Forum Courtyard Discussion

[enchanted_elixir]

Im 6'1 frauding to 6'2.5 and im an incel so its cope unless ur like 6'4

are manlets outmogging you?

 

[enchanted_elixir]

I went to an airplane and heightmogged everyone in the plane and i am still imcel

explain

 

[Deleted member 23218]

are manlets outmogging you?

My oneitis two oneitisies ago I saw with a 5'7 bloated ltn but he looked like he had rizz

 

[Deleted member 23218]

explain

I hit my head on the way into the plane im like 6.2.5 in my lifts which isnt crazy tall

 

[enchanted_elixir]

My oneitis two oneitisies ago I saw with a 5'7 bloated ltn but he looked like he had rizz

Damn you must be a 3/10 then,

 

[Deleted member 25938]

huh? I don’t get it. Lower your IQ to communicate with me.

Ironic coming from you tbh.

Remember when you proposed macros (e.g., M(x,y))? If I made 26 commonly used words a single letter, then that would potentially interfere with the M component of M(x,y).

My suggestions to solve this are as follow:

a) do not make 26 words a single letter
b) remove macros
c) only be able to state macros in certain tenses
d) putting a grouping operator around a macro
e) make sure that the M is capitalized always

There are probably more solutions to this.

 

[Deleted member 23218]

Damn you must be a 3/10 then,

Im a mtn when lean (bulking rn). I am prettyboy maxxer lightskin curry. I have no friends tho tbh i am a social pariah

 

[Deleted member 23218]

Damn you must be a 3/10 then,

height wont really halo you to the point it makes up for verything else unless htn and white imo

 

[thecel]

Ironic coming from you tbh.

Remember when you proposed macros (e.g., M(x,y))? If I made 26 commonly used words a single letter, then that would potentially interfere with the M component of M(x,y).

My suggestions to solve this are as follow:

a) do not make 26 words a single letter
b) remove macros
c) only be able to state macros in certain tenses
d) putting a grouping operator around a macro
e) make sure that the M is capitalized always

There are probably more solutions to this.

Macros are based on macros in the C programming language. They can be named anything not just 1 letter names.

 

[Deleted member 25938]

Macros are based on macros in the C programming language. They can be named anything not just 1 letter names.

If that is the case, then it might be good to have a grouping operator around a macro

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Im a mtn when lean (bulking rn). I am prettyboy maxxer lightskin curry. I have no friends tho tbh i am a social pariah

how are you a social pariah?

 

[Deleted member 23218]

Macros are based on macros in the C programming language. They can be named anything not just 1 letter names.

i can tell you go to mit or stanford or sum shit

 

[enchanted_elixir]

i can tell you go to mit or stanford or sum shit

It isn't that hard.

 

[Deleted member 23218]

how are you a social pariah?

Im not social pariah that exagarationi have some aquantances but no friends and i havent gone to parties or anything i am second year in college


I never talked to girls not related all my life for more than like one min outside group project setting. I went to all boys school in middle and high school im a bit stunted some say

 

[Deleted member 23218]

It isn't that hard.

I go to a top college but im a bussiness major im basically retarted tbh

 

[thecel]

If that is the case, then it might be good to have a grouping operator around a macro

Fuck macros. Let’s drop the feature. Good use cases for macros are giga rare.

Usually, when you feel the need to use a macro, you’d communicate your idea better with a table, chart, graph, or infographic.

Time to communicate verbally and visually.

 

[Deleted member 25938]

Fuck macros. Let’s drop the feature. Good use cases for macros are giga rare.

Usually, when you feel the need to use a macro, you’d communicate your idea better with a table, chart, graph, or infographic.

Time to communicate verbally and visually.

Should we also drop grouping syntax or are those actually useful for organization?

 

[thecel]

Should we also drop grouping syntax or are those actually useful for organization?

Grouping syntax is useful.

Example 1
I don’t ( jack off because I find men attractive ) .
Makes sense. He’s not gay.

Example 2
( I don’t jack off ) because ( I find men attractive ) .
JFL. He’s on NoFap because he’s a faggot.

 

[Deleted member 25938]

Grouping syntax is useful.

Example 1
I don’t ( jack off because I find men attractive ) .
Makes sense. He’s not gay.

Example 2
( I don’t jack off ) because ( I find men attractive ) .
JFL. He’s on NoFap because he’s a faggot.

Great example, caged.

Do you think using curly brackets { } would be more ideal in denoting that it is a grouping operator instead of non-essential info contained in parentheses?

 

[thecel]

Great example, caged.

Do you think using curly brackets { } would be more ideal in denoting that it is a grouping operator instead of non-essential info contained in parentheses?

yes. good idea.

 

[Deleted member 25938]

yes. good idea.

Case closed then. Good work, Gigachico.

 

[Deleted member 23218]

Has anyone read moby dick? I had an essay due yesteday and i need to finish it today havent started

 

[Deleted member 25938]

You should make the top 26 most common words each have 1 letter of the alphabet.

How bout these words:

ōmn --> a - a, one (not the number)
d - of
e - estrogen (should it be capitalized?)
'ph --> f - if
ih --> i - i, me, myself
q --> n - and
krō --> o - on (the preposition "over" could be "o'er")
qecht --> q - question
'r --> r - or
t - testosterone (capitalize?)

 

[Deleted member 25938]

How bout these words:

ōmn --> a - a, one (not the number)
d - of
e - estrogen (should it be capitalized?)
'ph --> f - if
ih --> i - i, me, myself
q --> n - and
krō --> o - on (the preposition "over" could be "o'er")
qecht --> q - question
'r --> r - or
t - testosterone (capitalize?)

e.g.) Ih av ōmn qecht: aem ih ōmn subhuman? --> I av a q: aem i a subhuman?

Does this look too much like English or is it good?

 

[Acne Victim]

Can't be trans with long midface, impossible. The ONLY deciding factor wether a MTF will be successful or not is midface length.

i wouldn't say it's the only but yeah if you have a truly long midface (< 0.9) then it's impossible to look like a real female - and there is no realistic way of fixing it

 

[thecel]

Can't be trans with long midface, impossible. The ONLY deciding factor wether a MTF will be successful or not is midface length.

and hip width to shoulder width ratio, leg length to torso length ratio, thigh thickness, ass size, boob size, etc.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

and hip width to shoulder width ratio, leg length to torso length ratio, thigh thickness, ass size, boob size, etc.

Boob size???? Also I'm pretty sure long legs are more attractive for both genders, won't find a model with short ones.

 

[GandyIsNormie]

Boob size???? Also I'm pretty sure long legs are more attractive for both genders, won't find a model with short ones.

Long legs + short torso + large wingspan + good frame is the ideal body

6'0-6'3

 

[Deleted member 19174]

I’m incel because I’m short, I’m ugly I’m high inhib and I have no rizz

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Long legs + short torso + large wingspan + good frame is the ideal body

6'0-6'3

I agree wholeheartedly.