Future of Marriages in The West

LowInhibIncel

LowInhibIncel

KHHV | 27 | Lowly Accountant
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
22
Reputation
622
If your eyes have been open you know that this as we know it is gone

1590245365693

I liked the posting by @bruh3610


;TLDR
A woman cheated on her chad husband.


I will get into why this happened later in my theory. Which I also got smoking a blunt on my couch

1590245465606


This theory would be great because its a rare occurrence where it would work make both MEN and WOMAN happy.

Let's go over some of the biggest grips of the current marriage system
- Woman marrying high SMV men and then taking them for granted(see bruh3610's article or Angelina Jolie divorcing Mr.Pitt)
- Incels able to get sex (hookers, streetwalkers, and high end escorts), but not able to pass their genes into the next generation.
- Low SMV woman getting partners they don't really love

The answer to be short twofold:

is to make LEGAL male and female polygamy

1590245921898


1590245948599


then make LEGAL male and female PROSTITUTION

Now I've proposed the solution let me explain why this would work.


High SMV Males taking multiple wives was common place in the old world. Even in the old testament of the bible Kings had their main wive , but then had many wives and concubines.

1590246103678


This makes woman never get to comfortable. They stop withholding sex, if anything these men get the freakiest sex. Since each woman knows that she's in a bitter competition with the next woman. This immediately elicits the best most feminine behavior even from the main wife. Woman won't have a problem with this. Many woman would rather have 1/10,1/50th of a high SMV man that marry an incel like myself. This would also bring up the average IQ, height, and looks in just a couple generations. Since one of these men with 20 wives could make 100+ high smv children



However, female SMV has been steadily rising and male SMV lowering with the increase of incels.

1590246503925

Therefore, we must now make room for also female polygamy. This would mostly be in the form of incels sharing a wife. The wife is happy because instead of getting one betabux she get's 2+. The wife also has to treat these men well because they know they could take their money elsewhere. The incel would just be in this marriage for have children, but there would also be some affection. Assuming 3 men per wife, each man could get 1-2 kids maybe more. The wife would usually only have sex for reproduction though .This incel men would have his wildest sex during and before the marriage which brings use to our next point

LEGAL PROSTITUTION

I'm going to write a Guide to EscortMaxxing for Dummies later, but legalizing prostitution would have several advantages.

- More tax money, so we could lower the income tax. Get better schools, roads and so on
- Less socials stigma
- Moneymaxxed incels could slay 50+ woman a year

The more money you pay for higher end escorts. The more of a better actor she is, of making you feel like a total chad.
So the incels feel better. There's more taxes money being collected, and sex workers are making less per client, but getting more clients overall

Politicians are too low IQ and to low inhibition to enact something like this. Either this or they know not of human biology and evolutionary psychology
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: greywind, ArcticStorm, reptiles and 14 others
Keeps writing S A
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
I doubt this could happen in America, but maybe somewhere like Europe or a political sandbox like a Seastead:

 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: doomguy333, Deleted member 8765 and LowInhibIncel
High effort thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
Or we could take away womens sexual power and make female promiscuity frowned upon again
 
  • +1
Reactions: robtical, futuregigamogger, Deleted member 8765 and 2 others
Dn rd
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
So your solution is to produce a society where 90% of males are basically even more incel than today. Yes, I'm sure this will create social stability.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ArcticStorm, optimisticzoomer and LowInhibIncel
imo, only male polygamy should be allowed
 
  • +1
Reactions: robtical, LowInhibIncel and Deleted member 8765
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel and Deleted member 6403
We have tried polygamy in the past and it's never worked out on a societal scale.
Humans prefer monogamy anyway.
This is barbaric and the day polygamy is accepted is the day Jesus raptures the Earth.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel, quakociaptockh and Deleted member 8765
This is barbaric and the day polygamy is accepted is the day Jesus raptures the Earth.
Why is it the day Jesus Raptures the Earth? How do we even know he’s real?
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel and Deleted member 5969
Why is it the day Jesus Raptures the Earth? How do we even know he’s real?
Just an expression its not exactly Biblical
We have the Roman Texts Ancient Manuscripts archaeological evidence etc etc etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
Just an expression its not exactly Biblical
We have the Roman Texts Ancient Manuscripts archaeological evidence etc etc etc
Maybe the Bible was simply meant to suppress society and females sexuality.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel and Deleted member 8765
Christianity is extension of Judaism. Judaism is an extension of Egyptian religion. All 3 religions had monogamy, forbade cheating, and also forbade fapping.

There must be something considering it stood for good 6000 years.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
Elab, and none taken.
If the Bible/religion was created to control women they did a horrible job
People say Islam is the hardest on women but yet they had women marches in Pakistan

The Bible is the true account of Jesus, women don't matter they are temporary
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel and Deleted member 8765

Similar threads

NT Master
Replies
11
Views
342
WeiWei
WeiWei
Earth Dollar
Replies
7
Views
381
Orvka381
Orvka381
NT Master
Replies
6
Views
212
BrokenCharm
BrokenCharm
glaruz
Replies
9
Views
189
MoggerGaston
MoggerGaston

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top