Given a height h and some number d > 0, then height h+d is better than height h

apocalypse

apocalypse

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2021
Posts
11,244
Reputation
22,286
Simple axiom that copers here should accept before having any height discussions
 
dihydrogen oxide
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Danish_Retard, Deleted member 16636 and Clandestine
fuck f yourself y
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 1617, Deleted member 16636 and Deleted member
"the taller the better"
 
legit point
 
that logic doesn't makes sense if by "better", you mean "more attractive". 7' tall isn't more attractive than, say, 6'3''.

If by "better", you mean "taller". then yea. duh.
:soy:
 
dihydrogen oxide
God I hate it when a faggot says water wet on a point that's actively debated against by most of the forum
1640024596388

1640024621433

1640024625958

1640024631983

1640024638046

1640024643443
 
that logic doesn't makes sense if by "better", you mean "more attractive". 7' tall isn't more attractive than, say, 6'3''.

If by "better", you mean "taller". then yea. duh.
:soy:
autism.gif
 
Taller isn't always better

After a certain point there are diminishing returns
More than 7' is too much
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot
It's not linear it's more like a piece wise function wherein you are linearly increasing up to 6'4, stagnating till 6'10 and then decreasing logarithmically after on the average. This is the chart for the aggregate imo. Of course niche markers and location will heavily affect what to use as barriers for sections.
 
Lifts theorom
 
  • +1
Reactions: CaptainCalicoe

Similar threads

TrueAfghan
Replies
3
Views
56
matti1
matti1
fine3se
Replies
8
Views
86
Kingly
Kingly
joao
Replies
13
Views
115
Robertski
Robertski
jsmogu
Replies
10
Views
102
mtn_dude_193
mtn_dude_193
KiriB
Replies
13
Views
90
KiriB
KiriB

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →