FULL BREAKDOWN OF MY RATING CONCEPTS AND HOW TO PROPERLY RATE PPL

[poreskin]

You need to understand one concept thats often confused:

---------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGENESS VS ATTRACTIVENESS
--------------




--------------
Women have a biological shift inside of them that makes them attracted to men, because of health indicators that make them fit to reproduce. Sometimes this can be culturally influenced but usually it's only minimal.

This measures a males attractiveness.
---------
Men have an average that is influenced by age, enviorment, and culture.

This measures a males averageness.
-------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought expirment:

If all men became severely fat and deformed, and then theres another man who is fat with poor features but he's not deformed and he's only slightly overweight


His averageness would improve majorly, he would be in the top 1% of men and he considered chad

But his attractiveness wouldn't change, this is because woman are still wired to be attracted to healthy men in which he doesn't meet the biological standards, even if hes better than any other men, women will still see him as a creep because their biological hardwiring hasnt changed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In conclusion:

Ltn is average, but girls will be have a negative repulsion to them because their biologically hardwired too, even if its standardly average cuz of poor habits

Mtn is above avg, but girls will see them as mid cuz their hardwiring hasnt changed. This is because the bar is so low for men to outpreform eachother, however, womens bar hasnt changed because its hardwired through thousands of years of evolution.

to guage how women see you, its only fair to rate yourselves to lean men with no severe deformities or falios.

 

[Potency]

blabber

 

[negativ_canthalshit]

You need to understand one concept thats often confused:

---------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGENESS VS ATTRACTIVENESS
--------------




--------------
Women have a biological shift inside of them that makes them attracted to men, because of health indicators that make them fit to reproduce. Sometimes this can be culturally influenced but usually it's only minimal.

This measures a males attractiveness.
---------
Men have an average that is influenced by age, enviorment, and culture.

This measures a males averageness.
-------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought expirment:

If all men became severely fat and deformed, and then theres another man who is fat with poor features but he's not deformed and he's only slightly overweight


His averageness would improve majorly, he would be in the top 1% of men and he considered chad

But his attractiveness wouldn't change, this is because woman are still wired to be attracted to healthy men in which he doesn't meet the biological standards, even if hes better than any other men, women will still see him as a creep because their biological hardwiring hasnt changed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In conclusion:

Ltn is average, but girls will be have a negative repulsion to them because their biologically hardwired too, even if its standardly average cuz of poor habits

Mtn is above avg, but girls will see them as mid cuz their hardwiring hasnt changed. This is because the bar is so low for men to outpreform eachother, however, womens bar hasnt changed because its hardwired through thousands of years of evolution.

to guage how women see you, its only fair to rate yourselves to lean men with no severe deformities or falios.

Nice

 

[ProBono]

From what I've gathered, you're saying that every measure of attractiveness is hardwired into women. You might end up mogging more people because society is arguably more unattractive and unfit now, making you above average, but that doesn't cause women to sexually desire you more. At most, it's a status boost.

At it's core, people but women moreso are motivated by strict and hypergamous measures of sexual selection. It's already been historically proven that pre-civilisation we have far more female than male ancestors, and this led to not only more attractive people, but people who have a higher standard of attractiveness and also more sociopathic traits which might let them fraud with status or power to reproduce.