Give me one reason why this dude isnt chad tbh

I just don't get what is hard to understand. The purpose of a ratio is to measure something like the extent of recession or the extent of protrusion for example. Why would it be in your best interest to measure the same bone growth thrice over again, and you can't even give me examples to show me that you're measuring something separate that warrants its application, you tried and you just missed the point.
wrong
I just don't get what is hard to understand. The purpose of a ratio is to measure something like the extent of recession or the extent of protrusion for example. Why would it be in your best interest to measure the same bone growth thrice over again, and you can't even give me examples to show me that you're measuring something separate that warrants its application, you tried and you just missed the point.

You can have a high JWHR due to bruxism, but good LTP and facial third distribution because your shit isn't actually severely recessed, but that case can be fully explained and deducted with bi-gonial width
??? no?
lower third proportion:how close/long is your mouth to philtrum ≠ Explained and deducted to bigonial witdh???
You can also have a high JWHR due to an actual short jaw, which usually results in all of those ratios being very unideal anyways, so they already get deducted via those ratios
true, thats why 1.95+ is unideal
It's like if I created a ratio called ICD : OCD, that's okay by itself, but there's nothing that ratio does that the other eye ratios don't, so it's completely unnecessary
no jaw ratio does what jwhr does bro
 
??? no?
lower third proportion:how close/long is your mouth to philtrum ≠ Explained and deducted to bigonial witdh???
its lower maxilla height to the height of the mandible, if someone has a short jaw it would be expressed via a low ltp value, and if they have a long philtrum it would be expressed via a high value, jwhr is the height of the lower third to bigonial width

IMG 6239


he has bruxism, so his bigonial is unideal, which is the only reason why his jwhr is unideal, his other ratios are okay (ltp and thirds)

IMG 6241


this dude’s jaw is actually short, so he gets deducted for ltp, thirds, and bigonial

remove jwhr as a ratio and there’s no difference in penalty

making it a useless ratio that doesn’t actually measure anything new
no jaw ratio does what jwhr does bro
explained this already boss, ltp is lower maxilla height in proportion to mandible height, bigonial is jaw width, and the total height of the lower third

jwhr is lower third to bigonial width, and someone can have a jwhr of 2 because of bruxism or because their jaw is actually short

the former is already measured via bigonial and the latter is measured via lower third and lower third proportion

so they already do their job, seems like you’re still missing the point
 
its lower maxilla height to the height of the mandible, if someone has a short jaw it would be expressed via a low ltp value, and if they have a long philtrum it would be expressed via a high value, jwhr is the height of the lower third to bigonial width
Images 31 (shit maxilla)
nope, He has a long jaw and low tp value, here it has a bad jwhr because is lower heights to witdh jaw is narrow but his bigonial is fine.
he has bruxism, so his bigonial is unideal, which is the only reason why his jwhr is unideal, his other ratios are okay (ltp and thirds)

View attachment 5613612
Screenshot 20260906 035226 ImageMeter Pro
Screenshot 20260906 035152 ImageMeter Pro he has ideal jwhr and bigonial on the higher end range
the mer is already measured via bigonial and the latter is measured via lower third and lower third
so they already do their job, seems like you missing the point

because it measures a fucking new thing
bigonial is correlated to cheekbone
ltp and
ctp height
doesnt measure the balance of a height and witdh of a jaw itself
Dgandi02 v 10sep10 rex b
Shit Jwhr but good Bigonial
Screenshot 20260906 035152 ImageMeter Pro good jwhr and good bigonial
Screenshot 20260906 040236 TikTok Shit Jwhr and shit Bigonial
he doesnt have a short Lower third or bruxism,
now tell me, if every jaw ratios explains what jwhr do, Why people with good jaw ratios have differente Jwhr ranges Inside and outside ideal even when they have good jaw ratios?
 
he doesnt have a short Lower third or bruxism,
He has a giga short lower third and giga bruxism lmao, proving me right
(shit maxilla)
nope, He has a long jaw and low tp value, here it has a bad jwhr because is lower heights to witdh jaw is narrow but his bigonial is fine.
His maxilla is top 1, and whats his ltp and jwhr, im not on my pc rn
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan
How
These ratios are all cope, unironically all of them

Gonion shape I guess, but his condylar process is developed, lips aren't thin in the slightest & his chin is wide
How are scientifically determined ideal ratio’s cope😭
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260906_042321_TikTok.jpg
    Screenshot_20260906_042321_TikTok.jpg
    293.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_20260906_042302_TikTok.jpg
    Screenshot_20260906_042302_TikTok.jpg
    416.3 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: killcry
two good looking so he is subhuman
 
How

How are scientifically determined ideal ratio’s cope😭
they're only theoretical and those in particular i said are cope because they're practically ineffective, the landmarks used are really superficial and what they're measuring can already be assessed with other ratios, you're using the term "scientifically determined" arbitrarily
 
To much tattoos.
 

Similar threads

AscendHQ
Replies
10
Views
88
AscendHQ
AscendHQ
BraveCake
Replies
12
Views
81
Patrick.
Patrick.
Anavarforthehuz69
Replies
1
Views
25
ashka2111
A
T
Replies
4
Views
23
thehand
T
Taylors_Lil_Ethnic
Replies
15
Views
58
Taylors_Lil_Ethnic
Taylors_Lil_Ethnic

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top