data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17dd7/17dd71a3aff03b70f7e8a4abc9e7a44e57cbbdb1" alt="Zygos4Life"
Zygos4Life
Joseph Joestar
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
- Posts
- 8,347
- Reputation
- 11,000
All of you Christiancels, Muslimcels, Hinducels and Atheistcels gtfih tbh
Prove to me that god exists.
Prove to me that god exists.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Same tbhi would be ready to accept god exist but I need proof.
Nice ad hominem
stfu shitskin sikh we dont need to prove shit to youAll of you Christiancels, Muslimcels, Hinducels and Atheistcels gtfih tbh
Prove to me that god exists.
Nice ad hominem
Time to go on ignoreAll of you Christiancels, Muslimcels, Hinducels and Atheistcels gtfih tbh
Prove to me that god exists.
mirin high iqProve to me God doesn't exist. You can't.
That's a logical fallacy.Prove to me God doesn't exist. You can't.
you realize the spaghetti monster was a meme made by atheist neckbeards right?That's a logical fallacy.
I can't prove that god doesn't exist in the same way that I can't prove that a sphagetti monster with an 8 inch dick doesn't exist.
If I made the claim of a sphagetti monster existing, I must provide proof.
If you made the claim of a god existing, you must provide proof.
I could use any other example.you realize the spaghetti monster was a meme made by atheist neckbeards right?
Prove to me God exist. You can't.Prove to me God doesn't exist. You can't.
I thought you were Muslim broProve to me God exist. You can't.
I'm gonna make a threadAll of you Christiancels, Muslimcels, Hinducels and Atheistcels gtfih tbh
Prove to me that god exists.
do you really think I will have faith in a religion who my ancestors were converted by sword.I thought you were Muslim bro
Truedo you really think I will have faith in a religion who my ancestors were converted by sword.
In the title of this thread, you explicitly state that God doesn't exist though, no providing any proof to your claim.That's a logical fallacy.
I can't prove that god doesn't exist in the same way that I can't prove that a sphagetti monster with an 8 inch dick doesn't exist.
If I made the claim of a sphagetti monster existing, I must provide proof.
If you made the claim of a god existing, you must provide proof.
no it doesnt. the spaghetti one served as a parody of those that believe in god. the others you mentioned here dont.I could use any other example.
Like Santa Claus
Or the existence of Zeus
Or platinum tinted unicorns
Or the Existence of anything else that doesn't have any proof
My point still stands.
That's right, I can never prove for 100% that God exists just like you cannot prove that God doesn't exist for 100%.Prove to me God exist. You can't.
Yep, I drew a conclusion from a claim that has no proof.In the title of this thread, you explicitly state that God doesn't exist though, no providing any proof to your claim.
Yeah, so I gave you the benefit and used another example instead, since my logic would still apply.no it doesnt. the spaghetti one served as a parody of those that believe in god. the others you mentioned here dont.
noneTrue
Which religion do you follow?
That's all there is to it. You come to the conclusion that God doesn't exist and I come to the conclusion that God does exist.Yep, I drew a conclusion from a claim that has no proof.
The original claim that religion makes is that God exists.
I'm just making an observation on a claim and the amount of proof it has.
The claim in question doesn't have any proof, so I've deducted that this claim isnt true.
I could make a thread saying "Santa Claus doesn't exist". Does that move the burden on proof on me to prove that he doesn't exist?
But the burden of proof is on you to prove it, not me.That's all there is to it. You come to the conclusion that God doesn't exist and I come to the conclusion that God does exist.
Neither you nor myself can provide definite proof to our respective claims, it's a matter of personal opinion at the end of the day.
cuck traitdo you really think I will have faith in a religion who my ancestors were converted by sword.
zeus is considered mythical. that answers your own questikonYeah, so I gave you the benefit and used another example instead, since my logic would still apply.
There's no proof that Zeus exist, but there's no proof that Zeus doesn't exist.
Hence, does Zeus exist?
it is precisely the reverse, my ancestors lived in peace before sandnigger invasions and their `` one and true '' religioncuck trait
The existence of God is also mythical.zeus is considered mythical. that answers your own questikon
could have been done willingly, like in indonesiait is precisely the reverse, my ancestors lived in peace before sandnigger invasions and their `` one and true '' religion
nope. religious =/= mythicalThe existence of God is also mythical.
in my region? hell nahcould have been done willingly, like in indonesia
How is the burden of proof on me to prove it? I'm not even a religious person, never have been.But the burden of proof is on you to prove it, not me.
Since religion is the one that makes the claim of God existing.
I can't provide proof that santa Claus exists, but a believer of Santa Claus can't provide proof that he doesn't exist.
Does that move the burden of proof on me?
Definition of a myth(s):nope. religious =/= mythical
Because if someone makes the claim of something existing, then the burden of proof is on them to prove it.How is the burden of proof on me to prove it? I'm not even a religious person, never have been.
Your argument literally holds as much value as mine. But I get it, you cannot prove God doesn't exist with definite proof but you simply don't want to admit it. I'm fine with admitting I cannot provide definite proof of God existing but you are in the exact same situation with regards to your claims. As I said before, it's a matter of drawing your own conclusions.
Not sure what the entire Santa Claus analogy is supposed to prove when your argument holds as much value as mine?
That means everything existseverything you think exists in the material world because thoughts are chemical reactions in your brain. so if someone thinks about god the he technically exists.
miring high iq?
exactly what i was trying to sayThat means everything exists
Zeus exists
Santa Claus exists
Mirin high iq tbh
So God doesn't exist, it's just a concept/idea used by religious people to cope?God exists as a metaphysical figure, just like "capitalism," "laws" and "literature" exist. They are concepts represented through words, and the word "God" mobilizes people the way laws mobilize people. jfl if you actually interpret that religious people pray to a physical figure the way NPCs adore celebrities. That's not the point.
By that logic, nothing can be proven to be true because everything that exists is made up one way or another.Because if someone makes the claim of something existing, then the burden of proof is on them to prove it.
Like women making rape allegations, proof must be provided for these rape allegations, and until then, the man is innocent.
Like me claiming the existence of Santa Claus, the burden of proof would be on me to prove it, not you.