Fuck men

[Deleted member 17872]

Why hate women when it was the men who are responsible for feminism?

 

[ihatereddit]

half of all men are oofydoofymaxxed and just mirror whatever women say but your right tbh

 

[Deleted member 7580]

Yea true most moids are retarded

Also mirin that younger gen is more based

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Yea true most moids are retarded

Also mirin that younger gen is more based

Forgot i put u on ignore.

Muh younger gen is based. It is past the point of no return.

 

[horizon]

I wish they had split the age groups further for the data. They only divided it into below 50 and above 50.

It would be interesting to see how Gen Z women view feminism vs. millennial women for example.

It says that 23% of left-wing young women believe that feminism was a bad idea. I can't think of any woman in my life under the age of 20 who isn't a feminist.

 

[AngryShane]

It says that 23% of left-wing young women believe that feminism was a bad idea. I can't think of any woman in my life under the age of 20 who isn't a feminist.

It is now seen as "trendy" to be a feminist...

 

[Deleted member 17872]

I wish they had split the age groups further for the data. They only divided it into below 50 and above 50.

It would be interesting to see how Gen Z women view feminism vs. millennial women for example.

View attachment 1976927

It says that 23% of left-wing young women believe that feminism was a bad idea. I can't think of any woman in my life under the age of 20 who isn't a feminist.

Democrat is not left wing. Those 23% would be the support johnny depp amber heard is evil type
Liberals who thinks feminism has gone to far. Mostly the good looking ones who wants the traditional benefit of being a woman.

 

[horizon]

Democrat is not left wing. Those 23% would be the support johnny depp amber heard is evil type
Liberals who thinks feminism has gone to far. Mostly the good looking ones who wants the traditional benefit of being a woman.

True. I see a lot of women under 25 who want to be housewives despite being outspoken feminists.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

True. I see a lot of women under 25 who want to be housewives despite being outspoken feminists.

It’s the natural instinct of woman to be housewives. Sadly no man would wife them up. Democrat men are too dead beat to be desirable husbands while republican men would pick non feminist conservative women over them.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Daily reminder cucks

 

[Deleted member 21597]

Old boomer men are cucked about women cuz they gave women rights and didn’t get to see true female nature reveal itself.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Daily reminder

 

[Deleted member 17872]

True. I see a lot of women under 25 who want to be housewives despite being outspoken feminists.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

@TRUE_CEL

 

[Dr. Bludy]

Fuck u

 

[Deleted member 17872]

@TRUE_CEL

wrong tag. @Aypo129 feminism to me just seems elusion by ugly men who yjought they could get laid because of Patriarchy and religion

 

[Michael Myers]

wrong tag. @Aypo129 feminism to me just seems elusion by ugly men who yjought they could get laid because of Patriarchy and religion

Wrong tag because I live rent free in your head.

 

[Deleted member 16275]

View attachment 2004716

Wdym they're public property to left wing?

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Wdym they're public property to left wing?

Search free love

 

[5'7 zoomer]

I'm not gay sorry

 

[Deleted member 22124]

Fucking men is gay

 

[Deleted member 19036]

It’s the natural instinct of woman to be housewives. Sadly no man would wife them up. Democrat men are too dead beat to be desirable husbands while republican men would pick non feminist conservative women over them.

what dead beat means bro

 

[Deleted member 17872]

what dead beat means bro

a person who is not willing to work, does not behave in a responsible way, avoids responsiblity, abandons his family and does not fit into ordinary society

 

[Deleted member 19036]

a person who is not willing to work, does not behave in a responsible way, avoids responsiblity, abandons his family and does not fit into ordinary society

brutal how its true. most of the people WANT THE RESULTS but they don't wanna Put in ANY FUCKING EFFORT to get it. These fucking npc stupid gen z fuckers. 80iq averaged

 

[Deleted member 17872]

@MoggerGaston @Penguin of Zagreb

 

[Deleted member 26535]

@MoggerGaston @Penguin of Zagreb

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Reported to ADL

 

[Deleted member 17872]

@SecularIslamist

 

[SecularIslamist]

@SecularIslamist

They are already sowing the consequences of their actions.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

They are already sowing the consequences of their actions.

