Reinhard_Heini
Platinum
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2026
- Posts
- 1,032
- Reputation
- 1,012
This all if from an article/ also a little bit powered up from myself, enjoy the reading.
"We have a society in which everything is creaking, from healthcare to housing, and yet we keep our borders open to people from cultures that are often diametrically opposed to our values... I have experienced this firsthand, with scars as silent witnesses, after a brutal attack outside a gay party. This freedom that many take for granted is, for some of us, deadly serious."
For good reason, not all gays are pro-immigration 1, despite all the "libera CIA" / Soros efforts to unify LGBTQ and pro-Third World immigration activism.
"Percentages of female judges at Dutch courts. North Holland [Amsterdam]: 70%. Central Netherlands: 64%. The Hague: 63%. Rotterdam: 61%."
May 22, 2014, Trouw (major Dutch newspaper), 'Vrouwelijke rechters in de meerderheid' ('Female judges in the majority'). Council of Europe numbers for 2021 reveal 60.2% of judges, 60.2% of prosecutors (same percentage), 67.6% prosecutor staff, and 45.6% of lawyers are women. 2 One noteworthy thing is that certainly with the female judges and prosecutors is that all "research" coincidentally comes down to political correctness, cutting-and-pasting, forgery, hiding and pushing out counter-evidence, etc.
"In 2021, Slovenia has 3,455 non-judge staff (of which 3 027 are Female [i.e. 88%])... 79,9% of the total number of judges [is] Female. ... 69,2% of the total number of prosecutors [are] Female. ... There are 40,81 professional judges per 100 000 inhabitants [which is far] above the EU median of 24,1 judges per 100 000 inhabitants. ... Gender balance: ... Professional judges: ... EU Median: ... Female: 62.2%. ... Prosecutors: ... EU Median: ... Female: ... 59.6%."
2021 Council of Europe study numbers.
^^
Apart from summarizing a bit of LGBTQ and gender science, the primary purpose of this oversight is to demonstrate that the entire international feminist and LGBTQ obsession of the media and politics, especially since the Obama years, actually is heavily financed by the globalist superclass and its countless "liberal CIA" foundations: Soros, Buffett, Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Gates, etc.
In particular, we are talking here about so-called "grassroots" action groups regularly staging "independent" protests to demand "social change". It's all stage-play. The organizers and many of the core participants always are tied in with international NGOs and political parties, with whole armies of antifa anarchists and communists being coordinated by the European Union and Soros' Open Society Foundations. The U.S. has its own, overlapping structures. The issue is that the media just always pretends that these protesters represent actual "grassroots" citizens. But nothing could be further from the truth.
All of it reminds us very much of the oppressive, propagandist manner in which "liberal CIA" foundations as Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie and Soros - as well as social media as Instagram and Tiktok - even today are non-stop sowing the seeds of division between races, genders, generations, and nationalities. Most importantly, all these entities are part of the globalist movement that certainly since the 1950s and 1960s has relentlessly pushed for the replacement of white people by the masses of the Third World. But the seeds for that already were laid in the late 19th and early 20th century.
While the description of the 4th wave speaks for itself here, just a casual read-up on the supposed 4-wave feminist model exposes numerous issues:
"We have a society in which everything is creaking, from healthcare to housing, and yet we keep our borders open to people from cultures that are often diametrically opposed to our values... I have experienced this firsthand, with scars as silent witnesses, after a brutal attack outside a gay party. This freedom that many take for granted is, for some of us, deadly serious."
For good reason, not all gays are pro-immigration 1, despite all the "libera CIA" / Soros efforts to unify LGBTQ and pro-Third World immigration activism.
"Percentages of female judges at Dutch courts. North Holland [Amsterdam]: 70%. Central Netherlands: 64%. The Hague: 63%. Rotterdam: 61%."
May 22, 2014, Trouw (major Dutch newspaper), 'Vrouwelijke rechters in de meerderheid' ('Female judges in the majority'). Council of Europe numbers for 2021 reveal 60.2% of judges, 60.2% of prosecutors (same percentage), 67.6% prosecutor staff, and 45.6% of lawyers are women. 2 One noteworthy thing is that certainly with the female judges and prosecutors is that all "research" coincidentally comes down to political correctness, cutting-and-pasting, forgery, hiding and pushing out counter-evidence, etc.
"In 2021, Slovenia has 3,455 non-judge staff (of which 3 027 are Female [i.e. 88%])... 79,9% of the total number of judges [is] Female. ... 69,2% of the total number of prosecutors [are] Female. ... There are 40,81 professional judges per 100 000 inhabitants [which is far] above the EU median of 24,1 judges per 100 000 inhabitants. ... Gender balance: ... Professional judges: ... EU Median: ... Female: 62.2%. ... Prosecutors: ... EU Median: ... Female: ... 59.6%."
