jeremyy
Justice. Soon.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2024
- Posts
- 14,139
- Reputation
- 13,648
Lips looking purple or is it just me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Lips looking purple or is it just me
wrongI just don't get what is hard to understand. The purpose of a ratio is to measure something like the extent of recession or the extent of protrusion for example. Why would it be in your best interest to measure the same bone growth thrice over again, and you can't even give me examples to show me that you're measuring something separate that warrants its application, you tried and you just missed the point.
??? no?I just don't get what is hard to understand. The purpose of a ratio is to measure something like the extent of recession or the extent of protrusion for example. Why would it be in your best interest to measure the same bone growth thrice over again, and you can't even give me examples to show me that you're measuring something separate that warrants its application, you tried and you just missed the point.
You can have a high JWHR due to bruxism, but good LTP and facial third distribution because your shit isn't actually severely recessed, but that case can be fully explained and deducted with bi-gonial width
true, thats why 1.95+ is unidealYou can also have a high JWHR due to an actual short jaw, which usually results in all of those ratios being very unideal anyways, so they already get deducted via those ratios
no jaw ratio does what jwhr does broIt's like if I created a ratio called ICD : OCD, that's okay by itself, but there's nothing that ratio does that the other eye ratios don't, so it's completely unnecessary
its lower maxilla height to the height of the mandible, if someone has a short jaw it would be expressed via a low ltp value, and if they have a long philtrum it would be expressed via a high value, jwhr is the height of the lower third to bigonial width??? no?
lower third proportion:how close/long is your mouth to philtrum ≠ Explained and deducted to bigonial witdh???
explained this already boss, ltp is lower maxilla height in proportion to mandible height, bigonial is jaw width, and the total height of the lower thirdno jaw ratio does what jwhr does bro
its lower maxilla height to the height of the mandible, if someone has a short jaw it would be expressed via a low ltp value, and if they have a long philtrum it would be expressed via a high value, jwhr is the height of the lower third to bigonial width
he has bruxism, so his bigonial is unideal, which is the only reason why his jwhr is unideal, his other ratios are okay (ltp and thirds)
View attachment 5613612
the mer is already measured via bigonial and the latter is measured via lower third and lower third
so they already do their job, seems like you missing the point
He has a giga short lower third and giga bruxism lmao, proving me righthe doesnt have a short Lower third or bruxism,
His maxilla is top 1, and whats his ltp and jwhr, im not on my pc rn(shit maxilla)
nope, He has a long jaw and low tp value, here it has a bad jwhr because is lower heights to witdh jaw is narrow but his bigonial is fine.
Measure his ltp retard, subhuman lower third35% isnt short retard
View attachment 5613701
what exacly is wrong hereMeasure his ltp retard, subhuman lower third
View attachment 5613717
Dont measure anything again wtf im getting on my computer
How are scientifically determined ideal ratio’s copeThese ratios are all cope, unironically all of them
Gonion shape I guess, but his condylar process is developed, lips aren't thin in the slightest & his chin is wide

another example if u think im copingMeasure his ltp retard, subhuman lower third
View attachment 5613717
Dont measure anything again wtf im getting on my computer
they're only theoretical and those in particular i said are cope because they're practically ineffective, the landmarks used are really superficial and what they're measuring can already be assessed with other ratios, you're using the term "scientifically determined" arbitrarilyHow
How are scientifically determined ideal ratio’s cope![]()
i'm gonna make a threadanother example if u think im coping
ok brahi'm gonna make a thread