They aren't. These fags were the most privileged people to ever live. Got handed everything on the platter. Never had to work hard. Plus they had hot women unlike the fat abominations of today.

Only one who are sowing their consequences are their children. These fags deserve to rot in hell.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

@Aypo129 i'm still not convinced that feminism was result of transhumanism agenda of the elite.

 

[Aypo129]

@Aypo129 i'm still not convinced that feminism was result of transhumanism agenda of the elite.

It wasnt
It only got incorporated

 

[Deleted member 17872]

It wasnt
It only got incorporated

Explain in detail.

 

[Aypo129]

@Aypo129 i'm still not convinced that feminism was result of transhumanism agenda of the elite.

The simple story was UK needed soldiers so they created a group named women of white feather
These women will go out and give men those who wont fight in ww1 a white feather basically a coward label
Very simple trick which later on become kind of a model for bigger countries
feminism in intention is not for designing countries but in practicality is useful

Orwell wrote this very early:-
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/3706.George_Orwell

A tramp, therefore, is a celibate from the moment when he takes to the road. He is absolutely without hope of getting a wife, a mistress, or any kind of woman except — very rarely, when he can raise a few shillings — a prostitute.

It is obvious what the results of this must be: homosexuality, for instance, and occasional rape cases. But deeper than these there is the degradation worked in a man who knows that he is not even considered fit for marriage. The sexual impulse, not to put it any higher, is a fundamental impulse, and starvation of it can be almost as demoralizing as physical hunger. The evil of poverty is not so much that it makes a man suffer as that it rots him physically and spiritually. And there can be no doubt that sexual starvation contributes to this rotting process. Cut off from the whole race of women, a tramp feels himself degraded to the rank of a cripple or a lunatic. No humiliation could do more damage to a man’s self-respect.

 

[Aypo129]

The simple story was UK needed soldiers so they created a group named women of white feather
These women will go out and give men those who wont fight in ww1 a white feather basically a coward label
Very simple trick which later on become kind of a model for bigger countries
feminism in intention is not for designing countries but in practicality is useful

Orwell wrote this very early:-
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/3706.George_Orwell

More importantly
Feminism = less birth count
Thus simply better

 

[Aypo129]

I am not make case for men or against women
Imo you cant change how these slaves will behave so i wont waste time advocating for this or that right

 

[Deleted member 17872]

More importantly
Feminism = less birth count
Thus simply better

I still don't understand why elites would want low birth. It means low workers and tax payers.

I am not make case for men or against women
Imo you cant change how these slaves will behave so i wont waste time advocating for this or that right

I don't want you to make a case. I hate majority of men and women equally. What i'm asking you is to Enlighten me on the topic of feminism. There's too many false information about it from both sides.

 

[Aypo129]

@David Rothschild
You ever heard of a very early famous now forgotten experiment called mouse utopia

 

[Deleted member 17872]

@David Rothschild
You ever heard of a very early famous now forgotten experiment called mouse utopia

You mean the behaviour sink experiment? It was found to be not applicable to humans.

 

[Aypo129]

You mean the behaviour sink experiment?

Yes
Originally it was about population control
if a international system of rats grow out of a system that is equilly sustainable
Those rats grow sedentary
Imagine a human world that is equally sustainable
You dont need to

Population grows large:- unequal :- violence
Population grow large :-equal :-sedentary :-dies out

When rockfeller fist entered dhaka in the 1850s his first word were :- "this population needs to be extremely reduced"

With technology,feminism everything coincides
You are asking about taxes my friend not seeing the human colony they have just planned
CDBC was unlawful yet they passed it
Imagine what else they can pass if a emergency were to occur

I already proved previously that 9/11 had been planned

No one can tell what exact move theu were going to do except them

Regarding feminism its a small fish
A distraction

 

[Aypo129]

Btw
If you dint know the strongest proof behind 9/11 Operation here i will make it irrefutable to you

Bremer interview, NBC)

9/11 Insider Trading

On September 12, 2001, before the dust had even settled on Ground Zero, the Securities and Exchange Commission opened an investigation into a chilling proposition: that an unknown group of traders with advance knowledge of the 9/11 plot had made millions betting against the companies involved in the attacks.