2021 Council of Europe study numbers.
^^
INTRO
Elite funding
Apart from summarizing a bit of LGBTQ and gender science, the primary purpose of this oversight is to demonstrate that the entire international feminist and LGBTQ obsession of the media and politics, especially since the Obama years, actually is heavily financed by the globalist superclass and its countless "liberal CIA" foundations: Soros, Buffett, Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Gates, etc.In particular, we are talking here about so-called "grassroots" action groups regularly staging "independent" protests to demand "social change". It's all stage-play. The organizers and many of the core participants always are tied in with international NGOs and political parties, with whole armies of antifa anarchists and communists being coordinated by the European Union and Soros' Open Society Foundations. The U.S. has its own, overlapping structures. The issue is that the media just always pretends that these protesters represent actual "grassroots" citizens. But nothing could be further from the truth.
Perversion / poison pills
As we will discuss in detail, throughout history the feminist movement has been financed by Rockefeller and Rockefeller-tied elites, and involved very manipulative, very divisive propaganda even in the early 20th century. ISGP refers to this pattern as "perversion", as in, a perversion of a truly independent, truly grassroots, truthful movement. It is synonymous with the term "poison pill".All of it reminds us very much of the oppressive, propagandist manner in which "liberal CIA" foundations as Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie and Soros - as well as social media as Instagram and Tiktok - even today are non-stop sowing the seeds of division between races, genders, generations, and nationalities. Most importantly, all these entities are part of the globalist movement that certainly since the 1950s and 1960s has relentlessly pushed for the replacement of white people by the masses of the Third World. But the seeds for that already were laid in the late 19th and early 20th century.
History of feminism discussed: formal vs accurate
Who would have thought? Writing about feminism eventually required studying the (formal) history of feminism...Timeline of feminist laws: 1641-today
The basic feminist breakthroughs for U.S. women are:- 1641: The Massachusetts Bay Colony introduces a law against abusive husbands. Enforcement is largely lacking.
- 1824: Massachusetts bans the physical abuse of a spouse, but "moderate" disciple by the husband - and only the husband, due to the "coverture" legal doctrine - remains allowed.
- 1824: New York ups the minimum age for marriage for girls to 14, upped from the common minimum age of 12 for girls in earlier times (14 for boys). Parental consent still is required below age 21.
- 1836: New York state recognizes assault on a wife as a criminal offense. From the 1850s on, this law starts getting enforced increasingly often.
- 1837: Oberlin College becomes the first in allowing women to attend.
- 1842: Connecticut starts introducing laws against assault on wives, with certainly a number of cases of serious assault being prosecuted.
- 1848: Married women could now own property separately from their husbands, greatly undermining the centuries old "coverture" legal doctrine in which women are subordinate to their husbands. State laws would continue to expand these laws.
- 1848: Massachusetts introduces compulsory education for boys and girls in the ages 8-14.
- 1860: Married women gain control over their wage income, independent from their husbands. State laws would continue to expand these laws.
- 1861 (UK): Offences Against the Person Act, making physical abuse of spouses illegal.
- 1869: Wyoming becomes the first U.S. territory to provide women with full voting rights.
- 1870: Cornell University becomes the first major, internationally prestigious university to allow women.
- 1874: New York and California follow Massachusetts in introducing compulsory education for boys and girls in the ages 8-14.
- 1890s: States as New York and California increase the age for compulsory education for boys and girls to 16, due to higher literacy requirements in the age of the Industrial Revolution.
- 1918: All U.S. states at this point have some form of compulsory education.
- 1920: National voting rights for women.
- 1920:Over the past 3-4 decades, the age of consent has been going up dramatically through lobbying by Christian feminists of the social purity movement. By 1920, the age of consent is 14 in only one state (Georgia, until 1995), 16 in 26 states, and 18 in 21 states. Compare this to 1880 when the age of consent was 10 in 37 states, 12 in 10 states, and 7 years in Delaware. There were no close-in-age laws in these periods, so senior citizens could "consensually" have sex with 7- to 12-year-olds. For decades though, socially accepted underage marriages still would remain a thing though:
- 1937: Unlawful, underage child marriages become increasingly hard to enact due to a major national controversy over a marriage in Tennessee between a 9‑year‑old Eunice Winstead and a 22-year-old Charlie Johns. First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt joins the protests, agreeing that Eunice is a "little young for nuptials." 4 Another unlawful case - with parental consent - at the same time in Watertown, New York, between a 12-year-old girl and 19-year-old boy, added to the controversy. In all fairness, in 1960 Eunice described having been lucky with Charlie being a "good husband" 5, with the 12-year-old bride in New York - Leona Elizabeth Roshia - complaining: "I wish everyone would mind their own business. I am very happy." 6
- 1936: The right for doctors to import (early) contraceptives, undermining the strict 1870 Comstock Law that included "contraceptives" in a list of "obscene" material banned from importing.
