Chance1
Zephir
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2025
- Posts
- 1,891
- Reputation
- 4,142
I know this is water, but I'm going to make a thread on it anyways.
What kind of retard actually believes in germ theory? The nearly 460 year old theory that germs, and more recently theoretical viruses cause illness, disease, and death is known as the "Germ Theory of Disease." The reason it can not be called germ fact to this day, is because there is two very simple ways to prove it. Both have been done, and not only could they not prove it, but both actually disproved it.
The first way to prove this bullshit pseudoscience is through Koch's postulates. A very simple, and logical way to check the claims of people like Louis Pasteur and even Robert Koch himself, funnily enough.
The first step of Koch’s postulate is that you must find the micro organism that you suspect, or that you are accusing or alleging that is the cause of the disease in abundance in all human or animals that are suffering sickness symptoms from that disease weather its an alleged covid 19 virus or a bacteria, germ, or fungi that causes illness. That same micro organism should not be found in healthy animals or humans. In other words, you can not be asymptomatic meaning not sick and have that organism inside of your mucus, stool, or tissue sample. Otherwise that organism can not be the cause of that disease, either that micro organism makes you sick, or it doesn't. That is what cause means. Also if you test someone who is sick with the symptoms you allege to be the disease, and they do not have that same micro organism inside of them then you can not say for certainty that that is what is causing either of them illness.
The second step of Koch’s postulates is that the micro organism (alleged virus, bacteria whatever.) must be completely isolated from all other tissue and debris in the diseased human or animal sample and grown in a pure culture. Not a nutrient starved, and chemically poisoned culture. Then in your control group, you have to purify the sample of a healthy human or animal that does not have that alleged virus or bacterial microorganism in its sample, and grow that in a pure sample as well to make sure that microorganisms don't grow there later. This is the only way you can prove germ theory allegations that those microorganisms are contagious invaders from an outside environment, and not the body’s natural bacteria and micro zamia eating the sick dying cells from those who suffer from toxemia inflammation.
If you wanted to find out if eating filthy water soaked oysters causes food poisoning would you have your test subjects only eat oysters? Or would you have them drink two bottles of vodka, and ingest cyanide poison, would you blame the raw oysters for making them sick? Because that is tantamount to what virologists do in the petri dish and somehow we accept this as a valid scientific method.
But back to Koch's third postulate. You would then have to inject that purified and cultured alleged virus or bacteria with no other additional poisons or toxins into a healthy human or animal and it must cause the same disease, sickness, and symptoms as found in the original human or animal the sample was taken from. Not only that, if you do add additional poisons or toxins, you must have a control group or a gold standard who are also injected with those exact same additional poisonous and toxic antigens, but without the alleged virus or bacteria and make sure they too do not get the same disease, sickness, and symptoms to make sure that it was the alleged virus or bacteria, or filthy raw oysters and not the antigens, or two bottles of vodka and cyanide poisoning that was making them sick.
Remarkably, this too has never been done in virology.
And finally, Koch’s fourth postulate states that the alleged virus or microorganism must be recovered from that second injected human or animal host, reisolated, and it must be identical to the original specific alleged or accused causative agent. To make sure that the additional poisonous advagens and antigens, and antibiotics they added to the petri dish in their bogus process aren't a new and different causative agent.
The second simple way to prove germ contagion theory is to expose hundreds of healthy people in every way possible to the breath and body fluids of sick people, and see if those healthy people get sick from the exposure. I will not be going further into this, you can read for yourself here.
https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html
@Verdam @irapeinfras33
What kind of retard actually believes in germ theory? The nearly 460 year old theory that germs, and more recently theoretical viruses cause illness, disease, and death is known as the "Germ Theory of Disease." The reason it can not be called germ fact to this day, is because there is two very simple ways to prove it. Both have been done, and not only could they not prove it, but both actually disproved it.
The first way to prove this bullshit pseudoscience is through Koch's postulates. A very simple, and logical way to check the claims of people like Louis Pasteur and even Robert Koch himself, funnily enough.
The first step of Koch’s postulate is that you must find the micro organism that you suspect, or that you are accusing or alleging that is the cause of the disease in abundance in all human or animals that are suffering sickness symptoms from that disease weather its an alleged covid 19 virus or a bacteria, germ, or fungi that causes illness. That same micro organism should not be found in healthy animals or humans. In other words, you can not be asymptomatic meaning not sick and have that organism inside of your mucus, stool, or tissue sample. Otherwise that organism can not be the cause of that disease, either that micro organism makes you sick, or it doesn't. That is what cause means. Also if you test someone who is sick with the symptoms you allege to be the disease, and they do not have that same micro organism inside of them then you can not say for certainty that that is what is causing either of them illness.
The second step of Koch’s postulates is that the micro organism (alleged virus, bacteria whatever.) must be completely isolated from all other tissue and debris in the diseased human or animal sample and grown in a pure culture. Not a nutrient starved, and chemically poisoned culture. Then in your control group, you have to purify the sample of a healthy human or animal that does not have that alleged virus or bacterial microorganism in its sample, and grow that in a pure sample as well to make sure that microorganisms don't grow there later. This is the only way you can prove germ theory allegations that those microorganisms are contagious invaders from an outside environment, and not the body’s natural bacteria and micro zamia eating the sick dying cells from those who suffer from toxemia inflammation.
If you wanted to find out if eating filthy water soaked oysters causes food poisoning would you have your test subjects only eat oysters? Or would you have them drink two bottles of vodka, and ingest cyanide poison, would you blame the raw oysters for making them sick? Because that is tantamount to what virologists do in the petri dish and somehow we accept this as a valid scientific method.
But back to Koch's third postulate. You would then have to inject that purified and cultured alleged virus or bacteria with no other additional poisons or toxins into a healthy human or animal and it must cause the same disease, sickness, and symptoms as found in the original human or animal the sample was taken from. Not only that, if you do add additional poisons or toxins, you must have a control group or a gold standard who are also injected with those exact same additional poisonous and toxic antigens, but without the alleged virus or bacteria and make sure they too do not get the same disease, sickness, and symptoms to make sure that it was the alleged virus or bacteria, or filthy raw oysters and not the antigens, or two bottles of vodka and cyanide poisoning that was making them sick.
Remarkably, this too has never been done in virology.
And finally, Koch’s fourth postulate states that the alleged virus or microorganism must be recovered from that second injected human or animal host, reisolated, and it must be identical to the original specific alleged or accused causative agent. To make sure that the additional poisonous advagens and antigens, and antibiotics they added to the petri dish in their bogus process aren't a new and different causative agent.
The second simple way to prove germ contagion theory is to expose hundreds of healthy people in every way possible to the breath and body fluids of sick people, and see if those healthy people get sick from the exposure. I will not be going further into this, you can read for yourself here.
https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html
@Verdam @irapeinfras33
Last edited:
