GOD EXISTS

[theRetard]

prove me wrong

 

[theRetard]

damn no replies

 

[vltn]

damn no replies

cuz they cant prove you wrong lol

 

[richoxne]

idk

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

prove me wrong

He does

 

[theRetard]

He does

i know

 

[TiktokUser]

you should debate @WELOVELOOKS

 

[theRetard]

you should debate @WELOVELOOKS

i will. but what are your own thoughts?

 

[TiktokUser]

i will. but what are your own thoughts?

agnostic

I wouldn’t believe because of miracles, comfort, or heaven. I would believe because evil exists, and without something beyond it, life is meaningless

Cause god isn’t hope, hes what remains when all hope is gone.

 

[theRetard]

agnostic

I wouldn’t believe because of miracles, comfort, or heaven. I would believe because evil exists, and without something beyond it, life is meaningless

Cause god isn’t hope, hes what remains when all hope is gone.

life meaning could be non-related to god though, god and life meaning can exist independently

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

You have the burden of proof in proving that god exists

If you’re asserting he exists, you have to prove it

Explain to me why god is more likely to exist, rather than not. You don’t even need to give me “proof”

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

i can prove it because he can't suck my dick

 

[theRetard]

You have the burden of proof in proving that god exists

If you’re asserting he exists, you have to prove it

Explain to me why god is more likely to exist, rather than not. You don’t even need to give me “proof”

non-existence does not exist
so god cannot be non-existing
so he does exist

 

[maximuslaid]

prove me wrong

I think if god is an idea that causes people to do good things, that alone proves he even as an idea is a real force that has real meaning in this world

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

non-existence does not exist
so god cannot be non-existing
so he does exist

Yeah, non existence does not exist this is true…

Just because non existence doesn’t exist doesn’t mean everything we could think of exists

non existence cannot exist lmao, because non existence is not a thing. It’s the absence of a thing, it doesn’t really mean anything.

Where’s the link between non existence and the specific existence of god?

 

[Vazelrr]

Water

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

you should debate @WELOVELOOKS

I don’t think it’s really worth it atp


No good points brought up so far, in a debate stance it’s not even close. If this was a real debate I’d be legit dominating on points dramatically I can promise that

I already saw much of what he said in my thread. A lot of the stuff these guys say isn’t even worth arguing with because it’s so entirely easy to deduce the flaws

 

[theRetard]

Yeah, non existence does not exist this is true…

Just because non existence doesn’t exist doesn’t mean everything we could think of exists

non existence cannot exist lmao, because non existence is not a thing. It’s the absence of a thing, it doesn’t really mean anything.

everything we can think about already does exist because our thought indeed exist.
so thought and existence is the same thing. so because we are able to think about god, then he does exist

Where’s the link between non existence and the specific existence of god?

i can't link it because non-existence does not exist

 

[theRetard]

I don’t think it’s really worth it atp


No good points brought up so far, in a debate stance it’s not even close. If this was a real debate I’d be legit dominating on points dramatically I can promise that

I already saw much of what he said in my thread. A lot of the stuff these guys say isn’t even worth arguing with because it’s so entirely easy to deduce the flaws

so deduce the flaws, do it

 

[Swancel]

Witchcraft defiantly exists... Watch the first part of this video.

 

[taai]

You have the burden of proof in proving that god exists

If you’re asserting he exists, you have to prove it

Explain to me why god is more likely to exist, rather than not. You don’t even need to give me “proof”

I knew you would be here

 

[theRetard]

.

 

[iwannabeloved2]

prove me wrong

burden of proof is on you bud

 

[theRetard]

burden of proof is on you bud

non-existence does not exist
so god cannot be non-existing
so he does exist

 

[iwannabeloved2]

wtf are you saying mirin the jump from p1 to p2 something can be non-existent but still exist just depends on wether its existence is intramental but yeah this line of reasoning of urs is ass

 

[theRetard]

wtf are you saying mirin the jump from p1 to p2 something can be non-existent but still exist just depends on wether its existence is intramental but yeah this line of reasoning of urs is ass

there's no border in intramental and extramentality. they are the same.
and there's no such thing that can be non-existent but still exist, it is contradictonary

 

[Noesis]

Water

 

[iwannabeloved2]

there's no border in intramental and extramentality. they are the same

Laws of logic exist; how a McChicken from McDonald's exists, they are the same existence?

