Full facial analysis of infamous TikToker K.Shami

[Deleted member 19968]

So i’ve noticed this dude is pretty controversial out here and he is hated a lot for his “dogshit” ratios and thats why he is “mtn’.

ESR 45.9% (ideal)
Bigonial/byzygo 82% (unideal)
Total FWHR 1.37 (ideal)
Eyebrows setness 0.8 (unideal)
Cheekbones setness 82% (ideal)
Mouth to nose 1.55 (ideal)
Canthal tilt 5.2 deg avg (ideal)
Eye aspect 3.25 (ideal)
Bitemp 0.788(unideal) it should be at least 85% on men
Fwhr 1.78 ( his biggest flaw )
Chin to philtrum 2.3 (ideal)
Lower third proportion 1/3 (ideal)
Facial thirds forehead too short (unideal)
1 eye apart 1.13 (unideal)
Midface ratio: 0.945 (unideal)
Eyebrow tilt 11 deg (ideal)
Ipsilateral 82 deg
Jaw frontal 75 degrees (big flaw). This is why mandibular plane angle or how downgrown u are heavily influences how steep or flat ur jaw looks in the front.
Neck width 91% (ideal)
Upper lip to lower lip 1.5 (ideal)
Iaa and jf deviation 82 deg ipsilateral and 75 deg jaw frontal so 7 deg devitation (unideal)

Total HARMONY score: 69.3%

Overall he has good dimorphism, stubble, good jaw definition although could be better.

Based on those he would score close to his harmony score so high htn/chadlite.

 

[Deleted member 19968]

Forum chad amnesia got about 80% or so.

 

[News]

Mogs me.

 

[Mainstream]

How high does FWHR have to be in your eyes to be considered ideal?
1.7x is very average amongst the male population. Higher is surely more optimal, but I wouldn't consider near 1.8 a huge flaw.

 

[Deleted member 19968]

How high does FWHR have to be in your eyes to be considered ideal?
1.7x is very average amongst the male population. Higher is surely more optimal, but I wouldn't consider near 1.8 a huge flaw.

Ur right 1.7 is the average but 1.9-2.06 is ideal, almost all attractive males have this ratio with some exceptions (chico 1.85 and barret over 2.2). If u take average of normal looking people its about 1.7, but average of hollywood actors/attractive people its about 2 or so.

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

Ur right 1.7 is the average but 1.9-2.06 is ideal, almost all attractive males have this ratio with some exceptions (chico 1.85 and barret over 2.2). If u take average of normal looking people its about 1.7, but average of hollywood actors/attractive people its about 2 or so.

if u look good u just do bro no autistic ratios

 

[Deleted member 19968]

if u look good u just do bro no autistic ratios

He does look good regardless, the point of this is just to objectively explain why does

 

[St.TikTokcel]

Ur right 1.7 is the average but 1.9-2.06 is ideal, almost all attractive males have this ratio with some exceptions (chico 1.85 and barret over 2.2). If u take average of normal looking people its about 1.7, but average of hollywood actors/attractive people its about 2 or so.

Xd, anything over 1.9 is brachycephaly/SFS.

 

[Deleted member 19968]

Xd, anything over 1.9 is brachycephaly/SFS.

So 95% of hollywood actors / models are brachy? jfl

 

[saldagoat]

autism

 

[MaestheticMaso]

So 95% of hollywood actors / models are brachy? jfl

Most models don’t have a super high fwhr. If anything it’s closer to avg

 

[LooksThinker]

Good analysis but you are overrating the flawness of fwhr.

 

[mogssssssssssssssss]

So i’ve noticed this dude is pretty controversial out here and he is hated a lot for his “dogshit” ratios and thats why he is “mtn’.

ESR 45.9% (ideal)
Bigonial/byzygo 82% (unideal)
Total FWHR 1.37 (ideal)
Eyebrows setness 0.8 (unideal)
Cheekbones setness 82% (ideal)
Mouth to nose 1.55 (ideal)
Canthal tilt 5.2 deg avg (ideal)
Eye aspect 3.25 (ideal)
Bitemp 0.788(unideal) it should be at least 85% on men
Fwhr 1.78 ( his biggest flaw )
Chin to philtrum 2.3 (ideal)
Lower third proportion 1/3 (ideal)
Facial thirds forehead too short (unideal)
1 eye apart 1.13 (unideal)
Midface ratio: 0.945 (unideal)
Eyebrow tilt 11 deg (ideal)
Ipsilateral 82 deg
Jaw frontal 75 degrees (big flaw). This is why mandibular plane angle or how downgrown u are heavily influences how steep or flat ur jaw looks in the front.
Neck width 91% (ideal)
Upper lip to lower lip 1.5 (ideal)
Iaa and jf deviation 82 deg ipsilateral and 75 deg jaw frontal so 7 deg devitation (unideal)

Total HARMONY score: 69.3%

Overall he has good dimorphism, stubble, good jaw definition although could be better.

Based on those he would score close to his harmony score so high htn/chadlite.

He's always act like a chad but in reality he's makeupmaxxed mtn with slightly recessed jaw. Frauder of syria

 

[colton myers]

So i’ve noticed this dude is pretty controversial out here and he is hated a lot for his “dogshit” ratios and thats why he is “mtn’.

ESR 45.9% (ideal)
Bigonial/byzygo 82% (unideal)
Total FWHR 1.37 (ideal)
Eyebrows setness 0.8 (unideal)
Cheekbones setness 82% (ideal)
Mouth to nose 1.55 (ideal)
Canthal tilt 5.2 deg avg (ideal)
Eye aspect 3.25 (ideal)
Bitemp 0.788(unideal) it should be at least 85% on men
Fwhr 1.78 ( his biggest flaw )
Chin to philtrum 2.3 (ideal)
Lower third proportion 1/3 (ideal)
Facial thirds forehead too short (unideal)
1 eye apart 1.13 (unideal)
Midface ratio: 0.945 (unideal)
Eyebrow tilt 11 deg (ideal)
Ipsilateral 82 deg
Jaw frontal 75 degrees (big flaw). This is why mandibular plane angle or how downgrown u are heavily influences how steep or flat ur jaw looks in the front.
Neck width 91% (ideal)
Upper lip to lower lip 1.5 (ideal)
Iaa and jf deviation 82 deg ipsilateral and 75 deg jaw frontal so 7 deg devitation (unideal)

Total HARMONY score: 69.3%

Overall he has good dimorphism, stubble, good jaw definition although could be better.

Based on those he would score close to his harmony score so high htn/chadlite.

If his face is high htn then I am atleast chadlite..

 

[Allornothing]

He looks very good I don’t get why people here bash him lol

 

[Deleted member 19968]

He looks very good I don’t get why people here bash him lol

Facts, they just underrate him for no reason. Calling him MTN is absurd

 

[whitegymmax]

nothing special about this guy, but good ipd and hair, enough to mogg Neymar

 

[MakinMogReturns]

How high does FWHR have to be in your eyes to be considered ideal?
1.7x is very average amongst the male population. Higher is surely more optimal, but I wouldn't consider near 1.8 a huge flaw.

1.7 is terrible 1.9 and up is ideal

 

[lilith]

i want to skin him alive jfl

 

[try2beme]

i want to skin him alive jfl

Ikr

 

[try2beme]

He is very ugly to me and my ex

 

[recessedchincell]

So i’ve noticed this dude is pretty controversial out here and he is hated a lot for his “dogshit” ratios and thats why he is “mtn’.

ESR 45.9% (ideal)
Bigonial/byzygo 82% (unideal)
Total FWHR 1.37 (ideal)
Eyebrows setness 0.8 (unideal)
Cheekbones setness 82% (ideal)
Mouth to nose 1.55 (ideal)
Canthal tilt 5.2 deg avg (ideal)
Eye aspect 3.25 (ideal)
Bitemp 0.788(unideal) it should be at least 85% on men
Fwhr 1.78 ( his biggest flaw )
Chin to philtrum 2.3 (ideal)
Lower third proportion 1/3 (ideal)
Facial thirds forehead too short (unideal)
1 eye apart 1.13 (unideal)
Midface ratio: 0.945 (unideal)
Eyebrow tilt 11 deg (ideal)
Ipsilateral 82 deg
Jaw frontal 75 degrees (big flaw). This is why mandibular plane angle or how downgrown u are heavily influences how steep or flat ur jaw looks in the front.
Neck width 91% (ideal)
Upper lip to lower lip 1.5 (ideal)
Iaa and jf deviation 82 deg ipsilateral and 75 deg jaw frontal so 7 deg devitation (unideal)

Total HARMONY score: 69.3%

Overall he has good dimorphism, stubble, good jaw definition although could be better.

Based on those he would score close to his harmony score so high htn/chadlite.

whats fwhr

 

[luria]

what program u use to do facial analysis

 

[coispet]

He looks very good I don’t get why people here bash him lol

We bash him because he steals threads and regurgitates it word for word on his TikTok without giving the original thread creator credit