genetically engineer your kids

Deleted member 8244

Deleted member 8244

white/ 6'0/🇺🇸
Joined
Jul 7, 2020
Posts
10,252
Reputation
10,123
moneymaxx and design your kid with crispr. and worry about banging girls in the meantime.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Baldingman1998, Deleted member 5180, Gaia262 and 1 other person
moneymaxx and design your kid with crispr. and worry about banging girls in the meantime.

This is something i plan on doing. Its not even expensive and is already out to the public albeit hidden.

Its around $10k per child, its not crisper but PGD (selecting desirable traits) .

Its a complete bargain when you consider the costs of lost youth of being undesirable, cost of surgeries and general missed opportunities.

$10k to avoid all that. Hopefully it remains underground.

 
  • +1
Reactions: Gad and Deleted member 5180
This is something i plan on doing. Its not even expensive and is already out to the public albeit hidden.

Its around $10k per child, its not crisper but PGD (selecting desirable traits) .
Yeah, this is not gene-editing though. And gene-editing will take decades to get anywhere and it costs a ton, because you have to find causal SNPs, which can be a pain in ass.
You could, theoretically, replace entire sequences, but that also costs a lot more.

Your example is good though and this polygenic selection can happen for a number of different traits.
There are polygenic scores for height, IQ, eye-color, etc. also for health outcomes.
In fact, there is atleast one guy who already polygenically selected his child: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...s-with-best-health-odds-sparks-new-dna-debate

But he only cared about better health outcomes. The problem is that you need to save a lot of eggs and have a fertile woman (so you can get more eggs), because the pipeline from egg-harvesting to child birth is very leaky. Some eggs don't mature and die off, some don't fertilize, sometimes the embryo doesn't grow, etc. So you need a lot of eggs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gaia262
Doing whatever you can to make your kids chad is probably one of the best investments you can make. Your kids will be way to more likely to become rich and successful if they are good looking and over will have better mental health.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gaia262
Yeah, this is not gene-editing though. And gene-editing will take decades to get anywhere and it costs a ton, because you have to find causal SNPs, which can be a pain in ass.
You could, theoretically, replace entire sequences, but that also costs a lot more.

Your example is good though and this polygenic selection can happen for a number of different traits.
There are polygenic scores for height, IQ, eye-color, etc. also for health outcomes.
In fact, there is atleast one guy who already polygenically selected his child: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...s-with-best-health-odds-sparks-new-dna-debate

But he only cared about better health outcomes. The problem is that you need to save a lot of eggs and have a fertile woman (so you can get more eggs), because the pipeline from egg-harvesting to child birth is very leaky. Some eggs don't mature and die off, some don't fertilize, sometimes the embryo doesn't grow, etc. So you need a lot of eggs.

For PGD I am sure this is done by the elites regularly but isn't broadcasted to the public.

I also think its far more advanced then their websites lay on to avoid the media raising ethical questions and regulating this "designer kids bad".

I actually can't comphrened having kids naturally. Your basically just gambling their life outcomes with a losing hand, at that point you are just breeding and not investing.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

bppharmacist
Replies
11
Views
399
piec
P
Yahya
Replies
3
Views
101
aryan mogger
A
Narcissus🥀
Replies
12
Views
476
abdullah23k
abdullah23k
wishIwasSalludon
Replies
56
Views
773
wishIwasSalludon
wishIwasSalludon
D
Replies
14
Views
712
hirochan
H

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top