 

[Jesko]

prove me wrong

You cant

 

[theRetard]

You cant

i can

 

[Jesko]

i can

You can't prove him wrong since he's real

 

[Apchun144]

Yeah he exists but he’s cruel probs

 

[theRetard]

Laws of logic exist; how a McChicken from McDonald's exists, they are the same existence?

yeah laws of logic exist but you violate the 1st law
mcchiken and mcdonalds both exist but in a different way

 

[hampy]

prove me wrong

prove he’s real

 

[iwannabeloved2]

yeah laws of logic exists but you violate the 1st law
mcchiken and mcdonalds both exist but in a different way

Violate who? I only violate little boys, but yeah, they both exist, but in different ways. One exists in reality, and one exists only in our mind, periodtt

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

I knew you would be here

They tagged me and asked me to respond

 

[theRetard]

Violate who?

you are violating the 1st law of logic

. One exists in reality, and one exists only in our mind, periodtt

but mind is the reality

 

[theRetard]

I don’t think it’s really worth it atp


No good points brought up so far, in a debate stance it’s not even close. If this was a real debate I’d be legit dominating on points. Just referring to the other debate as well

They tagged me and asked me to respond

just say that my points are bad instead of refuting them theory lul

 

[iwannabeloved2]

you are violating the 1st law of logic

but mind is the reality

im not violating LI

 

[iwannabeloved2]

just say that my points are bad instead of refuting them theory lul

wait whats ur arg for god

 

[theRetard]

im not violating LI

my naughty boy, it's not funny. stop it.

wait whats ur arg for god

he does exist that's my argument

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

everything we can think about already does exist because our thought indeed exist.
so thought and existence is the same thing. so because we are able to think about god, then he does exist

i can't link it because non-existence does not exist

Yeah idk man these aren’t even remotely good points here I’m gonna be honest, it’s kinda a waste to debunk something obviously so false

The image of god being in your head, and the idea of him, doesn’t prove he’s the creator of the universe and it really doesn’t prove anything.

 

[iwannabeloved2]

my naughty boy, it's not funny. stop it.

he does exist that's my argument

omg but whats ur arg for gods existence mr aquinas btw i believe god exists aswell but im a fideist cause im lazy

 

[taai]

They tagged me and asked me to respond

Yeah I only scrolled for your name and saw later please excuse me

 

[theRetard]

Yeah idk man these aren’t even remotely good points here I’m gonna be honest, it’s kinda a waste to debunk something obviously so false

The image of god being in your head, and the idea of him, doesn’t prove he’s the creator of the universe and it really doesn’t prove anything.

but i've never claimed that he is the creator of universe
and yeah existence in head=existence in reality, because he can't think about what does not exist, because when we are thinking about "nothing" or "non-being" then they are already becoming anything, and anything is already exists, so it's impossible to think about something that doesn't not exist. Thus if he are able to think about god, then he does exist

 

[Part-Time Chad]

You made the positive claim for the existence of "God". Therefore, the burden of proof is on you, not me.

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

you are violating the 1st law of logic

but mind is the reality

Ok?

I can think of a giant titan beast in my head with 50 dicks attached everywhere on his body

Does that mean he exists in our physical reality and is creator of the universe?

 

[theRetard]

omg but whats ur arg for gods existence mr aquinas btw i believe god exists aswell but im a fideist cause im lazy

alr my mischievous i will repeat it but only once:
non-existence does not exist
so god cannot be non-existing
so he does exist

 

[taai]

omg but whats ur arg for gods existence mr aquinas btw i believe god exists aswell but im a fideist cause im lazy

They refuse to read or acknowledge Aquinas

 

[theRetard]

They refuse to read or acknowledge Aquinas

aquinas is not a proof though