine and they aren't too masculine it is a perfect mix of both.Who did you vote for? Thought 1 were prettyboys
@Perfection
2 are still pretty boy? Thought they were masc jflI voted 2. Pretty boys are 1 and robust pretty boys are 2. Robust pretty boys can pretty much appeal to almost any age. They aren't too feminine and they aren't too masculine it is a perfect mix of both.
I don’t know go ask them not me you twatDon't vote on PSL, vote on APPEAL ONLY.
Set 1
View attachment 2569817View attachment 2569818View attachment 2569819View attachment 2569820
Set 2
View attachment 2569821View attachment 2569822View attachment 2569823View attachment 2569824
twatI don’t know go ask them not me you twat