hypernormie
Only the truth is beautiful.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2022
- Posts
- 2,520
- Reputation
- 3,011
I did the photoshoot for a friend of a friend who was looking to build up his portfolio.
The other person in the shoot with me was a “non-binary” girl. Prior to the shoot they do what are called “fittings” which are when you show up and try everything on so the photographer or whoever can plan the outfits for the shoot.
During fittings there’s a lot of taking off and putting on clothes, so half the time you are just in your underwear. The “non-binary” girl obviously had to go through this process as well and being a non binary girl she doesn’t wear a bra to the fitting obviously because that would repress her fluid gender identity or something. Well we are doing the fitting and me and this girl are in the same room changing clothes a lot and since she’s not wearing a bra, her tits are out half the time.
The funny thing though is that whenever she would need to change and expose her tits, the photographer guy would ask me to turn around or look away. This seems benign until you think about it a little bit. I thought it was odd immediately because she’s supposedly “non-binary” right? Which means she isn’t supposed to be a girl or a boy. Which means treating her tits as inherently sexual to a man contradicts the whole premise of her gender identity. I could tell she also noticed this to some extent through her mannerisms but I doubt she understood why she also vaguely felt the oddity inherent in the requests or felt her obvious slight compulsion to keep her tits out and visible to me at every opportunity. She never once tried to hide her tits herself, even when the photographer wasn’t in the room requesting I turn around and I could plainly see them, she wouldn’t attempt to cover them up. So she herself evidently didn’t care if I could see them but everyone else there did.
If she is “non-binary” and I’m forced to refer to her as “they/them” and the other people made it a point to let me know that she refers to herself with those pronouns, I just find it very funny that when push comes to shove, they still view her and treat her as a woman. They still understand that breasts are inherently sexual and that I, as a man, potentially see them that way. Now I wasn’t staring at her tits, I’ve seen enough tits in my life to not feel the need to stare at them when they are exposed in front of me, these people also weren’t aware of my views on gender ideology and as far as I’m aware believed me to be indoctrinated just as they were. So why they felt the need to insist on her sexuality as a woman in my presence is plainly hypocritical. I was even asked at one point about my sexual orientation during a conversation because the photographer himself was gay and these kinds of people don’t like to assume sexual orientation. However not knowing beforehand if I was gay, straight, or bisexual makes it even more bizarre that they had this immediate inclination to shield her tits from my eyes. Everytime they told me to avoid seeing her tits was an insistence to the woman herself that she is actually a woman and will be treated as such. Something she herself took some subconscious umbrance with, however conflict avoidant she was to not point it out.
It’s obvious they know she’s a woman and treat her as a woman but they will willingly go along with the gender bending ideology and promote it in society. They aren’t actually congruent with the logical end of that ideology which would be to not see tits as inherently sexual and immediately treat every man as heterosexual.
Just some more evidence these aren’t serious people with serious convictions and they are only conforming to this nonsense out of a strong need for social approval.
The other person in the shoot with me was a “non-binary” girl. Prior to the shoot they do what are called “fittings” which are when you show up and try everything on so the photographer or whoever can plan the outfits for the shoot.
During fittings there’s a lot of taking off and putting on clothes, so half the time you are just in your underwear. The “non-binary” girl obviously had to go through this process as well and being a non binary girl she doesn’t wear a bra to the fitting obviously because that would repress her fluid gender identity or something. Well we are doing the fitting and me and this girl are in the same room changing clothes a lot and since she’s not wearing a bra, her tits are out half the time.
The funny thing though is that whenever she would need to change and expose her tits, the photographer guy would ask me to turn around or look away. This seems benign until you think about it a little bit. I thought it was odd immediately because she’s supposedly “non-binary” right? Which means she isn’t supposed to be a girl or a boy. Which means treating her tits as inherently sexual to a man contradicts the whole premise of her gender identity. I could tell she also noticed this to some extent through her mannerisms but I doubt she understood why she also vaguely felt the oddity inherent in the requests or felt her obvious slight compulsion to keep her tits out and visible to me at every opportunity. She never once tried to hide her tits herself, even when the photographer wasn’t in the room requesting I turn around and I could plainly see them, she wouldn’t attempt to cover them up. So she herself evidently didn’t care if I could see them but everyone else there did.
If she is “non-binary” and I’m forced to refer to her as “they/them” and the other people made it a point to let me know that she refers to herself with those pronouns, I just find it very funny that when push comes to shove, they still view her and treat her as a woman. They still understand that breasts are inherently sexual and that I, as a man, potentially see them that way. Now I wasn’t staring at her tits, I’ve seen enough tits in my life to not feel the need to stare at them when they are exposed in front of me, these people also weren’t aware of my views on gender ideology and as far as I’m aware believed me to be indoctrinated just as they were. So why they felt the need to insist on her sexuality as a woman in my presence is plainly hypocritical. I was even asked at one point about my sexual orientation during a conversation because the photographer himself was gay and these kinds of people don’t like to assume sexual orientation. However not knowing beforehand if I was gay, straight, or bisexual makes it even more bizarre that they had this immediate inclination to shield her tits from my eyes. Everytime they told me to avoid seeing her tits was an insistence to the woman herself that she is actually a woman and will be treated as such. Something she herself took some subconscious umbrance with, however conflict avoidant she was to not point it out.
It’s obvious they know she’s a woman and treat her as a woman but they will willingly go along with the gender bending ideology and promote it in society. They aren’t actually congruent with the logical end of that ideology which would be to not see tits as inherently sexual and immediately treat every man as heterosexual.
Just some more evidence these aren’t serious people with serious convictions and they are only conforming to this nonsense out of a strong need for social approval.