ANTONIO MORA: "What many Wall Street analysts believe is that the terrorists made bets that a number of stocks would see their prices fall. They did so by buying what they call 'puts.' If you bet right the rewards can be huge. The risks are also huge unless you know something bad is going to happen to the company you're betting against.
DYLAN RATIGAN: This could very well be insider trading at the worst, most horrific, most evil use you've ever seen in your entire life.
ANTONIO MORA: One example, United Airlines. The Thursday before the attack more than two thousand contracts betting that the stock would go down were purchased. Ninety times more in one day than in three weeks. When the markets reopened, United's stock dropped, the price of the contracts soared, and someone may have made a lot of money, fast.
DYLAN RATIGAN: $180,000 turns into $2.4 million when that plane hits the World Trade Center.
ANTONIO MORA: It's almost the same story with American Airlines.
DYLAN RATIGAN: That's a fivefold increase in the value of what was a $337,000 trade on Monday (September 10, 2001).
ANTONIO MORA: All of a sudden becomes what?
DYLAN RATIGAN: $1.8 million.
ANTONIO MORA: And there's much more, including an extraordinarily high number of bets against Morgan Stanley and Marsh & McLennan, two of the World Trade Center's biggest tenants. Could this be a coincidence?
DYLAN RATIGAN: This would be one of the most extraordinary coincidences in the history of mankind if it was a coincidence."
(SOURCE: 9/11 Wall Street Blames Put Option Inside Trading On Terrorists)

Although the put options on American and United Airlines are usually cited in reference to the 9/11 insider trading, these trades only represent a fraction of the suspicious trades leading up to the attack. Between August 20th and September 10th, abnormally large spikes in put option activity appeared in trades involving dozens of different companies whose stocks plunged after the attack, including Boeing, Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Munich Re and the AXA Group.

Traders weren’t just betting against the companies whose stocks dove after 9/11, however. There was also a sixfold increase in call options on the stock of defense contractor Raytheon on the day before 9/11. The options allowed the traders to buy Raytheon stock at $25. Within a week of the attack, as the American military began deploying the Raytheon-supplied Tomahawk missiles they would eventually use in the invasion of Afghanistan, the company’s share price had shot up 37% to over $34.

The SEC weren't the only ones interested in this particular 9/11 money trail, either. Investigations into potential insider trading before the attacks were opened by authorities around the globe, from Belgium to France to Germany to Switzerland to Japan. It wasn't long before this global financial manhunt started yielding clues on the trail of the terror traders.

On September 17th, Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Martino, addressing Italian Consob's own investigation into potential 9/11 trading, said: "I think that there are terrorist states and organizations behind speculation on the international markets."

By September 24th, the Belgian Finance Minister, Didier Reynders, was confident enough to publicly announce Belgium's "strong suspicions that British markets may have been used for transactions."

The president of Germany's central bank, Ernst Welteke, was the most adamant: "What we found makes us sure that people connected to the terrorists must have been trying to profit from this tragedy."

These foreign leaders were not alone in their conviction that insider trading had taken place. University of Chicago finance professor George Constantinides, Columbia University law professor John Coffee, Duke University law professor James Cox and other academics as well as well-known options traders like Jon Najarian all expressed their belief that investors had traded on advance knowledge of the attacks.

The scale of the SEC investigation was unprecedented, examining over 9.5 million securities transactions, including stocks and options in 103 different companies trading in seven markets, 32 exchange-traded funds, and stock indices. The probe drew on the assistance of the legal and compliance staff of the 20 largest trading firms and the regulatory authorities in ten foreign governments. The Commission coordinated its investigation with the FBI, the Department of Justice, and the Department of the Treasury.

The result of this investigation?

"We have not developed any evidence suggesting that those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks traded on the basis of that information."

Although this sounds like the investigation did not find evidence of insider trading, a second look reveals the trick; they are not saying that there was no insider trading, only that there is no evidence that "those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks" participated in such trading. But this begs the question: Who had that advance knowledge, and how did the SEC determine this?