- 1960: Introduction of the birth control pill.
- 1963: Equal pay for equal work for men and women.
- 1965: Contraception use made legal nation-wide for married couples.
- 1967: Colorado, California and a few other states start to expand the rights of women to abortion beyond saving the life of the mother.
- 1972: Contraception use made legal nation-wide for unmarried couples.
- 1972: Formal equal access to education.
- 1973: The right to abortion is set federally.
- 1974: Women allowed to credit, loans, and bank accounts without needing their husband as a co-signer.
- 1994: The first federal law against (physical) domestic abuse, specifically to protect women, called the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).
- 1991: Argentina introduces a law requiring that 30% of national candidates need to be women in 1991. Belgium (1994), France (2000) and other countries followed suit.
- 2003: Norway introduces a law that at least 40% of any board of publicly-traded companies needs to be female. France (2011), Germany (2015) and then the European Union (2022 - 40% of non-executive directors or 33% of all directors) follow suit with overlapping laws. These laws also served as the inspiration behind globalist businessmen as BlackRock founder Larry Fink and Warren "Yeah, most women do want to see my wallet" 7 Buffett, in 2014, setting up the 30% Club, with the "Goal of achieving 30% female directors on S&P 100 boards by 2020 ... up from 21.7% when it launched."
Timeline of feminist laws: 1953 - porn, prostitution, sex
You could also include erotics and pornography in the above list, because, good or bad, it gives tons of (financial, fame, worship, and expression-type) "empowerment" to women, certainly when male control over the industry was stripped - OnlyFans from the late 2010s being the best example:- 1953: The founding of Playboy magazine, for many years operating in a legal grey area of promoting itself as an expression of "art".
- 1957: The 1870 Comstock Law is further undermined when sexual material isn't necessarily banned anymore.
- 1962: The first silicone breast implant is introduced. Certainly by 1972, in her film 'Le Chic', porn star Rene Bond is among the first (later) known examples of breast enlargement.
- 1965: Penthouse magazine is founded, also operating in a legal grey area.
- 1969: Private possession of pornography material becomes legal.
- 1971: Nevada allows state-wide prostitution, letting counties decide themselves whether they want to legalize it or not.
- 1973: Pornography becomes legal in a general sense.
- 1973: Pornography becomes legal in a general sense.
- 1980s-1990s: Breast implants keep growing in size and become much more mainstream, especially with Pamela Anderson in the 1990s.
Feminism's mainstream 4-waves model
Just looking at these lists, I would definitely be among those to reject the prominent "four waves" of feminism, despite it literally (and wrongly) saying on Wikipedia that only "non-white" feminists do so. These waves are formally defined as follows:- 1st Wave (late 1800s - early 1900s): Mainly about women's suffrage: the fight for women's right to vote. This was achieved in 1920.
- 2nd Wave (1960s–1980s): About workplace, reproductive, and educational equality. The introduction of the birth control pill in 1960 made birth control many times more effective, and shook things up quite a bit.
- 3rd Wave (1990s–2000s): A focus on more diversity ("intersectionality") within the female experience, as in, "Women aren't all the same." Instead of all women being "boring", middle class (white) women, women began splitting off into their own social subgroups, diversified their self-expression, and more and more started to break gender norms. This involves openness about lesbian/bisexual affairs, different expressions through music (punk, pop, hip hop), different girl magazines, and difference in clothing.
- 4th Wave (2012-): Mainly focused on "fat is sexy", "destroying the patriarchy", angrily and artificially demanding equal pay down to the last cent and equal representation at the top layers of society, blaming white men for everything, supporting false and less false rape accusations against white men, and supporting white guilt and unlimited Third World immigration. #MeToo from 2017 likely was the most significant turning point.
