![Imretarded?](/data/avatars/l/65/65144.jpg?1725340836)
Imretarded?
Penis cum explosion
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2024
- Posts
- 10,213
- Reputation
- 18,890
Having a bulbous forehead Throws the whole face off and gives a lightbulb look.
Morph i made here gives a more angular look, zygos look more prominent, even lower third gains prominence from just narrowing temples.
Face also gains a taller, more high class feel to it. This is most of why brachycephalics look infantile and subhuman, they have bulbous piglike foreheads, it's like chucking a metal tool into some gears, it fucks everything up.
Real life example is Klaus and Jesse pinkman
Both are similar enough in mid and lower thirds that they can be used as examples. Jesse more or less has everything right. Except his bulbous fucking forehead that utterly destroys his aesthetics, norrow his temples
Now I have done the work to produce two more morphs where Jesse's upper third is gradually improved, first in narrowing temples which instantly gives him structure and he's suddenly very upper class looking and last one he's now ever more handsome and youthful.
So clearly having a further forward progressed hairline has a similar effect as a naturally inward facing temples. Personally I'd say having neutrally inwardly curved temples and a progressed hairline might be better looking as you wouldn't have any narrow or peanut skull look when your hair is short or wet combed back.
![IMG 7808 IMG 7808](https://i.looksmax.org/attachments/2024/08/thumb/4344705_IMG_7808.jpeg)
![IMG 7809 IMG 7809](https://i.looksmax.org/attachments/2024/08/thumb/4344706_IMG_7809.png)
Morph i made here gives a more angular look, zygos look more prominent, even lower third gains prominence from just narrowing temples.
Face also gains a taller, more high class feel to it. This is most of why brachycephalics look infantile and subhuman, they have bulbous piglike foreheads, it's like chucking a metal tool into some gears, it fucks everything up.
Real life example is Klaus and Jesse pinkman
![IMG 7838 IMG 7838](https://i.looksmax.org/attachments/2024/08/thumb/4344721_IMG_7838.jpeg)
![IMG 7840 IMG 7840](https://i.looksmax.org/attachments/2024/08/thumb/4344728_IMG_7840.jpeg)
Both are similar enough in mid and lower thirds that they can be used as examples. Jesse more or less has everything right. Except his bulbous fucking forehead that utterly destroys his aesthetics, norrow his temples
Now I have done the work to produce two more morphs where Jesse's upper third is gradually improved, first in narrowing temples which instantly gives him structure and he's suddenly very upper class looking and last one he's now ever more handsome and youthful.
![IMG 7840 IMG 7840](https://i.looksmax.org/attachments/2024/08/thumb/4344728_IMG_7840.jpeg)
![IMG 7841 IMG 7841](https://i.looksmax.org/attachments/2024/08/thumb/4344733_IMG_7841.png)
![IMG 7843 IMG 7843](https://i.looksmax.org/attachments/2024/08/thumb/4344734_IMG_7843.png)
So clearly having a further forward progressed hairline has a similar effect as a naturally inward facing temples. Personally I'd say having neutrally inwardly curved temples and a progressed hairline might be better looking as you wouldn't have any narrow or peanut skull look when your hair is short or wet combed back.
@Darkeningstar @Rea @GlamourPursuer @Gengar @Jason Voorhees @noobs @iloveboobs @ilovetakis @wishIwasSalludon @Xangsane @Gaygymmaxx @kaligula567 @ryuken @serialcoper @chudlite @Debetro @thecel
Last edited: