dat feel
DailyMail Expert
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2019
- Posts
- 4,005
- Reputation
- 5,403
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Probably the look she was going for. 90% certain she is a Lesbian. And that is a very old video, she looks like a 30 year old manlet now.Where’s the heiress I only see a gay little boy
what's wrong with that. beneficial for the public even if the government is shit at spending money. still better than a woman
it wasn't her who generated the wealth you absolute retard. there's no reason she should be allowed to inherit that much money she didn't work forWhat a retarded transexual. It's ancestors are turning in their graves. Imagen all the hard work innovation and generations of minds and blood and sweat which made the family this rich (or just be jew) and then your final decendant is a tranny lgbtq liberal soy commie that throws all the hard work in the trash. Brutal
Her father or grandfather or both. She absolutely should keep it all your just a jealous poor incelwhat's wrong with that. beneficial for the public even if the government is shit at spending money. still better than a woman
it wasn't her who generated the wealth you absolute retard. there's no reason she should be allowed to inherit that much money she didn't work for
Idk about that shithole country but in the US if you make a charity/donation claim, you are legally liable to go through with it.Probably the look she was going for. 90% certain she is a Lesbian. And that is a very old video, she looks like a 30 year old manlet now.
![]()
She gets huge status claiming she will donate 90% of her billion dollar plus inheritance. Meanwhile she is probably living off a trust fund. And she is not legally obligated to donate the money, she will probably donate half of it, and keep half., because expenses.
her father or grandfather not her. there's no reason for her to even be allowed to keep that money since she didn't work for it herself and she can't make use of it in a way that benefits the public (me)Her father or grandfather or both. She absolutely should keep it all your just a jealous poor incel
"She" , looks like the typical zoomer soy boy I see everywhere . Looks like the dire predictions of androgynous soy cucks is becoming a reality. What the FUCK is going on. What is causing this.
Probably if you specifically identify a beneficiary and a specific amount going to that beneficiary. As far as I know she has done neither . And although a written contract may not be strictly required, any verbal commitment would be at a huge disadvantage in a Court challenge to any written commitment. And there would be a strict legal requirement for a written contract (in almost all States) for any Real Estate involved.Idk about that shithole country but in the US if you make a charity/donation claim, you are legally liable to go through with it.



never have expectationsWhat a retarded transexual. It's ancestors are turning in their graves. Imagen all the hard work innovation and generations of minds and blood and sweat which made the family this rich (or just be jew) and then your final decendant is a tranny lgbtq liberal soy commie that throws all the hard work in the trash. Brutal
you're right about her statements being too vague to matter but i believe what you say about the law is mostly incorrectProbably if you specifically identify a beneficiary and a specific amount going to that beneficiary. As far as I know she has done neither . And although a written contract may not be strictly required, any verbal commitment would be at a huge disadvantage in a Court challenge to any written commitment. And there would be a strict legal requirement for a written contract (in almost all States) for any Real Estate involved.
This is the standard in the US not the exception... (granted I am making the assumption that a "promise" is no different than an "agreement")you're right about her statements being too vague to matter but i believe what you say about the law is mostly incorrect
oral contracts are valid but unenforceable. this includes real estate
however, when you are recorded saying things, that may make them enforceable
The reason why verbal agreements are no longer sufficient in Florida — and they used to be — is that a verbal agreement does not contain the essential elements of a contract like terms, price, remedy for default, etc. It becomes a matter of he said/she said, making resolution in a court of law practically impossible.
this lolis she retarded? this gives her more power to decide where that money goes. she can donate to her favorite lgbtq charity or whatever. what a complete waste of sperm. her dad should have pulled out
typical "muh government knows what's best for us" moron.
Meanwhile the Russians stay sane, untouched by Jewish-liberal propagandaCrazy how germans went from thinking they were the most superior, to being self flagellating cucks in under a century.
interesting, thanks. i am surprised, looks like the law has changed, very surprising as oral contracts always carried some weight and you had to be careful what you saidThis is the standard in the US not the exception... (granted I am making the assumption that a "promise" is no different than an "agreement")