The 9/11 Commission Report begs the question even more blatantly in their treatment of the anomalous put option activity on United Airlines stock on September 6: 95% of the puts were placed by "a single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda." Again, it is taken as a foregone conclusion that a lack of ties to "al Qaeda" means there could not have been advance knowledge of the attack, even if the evidence shows insider trading took place.

To be sure, insider trading almost certainly did take place in the weeks before 9/11. Although some have used the Commission report to conclude that the story was debunked, the intervening years have seen the release of not one, not two, but three separate scientific papers concluding with high probability that the anomalous trading was the result of advance knowledge.

In "Unusual Option Market Activity and the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001," University of Chicago professor Allen Poteshman concluded: "Examination of the option trading leading up to September 11 reveals that there was an unusually high level of put buying. This finding is consistent with informed investors having traded options in advance of the attacks."

In "Detecting Abnormal Trading Activities in Option Markets," researchers at the University of Zurich used econometric methods to confirm unusual put option activity on the stocks of key airlines, banks and reinsurers in the weeks prior to 9/11.

And in "Was There Abnormal Trading in the S&P 500 Index Options Prior to the September 11 Attacks?" a team of researchers concluded that abnormal activity in the S&P index options market around the time of the attack "is consistent with insiders anticipating the 9-11 attacks."

The only question, then, is who was profiting from these trades and why was no one ever indicted for their participation in them?

One lead is pursued by researcher and author Kevin Ryan. In "Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11," he examines an FBI briefing document from 2003 that was declassified in 2009. It describes the results of FBI investigations into two of the pre-9/11 trades that the Bureau had identified as suspicious, including the purchase of 56,000 shares of Stratesec in the days prior to 9/11. Stratesec provided security systems to airports (including, ironically, Dulles Airport, as well as the World Trade Center and United Airlines) and saw its share price almost double when the markets re-opened on September 17th, 2001.

The trades traced back to a couple whose names are redacted from the memo, but are easily identifiable from the unredacted information: Mr. and Mrs. Wirt D. Walker III, a distant relative of the Bush family and business partner of Marvin Bush, the President's brother. The document notes that the pair were never even interviewed as part of the investigation because it had "revealed no ties to terrorism or other negative information."

In addition to begging the question, this characterization is provably false. As Ryan noted in a conversation with financial journalist Lars Schall:

KEVIN RYAN: "Wirt Dexter Walker at Stratesec hired several people from a company called The Carlyle Group, and The Carlyle Group had Bin-Laden family members as investors. Also Wirt Walker's fellow (inaudible) director James Abrahamson was a close business associate of a man named Mansoor Ijaz, a Pakistani businessman and Mansoor Ijaz claimed to be able to contact Osama Bin-Laden on multiple occasions.
So there does seem to be some circumstantial evidence indicated that these people were connected to Al-Qaeda, at least to the point where we should investigate.
LARS SCHALL: And isn't it also true that some members of the Bin-Laden family were actually in Washington at the gathering of The Carlyle Group on 9/11?
KEVIN RYAN: That's true. The Carlyle Group had a meeting at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Washington on September 11th and present there were former President George H. W. Bush, James Baker and the brother of Osama Bin-Laden. I believe his name was Salem, I can't recall his exact name. But they were there, investors from the Bin-Laden family meeting with Carlyle Group representatives in Washington on September 11th."
(SOURCE: Terror Trading 9/11)

Was this why the FBI thought better of questioning him over his highly profitable purchase of Stratesec shares right before 9/11?

The CIA figures prominently in another line of investigation. One suspicious United Airlines put option purchase that was investigated by the FBI involved a 2,500-contract order for puts in the days before 9/11. Instead of processing the purchase through United Airlines' home exchange, the Chicago Board of Options Exchange, the order was split into five 500-contract chunks and run through five different options exhchanges simultaneously. The unusual order was brokered by Deutsch Bank Alex. Brown, a firm that until 1998 was chaired by A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard, a former consultant to CIA director James Woolsey who at the time of 9/11 was himself the Executive Director of the CIA.

MICHAEL C. RUPPERT: So right after the attacks of 9/11 the name Buzzy Krongard surfaced, it was instant research that revealed that Buzzy Krongard had been allegedly recruited by CIA Director George Tennant to become the Executive Director at (the) CIA, which is the number three position, right before the attacks.
And Alex Brown was one of the many subsidiaries of Deutsche Bank, (which was) one of the primary vehicles or instruments that handled all of these criminal trades by people who obviously knew that the attacks were going to take place where, how and involving specific airlines.
(SOURCE: Terror Trading 9/11)

Perhaps the most frank admission of insider trading is notable for three things: It was recorded on video, it has never been investigated by any agency or law enforcement official, and it was made by former CIA agent and frequent foreign policy commentator Robert Baer, the real-life inspiration for the character portrayed by George Clooney in "Syriana." Talking to citizen journalists after a speaking event in Los Angeles in 2008, Baer was recorded on video making a startling assertion about 9/11 insider trading:

JEREMY ROTHE-KUSHEL: ...the last thing I want to leave you with is the National Reconnaissance Office was running a drill of a plane crashing into their building and you know they're staffed by DoD and CIA...
ROBERT BAER: I know the guy that went into his broker in San Diego and said "Cash me out, it's going down tomorrow."
JEREMY ROTHE KUSHEL: Really?
ROBERT BAER: Yeah.
STEWART HOWE: That tells us something.
ROBERT BAER: What?
STEWART HOWE: That tells us something.
ROBERT BAER: Well, his brother worked at the White House.
(SOURCE: WeAreChangeLA debriefs CIA Case Officer Robert Baer about apparent Mossad and White House 9/11 foreknowledge)

This truly remarkable statement bears further scrutiny. If Baer is to be believed, a former CIA agent has first-hand knowledge that a White House insider had foreknowledge of the attacks, and to this day not only has Baer never revealed the identity of this person, but no one has questioned him about his statement or even attempted to pursue this lead.

So how is it possible that the SEC overlooked, ignored, or simply chose not to pursue such leads in their investigation? The only possible answer, of course, is that the investigation was deliberately steered away from such persons of interest and any connections that would lead back to foreknowledge by government agencies, federal agents, or their associates in the business world.

Unfortunately, we will likely never see documentary evidence of that from the Commission itself. One researcher requesting access under the Freedom of Information Act to the documentary evidence that the 9/11 Commission used to conclude there had been no insider trading received a response that stated "that the potentially responsive records have been destroyed."

Instead, we are left with sources that refuse to be identified, saying that CBOE records of pre-9/11 options trading have been destroyed and [with] second-hand accounts of traders who had heard talk of an event in advance of 9/11.

In a round-about way, perhaps the 9/11 Commission reveals more than it lets on when it tries to dismiss key insider trades with the pithy observation that the traders had no conceivable ties to Al Qaeda. If those with foreknowledge of the attacks weren't connected to Al Qaeda, what does that say about the identity of the real 9/11 perpetrators?

ANTONIO MORA: ABC News has now learned that the Chicago Board of Options Exchange launched their investigation into the unusual trading last week. That may have given them enough time to stop anyone from profiting from death here in the U.S. It may also give investigators, Peter, a "hot trail" that might lead them to the terrorists.
PETER JENNINGS: Thanks very much. As a reminder of the complications here, the Secretary of the Treasury said here today of this investigation, "You've got to go through ten veils before you can get to the real source."
ANTONIO MORA: Yeah.
PETER JENNINGS: Thanks, Antonio.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Yes
Originally it was about population control
if a international system of rats grow out of a system that is equilly sustainable
Those rats grow sedentary
Imagine a human world that is equally sustainable
You dont need to

Population grows large:- unequal :- violence
Population grow large :-equal :-sedentary :-dies out

As i said behaviour sink has not found to be applicable to humans.

When rockfeller fist entered dhaka in the 1850s his first word were :- "this population needs to be extremely reduced"

Source? I can't find anything on this

With technology,feminism everything coincides
You are asking about taxes my friend not seeing the human colony they have just planned

Taxes are important because without it they go bankrupt

CDBC was unlawful yet they passed it
Imagine what else they can pass if a emergency were to occur

What does CDBC have to do with taxes now?

I already proved previously that 9/11 had been planned

I still don't believe this. They probably knew about it but let that happened. Not planned it tho.

No one can tell what exact move theu were going to do except them

Scary tbh

Regarding feminism its a small fish
A distraction

Yes i agree. Elites want gender wars to keep the plebs busy and don't question them.

 

[Aypo129]

As i said behaviour sink has not found to be applicable to humans.

Source? I can't find anything on this

Taxes are important because without it they go bankrupt

What does CDBC have to do with taxes now?


I still don't believe this. They probably knew about it but let that happened. Not planned it tho.

Scary tbh

Yes i agree. Elites want gender wars to keep the plebs busy and don't question them.

1.Behaviour sink does not need to be applicable but part of behaviour sink just needs To billieved to be effective, Which is enough
In my own country
People are paranoid enough they basically allowed government to sterillize poor people which happened in 1980s

Link it to global warming also

2.Source is his book
Here is short link which is not working nowhttp://mikaelnyberg.nu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/The-Green-Capitalists.pdf

3.Taxes is just human currency there is a million different ways to create and control human currency
Hell the currency might not be human
CDBC is just a first step of all transactions that will be entirely be documented

4. I mentioned

5. We agree

 

[Aypo129]

The most laughable part is 1.26 billion population is asking for his demise living in the dirt with mere 50 billions and one person holds that much amount is living in some cozy 10 floors empty building with 100 cars

Its laughable comedy to anybody with sanity

 

[Deleted member 16275]

Explain what this means btw im too low iq

 

[Deleted member 17872]

1.Behaviour sink does not need to be applicable but part of behaviour sink just needs To billieved to be effective, Which is enough
In my own country
People are paranoid enough they basically allowed government to sterillize poor people which happened in 1980s

Link it to global warming also

Elites are dumber

2.Source is his book
Here is short link which is not working nowhttp://mikaelnyberg.nu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/The-Green-Capitalists.pdf

3.Taxes is just human currency there is a million different ways to create and control human currency
Hell the currency might not be human
CDBC is just a first step of all transactions that will be entirely be documented

What other different ways? You mean like Inca empire. Where we had to pay in commodities. Maybe data become the currency?

The most laughable part is 1.26 billion population is asking for his demise living in the dirt with mere 50 billions and one person holds that much amount is living in some cozy 10 floors empty building with 100 cars

Its laughable comedy to anybody with sanity

Whose demise?

 

[Aypo129]

Elites are dumber



What other different ways? You mean like Inca empire. Where we had to pay in commodities. Maybe data become the currency?


Whose demise?

2.yeah data,energy many other commodity
When a better system of control is present why not transform

3.thier own demise
You wont bilieve the mindset they have of thierself
Only when you live with these scum will you experience world of self hatred looks like
Totally okay if a million poor are sterillized

India’s Forced Sterilization Practices Under International Human Rights Law

voelkerrechtsblog.org

Totally okay if a hundred thousands are displaced in middle of day in winter just this year

Totally okay if a million are competing for a 1000 seat because there is no job

You can ask anybody here why there is no job
Why they dont wear clothes (unironically in indian street many children roam naked)
Why they dont have proper streets
And none of them ever show power to point up

Its all very laughable

 

[juste]

op fucks men literally
u cocksucker...

 

[Deleted member 17872]

2.yeah data,energy many other commodity
When a better system of control is present why not transform

3.thier own demise
You wont bilieve the mindset they have of thierself
Only when you live with these scum will you experience world of self hatred looks like
Totally okay if a million poor are sterillized

India’s Forced Sterilization Practices Under International Human Rights Law

voelkerrechtsblog.org

Totally okay if a hundred thousands are displaced in middle of day in winter just this year

Totally okay if a million are competing for a 1000 seat because there is no job

You can ask anybody here why there is no job
Why they dont wear clothes (unironically in indian street many children roam naked)
Why they dont have proper streets
And none of them ever show power to point up

Its all very laughable

What's the reason for this? Why are hindus so docile?

 

[Aypo129]

What's the reason for this? Why are hindus so docile?

its all demographic here except sikh
they have no bilief in themselves
Always looking for a new saviour
Thier tounge of bragging is stronger than thier yearning for good life