Debunking the 4-waves model
The first two waves certainly are understandable, as in terms of legislation pretty much stopped in 1920, and was only picked up again with the introduction of the birth control pill in 1960, changing a lot of things, for women in particular. So it makes sense that newspapers started writing about a "second wave" in the 1960s that preceded a "first wave" - that largely ended around 1920. But to say that that first wave began in the late 1800s is not exactly correct. 1848 is a key year: it saw the first compulsory education for both both and girls up to the age of 14. It also saw the beginning of the end for the "coverture" legal doctrine. And even before that, an increasing amount of laws were passed to try and protect women from domestic abuse.While the description of the 4th wave speaks for itself here, just a casual read-up on the supposed 4-wave feminist model exposes numerous issues:
- For starters, to label feminist activists and breakthroughs from the 19th century and earlier, as "proto-feminists", comes across as a quick fix for the initially flawed theory that feminism started in the late 1800s and mainly was focused on voting rights.
- Only the first two waves had clear legal laws as their base: abortion, birth control, education and age-of-consent.
- The Third Wave is a particularly weird one, to me, as the "diversification" of both the male and female experience already was long underway before the 1990s, or even 1980s. Looking at old footage, from the 1930s, the 1950s, 1960s, I always am surprised how "normal" relations were between men and women - if not more normal than today. In addition:
- The 1950s saw Elvis Presley emerge as a key symbol of new and "dangerous" rock and roll-type music, heavily influencing women in particular. The 1960s introduced additional types of rock music, as well as other music genres, such as soul and R&B, each with their own subgroups.
- In the 1950s famous models as Marilyn Monroe and Audrey Hepburn already were privately wearing jeans, slim trousers, cigarette pants, and capris. Fashion is a powerful cultural expression. By the 1970s, looking at hippies and older movies, tons of women were wearing jeans instead of skirts.
- So what happened in the 1990s? Apart from mass immigration by Muslims and blacks having their own "extra special" societal subgroups?
- The "third wave" of feminism largely was defined as such through a 1992 Ms. magazine essay of black activist Rebecca Walker titled 'Becoming the Third Wave', the same year she founded the Third Wave Direct Action Corporation. A quick check reveals that Rebecca is the daughter of black antifa, anti-Israel, pro-David Icke, pro-BDS Alice Walker (b. 1944), who used to study under none other than antifa godfather howard zior. She ended up working for the Legal Defense Fund of the "liberal CIA" NAACP, and then wrote the novel 'The Color Purple', the movie of which was directed by Steven Spielberg and starred black antifa and feminists as as Whoopi Goldberg, Danny Glover and Oprah Winfrey. Oh, the elder Walker also worked as an editor-in-chief of Ms. Magazine, later used as a key vehicle for her daughter, a Yale student, to introduce the "third wave" of feminism.
- The argument for the 4th wave starting in and around 2012 essentially is the spreading of feminist propaganda through social media platforms - instead of just through websites and forums. There probably was an acceleration of this at the time, but fact is, nothing particularly relevant happened that year, apart from Facebook buying instagram. Social media already was a thing though in the mid 2000s. You also had internet forums since the late 1990s. Then, from a legal perspective, in terms of equal female representation, the 4th wave arguably started in Argentina in 1991 in terms of politics, continued in Norway in 2003 with regard to big business, and in terms of sexual abuse (and "abuse") and body-shaming only really took off with #MeToo in 2017 (Victoria's Secret shut down its annual runway event due to it in 2019). You could label the latter as a continuation of domestic abuse laws though going back to 1641, including the 1994 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) that already saw a bit of claw back after women started exploiting the laws to get paid.
Notes
- Oct. 4, 2025, Nu.nl, 'Migratie is niet HET probleem van de woningmarkt: 'Dat is onzin''. ('Migration is not the main problem for the housing market: 'That's nonsense''). One of the comments.
- rm.coe.int/netherlands-2021-data-/1680ab89c1 (accessed: Dec. 6, 2024).
- rm.coe.int/slovenia-2021-data-/1680ab89c6 (accessed: Dec. 6, 2024).
- Feb. 3, 1937, Minneapolis Star, 'Child-Marriage Flayed by Women Here; Another Wedding Reported in New York.' As screenshotted in the following article: August 7, 2024, Grand Forks Herald, 'Minnesota women demanded change when 9-year-old girl got married in 1937'.
- May 30, 1960, The Tennessean, 'Child Bride, Now a Mother, Says:'It's Best To Wait...''. Screenshotted in the same 2024 article as above.
- Feb. 3, 1937, Minneapolis Star, 'Child-Marriage Flayed by Women Here; Another Wedding Reported in New York.'
- 2014, ABC, Warren Buffett interview with reporter Rebecca Jarvis.
youtube.com/shorts/A7fhG0IYKAU (accessed: July 20, 2025; 'Buffett: All Women Are Gold Diggers'.
