FWHR tierlist.

Joaquin

Joaquin

Mistral
Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Posts
2,202
Reputation
1,629
One of the most important facial ratios .
1,65 FWHR OR LESS=Over
1.7FWHR=Very bad
1.75FWHR=Bad
1.8 FWHR=Decent
1.85 FWHR=Good
1.9 FWHR=Very good
1.95=Ideal
2+=Very good too unless its more than 2.1+, then It becomes a slight flaw

I would like to know some of you guys opinion about this
 
  • +1
Reactions: aloooeJIEEES, ToryToad, kebinGarnett and 9 others
It is the most important facial ratio, @Magnum Opus told me about it.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: brownmutt42, Magnum Opus and CorinthianLOX
@pfl Since I think you know about facial ratios, is this list right? What are the most important ratios?
 
I always wondered how FWHR compares with absolute dimensions of face width and height
How much less is a guy taxed if he has a larger skull, with larger objective dimensions compared to somebody with a smaller skull with same ratio… will he also reach a point where he is better than a guy with a small skull but good FWHR?

I feel skull size matters even more than the ratio of dimensions for each respective skull
 
  • +1
Reactions: They_are_all_whores and NoReedemingFeature
I always wondered how FWHR compares with absolute dimensions of face width and height
How much less is a guy taxed if he has a larger skull, with larger objective dimensions compared to somebody with a smaller skull with same ratio… will he also reach a point where he is better than a guy with a small skull but good FWHR?

I feel skull size matters even more than the ratio of dimensions for each respective skull
Ive also questioned that.
Imo a small skulled guy with 1.9fWHR gets mogged by a 1.9 fWHR slightly Big skulled guy
 
  • +1
Reactions: chadintraining and greycel
Ive also questioned that.
Imo a small skulled guy with 1.9fWHR gets mogged by a 1.9 fWHR slightly Big skulled guy
Yes but what about a guy 1 who has 1.75 FWHR big skull, against guy 2 who has 2 FWHR, small skull

In real life when they are next to each other, beyond a certain point, the larger skull will always prevail
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Joaquin
Yes but what about a guy 1 who has 1.75 FWHR big skull, against guy 2 who has 2 FWHR, small skull

In real life when they are next to each other, the larger skull will always prevail
I have 1.75 fWHR, Big skull, I have a friend that has (more or less) a 2FWHR and a smaller skull. Imo he looks better than be because of that. 1.75 fWHR really is a flaw
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel and chadintraining
2.1+, then It becomes a slight flaw
Would say more than a slight flaw as it can make you look really weird (ex: Jordan Barrett, would look a lot better with a normal fwhr and overall facial structure)
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
Fuck, how you all calculate it?
 
I have 1.75 fWHR, Big skull, I have a friend that has (more or less) a 2FWHR and a smaller skull. Imo he looks better than be because of that. 1.75 fWHR really is a flaw
That was just a fixed value for an example
It’s really distributions, but absolute dimensions affect the displacement of these distributions if appeal is on the x axis
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joaquin
Would say more than a slight flaw as it can make you look really weird (ex: Jordan Barrett, would look a lot better with a normal fwhr and overall facial structure)
Hm yes, but still, a higher fWHR like 2.1 at most is better than a low one
 
That was just a fixed value for an example
It’s really distributions, but absolute dimensions affect the displacement of these distributions if appeal is on the x axis
True.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
Fuck, how you all calculate it?
Measure your vertical length from your Upper lip to your midbrow, then measure your bizygomatic width, and divide the bizygomatic width÷upper lip to midbrow
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoredPrince
One of the most important facial ratios .
1,65 FWHR OR LESS=Over
1.7FWHR=Very bad
1.75FWHR=Bad
1.8 FWHR=Decent
1.85 FWHR=Good
1.9 FWHR=Very good
1.95=Ideal
2+=Very good too unless its more than 2.1+, then It becomes a slight flaw

I would like to know some of you guys opinion about this
Do you think chat gpt is reliable enough to perform this measurement on your face?
 
Would say more than a slight flaw as it can make you look really weird (ex: Jordan Barrett, would look a lot better with a normal fwhr and overall facial structure)
It is not just that, barrets skull is vertically short aswell.
Looks at this guy
Screenshot 20250419 181804
he has a 2.1fWHR and still looks insane, because his face length is not that short(obviously because his other ratios, coloring , and dimorphism are good)
 
  • +1
Reactions: chadintraining
Do you think chat gpt is reliable enough to perform this measurement on your face?
Personally I measured this irl with a ruller:lul:
Peak Autism I know
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: BoredPrince and Imaloser7754
Yeah I agree
Depends on other factors tho
Like hexum has a 2.00 ratio but so does someone like leonardo dicaprio:whatfeels:
So depends on skull more:feelswat:
 
  • +1
Reactions: ThisCat
@pfl Since I think you know about facial ratios, is this list right? What are the most important ratios?
Yeah pfl knows a lot about copes (ratios)
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
Yeah I agree
Depends on other factors tho
Like hexum has a 2.00 ratio but so does someone like leonardo dicaprio:whatfeels:
So depends on skull more:feelswat:
DiCaprio has actually like 2.05 and his FHWR is Lower than the ideal so that means his skull is vertically too short
 
How are ratios copes:lul:
Bc he says im ugly bc of my ratios when im clrealy not ugly. Like he says my chin is 3 times the size of my philtrum so it makes ma ugly and bc my jaw is 40% of my face so too big it makes me ugly. All that according to his "ratios"


AirBrush 20250412211208
 
Bc he says im ugly bc of my ratios when im clrealy not ugly. Like he says my chin is 3 times the size of my philtrum so it makes ma ugly and bc my jaw is 40% of my face so too big it makes me ugly. All that according to his "ratios"


View attachment 3662236
Yeah, you are not noticable good looking bc some off your ratios are off
 
One of the most important facial ratios .
1,65 FWHR OR LESS=Over
1.7FWHR=Very bad
1.75FWHR=Bad
1.8 FWHR=Decent
1.85 FWHR=Good
1.9 FWHR=Very good
1.95=Ideal
2+=Very good too unless its more than 2.1+, then It becomes a slight flaw

I would like to know some of you guys opinion about this
mine is 1.7, .org rates me low htn, chosen fwhrcel
 
Yeah, you are not noticable good looking bc some off your ratios are off
I am DEFINETLY better lookong than most men. Bonestructure and facial
featureswise. I dont see many men who look like me irl
Screenshot 20241231 131152 Gallery
 
mine is 1.7, .org rates me low htn, chosen fwhrcel
if your other ratios are good then ofc youll be htn, what is your midface ratio
 
if your other ratios are good then ofc youll be htn, what is your midface ratio
no bro i am a fwhrcel so my midface is ass too it’s long as fuck😹😹

i just have high bone mass and a good jaw zygos and chin to balance it out
 
no bro i am a fwhrcel so my midface is ass too it’s long as fuck😹😹

i just have high bone mass and a good jaw zygos and chin to balance it out
Me too
I have 1.75 fWHR and 0.9midface
 
  • +1
Reactions: kana
You are dimorphic but dont glaze yourself too much
And thats whats attractive. And im not glazing myself im just saying women like that. How many men do you see with my bones and features?

1000054779
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250419_123721_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20250419_123721_Facebook.jpg
    188.3 KB · Views: 0
I do not see so many men with your dimorphism but you look weird asf on the first pic
Its the lighting and tue hoodie, i did it on purpose bc i know it was gonna accentuate my bones. I look less dimorphic irl. My pfp (me) is more accurate of my look
 
Its the lighting and tue hoodie, i did it on purpose bc i know it was gonna accentuate my bones. I look less dimorphic irl. My pfp (me) is more accurate of my look
Its not that
It is that your jaw looks weird and your chin to philtrum is 3:1
 
Its not that
It is that your jaw looks weird and your chin to philtrum is 3:1
Well after my eyes, my jaw is what ive beem complimented the most by women so it makes no sense. And theres nothing weird about my jaw. It looks pretty sharp
 

Similar threads

Joaquin
Replies
34
Views
525
cashcow
cashcow
kana
Replies
7
Views
172
kana
kana
BWC_virgin
Replies
27
Views
620
BWC_virgin
BWC_virgin
90%er Gigachink
Replies
56
Views
981
THE SCHOLAR
THE SCHOLAR
midgetfacecumer
Replies
17
Views
1K
Napoleon1800
Napoleon1800

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top